test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Some CoX refugees should stop constantly comparing

jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
edited November 2012 in Champions Online Discussion
I felt really bad for the CoX players when i heard the news. I have done a lot to help with the transition of many refugees that i meet. but this constant whining, by some not all, about how our game isn't as good as theirs is getting hard to take.
edit for clarification
jasinblaze wrote: »
but the posts i see say. (in zone)
  • "this game sucks it's not as good as CoX"
  • "This game has hardly any customization"
  • "this game will never be as good as CoH"



We chose this game and made it our home, i know you're hurt, but stop with the comparing. we don't want our game to be exactly like yours. most of the statements i hear are broad generalizations made with little knowledge or understanding of this game. this game has a high learning curve to figure out all of it's features. Keep in mind we didn't end your game, in fact we welcome you and still do.
If your house burned down and a neighbor let you move in, would you complain about their house saying it's not as nice as yours? If your answer is yes , don't bother reading this thread, i won't make any impact on you.
Sure make suggestions but don't say that we suck compared to your game. you are just going to build a bad reputation for other CoX refugees. Keep in mind we came to this game because we liked this game better. This is our home and we love it as much as you loved yours.
Welcome to our home, I hope you can make it yours as well.
Post edited by jasinblaze on
«1

Comments

  • stoopidmestoopidme Posts: 250 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Those of us who didn't play CoX complain just as much, venting dissatisfaction is fair. Though I do agree that maybe it shouldn't be based purely on comparison.
    __________________________________________________

    Brick_McDuggins in game.
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    stoopidme wrote: »
    Those of us who didn't play CoX complain just as much, venting dissatisfaction is fair. Though I do agree that maybe it shouldn't be based purely on comparison.
    agreed i complain too.
  • smoochansmoochan Posts: 2,553 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Oh hey this didn't take long to become an issue. People joining a game with tons of problems after their own game just buckled... wait, how did we fool ourselves into thinking this would somehow solve CO?

    Champions Online: Be the hero you wish you could be in a better game.
  • mijjesticmijjestic Posts: 481 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Really don't expect it to die down much until 6 months or more after CoH is truly dead. Human nature.
  • nextnametakennextnametaken Posts: 2,212 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I'm tired of the comparison to, but I know how they feel.
    I think try to convince themselves not to like it so they can deny that are addicted.
    Maybe its a cry for help.
  • mingdienastymingdienasty Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Obama hates CoX.
  • darqauradarqaura Posts: 169 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I've been playing this game along with COH since this game was in Alpha.

    There are things it needed in Alpha that it still needs.

    It's not only ex-COH players that see that.

    If there had never been a COH there would never have been a CO. :cool:
  • logandarklighterlogandarklighter Posts: 334 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I can tell you as a CoH player that my problems with CO of late have little or nothing to do with any comparison between CO and COH.

    I've always accepted CO and DCUO on their own terms as games and felt it was unfair to make comparisons. They are what they are.

    CO's problems I feel are completely a result of the neglect of this game by Cryptic and PWE. A neglect that recently has come to light as a result of conscious business design.

    It makes me angry and sad because as someone who accepted CO on it's own terms and someone who used to play the Pen & Paper game (actually I still would if there were a group nearby doing it) I see this game having so much potential. What it is already is good. What it COULD BE is amazing.

    But I don't see any commitment by Cryptic or especially their masters PWE to put forth the effort. Instead CO has become a cash cow to support the newer shiny.

    I'm not optimistic about the future of this game right now. I had the hope that when Neverwinter Nights came out that they would rotate some of the Devs from that game to this one.

    Based on the above linked reports I don't see that happening anymore. I think they'll acquire or put into production ANOTHER new game about the time that Neverwinter is ready for release, and then THAT will become the new shiny that sucks away all the development.

    I'll enjoy the game while it's here for however long that may be. But I've basically cut off any emotional investment in it. I'm no longer boosting it or actively recommending it as the COH alternative. I'll be here because my friends are. And not much more than that.

    Maybe I'm wrong. Believe me, I'd like nothing better and crow would taste wonderful compared to the alternative.

