Fake Bid or Optimistic?

Zaeh - Dreamweaver

Ashivas - Dreamweaver wrote: »

stupid butthurt QQ

As poster above me said, "I can swear me be cool!" Whatever your point was, I can't take your post seriously b:laugh Calling someone a nerd on the same game you're playing and displaying QQ as you are just makes you look like you belong in middle school.


Also, get the gender right b:cute

EDIT: just re-read the thing out of boredom, but really. My ego has a basis. My ego actually comes from real life and not in a silly game.

Narriru - Dreamweaver

Zaeh - Dreamweaver wrote: »

As poster above me said, "I can swear me be cool!" Whatever your point was, I can't take your post seriously b:laugh Calling someone a nerd on the same game you're playing and displaying QQ as you are just makes you look like you belong in middle school.


Also, get the gender right b:cute

This ^^^

And this too:

Bidding

Any willing and capable faction can bid on any opposing territory provided they have no affiliations with the current owners. The bids can only be made if the faction has a real intention of attacking and trying to win the territory. All bids must have a legitimate chance to win. This includes factions that are but is not limited to the following:

Training Wars

Practice or Training Wars are not allowed by the branch faction if the Territory is owned by an affiliated faction.

Small factions

Factions with too few members should not bid.


Please stop making topics Ds... b:surrender

Ashivas - Dreamweaver

Zaeh - Dreamweaver wrote: »

As poster above me said, "I can swear me be cool!" Whatever your point was, I can't take your post seriously b:laugh Calling someone a nerd on the same game you're playing and displaying QQ as you are just makes you look like you belong in middle school.


Also, get the gender right b:cute

EDIT: just re-read the thing out of boredom, but really. My ego has a basis. My ego actually comes from real life and not in a silly game.

Playing a game doesn't make you a nerd, taking it more seriously than real life does. Or equally as serious. And all girls are just guys in real life

And where am i QQing? From the looks of it the only people QQing here are It kids. So yea... Cry about how you're not good enough to beat regen some more, makes the rest of us laugh at you.

Oh, and I don't play this game anymore. I just troll the forums when i'm bored. Take your credit card dependant *** somewhere else.

Zaeh - Dreamweaver

Seems as though you're the one taking this game way too seriously. b:surrender Cursing at people on the internet and making stupid assumptions. Good going Maybe you should step outside and smell some fresh air. Maybe you'll realize your age when surrounded by your own age group and not hiding behind a silly screen.

Also, before you start assuming about my cash shopping, I cash shop every few months. I've been unable to find a job as most places I've applied don't want a 16 year old with no previous working experience. Most of it is spent farming. If I could afford to cash shop, hell yeah I'd have +10 R9 gear. But I can't afford it and simply don't care to afford it. My +3 Nirvana gear is perfectly peachy with me.

And even more, I congratulate Regen for being as good as they are. Its admirable. So before you start assuming something about the name above my head, look at my few other posts congratulating Regenesis for their awesome organization.

haphazardness

Narriru - Dreamweaver wrote: »

This ^^^

And this too:

Bidding

Any willing and capable faction can bid on any opposing territory provided they have no affiliations with the current owners. The bids can only be made if the faction has a real intention of attacking and trying to win the territory. All bids must have a legitimate chance to win. This includes factions that are but is not limited to the following:

Training Wars

Practice or Training Wars are not allowed by the branch faction if the Territory is owned by an affiliated faction.

Small factions

Factions with too few members should not bid.


Please stop making topics Ds... b:surrender

I'm sorry, to few members? Did you count? Did you see we had over 60 members in the faction? "Legitimate Chance". We had a chance. There where multiple bids and a divided faction. You do realize chance doesn't mean 100% chance? But, following your logic of Chance being 100% then I'd conclude IT would need well over 200 members to beat Regenesis in any attack that IT bids. I'm just saying, If Intandem bids on Regenesis I'm calling fowl, especially when I see them lose in under 20 minutes.
b:victory

haphazardness

Ashivas - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Youre all ****ing stupid. So when A bids on Spades, catface, or anyone else for that matter, it's not a fake bid, but only to the constantly butthurt IT fa.g faction?

