test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Official Feedback Thread: Bonding Runestone Changes

1192022242548

Comments

  • thefiresidecatthefiresidecat Member Posts: 4,486 Arc User

    If the both Nerf bondings and reduce buffs the games content is going to become unplayable.

    I would be the first to get out the pitchforks if the changes made the content unplayable. The initial post said they have been keeping an eye on rebalancing content as necessary through the whole process. Have you been on preview and failed to run anything that you could run before? If so, that would be helpful feedback.

    well I couldn't make it thru the chult jungle without dying every couple seconds. (I don't have that problem outside of preview) not nice. not pleasant. definitely not fun.
  • vincentr6669vincentr6669 Member Posts: 235 Arc User
    I made some calculations comparing the system we have now with the forthcoming system:

    Current System

    Our character has 13 slots (i'm not counting utility slots and i'm not differentiating offensive and defensive slots, i'm only calculating total stats) thus all these slots filled with Single Stat Rank 12 (+700) means 13 x 700 = 9100.

    The inherent stats of a rank 40 striker companion are 662 Power, 662 Critical and 662 Armor Penetration, thus 3 x 662 = 1986.

    Each Bonding Rank 12 gives 840 of Power or Defense. Since there are 3 rune slots together they sum 2520 total stats.

    Let's say our companion has three Companion Gear +4 from Illusionist's Gambit. Each gear has one stat +541 and one +361 which sums to 902. Since there are 3 gear slots then they equal 2706.

    Let's also say we have only Rank 12 filling all six slots from these gears. 6 x 700 = 4200.

    Now we sum everything that is inside companion and multiply by 2.85 (companion's gift from bonding proc): (1986+2520+2706+4200)x2.85=11412x2.85=32524.2

    Finally we sum that 32524,2 with the total stats from our character which is 9100. We obtain 41624,2.

    TOTAL STATS: 41624.2

    New System

    We have two numbers equal to the old system which are 1986 (stats from rank 40 companion "naked") and 2706 (3xGear +4 from IG). That spare us some calculations.

    Now everything else went from Rank 12 to 14. This means 13 slots x 1000 = 13000.

    Each Bonding 14 gives 1050 of stats. Three of them are 3150.

    All gear slots from our companion filled with Rank 14 is 6 x 1000 = 6000.

    1986 + 3150 + 2706 + 6000 = 13842
    13842 x 1.95 (bondings) = 26991.9
    26991.9 + 13000 = 39991.9

    TOTAL STATS: 39991.9

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As we can see even with everything at 14 (both on your character and your companion) we are 1632.3 stats behind of the old bondings. That 1.6k probably is a mix between Power, Critical and Armor Penetration, mostly Power.

    Note: i didn't take Power-Sharing into consideration.
  • gromovnipljesak#8234 gromovnipljesak Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    edited September 2017
    Here you go. It got upped a few hours ago, but I was busy. A comparison between power share and bondings. FYI, power share even WITHOUT a summoned companion gave me more power than a companion. So, are bondings the issue? HAMSTER no.

    Sorry, but I gotta say this - if you still can't see that the bondings aren't the issue... well, you don't deserve half the playerbase you have. Because this is no longer about nerfing something we all pretty much need, it's about not giving a HAMSTER about your fans genuinely trying to help you prevent mass exoduses of players.

    <font color="orange">Mod edit: link removed due to swearing used. Applied censor filter to post. The video link has been forwarded to the devs however. Thanks!</font>
    Post edited by zebular on
  • vindavinda Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited September 2017
    Bottom line players have invested real money purchasing your digital goods as advertised and now you are changing that digital product in a way that will require your customers to invest more real money in order to theoretically break even this is a poor investment strategy from a players standpoint and while mmorpg games will always have fluctuating populations a company that gets a reputation for taking away things that customers purchase never lasts long. I wont claim to know what will happen for others but I for one won't continue to purchase from your cash shop if my purchases are going to be made irrelevant whenever you decide "power creep" is getting out of hand. I'm sorry but I don't like spending time and money only to have my progress reversed as if I were beta testing for you.
  • santralafaxsantralafax Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 2,896 Arc User
    edited September 2017


    The goal as they have explained it is to remove the "absolutely must use" label on Bonding Runestones. They will still be the better but they will be less of a absolutely must use.

