test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

With the changes coming to GF, how many will stay conquerer or go protector

gorgothusgorgothus Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users Posts: 46
edited June 2013 in The Militia Barracks
All of this is pure speculation ofcourse, but just curious if more people will try "true" tanking builds over the current dps "fighter" builds.

The fix to block is a godsend regardless, but I'm still wondering, since from what I've read the model seems to be the DPS (conq) build for end game since it's more of a DPS race vs Tank and control.

The Increased threat plus DC's heal threat will be split even amongst the mobs means easier control, can we handle that much with 10% more gaurd? If you do the turtle tank build perhaps, yet that brings me circle back to the first question, dps vs control tanking.

anyway...what's your thoughts?
~FOUNDRY MISSION~ The Village on Ebon Lake ~Check it out!~
Search Code NW-DQ3S67EKX
H.P Lovecraft style Horror
Post edited by gorgothus on

Comments

  • supjeremiahsupjeremiah Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 569 Bounty Hunter
    edited June 2013
    Tank builds will actually be viable but you can still clear any content with a DPS spec so it's pointless to switch over.
    Envy - 60 Guardian Fighter - Mindflayer

    Wrath - 60 Great Weapon Fighter - Mindflayer

    Envy's Guardian Fighter DPS Conqueror Guide

    Youtube Channel

    http://www.twitch.tv/supjeremiah
  • skumbagduskskumbagdusk Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    gorgothus wrote: »
    All of this is pure speculation ofcourse, but just curious if more people will try "true" tanking builds over the current dps "fighter" builds.

    The fix to block is a godsend regardless, but I'm still wondering, since from what I've read the model seems to be the DPS (conq) build for end game since it's more of a DPS race vs Tank and control.

    The Increased threat plus DC's heal threat will be split even amongst the mobs means easier control, can we handle that much with 10% more gaurd? If you do the turtle tank build perhaps, yet that brings me circle back to the first question, dps vs control tanking.

    anyway...what's your thoughts?

    Why does everyone assume you have to guard every single attack? The only things I worry about blocking are the bigger hits, the AOE circles, the stuff that does nasty damage.

    The guard meter isn't intended for you to taunt all the mobs, and then hold shift while your group kills everything. You have to pick and choose your timing. That's the difference between good and great players.
  • gorgothusgorgothus Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users Posts: 46
    edited June 2013
    Why does everyone assume you have to guard every single attack? The only things I worry about blocking are the bigger hits, the AOE circles, the stuff that does nasty damage.

    The guard meter isn't intended for you to taunt all the mobs, and then hold shift while your group kills everything. You have to pick and choose your timing. That's the difference between good and great players.

    Sorry if I gave that impression when I said "Turtle tanking" my bad. What I really meant by that was , with a "Turtle Tank build" you can have more flexibilty to gaurd more, with the faster recharging guard plus the 10% extra guard given to us.

    Personally like most, I try to run out of the AoE circles or conals since it's telegraphed, keeping guard meter up at 100% most of the time. There are times though though "stuff" happens and your left with 0 to little gaurd after a single or two hits and yet another big swing comming your way without time to get out.

    With the changes though, if you wanted to per se , go in that build style, you could in essence , guard more then usual at a cost of your dps...so just wondering if that will bring more of the true sense of tanking.

    @Envy- Makes complete sense, Id probably guess most wont after all, if you can currently do it in the current Conquerer build (well minus with the block bug) why switch over.
    ~FOUNDRY MISSION~ The Village on Ebon Lake ~Check it out!~
    Search Code NW-DQ3S67EKX
    H.P Lovecraft style Horror
  • penpenstarpenpenstar Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    nope, protector still sux. Full of useless feats such as the measly knights valor buff, resistance on the single attack that breaks your guard. At-will buff that has bad synergy with shield talent feat bec the guard at end lvl get melted fast anyway.
  • bloodraiderx42bloodraiderx42 Member Posts: 74
    edited June 2013
    yeah dps might be the way to go
  • snowballosnowballo Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    A full tank gear, tactician tree tank will actually be viable now.
    Conqueror will stay viable too.
    Even a full defense tree might work, but that will seriously be overkill and a bit of a waste.

