test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› PvE Discussion

Split this forum into two sections

silence1xsilence1x Member Posts: 1,503 Arc User
edited November 2014 in PvE Discussion
I would love to see this forum subsection split into two groups:

PvE gameplay

PvP gameplay

I think that both groups would be better served by having a separate discussion section. For me, it's a huge forum to look through to find topics that I'm interested in.

Thoughts?
I aim to misbehave
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    signed /10char
  • damnataanimusdamnataanimus Member Posts: 446 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I've often thought this. Theyve basically lumped 3 sub forums into one - Gameplay, PvE and PvP discussion
    May the RNG Gods smile on you today!
    Adorable Temptress - 23.4k Temptation SW
    Mara Angelbane - 22k Thaum CW, Vaya Con Dios 15.2k Dragon CW.
    Mara Shadowskiss - 21.5k Destroyer GWF, Mara - 17.2k Sentinel GWF
    Mara Duskwalker - 15.4k Healing DC
    Mara Hawkeye -14.6k HR
    Mara Spiritforge - 16.9k Tanky GF
    Bad Religion - 14.7k Pew Pew DC
    Mara Shadowstouch,Maara - TR's
  • reiwulfreiwulf Member Posts: 2,687 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I like the idea, but I fear the PVE topic wouldn't get too many posts, most people in here post about PVP anyway.
    2e2qwj6.jpg
  • angryspriteangrysprite Member Posts: 4,982 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    A good idea. Except it wouldn't even be necessary if all the shrill (and calm) commentary that is about PvP would actually state it's about PvP. Of course, every single mention of "over-powered" is *always* a PvP comment. 'nuff said.
  • silence1xsilence1x Member Posts: 1,503 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    angrysprite wrote: »
    Of course, every single mention of "over-powered" is *always* a PvP comment. 'nuff said.

    Sad but true. Every class is OP in some way.
    I aim to misbehave
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited November 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • angryspriteangrysprite Member Posts: 4,982 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    embracemysword wrote: »
    Not true, people complained about TR being OP in P - V - E, aswell as CW being OP in P - V - E, for several months. Then it changed to GWF being OP in P - V - E. Don't talk about things that you cannot back up.

    On *preview* server regarding new mod 5 feedback. If it wasn't clear before then I'll clarify that my comment you quoted is meant to apply to the "live" forums, but the "preview/test" forums. My point being that whenever you see an "OP" comment in the olive forums, it is (practically-speaking and 99.44/100% always the case) a PvP-based comment.

    PvE comments rarely ever use the expression "over-powered" - those always use the expression "too easy to [name your function]".

    However, in the end I concur with the OP suggestion that a clearly defined line be drawn somewhere in the forums to make a bright distinction between PvP commentary and PvE. Too many PvP comments are being blasted by people reading them as PvE comments and vice-versa.
  • notsheriffsrsnotsheriffsrs Banned Users Posts: 396 Bounty Hunter
    edited November 2014
    angrysprite wrote: »
    A good idea. Except it wouldn't even be necessary if all the shrill (and calm) commentary that is about PvP would actually state it's about PvP. Of course, every single mention of "over-powered" is *always* a PvP comment. 'nuff said.

    just lol at you and this generalization.

    Seems you forgot the CW's QQ's since beta and many more.
Sign In or Register to comment.