    I guess we'll see.
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    this report was from 2011, the part he quoted was the business strategy for mainland china not the USA. the life of games in asia is much shorter than here. thank you for getting off topic yet again. its always the same with a few of you. you post in every slightly related post and try to take over.
    this post was about being polite and not comparing. what ever problems we have with PWE seem to be less than what paragon had with ncsoft.
    if you want to make references to an out of context post not directly related to this post go ahead , somewhere else. having lived in both china and korea i can tell you that attitude is par for course over there. the division that runs this game is based in the Netherlands to the us division in Delaware to cryptic in LA.
    (edit: i realized this might just be where they incorporated, its standard practice to incorporate in states and countries that give you the largest benefit, legal protection and tax cuts. the top PWI is incorporated in cayman islands btw


    the only thing they probably get from PWE is you better make some money. but most of you haven't bothered to read the whole document. btw do you think any other major game out there is any better.from where i stand Cryptic isn't doing worse than facebook games
    second , do you think you are helping the situation, maybe you just want everyone to quit playing and have this game disappear as well
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    darqaura2 wrote: »
    I've been playing this game along with COH since this game was in Alpha.

    There are things it needed in Alpha that it still needs.

    It's not only ex-COH players that see that.
    this post doesn't assume that this game is perfect
    it's about being more polite and not spamming zone and forums with comparisons all the time. other CoX players have noticed this too and think it's rude as well.
    complaining wont get anything fixed, better suggestions are our best hope for improving this game
  • bouxkanbouxkan Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I agree that they should stop comparing. It gets really annoying that it happens EVERY night, someone in zone has to bring it up. I'm about to follow a friend's path and just block every single one that I see complaining about CO not being their precious CoX. Might be a bit extreme, but it's become very grating. It's just my opinion, but if they truly think the game cannot live up to CoX, they should just go find another reality escape.
  • fantasycharacterfantasycharacter Posts: 457 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I heart you jasinblaze.
  • logandarklighterlogandarklighter Posts: 334 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    jasinblaze wrote: »
    this report was from 2011, the part he quoted was the business strategy for mainland china not the USA. the life of games in asia is much shorter than here.

    If that's the case then I apologize for mis-interpreting the situation. It seemed from the context at the time to apply to here as well. If it doesn't, that changes things.
    thank you for getting off topic yet again.

    No. It's very much on-topic. I was trying to explain how I felt about the game and how it was NOT a comparison. Thank YOU for overreacting to my overreaction.

    its always the same with a few of you. you post in every slightly related post and try to take over.

    That has not been my intent. Go look at my post history. I haven't done that in the past and in fact I've tried to be as helpful as I can be.

    this post was about being polite and not comparing.

    See above about me not comparing.
    what ever problems we have with PWE seem to be less than what paragon had with ncsoft.

    Since NCsoft cancelled City of Heroes and PWE hasn't cancelled CO I'll grant you that.
    if you want to make references to an out of context post not directly related to this post go ahead , somewhere else.

    Since it seemed to be related, I didn't see it as out of context. Given the clarification you gave above, I stand corrected on that point.

    having lived in both china and korea i can tell you that attitude is par for course over there. the division that runs this game is based in the Netherlands to the us division in deleware to cryptic in LA. the only thing they probably get from PWE is you better make some money. but most of you haven't bothered to read the whole document.

    That's interesting. And I'll grant you I didn't read the entire document. That's a rather convoluted chain of command. (The Netherlands? I wouldn't have called that one.) Odd that you say the US division is in Delaware. When I looked up PWE I could've sworn I saw an office on the West Coast. I'll have to check again. Maybe I have my memories confused with something else.
    btw do you think any other major game out there is any better. from where i stand Cryptic isn't doing worse than facebook games

    What does facebook games have to do with MMOs? And I thought we weren't making comparisons? I'll say what I said above. I always accepted CO and DCUO as good on their own merits. I preferred COH of course and always went back to it. But I thought CO did things better (and worse) and DCUO did things better (and worse). Each game has a particular "Feel" to it. CO is probably closer to COH than DCUO of course.
    second , do you think you are helping the situation, maybe you just want everyone to quit playing and have this game disappear as well

    No. What I want people to do is make some NOISE and get the developers attention back on this game!

    Sometimes - you just have to be, you know - THAT GUY.

    Yeah. THAT GUY. The one making a scene over at the customer service desk? The one making the store rep look really nervous and embarrassed? That other customers might be edging a little away from because of the vague implication of immanent violence?

    Yeah. THAT GUY.

    In most cases, as unpleasant as it is to be THAT GUY, doing so often gets results where nothing else will!

    Sometimes a company just won't take you seriously until you start blasting their ears off. I do try and limit my anger to the guy in Tier 1 tech support or the first guy I encounter at the service desk. But as soon as I get somebody with authority to make a decision in front of me or on the phone, and if I'm not satisfied with what they offer? If they are even the least bit condescending?

    Oh yeah. It's time to become...

    THAT GUY.

    And THAT GUY - he gets results!

    That's what I'm trying to do.

    But yeah - I'm going to be THAT GUY with the squeaky wheel around here (or maybe just the annoying squeak toy). I see something I don't like, I'm gonna b-itch and moan and complain.

    And sometimes I'll get it wrong.

    I do try not to take offense when that's pointed out.

    Though I'm annoyed at your tone, I also have to thank you for pointing out the full context. That does help restore a good portion of my optimism.
  • canadascottcanadascott Posts: 1,257 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Comparisons at this stage are only natural among people coming into the game. I played CoH for the first eighteen months, and I have a *vastly* different opinion of CO vs. CoX based on that experience, but I'm willing to put up with a little homesickness and I'm not going to kick them when they're down by forcing my opinions on them.
    /CanadaBanner4.jpg
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited October 2012

    Oh yeah. It's time to become...

    THAT GUY.
    lol i guess i see too many' that guys' lately
    i understand your frustration. there are things that definitely need fixing.
    but if this game sucks like they say, why would we want to fix it? we want to fix it because it is good and we want to make it better
    but the posts i see say. (in zone)
    • "this game sucks it's not as good as CoX"
    • "This game has hardly any customization"
    • "this game will never be as good as CoH"
    and thats the rudeness i am reacting to.
    i am not "kicking them when they are down"
    in fact i try to help when ever asked if reasonable.
    but when you extend niceness and are slapped back with insults as above, i find it rude.
  • drreverenddrreverend Posts: 534 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    You also have to remember that from the CoHers perspective, they've just had the rug pulled out from under them pretty harshly by NCSoft. So they come here, and they start looking around and feeling like PerfectWorld is just NCSoft with a different coat of paint, and is one day going to randomly walk into Cryptic's offices and pull the plug without warning. So there's a might bit of fear that's seeping in. They complain because they feel like they've got Perfect World demanding they hand over their wallets... and are gonna kill the game at the drop of a hat.

    After all, NCSoft killed CoH with Issue 24 almost ready for prime time and a new powerset released a week and a half earlier.

    And then they come here, and there's a lot of concern that CO is going to be ignored by the powers that be. And no real communication or reassurance that they're going to pull CO off the back burner and give it some real attention. Give it the care and resources it needs to really bloom, and not just treat it as disposable.
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    a difference between the chinese and the koreans is
    • in china as long as it still makes money they will keep it
    • koreans not as much so. in korea having the best and being the best is important.
    this is my understanding having lived in Asia for 6 years and being married to a Korean. because of this i expect PWE will keep this game around as long as it makes money, by money i mean profit.
    the lucky things are
    • CO has no liscense costs , in fact they make $1 a year from hero games so this game has low overhead(same can not be said for STO)
    • CO has been profitable, and despite rumors has not lost any money
    so as long as the game is profitable they will keep it plugged in
  • smoochansmoochan Posts: 2,553 Arc User
    edited October 2012

    Sometimes - you just have to be, you know - THAT GUY.

    THAT GUY.

    And THAT GUY - he gets results!

    That's what I'm trying to do.

