test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

THE LEGENDARY BORTASQU' COMMAND BATTLECRUISER

baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,007 Community Moderator
edited November 2023 in Galactic News Network [PC]
The Legendary Bortasqu' Command Battlecruiser is part of the Legendary Battlecruiser Bundle!

https://www.playstartrekonline.com/en/news/article/11554983
GrWzQke.png
Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
----> Contact Customer Support <----
Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
Tagged:

Comments

  • inferiorityinferiority Member Posts: 4,443 Arc User
    edited September 2023
    A weird choice of trait for the level 6 mastery - something that procs off Cannon skills on a ship that works so much better when equipped with Beams.

    Edit:
    Actually, now that I read the blog correctly and see the new Quad Cannons that enhance turn rate, the trait makes more sense.
    Post edited by inferiority on
    - - - - I n f e r i o r i t y - C o m p l e x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Everyone has a better name and Youtube Channel than me...  :/
  • ikonn#1068 ikonn Member Posts: 1,450 Arc User
    A 5/2 Battlecruiser? Please tell me that was a typo.
    -AoP- Warrior's Blood (KDF Armada) / -AoP- Qu' raD qulbo'Degh / -AoP- Project Phoenix
    Join Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010
  • finsches123finsches123 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    The KDF has two excellent legendary battlecruisers already, the D7 and the Vor'cha. The bortaSqu' could have been such a cool Juggernaut.

    That said, I need to get it right away!
  • nightkennightken Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    why did they bother to release this? they could have at least used the martok as the base so it have something good about it.

    if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
  • husanakxhusanakx Member Posts: 1,608 Arc User
    A weird choice of trait for the level 6 mastery - something that procs off Cannon skills on a ship that works so much better when equipped with Beams.

    It procs of cloak as well... which the bort has. So your golden anyway.
  • husanakxhusanakx Member Posts: 1,608 Arc User
    This is one of the coolest additions in a long time. Thank you very much.

    With so many ships in this game... and designs basically being super dogmatic at this point. Escort Destroyer Cruiser battle cruiser hanger deck cruiser... and so on everyone being so very much like the next.

    With all of that you give us a battle cruiser, with an Enhanced Battle Cloak... and interesting trait that actually makes flying an enhanced battle cloaking battle cruiser super interesting. Commander command. I admit at first my reaction was why? Command ahhh. Now I'm sold. I can fly this as a big beefy torp boat... haha how fun is that. Something new and unexpected.

    Cryptic your not going to hear it much on this one cause its an odd (I think very interesting choice). Thank you. This seems like fun... can't say that about ship packs all that often.
  • husanakxhusanakx Member Posts: 1,608 Arc User
    ikonn#1068 wrote: »
    A 5/2 Battlecruiser? Please tell me that was a typo.

    Yes its 5/3. The Enhanced battle cloak is not a typo.
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,498 Arc User
    I've got the Bort and like the autocannon, but a legendary version of the ship does not appeal to me.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • novapolaris#2925 novapolaris Member Posts: 808 Arc User
    edited September 2023
    I absolutely love the ship so far! Everyone who worked on it did a fantastic job! The ship finally getting a legendary version is very well deserved! Thank you so much! It was an instant buy for me!

    However... is the ship missing a hangar bay? (Especially with those hangar doors added to the model.)
  • cookiecrookcookiecrook Member Posts: 4,543 Arc User
    Where was this ship during the Year of the Klingon? Two years late.
    <
    > <
    > <
    >
    Looking for a new fleet? Drop by the in-game chat channel, "tenforwardforum", and say hi to the members of A Fleet Called Ten Forward (Fed) and The Orion Pirates (KDF). If you already have a fleet you are happy with, please feel free to drop by our chat channel if you are looking for a friendly bunch of helpful people to socialize with.
  • novapolaris#2925 novapolaris Member Posts: 808 Arc User
    Where was this ship during the Year of the Klingon? Two years late.

    Better late than never, as they say.
  • szerontzurszerontzur Member Posts: 2,724 Arc User
    I love the visual revamp, but as someone who 'mained' the T5 version back in the day and has a vested personal interest... this ship completely missed the mark.

