test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Mega-Destroid Update

2»

Comments

  • monaahirumonaahiru Posts: 3,088 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    People were screaming for a fix, and are screaming now because as usual they over nerfed.

    I agree that they should have made them 30 min cooldown with no cooldown reduction effecting them, but the shared cooldown was excessive, made having more than 1 pointless and ruined the fun of trying to collect the full set.

    At most they should have made it the 30 min cooldown unaffected by reduction, and using one placing a 5 min shared cooldown on the others, that way all 6 still have some use.


    Totally agreed, I also don't care DPS+Life amount fix much lower.

    Or, fix them as Bind on Account or make them tradeable, which ever.:frown:
  • skcarkskcark Posts: 715 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    jonsills wrote: »
    Hey, when people started complaining about these devices "breaking the game", I asked why it was a bad thing to be able to steamroller content when you want to - after all, nobody was forcing anyone to min/max their cooldowns so they could pop one Champion after another - and got shouted down because apparently making something easy-mode for yourself without necessarily affecting anyone else's gameplay is eeeevil.

    I was the only person raising this point, as far as I could see (I don't topuch PvP threads, as I don't touch PvP).

    Then the fix that was being loudly demanded was put in place - and suddenly there are voices I never heard before screaming about that!

    It's a wonder the devs worry about pleasing anyone at all - no matter what they do, there are going to be a lot of people raging and threatening to quit.

    So. where are these people who complain the damage is overpowered, and also then suggest to make the cooldown longer and shared as opposed to fixing the the damage itself? I'd just like to know which people not to take seriousl in future for suggesting to fix a problem by re-routing the problem as opposed to actually fixing the problem.
  • crypticbuxomcrypticbuxom Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    skcark wrote: »
    So. where are these people who complain the damage is overpowered, and also then suggest to make the cooldown longer and shared as opposed to fixing the the damage itself? I'd just like to know which people not to take seriousl in future for suggesting to fix a problem by re-routing the problem as opposed to actually fixing the problem.

    No one did. People wanted the damage to be lowered, the cooldowns to be shared or the cooldown increased. We got two nerfs instead of a single fair one.
  • skcarkskcark Posts: 715 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    No one did. People wanted the damage to be lowered, the cooldowns to be shared or the cooldown increased. We got two nerfs instead of a single fair one.

    It was kinda meant to be taken as sarcasm in response to jonsills saying people requested this form of nerf specifically, and then imply the same people then turn around and complain about getting "what they want" when no one even got what they wanted. Because no one suggested this method of nerf, since it in no way fixes the issue of immense power in one usage
  • crypticbuxomcrypticbuxom Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I'm sure a lot of people knew it was sarcasm. I replied for those who didn't.
Sign In or Register to comment.