    Here's the problem. You're being THAT GUY, sure... but when that guy went to the customer service desk at CO-Mart to complain, there was no employee at the desk, so that guy started complaining to other customers who just looked at him like "... what do you want us to do?".

    Champions Online: Be the hero you wish you could be in a better game.
  • logandarklighterlogandarklighter Posts: 334 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    jasinblaze wrote: »
    lol i guess i see too many' that guys' lately
    i understand your frustration. there are things that definitely need fixing.
    but if this game sucks like they say, why would we want to fix it? we want to fix it because it is good and we want to make it better
    but the posts i see say. (in zone)
    • "this game sucks it's not as good as CoX"
    • "This game has hardly any customization"
    • "this game will never be as good as CoH"
    and thats the rudeness i am reacting to.
    i am not "kicking them when they are down"
    in fact i try to help when ever asked if reasonable.
    but when you extend niceness and are slapped back with insults as above, i find it rude.

    Ahhhh yes. Now THAT I don't want to see. And I'm totally with you there.
  • angelphoenix12angelphoenix12 Posts: 313 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    jasinblaze wrote: »
    lol i guess i see too many' that guys' lately
    i understand your frustration. there are things that definitely need fixing.
    but if this game sucks like they say, why would we want to fix it? we want to fix it because it is good and we want to make it better
    but the posts i see say. (in zone)
    • "this game sucks it's not as good as CoX"
    • "This game has hardly any customization"
    • "this game will never be as good as CoH"
    and thats the rudeness i am reacting to.
    i am not "kicking them when they are down"
    in fact i try to help when ever asked if reasonable.
    but when you extend niceness and are slapped back with insults as above, i find it rude.

    i see where your coming from, i aslo see where they are coming from. city of was a great game. however some city of vets came over here and dcu thinking it was another city of. when it is not. i think it robbed them of a great experience with this game.
    that is not saying they cant complain. i complain as well. if we dont complain in a constructive way the devs wont listen.
  • arimikamiarimikami Posts: 475 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I can see where you're coming from. I'm a former CoHer and, to be perfectly honest, I'm sick of hearing the complaints too. While some are valid issues that have been brought up, I've come across plenty that are either people being unrealistic in their expectations that Champions Online is going to be City of Heroes 2 or, they're basically throwing a fit because this isn't the game they like to play. There are a lot of things in this game that are very well done and I think some CoHers just don't want to admit it. There have been occasions when I've seen people comparing CoH to CO in zone chat as well and I tend to cringe over how insanely biased and/or tactless they can be when doing it.

    Personally, I think it's a bit rude to go to another game and start going on about how it'll never be as good as the one you were playing before so, let me be the first CoHer to say I'm sorry that some of our former community seem to lack manners and I really hope it doesn't get any further out of hand than it already has.
  • darqauradarqaura Posts: 169 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    jasinblaze wrote: »
    this post doesn't assume that this game is perfect
    it's about being more polite and not spamming zone and forums with comparisons all the time. other CoX players have noticed this too and think it's rude as well.
    complaining wont get anything fixed, better suggestions are our best hope for improving this game

    My post was about this game and had nothing to do with comparing or what goes on in zone.

    There is no point for further suggestions until some resources are freed up. It's clear that won't happen until NWO is launched.

    If there had never been a COH there would never have been a CO. :cool:
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    arimikami wrote: »
    let me be the first CoHer to say I'm sorry that some of our former community seem to lack manners and I really hope it doesn't get any further out of hand than it already has.
    there is no need for you to apologize. other CoX people have told me the same thing. I just know others might not be good at distinguishing the few from the masses(human nature i guess). welcome to your new home.
  • cptvanorcptvanor Posts: 274 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    drreverend wrote: »
    You also have to remember that from the CoHers perspective, they've just had the rug pulled out from under them pretty harshly by NCSoft.

    While that's true, it also doesn't give them an excuse to come over here and pee in our cornflakes.

    I understand that people will compare something to something they already knew, that's human nature. Considering how close CO is to CoX, it's a given people will do that.

    It's also human nature to want things to be how you like them. Even though CO is similar to CoX it's not the same. So it's expected CoX players might like to see things changed to be more like the game they knew.