    Each will run the dungeon differently.

    Now GWF will be the new highest AOE dps.
    CW won't be able to do enough aoe dmg and will have to fallback on their control ability.
    GF won't be dealing enough AOE dmg compared to GWF making GF less wanted over 2 GWF, but not as bad that you would mind having either GF+GWF or 2xGWF

    Welcome to the new meta
    1x DC
    4x GWF

    And I'm not even kidding.
    Snow's Melee Arena: NW-DMT7STJ9E
    Combat arena. Adjustable challenge.
    Difficulty: Adjustable easy - very hard
    Duration: Adjustable 1 - 25min
  • bloodraiderx42bloodraiderx42 Member Posts: 74
    edited June 2013
    yeah id like too tank i have both sets
  • kyuubiilkyuubiil Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 59
    edited June 2013
    snowballo wrote: »
    A full tank gear, tactician tree tank will actually be viable now.
    Conqueror will stay viable too.
    Even a full defense tree might work, but that will seriously be overkill and a bit of a waste.

    Each will run the dungeon differently.

    Now GWF will be the new highest AOE dps.
    CW won't be able to do enough aoe dmg and will have to fallback on their control ability.
    GF won't be dealing enough AOE dmg compared to GWF making GF less wanted over 2 GWF, but not as bad that you would mind having either GF+GWF or 2xGWF

    Welcome to the new meta
    1x DC
    4x GWF

    And I'm not even kidding.

    .. what're you smoking? Like not to be offensive, but the GWF aren't really in that much better of a place than they were before the patch, cooldowns are nice, but we don't have many AOE encounters, we get it mostly from our at-wills. which got a measly 20% buff. They're great aoe dps, but conquerors were beating them by miles before and.. weren't nerfed, at all. Cleave hits like wicked strike, but doesn't lose ~15% damage per mob hit, and gets 40? 45?% bonus damage from feats, and that's before you take into account how powerful stalwart bulwark and reckless fighter are.

    That said, the meta HAS diversified, simply because the majority (~70%!) of a rogues dps is the duelist flurry bleed, and they've made it not stack past 10 (instead of 10 stacks per rogue), meaning multiple rogues will take a noticable hit in output.

    Likewise There isn't much point to stacking DC's besides astral shield, there aren't many powers you benefit from having TONS OF besides AS, and it no longer stacks.

    Wizards are still golden for singularity, and their ability to drop mitigation (RoE wasn erfed, but the thaumaturge capstone wasn't, AS wasn't. They can gather mobs, nuke boss mitigation, leave the killing to everyone else).

    Couple this with the fact that threat is fixed, and clerics suffer righteousness from AS now (-40% healing), thus ending the era of cleric tanks, so you'll need a guardian (though conqueror works) or GWF (.. sentinel is actually pretty delicious, feat-wise. and you can get pretty absurd DR fairly easily.) to tank.

    So while the changes didn't exactly make every class SUPER OP, they removed a lot of the oomph from stacking certain classes (TR, DC), and gave the other classes viability
  • talesmithtalesmith Member Posts: 116
    edited June 2013
    Why does everyone assume you have to guard every single attack? The only things I worry about blocking are the bigger hits, the AOE circles, the stuff that does nasty damage.

    The guard meter isn't intended for you to taunt all the mobs, and then hold shift while your group kills everything. You have to pick and choose your timing. That's the difference between good and great players.

    If you're going with a full tank build I don't see why you wouldn't try and guard as many blows as your guard meter allows. Nets you a good amount of action points and you want to be using aggravating strike to generate maximum threat anyway.
    snowballo wrote: »
    Welcome to the new meta
    1x DC
    4x GWF
    I'd be really surprised, but stranger things have happened.
    A more likey scenario to me seems
    1x DC
    1x TR
    3x CW
  • freehugs9freehugs9 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 201 Bounty Hunter
    edited June 2013
    kyuubiil wrote: »
    ...the meta HAS diversified, simply because the majority (~70%!) of a rogues dps is the duelist flurry bleed, and they've made it not stack past 10 (instead of 10 stacks per rogue), meaning multiple rogues will take a noticable hit in output.

    Likewise There isn't much point to stacking DC's besides astral shield, there aren't many powers you benefit from having TONS OF besides AS, and it no longer stacks.

    Wizards are still golden for singularity, and their ability to drop mitigation (RoE wasn erfed, but the thaumaturge capstone wasn't, AS wasn't. They can gather mobs, nuke boss mitigation, leave the killing to everyone else).

    Couple this with the fact that threat is fixed, and clerics suffer righteousness from AS now (-40% healing), thus ending the era of cleric tanks, so you'll need a guardian (though conqueror works) or GWF (.. sentinel is actually pretty delicious, feat-wise. and you can get pretty absurd DR fairly easily.) to tank.

    So while the changes didn't exactly make every class SUPER OP, they removed a lot of the oomph from stacking certain classes (TR, DC), and gave the other classes viability


    What's this? A SANE person responding to the patch notes?!?!
    I like your take on the patch notes Kyuubiil. They've also stopped Ray of Enfeeblement from stacking from multiple Wizards which supports what you're saying.
  • kyuubiilkyuubiil Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 59
    edited June 2013
    freehugs9 wrote: »
    What's this? A SANE person responding to the patch notes?!?!
    I like your take on the patch notes Kyuubiil. They've also stopped Ray of Enfeeblement from stacking from multiple Wizards which supports what you're saying.

    I dislike hysteria and doom-saying, I would have liked more of an upgrade for my GWF, or hell, more of a actual paradigm shift in balancing.

    But honestly, they made sentinel viable, which was what I was hoping to respec to anyhow, so.. I'll take it.
  • kyuubiilkyuubiil Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 59
    edited June 2013
    talesmith wrote: »
    I'd be really surprised, but stranger things have happened.
    A more likey scenario to me seems
    1x DC
    1x TR
    3x CW

    Also likely not possible, the CW-PUSHCLIFF mindset was set for speed runs, use geometry glitches to skip content, bug bosses, melee that isn't a rogue is a liability. One of the biggest sections of the patch notes was the dungeon/zone fixes. Many shortcuts are done. Many exploits fixed. Speedruns aren't a thing anymore, and as such, the general playerbases mindset will likely have to adjust to "What's the most likely comp to get me through this run successfully and maybe net me a second run during this DD" and less "WE CAN JUST SKIP THE HARD BITS AND HAVE THE CW PERMAMEZ EVERYTHING, WHY WOULD WE WANT SOMEONE TO TANK WHEN WE CAN JUST SKIP TH BOSS AND BURN HIM AND DO 6 RUNS THIS DD.", which psychologically speaking, will actually have an impact on class elitism in group comp.

    also remember, Righteousness (-40% on self heals) now applies to AS, clerics aren't tanks anymore
  • tarlockentarlocken Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Where are the full patch notes for the new update?
  • snowballosnowballo Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    tarlocken wrote: »
    Where are the full patch notes for the new update?

    On the homepage of Neverwinter.
    Snow's Melee Arena: NW-DMT7STJ9E
    Combat arena. Adjustable challenge.
    Difficulty: Adjustable easy - very hard
    Duration: Adjustable 1 - 25min
  • synfoolasynfoola Member Posts: 198 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Seems like the Block Issue is still there although a little streamlined...so that just lessens my motivation to spec ducking behind my shield even more. I'll have to see more progress on Test before I change my mind on it.
  • snowballosnowballo Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    synfoola wrote: »
    Seems like the Block Issue is still there although a little streamlined...so that just lessens my motivation to spec ducking behind my shield even more. I'll have to see more progress on Test before I change my mind on it.

    Block, even when working properly wasn't working as a permanent dmg block anyway.
    You gotta use it as a "dodge" button, to block the hard hitting stuff or bad CC's not the minor dmg.
    Getting more aggro on us and thus more of the small hits, might be a reason to respec into a more tanky/tactician guardian.
    As the AP gain from tactician would be pretty high when everything is actually hitting you.
    Snow's Melee Arena: NW-DMT7STJ9E
    Combat arena. Adjustable challenge.
    Difficulty: Adjustable easy - very hard
    Duration: Adjustable 1 - 25min
Sign In or Register to comment.