    Big Soapbox ahead!
    When the Bortasqu was released it was the biggest, baddest ship in the game. It was the physically largest ship a captain could fly at the time and it had the firepower that was only rivaled by the most tactically oriented escorts in the game(specifically, the Defiant, and later the 'Bug'/JHAS). It was a giant brick that wasn't going anywhere quickly, but if anything dared to get close, it would get its head chewed off. Its console set even emphasized this point - Subspace Snare warped prey into your 'maw', and the Autocannon tore apart anything that needed an extra 'bite'.

    It was an incredible experience to warp into group content.. and see people actually follow and escort a ship of that size and.. presence. Furthermore, I used it to completely lock down entire lanes in the Elite queues with its tremendous firepower. I couldn't react very quickly(turn rates were actually scaled considerable slower back then), but when tactically positioned it was a force to be reckoned with and was durable enough to go toe to toe with any threats. I could solo Tac Cubes and even entire Red Alerts with the thing back in the day. It was everything you could imagine when you think of a massive "flagship" that inspires and "dominates" a battlescape. Obviously, the Scimitar took its place in a lot of categories when Romulans became playable, but the fondness of what the Bortasqu was capable of is still there.


    However, this.. thing.. feels like it doesn't even understand what it WANTS to be, let alone what it actually is..

    Traits/special quad cannons focusing on speed and single target attacks? This cumbersome beast is NOT an interceptor. It's bluntly a waste of time for a ship of this size and poor agility to not be running multi-target attacks at all times.

    EBC and cloaking/torpedo leaning? This isn't a ship for hiding and sneaking around, it's a big, cumbersome brick of a ship that excels at attracting attention and punishing things that get close. (I mean, the word Bortasqu literally means Revenge in Klingon.)

    Tanking? Well, it has the command spec/Suppression Barrage 3, but the 5/3 is largely unnecessary and the bridge layout leaves a LOT to be desired for debuff immunity/cleansing. The 1.5 Hull modifier is also not particularly remarkable compared to the Qoj(1.54), Klothos(1.55), or Durgath(1.55).

    A Fire Support Platform? This is honestly where I feel the ball was dropped the hardest. One of the single most defining features of the Bortasqu' line was its ability to field 5 Tactical consoles despite not having a Tactical Commander seat. Now sure, I hear "Isomags are a thing", and while that is true, without a Miracle Worker spec for the extra console and bonus damage, this thing is nowhere near the performance benchmark of excellent DEW platforms. Much like how the Avenger stole the Mogh's spotlight back in the day, the Legendary Avenger is a giant middle finger to what the Legendary Bortasqu should have been as an offensive DEW platform.

    A Flotilla Command/Support Ship? It lacks the hangars to maximize this role and compensate for its poor agility(especially its inertia). While it would be a slight departure from the existing variants, it would be in line with existing Klingon Capital ships like the Vo'quv or Sarcophagus and is largely what people were hoping for with the ship.


    Klingons RARELY get new ships; when get them, they NEED to be bleeding edge designs that can stand up to their counterparts during the long droughts between releases. "Mediocre" isn't good enough, and is the biggest reason why their sales are poor.

    TL;DR: I was both extremely hopeful and disappointed. I intend to stick with my Durgath, despite its many flaws.

    (I still got the bundle to show my support for KDF, as per usual.)
  • beaver#8175 beaver Member Posts: 31 Arc User
    edited September 2023
    (Trolling comments moderated out. - BMR)
    Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
  • calford24calford24 Member Posts: 32 Arc User
    edited September 2023
    Where's the Hanger Bay?

    I've been waiting for this ship since I bought the original Federation legendary bundle. Why did they not follow suite with the addition of the hanger bay like the other Legendary Flagships? For the record, I'm biased toward ships with pets. I have purchased every legendary ship with a hanger bay and have been waiting for a Klingon ship. I guess no buy for me. I was hoping for a legendary D7 with hanger bay to compliment the Legendary Disco Connie but no dice. Was really hoping for this one to have a hanger bay after getting the Legendary Scimitar.
    Post edited by calford24 on
  • terra510terra510 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    I think it would be better if it were a Legendary Negh'Var battlecruiser instead, seeing that the ship is canon. Don't get me wrong the Bortasqu' is ok, the design could've been a little better, but the Negh'Var should be here first.
This discussion has been closed.