A can't beat anyone, they have like 10 TW members. But no one was screaming fake bid until they got in the way of IT and their fa.g motives of "get rap.ed by regen week in and week out"... Which they're actually helping IT on that, so I don't get why IT is crying.

Those who play to win often end up sore losers. And well those who play to play, they accept the ganks, the bids and losing lands, because in the end they still get some pretty epic TWs.

Decus - Dreamweaver

haphazardness wrote: »

...I'm calling fowl...

Which? Gamefowl or waterfowl? Are we talking parakeets or mallards? b:shutup

Berserker_ - Dreamweaver

QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ sorry had to.b:surrender

Viscosity - Dreamweaver

haphazardness wrote: »

If Intandem bids on Regenesis I'm calling fowl, especially when I see them lose in under 20 minutes.
b:victory

Not quite because InTandem and Regenesis are about equal. InTandem has the best chance out of any faction on the server of beating Regenesis so it wouldn't be a fake bid. InTandem simply needs to find something that works for them in order to be successful.

ColdSnow - Dreamweaver

Viscosity - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Not quite because InTandem and Regenesis are about equal. InTandem has the best chance out of any faction on the server of beating Regenesis so it wouldn't be a fake bid. InTandem simply needs to find something that works for them in order to be successful.

o.o hun...you fasting? i need a companion...i made it 3 days without food. want to join me? i feel so lonely, noone wants to join meeeehhhh b:sad

Ds. shut up. if its not IT, then its EQ, if not EQ, then Dyna, not Dyna, then Temptest etc etc...you do realise no faction really wants you not cause of your "right" opinion. you just another hater, who cant endure to lose.

Renerei - Dreamweaver

lol..

Ds you need to just give up and stop posting threads like this on the forums; Don't really mean to sound mean but you do really fail at this. Right now, you've made a thread to defend your faction over something that came up in your last TW flame thread that no one really whould have noticed if you hadn't made such a big deal over it.

There are tons of factions who just TW for fun, who don't really have that big of a chance at winning but give it a try anyway. Why are none of these factions TWs being called fake bids while A's is? Cause you either just get some high from announcing such a big faction needs to bring out 80 people just to crush your 18 or maybe you just can't live without flaming someone every week, I don't know, but I'm just saying you did bring this on yourself.

Zanryu - Dreamweaver

That's because he's a f*cking dipsh*t. I mean honestly, I don't even have to go on some long *** rant insulting him because that's all that needs to be said. He's a complete. f*cking. dipsh*t. Or it could be that he needs something to b*tch about weekly otherwise he will self destruct if he keeps his idiotic thoughts to himself. Or perhaps "he" is actually a "she" and she happens to be on an abnormally long period, I'm honestly not too sure just how to explain how or why this total f*cking idiot keeps making stupid posts, but I'm sure it's some variation of the above.

Namari - Dreamweaver

Zanryu - Dreamweaver wrote: »

That's because he's a f*cking dipsh*t. I mean honestly, I don't even have to go on some long *** rant insulting him because that's all that needs to be said. He's a complete. f*cking. dipsh*t. Or it could be that he needs something to b*tch about weekly otherwise he will self destruct if he keeps his idiotic thoughts to himself. Or perhaps "he" is actually a "she" and she happens to be on an abnormally long period, I'm honestly not too sure just how to explain how or why this total f*cking idiot keeps making stupid posts, but I'm sure it's some variation of the above.

Hey hey hey! I am a she who's on an abnormally long period! That's offensive to all those shes with abnormally long periods! *rage*

Zanryu - Dreamweaver

Namari - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Hey hey hey! I am a she who's on an abnormally long period! That's offensive to all those shes with abnormally long periods! *rage*

Oh god. What. Have. I. DOOOOOONNNNNNNEEEEEEEE!!!! *makes a hasty retreat*

ColdSnow - Dreamweaver

Zanryu - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Oh god. What. Have. I. DOOOOOONNNNNNNEEEEEEEE!!!! *makes a hasty retreat*

Lets meet again when i have my pms..

