when it was proposed by someone else, i was totally against it.
imagine a cw with eye of the storm, storm spell and chill presence for example.
and this is the most destructive scenario...
after a month of testing i dont think anymore it would be so destructive.
people still against it like i was time ago or you to have revalued the idea too?
Well, I'm voting yes. I specced my CW to oppressor and realized that I can't decide what to take - storm spell, chilling presence and orb of imposition. Would be so cool to use them all.
M6 almost drains your soul given how boring it is. (c) joocycuzzzzzz
IF is a good thing and the problem is ONLY a cw, so nerf/fix cw and put this.
lord, is so easy...
BUT what should be good is if you have 2 slots for the normal class feature and one extra for paragon.
pratical example. a sword master gf/gwf can not slot steel blitz+steel defense in the same time but can slot 2 class features of the class (destroyer/bravery)+1 extra paragon class feature.
Comments
I've seen other games with 6+ passives.
4 is reasonable, gives more variety... I'm tired of using the 2 same ones since beta.
So long as they reduced the power of each passive this might lead to more interesting build combinations.
No. The point of adding a 3rd or even 4th is due to the difficulty of the new mod. Watering down the existing ones would defeat that purpose
lord, is so easy...
BUT what should be good is if you have 2 slots for the normal class feature and one extra for paragon.
pratical example. a sword master gf/gwf can not slot steel blitz+steel defense in the same time but can slot 2 class features of the class (destroyer/bravery)+1 extra paragon class feature.