    It's also human nature to defend something you like or enjoy. This is especially true of MMO's it seems. When someone badmouths a MMO someone is playing they are often offended at it and even take it personally.

    So while I understand CoX players being upset, and even wanting CO to change. This is not CoX and never will be CoX, CoX systems may or may not work here. We as CO players have every right to expect some sense of civility and respect for our opinions.

    The fact that they had their game shut down doesn't mean we have to put up with them being rude to us. As someone else said, if someone's home burned down and they moved in with the neighbors, you'd not expect them to critize the neighbors house.

    I by no means think that CO is a perfect game. It has issues, but most of those issues are in the form of lack of content and end game systems. The basic stuff in CO, such as the combat and powers all work fairly well IMO.
  • pion01pion01 Posts: 758 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    There's also a distinct difference between a valid complaint (targetting is ****, in-game login is annoying, we need new content) vs comparing the two games and finding "flaws" that don't exist based on a lack of understanding of the game.

    CoX did have numerous things it did better than CO, without a doubt, but often times the complaints are ridiculous, or based on subjective opinion, like saying CoX had better graphics because CO is too cartoony, or complaining there's no content when all you've done is alerts.
  • spyralpegacyonspyralpegacyon Posts: 381 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    arimikami wrote: »
    Personally, I think it's a bit rude to go to another game and start going on about how it'll never be as good as the one you were playing before so, let me be the first CoHer to say I'm sorry that some of our former community seem to lack manners and I really hope it doesn't get any further out of hand than it already has.

    And I'll be the second.
    tumblr_moni7tHVoq1rzu2xzo1_500.gif
  • cybersoldier1981cybersoldier1981 Posts: 2,501 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    CO has its share of problems worth complaining about, I'll give you that. If CO had a proper Dev team, it could rival CoX's content and features after some time. But sadly Cryptic/PWE's focus seems to be more on regurgitating yet ANOTHER boring Wizards & Wusses game with the same-old ideas re-used.

    However, you're comparing Hookers and Strippers. Sure, they're both women you throw money at, but there are a lot of differences and common things as well.
  • epeleskerepelesker Posts: 307 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    And I'll third.

    I admit coming into CO with some generally mixed second-hand impressions, but actually playing has changed my outlook on it. I found new things to enjoy here that I couldn't even do before, which is driving my interest (and emptying by bank account? :O) further.

    I think it'll be difficult to avoid saying "I'm going to miss my old game because of xyz", but there really isn't any point comparing to the point of exuding negativity, at least the way I see it.
    ----
    Heroic Roleplayer @epelesker | PRIMUS Database Moderator | Brigade Advocate
  • chaoswolf820chaoswolf820 Posts: 727 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    However, you're comparing Hookers and Strippers. Sure, they're both women you throw money at, but there are a lot of differences and common things as well.

    So which of us is which?
  • pion01pion01 Posts: 758 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Oh, we're totally the hookers, we give it all up fo da money.
  • gtw891gtw891 Posts: 115 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I was going to stay out of this but as a CoX refugee I just had to add my 2 cents here.

    For the record while I still think CoX is a better game CO has a lot going on in it that. It's not Cox. It's it's own game much like WoW, and others with it's on style that one has to get use to. And one that after (still) going thru it's learning curve I now find it just as fun. One that I see constructive crits can only make it better.

    However there's a difference between constructive crits and constant carping. And the later is also starting to grate on my nerves a bit (and is starting the poison the constructive crits to make this game better).

    In short while both camps have valid points this it (IMO) is starting to create two hostile camps. Something that this game doesn't need.

    So at the risk of PO'ing both camps maybe it's about everyone start to 'check' themselves a bit before it all blows up into something ugly.

    Again, just my 2 cents here.
  • lokikinlokikin Posts: 624 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Actually, I see the "Stripper/Hooker" analogy present in both games...

    F2P (here known as Silver) players visit the stripper. They get the show for free, but to see more they gotta pay a little. And to see even more, they gotta pay a little more. But they never reach what the hooker offers; full contact with all the bells and whistles...

