A heavy armored rogue sneaking through enemy lines with a shiny 50kg piece of metal on his back. That makes sense.
People are talking about armor appearances only. Regardless, the game already has places with illusionary walls and floors, so it isn't unfeasible to have illusionary garb...
I mean, heck, you can fight in your fashion clothing without any penalties...
<::::::::::::::)xxxo <::::::::::::::)xxxo <::::::::::::)xxxxxxxx(:::::::::::> oxxx(::::::::::::::> oxxx(::::::::::::::> "Is it better to be feared or respected? I say, is it too much to ask for both?" -Tony Stark Official NW_Legit_Community Forums
People are talking about armor appearances only. Regardless, the game already has places with illusionary walls and floors, so it isn't unfeasible to have illusionary garb...
I mean, heck, you can fight in your fashion clothing without any penalties...
It's all true. I still think GWF should be able to wear GF plate.
0
reagenlionel1Member, Neverwinter Beta UsersPosts: 0Arc User
People are talking about armor appearances only. Regardless, the game already has places with illusionary walls and floors, so it isn't unfeasible to have illusionary garb...
I mean, heck, you can fight in your fashion clothing without any penalties...
Indeed.
Which further validates why there should'nt be a class restriction with transmutation.
Comments
People are talking about armor appearances only. Regardless, the game already has places with illusionary walls and floors, so it isn't unfeasible to have illusionary garb...
I mean, heck, you can fight in your fashion clothing without any penalties...
"Is it better to be feared or respected? I say, is it too much to ask for both?" -Tony Stark
Official NW_Legit_Community Forums
It's all true. I still think GWF should be able to wear GF plate.
Indeed.
Which further validates why there should'nt be a class restriction with transmutation.
It defeats half the purpose with that in place.