Really Enrage?
Comments
-
It affected nothing, the bid was just a bid.
If the bid on Archo didn't happen, they well...Archo wouldn't have been bid on at all and would have been completely out of the picture this weekend.
People need to be logical for once....[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
b:flowerHave a Techno Rave Flower!b:flower
-Self-Proclaimed TW commentator of HT-
-Certified Barbarian Master-
-You gained +10 coolness points for viewing this signature-
-Master of Coffee-0 -
Knownase - Heavens Tear wrote: »People need to be logical for once....
Asking a bit much there me thinks b:chuckle[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
I am going to agree with Conavar here. Asking for logical thinking is like asking for a miracle to happen.Not motivated enough to make another PWI siggy0
-
LadyofReal - Heavens Tear wrote: »I am going to agree with Conavar here. Asking for logical thinking is like asking for a miracle to happen.
um, you agreed with Conavar...isnt that a miracle in itself?*insert awesome siggy here*0 -
Anneliesse - Heavens Tear wrote: »um, you agreed with Conavar...isnt that a miracle in itself?
Pfft I'm a very agreeable person b:shy[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Skilzman - Heavens Tear wrote: »I remember a post from a Enrage member 2 weeks ago (we dont care about Eviltree all there lands belong to us b:chuckle)
but imo a stuppid move i mean is it worth it to risk a ban only to protect arch? (i dont think so)
ET was the only faction that bid on arch anyway. Im pretty sure if Rad or War wanted to they could drop a decent size bid so its not like ET's bid did much. It would be a completely different scenario if war bid on 1k, dom bid on lost, and someone bid on dwp at that point the bid on archo would have broken up a gank and then it could be called fake bidding. Seeing as Cities appear all in the same time slot. That bid on the 4th city would have had a 50/50 chance to break up a 3 way gank that would have been defendable anyway.
Still not a fake bidouka - 101 HA veno - " Squeek, I'm A Fox!"
ouka__ - 103 vit barb- "Nom Nom I'm A Panda!"
People need to learn how to control their stupid0 -
wonder if enrage would farm kill eviltree. Anneliesse cleric can kill her self with her sin. and Bis's sin can farm his archer. so many fun match-ups i wonder how they would do against themselves or are they all on same accounts ?0
-
__StarsKy__ - Heavens Tear wrote: »wonder if enrage would farm kill eviltree. Anneliesse cleric can kill her self with her sin. and Bis's sin can farm his archer. so many fun match-ups i wonder how they would do against themselves or are they all on same accounts ?
although the thought is funny, not worth the ban. my sin left ET after bids were announced last night.*insert awesome siggy here*0 -
it really wasnt me trying to ban someone more then it just being funny to me... heres the thing. the biding of eviltree on enrage did not change the out come of tw this week. so people are just QQing about enrage being enrage and not even about the bid. but most of all.. the bid would have only messed up Rads bid IF they had bid there, BUT it seems to me the people that are mad about it are not even in Rad. if there is anything to QQ about it is that enrage/eviltree will get a good and very fun tw out of all of this. this is nothing like what mono did and to look at it that way is just lame. this weeks biding didnt change anything so theres nothing to QQ about.0
-
I love how everyone has their heads so far up Enrage's **** they can tell what we are going to eat next week.
I guess Enrage is just so popular, nobody could give a rat's b-hole what any of the other factions are doing."Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory.
Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat." ~Sun Tzu
"Lennox Lewis, I'm coming for you man. My style is impetuous. My defense is impregnable, and I'm just ferocious. I want your heart. I want to eat his children. Praise be to Allah!"