    The devs forced bondings on us when they last visited them--and made them better than before. It was at that point I was forced to give up my augment, which I had loved--and *spend a ton of astral diamonds* ranking up the bondings. They *made* bondings a requirement, an expensive requirement.

    I'm no fan of these dev decisions. Neither the previous one, nor the current.
  • santralafaxsantralafax Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 2,896 Arc User

    So you tossed this hilariously nonsensical idea with the 50% uptime on bondings out of the window. Phew...thank gawd for that... I hope you buried it deep so it will never see the light of day again :# It still leaves a bad taste in my mouth because the idea is so comically bad and so clearly not beneficial to players that one has to wonder how the team could possibly have come up with it in the first place. Still it is very good to see you responded to the critique.

    The streamlining of the refinement process sounds nice in and of itself but even that is soured by the heavy nerf to bondings (even without the 50% uptime nonsense...I hope it will work like before...apart from the heavy % nerf?) and the lengthening of an already very lengthy refinement process. One doesn' t need to be a genius to see why players might not be giddy about you taking away a ton of stats they already had while offering them different and very costly ways to try and get them back again...You also failed epically in explaining why, how this could possibly be beneficial to you, the players, game design, anything...it' s just baffling. Just like the new idea for random queues...I cannot imagine how anyone could have come up with that with a straight face. Seriously.. I just don' t know. But: no shame whatsoever in having outrageously bad ideas every now and then if you don' t stick to the them!

    There are some really odd things coming out of Mount Dev these days! And it smells like Mod 6, to boot.
  • This content has been removed.
  • demonmongerdemonmonger Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 3,350 Arc User
    it's going to happen... and you are going to like it....
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va2cxtPWMHg
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I hate paying taxes! Why must I pay thousands of dollars in taxes when everything I buy is taxed anyways!
  • jxsinjxsin Member Posts: 25 Arc User
    > @tripsofthrymr said:
    > If the both Nerf bondings and reduce buffs the games content is going to become unplayable.
    >
    > I would be the first to get out the pitchforks if the changes made the content unplayable. The initial post said they have been keeping an eye on rebalancing content as necessary through the whole process. Have you been on preview and failed to run anything that you could run before? If so, that would be helpful feedback.

    Have you been on preview and failed to run anything that you could before WITH the same gear and items you had without having to obtain rank 14 enchants would be a better question.
  • edited September 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • thefiresidecatthefiresidecat Member Posts: 4,486 Arc User
    > @jonkoca said:
    > Ok watched the vid, swearing aside, it was conclusive.
    >
    > The gwf's personal pet buff stat boost equalled roughly 30-35k or so, but with a single op/dc power share party, he was routinely hitting 200k and more power. Even at one point when he dismissed his pet, power share still boosted his power more than his pet would have...
    >
    > i.e.. leave bondings as they are and tone down power sharing. Though tbh. that might actually scare people more lol.

    Personally I'd rather the buffs got toned down a bit not entirely because the dungeons are hard. But doing dailies even really requires those stats. Even pugging it you don't get those specialised party buffs 99 percent of the time. It's really an elitist problem not a general population problem. This will get me 1000 dislikes for saying it but the solution might be to restrict the number of buffers in any given party.
  • gromovnipljesak#8234 gromovnipljesak Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    @thefiresidecat
    Instead of limiting number of buffers, limit the buffs instead. Not quantity but quality. Instead of 33% power affecting both player and companion, make it 50% of the player's power only affecting the player. Because via comp it just gets tripled. And since the common TNG run is 2x DC and 1x Pally or GF, you're gonna be running with 250k power regardless of bondings. I've proven that by running with one DC and no bondings, and still reaching 76k power (what's about 20k more than bondings alone). That's the issue, when a free skill does more than a paid-for item. As in, muuuch more. Imagine running with 2x DC. I'd be running with 120k power at any given moment without any bondings whatsoever.
  • strathkinstrathkin Member Posts: 1,798 Arc User
    edited September 2017
    I think many people NEED to get on PREVIEW and see where the DPS is on DRAGON verses PREVIEW on the same DUNGEON especially as they 'rework' the recently announced changes to Bondings.