    Now subscribers (Gold here) skip the nickel and dime and pay upfront for the whole wad (pun intended). But then they find that that's for the "standard" and if you want something special, it'll cost ya extra...

    It's probably more appropriate to compare the argument to who has a better pimp..

    Oh, and Lock Boxes? Chastity belts...

    :cool:
    _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

    M-O-O-N, that spells @Rhyatt

    Originally Posted by mijjestic: Ultimately, though, MMO players throwing stones at each other in this fashion is basically one nerd pointing and laughing at another nerd whose glasses are thicker.

    Laws yes!
  • ironmastodonironmastodon Posts: 12 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    LOL! Hookers and Strippers...


    Count me as another dual-gamer of both games. As a member of both, I feel just as much right to speak out in representative of either as I see fit. But the analogy of the house burning down is as appropriate as any that could be offered. We lost our home, and no matter how nice it was, or how much better it was perceived to be, It now is just ash that has no resemblance to what it once was.

    Was the house nicer? Eye of the Beholder. Is the house currently better? Only to those that can appreciate a pile of soot and char. Don't like the options you have available? go sleep on your rubble, I won't keep you away.

    Honestly, all I believe is happening is that we here are receiving an influx of CoX; the good and the bad. We are gaining a ton of superb, loyal, friendly, and appreciative players, but in order to welcome them in, we also have to allow a few odd ducks and rabble-rousers to tag along.

    Think of it like this- Our Neighbors house burned down, and since we love each other so much, we offered up our home to get them through this trying time. Unfortunately, they have this kid who has always teased your dog, tore up your flower garden, and broke planks off of your fence to use as a sword. Now he is running around your house, insulting your wife's cooking, leaving a mess, constantly fighting with your kids, and griping about everything around him. Your friends do what they can to keep him under control, but they can't quell it 100%. He is not dangerous, just a jerk.

    Trolls just be trollin.
    "We don't have time to negotiate in a civilized way... Destroy them!"

    "Captains log: I can take up a holding pattern while engineering locates the source of this malfunction, but this area is known to be a frequent destination of pirates. If we are detected by enemy ships, we won't be able to defend ourselves."
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    that metaphor made me smile
  • pwkampfykaufmannpwkampfykaufmann Posts: 253 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    However, you're comparing Hookers and Strippers. Sure, they're both women you throw money at, but there are a lot of differences and common things as well.

    ...that was the best metaphor ever. Give this man an award.
  • gtw891gtw891 Posts: 115 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Bravo iron, bravo. :smile:
  • nephtnepht Posts: 6,872 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    I like playing both because even though they were both about super heroes they both were so different from each other. I think people that played CoH and nothing but CoH will find the different stuff annoying and confusing at first.

    What people need to remember and this fact is out there in the googlewebs the game that inspired Cryptic to make CO was not its previous game but Hulk ultimate Destruction/ Free roaming Spiderman games as odd as it seems :/

    Thats the gamestyle they aimed for and they have achieved that.
    nepht_siggy_v6_by_nepht-dbbz19n.jpg
    Nepht and Dr Deflecto on primus
    They all thought I was out of the game....But I'm holding all the lockboxes now..
    I'll......FOAM FINGER YOUR BACK!
  • pion01pion01 Posts: 758 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    nepht wrote: »
    I like playing both because even though they were both about super heroes they both were so different from each other. I think people that played CoH and nothing but CoH will find the different stuff annoying and confusing at first.

    What people need to remember and this fact is out there in the googlewebs the game that inspired Cryptic to make CO was not its previous game but Hulk ultimate Destruction/ Free roaming Spiderman games as odd as it seems :/

    Thats the gamestyle they aimed for and they have achieved that.

    This is what I especially don't get mind you. We didn't get either the ultimate destruction, nor the free roaming wall crawling.....

    It's weird.

    I would have loved to see what RavenSoft could have done with Systems, while Cryptic did Art, FX and character creation. And someone else entirely for lore.
  • witchgunwitchgun Posts: 44 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Well as a former coh player myself I have to respect both games are different COH was oddly the first of the wow type generation of games by about a month and had all the trappings of such a thing. It was very traditional mmo with good CC and in the end sadly was really growing in leaps and bounds.

