test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

what about the gwfs

2»

Comments

  • zacazuzacazu Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,934 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    What's your point?

    if sounds fair to you a non main striker class, in your dps tree, be competitive to a main striker class in your main striker tree
    is valid a secundary defender be so great defender than a primary defender in your defender tree. that is +/- what the thread tryng discuss.
  • commanderdata001commanderdata001 Member Posts: 307 Bounty Hunter
    edited June 2015
    zacazu wrote: »
    if sounds fair to you a non main striker class, in your dps tree, be competitive to a main striker class in your main striker tree
    is valid a secundary defender be so great defender than a primary defender in your defender tree. that is +/- what the thread tryng discuss.

    I see no point just the usual mantra.
    You guys better in these and forum QQ than making builds and testing...
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • zacazuzacazu Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,934 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    my destroyer is fine, i have test enough to have property to say what a class can do or nothing.

    that my parenthesis is not a mantra, is a obvious conclusion. but no matter what it is fair, correct? two weights and two measures... you just want your class in the top of everthing...

    nevermind, you dont need understand or accept to that be a correct thing.
  • commanderdata001commanderdata001 Member Posts: 307 Bounty Hunter
    edited June 2015
    Oh I undestand just fine!

    FOTM players and paingiver mainiacs making their thesis how their class should be the best for at least 10 modules and find some writing of some kind of primary and secondary attributes in the game and selling like it was some kind of absolute truth...
    In reality no FOTM class is the best longer than 1-2 modules.
  • zvieriszvieris Member Posts: 1,261 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Oh I undestand just fine!

    FOTM players and paingiver mainiacs making their thesis how their class should be the best for at least 10 modules and find some writing of some kind of primary and secondary attributes in the game and selling like it was some kind of absolute truth...
    In reality no FOTM class is the best longer than 1-2 modules.

    You're the one playing the foty (flavor of the year) class. CW was the best class in both PvP and PvE for 5 modules, and is still great. Get your head off your ***, you moron.
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • burkaancburkaanc Member Posts: 2,186 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    xsayajinx1 wrote: »
    You must played different modules than me. . .

    it is the best PvE class since launch, no sane person can dispute that, though atm its damage is now closer to where it should be compared to destroyers

    atm dont see many problems in PvP with cw though
    Paladin Master Race
  • commanderdata001commanderdata001 Member Posts: 307 Bounty Hunter
    edited June 2015
    zvieris wrote: »
    You're the one playing the foty (flavor of the year) class. CW was the best class in both PvP and PvE for 5 modules, and is still great. Get your head off your ***, you moron.

    Really?
    CW was free kill in mod1-3.
    And die really fast against TR, GF and HRs if not have far greater gear.
  • zacazuzacazu Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,934 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Oh I undestand just fine!

    FOTM players and paingiver mainiacs making their thesis how their class should be the best for at least 10 modules and find some writing of some kind of primary and secondary attributes in the game and selling like it was some kind of absolute truth...
    In reality no FOTM class is the best longer than 1-2 modules.

    1 - Stop being "cw centric"; I am against secundary strikers be competitive with gwfs. .

    2 - between the strikers I have strong reservations about the rogues (not rangers or sws in property trees) for one reason in particular: imagine if rogues become an invisible force, causing daze in area against enemies who die in an instant?

    you destroy cws, other strikers, defenders and healers. would happen to pve something MUCH worse than occurred in pvp. and pvp, BOOM.

    but YOUR speech does not take into consideration any scenario. the "cw" expedient in this forum, in some cases, is just put down, for any <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> argument, a class that have some advantage.
Sign In or Register to comment.