    I think that will have many see the changes aren't as severe as they feared. Keeping the uptime at almost 100% depending on your companion was a major reversal for the players.
  • edited September 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • tripsofthrymrtripsofthrymr Member, Neverwinter Moderator, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,624 Community Moderator
    edited September 2017


    well I couldn't make it thru the chult jungle without dying every couple seconds. (I don't have that problem outside of preview) not nice. not pleasant. definitely not fun.

    You have ranked-up bondings but can't survive the jungles without dying every few seconds? My squishy CW can do his Chult dailies just fine with no companion summoned at all (no bondings, no augment, no eldritch).

    Watch on Twitch

    Caritas Guild Founder (Greycloak Alliance)

    Sci-fi author: The Gods We Make, The Gods We Seek, and Ji-min
  • jxsinjxsin Member Posts: 25 Arc User
    > @gromovnipljesak#8234 said:
    > Yeah, after spending the equivalent of 45 mil AD... who would've thought that your DPS is supposed to go UP when you upgrade something... oh wait, it's literally anyone with sentient thought. And the fact that it required so many upgrades to get to the point where you're STILL below what you were before... that is not a good choice. It's like take-backsies between 5 year olds. Except you lose whatever you traded in, twice.

    Exactly this. I have no doubt it's only a minor nerf WHEN you spend a small fortune to rank stuff up. I want to see the non elite people run the same content they were able to run before using the same exact gear they normally use, not rank 14 or unparalleled stuff.
  • gromovnipljesak#8234 gromovnipljesak Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    @jxsin
    Exactly what I implied before - this helps top tier players be even further away, and everyone below that just trails behind even further. In my entire alliance there's maybe 5 people who can afford that, and that's probably overestimating it too - I am only certain that one can do it. This will be elitism extraordinaire.
  • thrill#1417 thrill Member Posts: 163 Arc User
    edited September 2017


    The goal as they have explained it is to remove the "absolutely must use" label on Bonding Runestones. They will still be the better but they will be less of a absolutely must use.

    The devs forced bondings on us when they last visited them--and made them better than before. It was at that point I was forced to give up my augment, which I had loved--and *spend a ton of astral diamonds* ranking up the bondings. They *made* bondings a requirement, an expensive requirement.

    I'm no fan of these dev decisions. Neither the previous one, nor the current.
    That is how the "business model" works. Sales are slow over here, let's nerf stuff and bring up sales on that other stuff. Now that stuff is OP. Let's nerf it and force people to spend money on this other stuff.

    Could you imagine a car company getting away with that? Diesel is hurting gas model sales. Let's nerf the diesels gas mileage.

    No, but really, it is to make the game better. :/

    I have spent roughly $400 on this game. A big chunk of that was to rank up 3 rank 12 bondings. I won't make that mistake again with these folks.
  • edited September 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • demonmongerdemonmonger Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 3,350 Arc User
    > @thrill#1417 said:
    > The goal as they have explained it is to remove the "absolutely must use" label on Bonding Runestones. They will still be the better but they will be less of a absolutely must use.
    >
    > The devs forced bondings on us when they last visited them--and made them better than before. It was at that point I was forced to give up my augment, which I had loved--and *spend a ton of astral diamonds* ranking up the bondings. They *made* bondings a requirement, an expensive requirement.
    >
    > I'm no fan of these dev decisions. Neither the previous one, nor the current.
    >
    > That is how the "business model" works. Sales are slow over here, let's nerf stuff and bring up sales on that other stuff. Now that stuff is OP. Let's nerf it and force people to spend money on this other stuff.
    >
    > Could you imagine a car company getting away with that? Diesel is hurting gas model sales. Let's nerf the diesels gas mileage.
    >
    > No, but really, it is to make the game better. :/
    >
    > I have spent roughly $400 on this game. A big chunk of that was to rank up 3 rank 12 bondings. I won't make that mistake again with these folks.

