When It's counterparts, Concentration and and the Focus Four are only Tier 1? This means immediately after choosing your Energy Builder, you can slap on one of those forms *assuming you're using the correct powerset (Gunslinger/Concentration, Ect)
Where with Enraged, you have to choose up to three powers, THEN Enraged becomes available. Why is it Tier 2? All it's doing is forcing you to choose more powers in might before you can break from Tier 0/1.
I suggest bringing it to Tier 1 with the rest of them.
Short answer: Leftover from when it was a click that you activated to keep stacks up.
Before it became a toggle like the rest, it was the be-all end-all for generic damage boosting. Wanted a nice consistent damage buff for your character and wasn't afraid to get close? Create a build with decent strength, and take Enrage, and back it up with Roomsweeper. Building and maintaining a damage buff on top of your regularly more powerful ranged attacks was no sweat.
Aside from preserving proper leveling progression on established builds (i.e. you gain access to Haymaker, a T3, thanks to T2 enrage), this has no purpose. It really should be brought to T1.
If this ever happen can we have have Aggressor SYNERGY and give Stacks of Enraged to Aspect of the Bestial which works with Enraged by Bleed?
would be nice,
Those lack* of Synergies piss me off
POWERFRAME REVAMPS, NEW POWERS and BUG FIXES > Recycled Content and Events and even costumes at this point Introvert guy who use CO to make his characters playable and get experimental with Viable FF Theme builds! Running out of Unique FF builds due to the lack of updates and synergies! Playing since 1 February 2011 128 + Characters (21 ATs, 107 FFs) ALTitis for Life!
If this ever happen can we have have Aggressor SYNERGY and give Stacks of Enraged to Aspect of the Bestial which works with Enraged by Bleed?
would be nice,
Those kind of Synergies piss me off
Actuallly, it's sort of odd, because other moves that are made to stack Enrage (Roomsweeper, Cleave, etc) actually will still attempt to do so, even when an enrage toggle isn't involved. Usually this just causes the stacks to abruptly end, but if you're using either Enrage OR Aspect, it'll stack correctly.
In other words, there's no real reason for Aggressor to not attempt to stack enrage when you don't have the Enrage toggle.
Actuallly, it's sort of odd, because other moves that are made to stack Enrage (Roomsweeper, Cleave, etc) actually will still attempt to do so, even when an enrage toggle isn't involved. Usually this just causes the stacks to abruptly end, but if you're using either Enrage OR Aspect, it'll stack correctly.
In other words, there's no real reason for Aggressor to not attempt to stack enrage when you don't have the Enrage toggle.
My guess: in the code, the always-on buff from the toggle that 'sources' each stack is what's tied to Aggressor. In other words, it works from 'Enrage' and not 'Enraged!' as a general stacking buff.
Also, ya can no longer have >1 stack of a toggle that isn't currently active. In the past I think I've had >1 stack of Enrage fall off even while I was using IDF.
There is also the facts that the new forms are not counting towards any in-set number of powers. And concentration is also the go-to form for elemental powers, the non-munitions power requirement for concentration is just as high as in-set requirements for enrage.
That said, I'd be fine with enrage being r1, melee builds could use some more small advantages like that.
Comments
Before it became a toggle like the rest, it was the be-all end-all for generic damage boosting. Wanted a nice consistent damage buff for your character and wasn't afraid to get close? Create a build with decent strength, and take Enrage, and back it up with Roomsweeper. Building and maintaining a damage buff on top of your regularly more powerful ranged attacks was no sweat.
Aside from preserving proper leveling progression on established builds (i.e. you gain access to Haymaker, a T3, thanks to T2 enrage), this has no purpose. It really should be brought to T1.
Caliga's PRIMUS Database! --XXX--The Caliga Build: Threatening Haymakers! --XXX-- Caliga and Conquer fanart!
-Ogre
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
- Be safe and have fun, champs - for science!
Actually related to that:
The good (fairly short) ol' days when Primal Rage w/ IDF reigned supreme.
And yes, IDF needs a ridiculous buff to be worth anything. Compassion trumps it on too many levels.
My super cool CC build and how to use it.
would be nice,
Those lack* of Synergies piss me off
Actuallly, it's sort of odd, because other moves that are made to stack Enrage (Roomsweeper, Cleave, etc) actually will still attempt to do so, even when an enrage toggle isn't involved. Usually this just causes the stacks to abruptly end, but if you're using either Enrage OR Aspect, it'll stack correctly.
In other words, there's no real reason for Aggressor to not attempt to stack enrage when you don't have the Enrage toggle.
My guess: in the code, the always-on buff from the toggle that 'sources' each stack is what's tied to Aggressor. In other words, it works from 'Enrage' and not 'Enraged!' as a general stacking buff.
Also, ya can no longer have >1 stack of a toggle that isn't currently active. In the past I think I've had >1 stack of Enrage fall off even while I was using IDF.
- Be safe and have fun, champs - for science!
That said, I'd be fine with enrage being r1, melee builds could use some more small advantages like that.