Zaeh - Dreamweaver

According to Imp... I PMS all month, every day, every hour. With only one 5 min break an hour.

Narriru - Dreamweaver

haphazardness wrote: »

I'm sorry, to few members? Did you count? Did you see we had over 60 members in the faction? "Legitimate Chance". We had a chance. There where multiple bids and a divided faction. You do realize chance doesn't mean 100% chance? But, following your logic of Chance being 100% then I'd conclude IT would need well over 200 members to beat Regenesis in any attack that IT bids. I'm just saying, If Intandem bids on Regenesis I'm calling fowl, especially when I see them lose in under 20 minutes.
b:victory

Oh come on Ds... You and I both know IT has a better chance of beating Regenesis than "A" does of beating IT. It was mentioned in your other thread that you brought 8-10 members to a TW vs InTandem. You could have ten billion members, I wouldn't really care. Fact is, a majority of them didn't go, having only those 8-10 falls under the 'To few members.' Nowhere did I state that Legitimate to me is 100%, take it up with the GM as to what they call legitimate. My personal opinion of legitimate is 90% or above. Even with 10 members max going into a TW against IT (divided or not), that is nowhere near the 90% mark, probably wouldn't even grace the 50% mark. Again, Zan says it best:

That's because he's a f*cking dipsh*t. I mean honestly, I don't even have to go on some long *** rant insulting him because that's all that needs to be said. He's a complete. f*cking. dipsh*t. Or it could be that he needs something to b*tch about weekly otherwise he will self destruct if he keeps his idiotic thoughts to himself. Or perhaps "he" is actually a "she" and she happens to be on an abnormally long period, I'm honestly not too sure just how to explain how or why this total f*cking idiot keeps making stupid posts, but I'm sure it's some variation of the above.

And 'fowl'? Go take a grammar class, or retake English.

Decus - Dreamweaver

Narriru - Dreamweaver wrote: »

And 'fowl'? Go take a grammar class, or retake English.

Everyone missed my attempt at levity on the same misspelling

Prophete - Dreamweaver

Honestly, 90% chance or above to win or it's a fake bid to you?
Everyone is fake bidding or what? xD

Narriru - Dreamweaver

Decus - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Which? Gamefowl or waterfowl? Are we talking parakeets or mallards? b:shutup

^ I saw it Decus, :P

Prophete - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Honestly, 90% chance or above to win or it's a fake bid to you?
Everyone is fake bidding or what? xD

And Prophete, I loved TW. When you're lasting longer than an hour against an equally matched guild, it's so much fun. My very first TW was in december when EQ got a land from Cala, and I had a blast. I hated when I was in EQ and I was looking forward to an hr or longer war, then Cala would come and they'd get our crystal in under 10 minutes. They did that alot. Im sure some members of "A" share my feelings on being rolled. b:surrender

Also. Sorry ahead of time if link doesn't work. Posting from ipod so it gave me a mobile site for yt and I modified the link. 630 am on day off ftl, b:cry -heads back to bed-

Getter_Robo - Dreamweaver

b:bye Try not to feed the trolls. *goes back to sleep*

Renerei - Dreamweaver

Getter_Robo - Dreamweaver wrote: »

b:bye Try not to feed the trolls. *goes back to sleep*

Says the guy who commented on it 10 days before it became a necro

*Hands Getter a shovel and bag of troll feed* b:avoid

Aizza - Harshlands

haphazardness wrote: »

Is it poor sportsmanship to say fake bid when you lose weekly? yes.

Being beaten down by a guild none-stop is hard. It's easy to say fake bid or try to excuse away the reason for the loss. After all, when you get beat down hard and fast, it is a blow to your self-esteem and everyones emotions are run high.

IF an opposing guild does fake-bid, then they showed their inability to TW - they way they expect everyone else to, and proves they believed they would of lost if they had not fake-bid. In this, the guild they fought, wins.