    I spent more than $3000.00
    But I still don't have bonding rank 12
    Knew thus day was coming
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I hate paying taxes! Why must I pay thousands of dollars in taxes when everything I buy is taxed anyways!
  • wraithr32wraithr32 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 38 Arc User

    So you tossed this hilariously nonsensical idea with the 50% uptime on bondings out of the window. Phew...thank gawd for that...

    Where did you find this information?? No-one else seems to have said anything about it.

  • strathkinstrathkin Member Posts: 1,798 Arc User
    edited September 2017

    > @thrill#1417 said:

    > The goal as they have explained it is to remove the "absolutely must use" label on Bonding Runestones. They will still be the better but they will be less of a absolutely must use.

    >

    > The devs forced bondings on us when they last visited them--and made them better than before. It was at that point I was forced to give up my augment, which I had loved--and *spend a ton of astral diamonds* ranking up the bondings. They *made* bondings a requirement, an expensive requirement.

    >

    > I'm no fan of these dev decisions. Neither the previous one, nor the current.

    >

    > That is how the "business model" works. Sales are slow over here, let's nerf stuff and bring up sales on that other stuff. Now that stuff is OP. Let's nerf it and force people to spend money on this other stuff.

    >

    > Could you imagine a car company getting away with that? Diesel is hurting gas model sales. Let's nerf the diesels gas mileage.

    >

    > No, but really, it is to make the game better. :/

    >

    > I have spent roughly $400 on this game. A big chunk of that was to rank up 3 rank 12 bondings. I won't make that mistake again with these folks.



    I spent more than $3000.00

    But I still don't have bonding rank 12

    Knew thus day was coming

    If you used the AD:Zen Exchange you'd have R12 bondings purchased off auction each for about 100.00 Zen (denote 100.00 as in dollars) so you could have had 30.

    Yes 100.00 in Zen gets you over 4m AD which is enough to buy one R12 Bonding on Auction or still 30 if you spent 3000.00 as you indicated.
    Post edited by strathkin on
  • thefiresidecatthefiresidecat Member Posts: 4,486 Arc User
    edited September 2017
    > @tripsofthrymr said:
    > well I couldn't make it thru the chult jungle without dying every couple seconds. (I don't have that problem outside of preview) not nice. not pleasant. definitely not fun.
    >
    >
    > You have ranked-up bondings but can't survive the jungles without dying every few seconds? My squishy CW can do his Chult dailies just fine with no companion summoned at all (no bondings, no augment, no eldritch).
    >
    > Watc@tripsofthrymr sai

    You do realize how you are coming off here don't you? My experience is invalid because yours is different sure ok you rawk and I suk. Fine but I still get killed quickly in the new zone in preview now.its still kind of off point because this Nerf is treating a small symptom instead of the real problem double dipping the buffs as proven pretty conclusively earlier in this thread
  • niadanniadan Member Posts: 1,635 Arc User
    jonkoca said:

    Ok watched the vid, swearing aside, it was conclusive.

    The gwf's personal pet buff stat boost equalled roughly 30-35k or so, but with a single op/dc power share party, he was routinely hitting 200k and more power. Even at one point when he dismissed his pet, power share still boosted his power more than his pet would have...

    i.e.. leave bondings as they are and tone down power sharing. Though tbh. that might actually scare people more lol.

    I would not be surprised if they do both: Nerf Bondings AND Power Sharing.
  • gromovnipljesak#8234 gromovnipljesak Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    @strathkin
    100 zen? Are you mad? They were about 3.25 mil AD on PC.
Sign In or Register to comment.