~Iron Mike Tyson Enrage.omgforum.net
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
__StarsKy__ - Heavens Tear wrote: »it really wasnt me trying to ban someone more then it just being funny to me... heres the thing. the biding of eviltree on enrage did not change the out come of tw this week. so people are just QQing about enrage being enrage and not even about the bid. but most of all.. the bid would have only messed up Rads bid IF they had bid there, BUT it seems to me the people that are mad about it are not even in Rad. if there is anything to QQ about it is that enrage/eviltree will get a good and very fun tw out of all of this. this is nothing like what mono did and to look at it that way is just lame. this weeks biding didnt change anything so theres nothing to QQ about.
No, you could still QQ that Enrage tried to break up a gank. That is however, if that was the intended plan. All of this was on the ET leader, so to put blame on Enrage leadership or anyone besides the ET leader is both silly and redundant. Hell, I would be pissed off if this was actually planned out, and I would be ashamed of being in Enrage. But again, this isn't leadership's fault so I'm moot about this.0 -
still nothing happen so there is nothing to be mad about. even if that were the plan to break up a gank it did not happen. so whats the point of all this? oh wait....KMC lol... why are we here again ?0
-
Ketania - Heavens Tear wrote: »No, you could still QQ that Enrage tried to break up a gank. That is however, if that was the intended plan. All of this was on the ET leader, so to put blame on Enrage leadership or anyone besides the ET leader is both silly and redundant. Hell, I would be pissed off if this was actually planned out, and I would be ashamed of being in Enrage. But again, this isn't leadership's fault so I'm moot about this.
I think something is wrong and no matter what it is I will blame Enrage.
Thats how it works.
"gold is too high" blame Enrage.
"Our faction sucks massive balls, even tho we bought tons of R9" blame Enrage.
"I got sand all up in muh snatch and wanna rage!" blame Enrage."Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory.
Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat." ~Sun Tzu
"Lennox Lewis, I'm coming for you man. My style is impetuous. My defense is impregnable, and I'm just ferocious. I want your heart. I want to eat his children. Praise be to Allah!"
~Iron Mike Tyson Enrage.omgforum.net
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
this reminds me of the "Blame Enrage day" back one year ago.
As ppl already said, bid did not affect tw outcome and it wasnt planned by the two leaderships, was just something intended to be fun but turned out to be silly (which any normal person wouldve seen it from the begining). Trying to get enrage leader banned is just trying to revenge all the stolen cookies, all the baby shakes and all the brains that Aesthor ate from all of you.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
When people walk away from you, let them go... your destiny is never tied to anyone who leaves you.. and it doesn't mean they are bad people.. It just means that their part in your story is over...0 -
Whoever did that bid should be banned. The leader of Enrage shouldn't be, but the leader of EvilTree should be.
Bring on the flames and whatever other ESS AICH EYE TEE you want to throw at me.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
SgtSIaughter - Heavens Tear wrote: »I think something is wrong and no matter what it is I will blame Enrage.
Thats how it works.
"gold is too high" blame Enrage.
"Our faction sucks massive balls, even tho we bought tons of R9" blame Enrage.
"I got sand all up in muh snatch and wanna rage!" blame Enrage.
Because in most cases, Enrage members are wrongfully blamed and are only victims, right?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
I like turtles.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Dysk is my tasty chimichanga.0 -
It's Enrage's fault I'm going bald b:cry0
-
Mmmmm at least according to past history if guilds so much as talk to each other to make an attack on the same person the leaders are capable of being banned. Or for instance lack there of if they were suspected of collaborating they had the ban stick brought on them. I heard tale of proof that they were in direct contact but no one ever produced such a thing so I think its simply evil tree wants to help enrage and that not a bad thing but it doesn't mean they are collaborating to some master scheme.
Mind you enrage probably isn't what it was to start with in fact I am almost 99% positive that it isn't. Enrage was never really all that bad to start with they liked to have fun and the fun enrage had is really only mildly different in what is considered nice today.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Anneliesse - Heavens Tear wrote: »um, you agreed with Conavar...isnt that a miracle in itself?
I've agreed with Conavar on numerous occassions. But nonetheless, it's true...imho.Not motivated enough to make another PWI siggy0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 697 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk