Visual Update
Comments
-
I'd like to loudly second the need for new meditation bubbles for the original races. They're so boring compared to the Earthguard, Tideborn and Nightshade ;; My poor cleric needs something shiny to show off her wings more.0
-
sylenthunder said:
You would basically have to re-write the entire game. Why would anyone do that?
cuz is graphically dated....even swordsman have better physics (Angelica III) well ... pwi would be graphically attractive0 -
sylenthunder wrote: »You would basically have to re-write the entire game. Why would anyone do that?sylenthunder wrote: »Theoretically, when they re-hired the original developers of the game a year and a half ago, they were supposed to be working on updating the client to using the new Angelica engine to improve performance and compatibility with newer systems.
Following that, they talked about updating the visuals and doing new mo-cap animations.0 -
And if you read first post in this thread. (The very first response to the OP)sylenthunder said:
cuz is graphically dated....even swordsman have better physics (Angelica III) well ... pwi would be graphically attractivesylenthunder wrote: »You would basically have to re-write the entire game. Why would anyone do that?
sylenthunder wrote: »Theoretically, when they re-hired the original developers of the game a year and a half ago, they were supposed to be working on updating the client to using the new Angelica engine to improve performance and compatibility with newer systems.
Following that, they talked about updating the visuals and doing new mo-cap animations.
yea i read it thats why i said source or cryengine cuz :P
personally i dont like angelica... that engine have serious clipping issues0 -
yea i read it thats why i said source or cryengine cuz :P
personally i dont like angelica... that engine have serious clipping issues
The difference being that coding it for Angelica III only requires a few changes and will be much easier to re-texture.
Using a different engine would mean building the game entirely from the ground-up all over again. No developer in their right mind would do that.0 -
sylenthunder wrote: »yea i read it thats why i said source or cryengine cuz :P
personally i dont like angelica... that engine have serious clipping issues
The difference being that coding it for Angelica III only requires a few changes and will be much easier to re-texture.
Using a different engine would mean building the game entirely from the ground-up all over again. No developer in their right mind would do that.
Some developers did... But I think that was before a game was even released, but they basically finished the game already, but due to it being horrible they decided to go from scratch.
So, they do, just rarely I suppose.
I can't recall what game the article was about thoughThe only fitting image for this forum.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk