test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Why will you NOT be buying the Legendary Bundle?

24

Comments

  • howtorhowtor Member Posts: 194 Arc User
    I think for a newish player it is a good deal. but for myself and 10+ years of playing I do not see a benefit
  • darknovasc01darknovasc01 Member Posts: 164 Arc User
    Other.
    Options 2 to 5 from the list.

    Extremely poor value at this price and with the current contents, not a patch on the original bundle. For a new player, which this seems to be trying to entice, the likes of the Vanguard bundle represents far better value. I have plenty of T6 coupons, and do not want or need any of the other 'fluff'. Finally, the lack of the D7 (most likely being saved for yet another overpriced single ship plus fluff bundle) and other Klingon ships represents a very poor choice for the so-called Year of Klingon.

    Halve the price, drop the fluff = better value = would likely purchase x 5 (its an Autism/OCD thing) = possible $500 in sales versus $0 as things stand.
  • vegeta50024vegeta50024 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    Other.
    I honestly do not have the resources to afford this pack, hence why I will not be buying it.

    TSC_Signature_Gen_4_-_Vegeta_Small.png
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    Cryptic should have followed how the previous Legendary bundle was set up. A cheaper price for just the legendary ships and the full cost for the premium bundle. If that is how it was set up, then this year's premium bundle would have been far better than last year's premium bundle with the Holo-Worf Bridge Officer and Monk Robes.
  • doctorstegidoctorstegi Member Posts: 1,181 Arc User
    edited February 2021
    Other.
    Another reason why i don't buy the bundle. Here is yet another copy and paste Boff without Space Trait....

    worfstats.png

    C-Store Inc. is still looking for active members on the fed side. If you don't have a fleet feel free to contact me in game @stegi.
  • vanhyovanhyo Member Posts: 229 Arc User
    > @lianthelia said:
    > The Brel should be 5/1: It's totally inferior to the Temer

    of all the reasons, this is probably not a good one. That ship is absolute beast for pvp, it has all the dream seats for escort pvper, 4/2 is acceptable because high speed engagements favor beam arrays over fore weaps
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    I only want the ships, not the extra items
    vanhyo wrote: »
    > @lianthelia said:
    > The Brel should be 5/1: It's totally inferior to the Temer

    of all the reasons, this is probably not a good one. That ship is absolute beast for pvp, it has all the dream seats for escort pvper, 4/2 is acceptable because high speed engagements favor beam arrays over fore weaps

    In a game where maybe 2-4% of the player population cares about PvP, it's a good reason. :wink:
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • foppotee#4552 foppotee Member Posts: 1,704 Arc User
    It is priced too high
    Another reason why i don't buy the bundle. Here is yet another copy and paste Boff without Space Trait....

    worfstats.png

    Cryptic should've utilized 1 or 2 of those Worf traits or abilities from that "Sphere of Influence" mission I think is is, the one where we pilot the Obelisk ship at the end.

    Too much copy & paste bare minimum instead of creativity & innovation.
  • redeyedravenredeyedraven Member Posts: 1,297 Arc User
    Other.
    The bundle is just garbage.

    No ships-only-version like last year (at least so far unannounced), also SAME price for less "exclusive" content.

    On top of that, other than the Excelsior, none of the ships are considerably better than what's already available in the T6-range.

    I also wish that this bundle would have more actual klingon ships, rather than even more Starfleet mixed in. The Ambassador for example has no business being in there.
    The Vorcha already has the same mastery-trait, and other than the Ent-C's alleged huge sacrifice the ship didn't really do much on screen.

    Still holding out for a Negh'Var, honestly.
  • vanhyovanhyo Member Posts: 229 Arc User
    edited February 2021
    > @seaofsorrows said:
    > In a game where maybe 2-4% of the player population cares about PvP, it's a good reason. :wink:

    pve powercreep is meaningless, but ye whoever designed this ship must have had pvp in mind, given that the other ships look repulsing and unattractive, i wouldnt be surprised if their starship traits/consoles (i havent seen them) are some hidden pvp gems that give some champ the edge he needs in order to pwn the ker rat.
  • ussvaliant2#1952 ussvaliant2 Member Posts: 402 Arc User
    edited February 2021
    It is priced too high
    Priced to high and re-packaging T6 ships that are already available with slightly tweaked stats.

    How about focusing on ships not already T6 and selling me something I will buy like a T6 Nova/Steamrunner/Saber/Norway
    https://i.imgur.com/r6F7yxj.jpeg
  • postagepaidpostagepaid Member Posts: 2,899 Arc User
    Nothing in this bundle interests me
    Padding and power creep, so nothing to really pique my interest.

    Especially for the greedonomic price.
  • hostagekittyhostagekitty Member Posts: 7 Arc User
    It is priced too high
    Pure and simple i want the ships but the price is just too high.
  • phoeniz1994phoeniz1994 Member Posts: 102 Arc User
    Other.
    Other:
    Simple: I am more interested other acquisitions: like the Legendary T'Liss... i wonder if the other ZStore Legendaries go on sale when the KDF Pack is released
    0he9rXF.png
  • ulysses359#8595 ulysses359 Member Posts: 22 Arc User
    The Ships being offered do not include a ship that I want
    Let's take a look on the ships one by one

    - B'Rel: Usally i don't fly raiders.... so don't want this
    - Ambassador: I bought the Support Cruiser Bundle when it came out and I'm absolute happy with my Fleet T6x Ambass. With it's full TimeAgent Spec it's a better ship than the Legendary one, imho
    - Vor'Cha: Leg. One has a 5/3 Layout but it'S still not enough to switch from my Fleet T6X to this one.

    - Excelsior: The only ship from this bundle i would buy, if i can get it separate, like the Mirror Dreadnought.
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,354 Arc User
    Other.
    I'm broke as a joke.
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • hpgibbshpgibbs Member Posts: 395 Arc User
    It is priced too high
    I wish I could select multiple options. These packs are WAY expensive anymore, and completely unreasonable for cost. Second, with the sheer amount of ships that are currently available, short of some gimmick console, there really isn't much of a difference between them, and often times the gimmicks really aren't worth even using. After that, it's just like any other ship out there to start death by FAW for example. Its the same but with a different skin.
    The Grate Lorde Cheesus
    Ship build coordinator for The Breakfast Club http://WWW.TBCSTO.COM
    Doesn't Owe Anyone EC
    Kirks Prot
  • peterconnorfirstpeterconnorfirst Member Posts: 6,225 Arc User
    edited February 2021
    Nothing in this bundle interests me
    I don't mind paying good money for stuff I like to have.

    And that is where the prolems of this pack start... The ships are bad. They are bad because they would not only NOT help me progress any of my 13 end game charaters further, they would mean a direct downgrade compared to what I already got for them. Even if I pursue some thematic phatasy for any of my chars (which I often do) I always look at stats and build options when getting them a craft. No chance here.

    What the other stuff is concerned Im glad they left out any high end or must have performance items cryptic has the habbit of getting me with on other occasions.

    For that matter, big thank you! Easy call here. :D
    animated.gif
    Looking for a fun PvE fleet? Join us at Omega Combat Division today.
    felisean wrote: »
    teamwork to reach a goal is awesome and highly appreciated
  • majcyricmajcyric Member Posts: 12 Arc User
    The Ships being offered do not include a ship that I want
    None of those ships interest me... I dislike change (I hate setting up a ship for the first time), and based on my playstyle, i'm quite picky on what ship(s) I drive into battle.. With the 2 biggest boxes a ship has to check off is having a 5/3 weapon layout and to have/be able to use Weapon System Efficiency... Plus also atm my KDF Main character is quite content driving his Na'Qjej Intel Battlecruiser, the I.K.S. Butter-Cutter..
  • redeyedravenredeyedraven Member Posts: 1,297 Arc User
    Other.
    reyan01 wrote: »
    Hahaha! And now they throw just about every sale possible (Lobi, Zen charge, AND ship sale) at the playerbase in their desperation to convince us to buy their Bundle'O fluff.
    :D

    That's not desperation, it's planned - so that people who are on the fence can start to rationalize the purchase.
  • xorvxorv Member Posts: 75 Arc User
    Other.
    I'm a KDF aligned only player, so no interest in flying Fed ships. I only like flying fast ships, so that only leaves the Legendary B'rel which may be a very slightly improved version of one of my favorite ships the Na'kuhl Raider. No interest in any of the fluff. Even if I wanted all four ships it's too expensive, and I only somewhat want one of the ships. Oh and making part of the pack things most of us already have by just playing the game and participating in events is just insulting.
  • valetharvalethar Member Posts: 173 Arc User
    It is priced too high
    Severely overpriced, as are all of the ships, let alone the 'bundles'.

    At that price, pretty much everything would have to be account unlocks for me to even consider it. I've also never been a fan of locking exclusives into highly overpriced bundles. Worf alone would be a fairly hot seller in the store, once they added space traits. As it it now, it's very lackluster with all ground traits.

    I like the game, but TBH, as the years have passed, they've gotten more and more greedy with their micros. I blame PWE for that. Even with the discount on Zen and the piddling discount on the bundle, it's just not enough value for the money, and I have a hard time rewarding blatant cash grabs.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,820 Arc User
    edited February 2021
    Other.
    vanhyo wrote: »
    > @lianthelia said:
    > The Brel should be 5/1: It's totally inferior to the Temer

    of all the reasons, this is probably not a good one. That ship is absolute beast for pvp, it has all the dream seats for escort pvper, 4/2 is acceptable because high speed engagements favor beam arrays over fore weaps

    What "dream" seating...pretty much every raider has identical seating...everything except maybe the cmdr slot is uni. The Temer has the same seating and also has a extra uni ensign

    Besides...do you think the people who fork out who knows how much money/billions of ec to buy ships and traits to be as op as they can are going to use a c-store raider? No, they're gonna use a La Sirena which has a cmdr tac/pilot, cmdr uni, lt cmdr uni, and a lt uni. It also comes with a experimental weapon designed to disable your target...knock out their engines for a couple seconds and they're likely dust
  • mattingly1mattingly1 Member Posts: 206 Arc User
    It is priced too high
    Priced too high/only want the ships. It's both, really. But the inherent failing in this is price, so I went with that.
  • jennycolvinjennycolvin Member Posts: 1,100 Arc User
    Other.
    reyan01 wrote: »
    Hahaha! And now they throw just about every sale possible (Lobi, Zen charge, AND ship sale) at the playerbase in their desperation to convince us to buy their Bundle'O fluff.
    :D

    Well, jokes on them. I for one still have some of the Lobi from the latest campaign so I'll be outfitting my Temer with two pieces of the Altamid set for the price of one.
    They won't see a single dime from me for this poor excuse of a bundle.
    kv1Ohsx.png
    Not agreeing with someone doesn't give you the right to be an TRIBBLE.

    Ci sono tre tipi di giocatori:
    - quelli a cui non va mai bene niente... e vanno sul forum a trollare;
    - quelli che sono talmente imbesuiti da credere a qualunque cosa i dev dicano, perfino che la luna è fatta di formaggio... e vanno sul forum a trollare;
    - quelli che credono a quello a cui è giusto credere, sono d'accordo con quello con cui è giusto essere d'accordo e sono critici con quello che non va;

    Ai giocatori dei primi due tipi, gratis in omaggio un bello specchio lucente su cui arrampicarsi. E una mazzata in testa per la loro poca intelligenza e compassione verso gli altri giocatori che non la pensano come loro.
    Agli appartenenti al terzo tipo, invece, dico grazie. Anche se non sempre si riesce a mantenere la calma, siete quelli per cui vale la pena incazzarsi.
  • mattingly1mattingly1 Member Posts: 206 Arc User
    It is priced too high
    Just saw my first 'bundle' excelsior. I don't exactly know what to say. To be honest, my reaction was revulsion: disgust that someone would buy this pack, and anger at Cryptic's decision to milk the community in this manner. I know, of course, that there are shills that will fork out anything for "exclusivity," and that Cryptic is targeting these people. But I am simultaneously enraged that the answer to a lackluster ship like the C-store Excelsior is to lock the "fix" behind a putrid paywall such as this, rather than wasting even a moment of development time in altering the original - despite the fact that they still continue to ask money for the massively inferior product many of us own.

    I've spent well over $1,000 on this game. But I'm angry enough to close my wallet moving forward. If anyone of any authority in this company is watching, know this: your lacking ethics and business practices sicken me.
  • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    Other.
    mattingly1 wrote: »
    Just saw my first 'bundle' excelsior. I don't exactly know what to say. To be honest, my reaction was revulsion: disgust that someone would buy this pack, and anger at Cryptic's decision to milk the community in this manner. I know, of course, that there are shills that will fork out anything for "exclusivity," and that Cryptic is targeting these people. But I am simultaneously enraged that the answer to a lackluster ship like the C-store Excelsior is to lock the "fix" behind a putrid paywall such as this, rather than wasting even a moment of development time in altering the original - despite the fact that they still continue to ask money for the massively inferior product many of us own.

    I've spent well over $1,000 on this game. But I'm angry enough to close my wallet moving forward. If anyone of any authority in this company is watching, know this: your lacking ethics and business practices sicken me.

    Yeah I saw one at ESD. My reaction was the same...just kinda disgusted. I don't want this pack to succeed because that just means more bloatware packs like this in the future.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • mattingly1mattingly1 Member Posts: 206 Arc User
    edited February 2021
    It is priced too high
    reyan01 wrote: »
    nikephorus wrote: »
    mattingly1 wrote: »
    Just saw my first 'bundle' excelsior. I don't exactly know what to say. To be honest, my reaction was revulsion: disgust that someone would buy this pack, and anger at Cryptic's decision to milk the community in this manner. I know, of course, that there are shills that will fork out anything for "exclusivity," and that Cryptic is targeting these people. But I am simultaneously enraged that the answer to a lackluster ship like the C-store Excelsior is to lock the "fix" behind a putrid paywall such as this, rather than wasting even a moment of development time in altering the original - despite the fact that they still continue to ask money for the massively inferior product many of us own.

    I've spent well over $1,000 on this game. But I'm angry enough to close my wallet moving forward. If anyone of any authority in this company is watching, know this: your lacking ethics and business practices sicken me.

    Yeah I saw one at ESD. My reaction was the same...just kinda disgusted. I don't want this pack to succeed because that just means more bloatware packs like this in the future.

    I'd have to confess that I felt a great deal of disappointment when I spotted one. Silly really, as it was inevitable, but I'm struggling to not think that the success of this FluffBundle will result in more 'bundles of ships Cryptic decide we want + fluff' in favour of ships we've been requesting (and they've been ignoring) for a very long time.

    All the more reason to cease spending entirely. We're treated like fools - like trash. For almost three weeks they ignored the primary criticism about the pack (that it was loathsome behavior to mark up the "value" of a legendary ship 250% in a time of almost unprecedented crisis for the western working man), while padding it with a few additional, mostly-meaningless niceties. When we talk, the only respondent is Kael. And however measured his interactions with us may be, one thing enough is clear: he isn't making any decisions. And the people who do write that policy? Well, they're too important to speak with nobodies like us. So rather than have them misinterpret the meaning behind my purchases moving forward, I simply won't make any at all.
This discussion has been closed.