    Now onto CO, CO is not a wow type MMO, this game if I may say can be seen as a experimental hybrid, its fighting game mixed with old beat them ups like strreets of rage with a super hero theme, CO is something unique so is DCUO to a degree.

    So my word of caution to COh folks, the play style here is dfferent, this is not a classic style MMo its a hybrid while I agree with the lack of content for sure, bare CO's hybrid model in mind.

    Hope that makes sense.
  • smoochansmoochan Posts: 2,553 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    CO isn't a hooker or a stripper. CO is a girl who lets you get all the way to home base for free, then says "oh hey, if you buy me some cute outfits I'll dress up in them for you!", but you can still wazzle her woozle all day long even if you don't do that.

    I believe in the context of the metaphor, CO is a friend-with-benefits.

    Champions Online: Be the hero you wish you could be in a better game.
  • itsbrou#5396 itsbrou Posts: 1,777 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    I don't think anyone ever said it was going to be CoH 2. But there are people who still think that was the intention. How strange.
    Brou in Cryptic games.
  • pion01pion01 Posts: 758 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    smoochan wrote: »
    CO isn't a hooker or a stripper. CO is a girl who lets you get all the way to home base for free, then says "oh hey, if you buy me some cute outfits I'll dress up in them for you!", but you can still wazzle her woozle all day long even if you don't do that.

    I believe in the context of the metaphor, CO is a friend-with-benefits.

    Yeah. Yeah, that's pretty much on the money.
  • towershield#4714 towershield Posts: 1,205 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    smoochan wrote: »
    CO isn't a hooker or a stripper. CO is a girl who lets you get all the way to home base for free, then says "oh hey, if you buy me some cute outfits I'll dress up in them for you!", but you can still wazzle her woozle all day long even if you don't do that.

    I believe in the context of the metaphor, CO is a friend-with-benefits.

    The metaphor made my day considerably less crumby even though it ended up somehow reminding me about my tour in Korea, which was pretty crumby. The correlation: drinky girls.
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________
  • target1onetarget1one Posts: 30 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    If you go with the "house" analogy:

    Both CoH and CO are decent little row houses in the Western MMO neighborhood. Comfortable but not large or fancy. Both are rented by their tenants, though they're owned by different landlords.

    The CoH house was somewhat older, but the landlord's maintenance guys were top-notch and always making renovations... a new bay window for the kitchen, a better bathtub/shower, a replacement picket fence, new carpeting in the living room... nothing really jaw-dropping but nice nonetheless. But recently, the landlord decided to refocus his business. He fired his local maintenance crew, then told the tenants to get out by Nov. 30, after which the house will be razed, since the landlord wants to use the property for a new development called "B&S" rather than sell it as-is.

    The CO house, while nice enough by virtue of being newer, never really got the same level of local maintenance support as the other one. It gets a new paint job here, a bit of new trim there, but very little to actually improve the quality of life for the tenants. The landlord seems to be willing to keep the house available to the tenants for the indefinite future... but frankly, it's only a matter of time before a fire or flood causes some major damage. Then, sadly, the house will likely be condemned, because the landlord is reluctant to spend any real money for repairs.

    Then, too, there's the DCUO house, whose landlord is somewhat more supportive than the CO one. But the DCUO house, while flashy, is somewhat cramped and oddly designed, not really a good fit for the former CoH residents.

    And let's not even consider the MUO house, still being built. It will come fully furnished and decorated. But the landlord plans to actually enforce a dress code and dictate the tenants' clothing (and even their behavior) rather than letting them live their lives as they see fit... :rolleyes:

    Target1one

    "ENOUGH!!! You are ALL of you BENEATH me! I am a GOD, you dull creature, and I will NOT be BULLIED by--" -- Loki

    *SMASH* *SMASH* *SMASH* <pause> *SMASHSMASH* "... puny god..." -- Hulk
  • iamruneiamrune Posts: 968 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    nepht wrote: »
    I like playing both because even though they were both about super heroes they both were so different from each other. I think people that played CoH and nothing but CoH will find the different stuff annoying and confusing at first.

    What people need to remember and this fact is out there in the googlewebs the game that inspired Cryptic to make CO was not its previous game but Hulk ultimate Destruction/ Free roaming Spiderman games as odd as it seems :/

    Thats the gamestyle they aimed for and they have achieved that.
    pion01 wrote: »


    This is what I especially don't get mind you. We didn't get either the ultimate destruction, nor the free roaming wall crawling.....

    It's weird.

    I would have loved to see what RavenSoft could have done with Systems, while Cryptic did Art, FX and character creation. And someone else entirely for lore.


    If I may interject.

    This is close, but not quite accurate.

    Champions Online's inspiration was actually the Marvel Ultimate Alliance game, with the following modifications.


    • It is an MMO, not Single Player.
    • You play one character at a time, not a squad.
    • That one character is extremely customizable in function.
    • Team up synergy in MUA is replaced with power synergy in CO.
    • The basic MMO world design is more WoW than CoH. *

    Designed to play on Xbox 360, and still has a wonderful controller scheme built right in for that even though that deal fell through, Cryptic absolutely hit all the marks they aimed for, and surpassed many of the most important ones in terms of compelling gameplay and character design. They unfortunately let things slide on the continuing development side of the equation.


    * Too much instancing and not enough open world objectives was a very common complaint leveled at Cryptic in early exit surveys and so on for the first three years, before Cryptic left NCsoft to focus on CO.
  • seismecaseismeca Posts: 47 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    smoochan wrote: »
    CO isn't a hooker or a stripper. CO is a girl who lets you get all the way to home base for free, then says "oh hey, if you buy me some cute outfits I'll dress up in them for you!", but you can still wazzle her woozle all day long even if you don't do that.

    I believe in the context of the metaphor, CO is a friend-with-benefits.

    That pretty much describes every f2p mmo though, CO isn't special in that regard.


    If we're using girlfriend metaphors CO is the geeky awkward girl that you kind of have to meet half way to do anything with her because she doesn't have any money and never wants to go anywhere


    and she has herpes so there's certain areas you can't touch.




    The thing is, you would be right that each game had its own strengths and merits and you cant compare them because theyre different games

    but CoH no longer exists, so youre going to get CoH players here, and theyre going to compare

    its just going to happen

    deal with it
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    The metaphor made my day considerably less crumby even though it ended up somehow reminding me about my tour in Korea, which was pretty crumby. The correlation: drinky girls.
    then you should have spent more time outside Itaewon.
  • mijjesticmijjestic Posts: 481 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Anti-Metaphor:

    CO is like that MMO that you play that you invested in so you keep hanging around waiting for it to get better and partake of the momentary distractions that crop up from time to time then b*tch about what its not doing for lack of else to be interested in. Then you maybe play something else.

    And it smokes in bed after sex.
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,360 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    metaphors are the window to the soul ;)
  • smoochansmoochan Posts: 2,553 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    target1one wrote: »
    If you go with the "house" analogy:

    Both CoH and CO are decent little row houses in the Western MMO neighborhood. Comfortable but not large or fancy. Both are rented by their tenants, though they're owned by different landlords.

    Gotta stop you right there. If CO was a house, it would probably be a crack house; everyone lives there for free, some people buy product to enjoy their time there a bit more.
    mijjestic wrote: »
    Anti-Metaphor:

    CO is like that MMO that you play that you invested in so you keep hanging around waiting for it to get better and partake of the momentary distractions that crop up from time to time then b*tch about what its not doing for lack of else to be interested in. Then you maybe play something else.

    And it smokes in bed after sex.

    Re-metaphor: I rode that ***** till she was wore out.. then when I realized she didn't have anything more to give I kicked her out of bed started having sex with Nero.

    Wait... I mean, started playing Devil May Cry... tho he is very pretty...

    Champions Online: Be the hero you wish you could be in a better game.
Sign In or Register to comment.