test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
31st century ships
shadowkosh
Member Posts: 1,688 Arc User
So I am wondering how long before we see new ships or uniforms
![http://i723.photobucket.com/albums/ww231/USS-Fearnow/Signature02_zpse20388d9.png[/SIGPIC]](http://i723.photobucket.com/albums/ww231/USS-Fearnow/Signature02_zpse20388d9.png[/SIGPIC]){kind=link}
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Yes meant the disco time frame
According to Wikipedia there's 8 more.
Totally agree...
Let's be realistic here, these ships WILL get added to the game. A ship doesn't need to make lore sense to be added to a lockbox or the store, the only concerns are popularity and the ability to make a profit. If they explain it in a blog at all it'll probably either be that the ships were accidentally sent to the past by a temporal anomaly, or that Q did it (the Temporal Accords are kinda meaningless to Q since no one can stop him from doing it ).
Got this pic from Trek BBS. As for the ship...yeah, it kind of does; if so, probably re-purpose of current models to cut costs.
https://trekbbs.com/threads/star-trek-discovery-3x05-die-trying.306216/page-3
Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
Those ships fit STO ship aesthetics quite nicely. Lots of negative space, strangely proportioned shapes, and even Iconian style detached hull components. I'm just wondering, besides show budget, why Starfleet is using hundreds year old ships. Wasn't the burn 150ish years prior to the episode?
120 years. Another point to add, considering the entire galaxy lost every ship with an active warp-core, possibly millions of ships, there was little push to make much in the way of a massive replenishment of such ships. Advancement was almost stunted in the Galactic 'Dark Ages' since and until it can be guaranteed there wouldn't be another 'burn' then you can see why.
does that timeline go back to DS9 or allow for STO? cos if it doesnt then hey, STO is alt timeline where time travel is cool cos the temporal cold war resolved different/ALOT earlier (cos we did it in missions. actually yeah, ignore the terran stuff thats a better proof of alt timeline.)
So we can have pretty DISCO future ships
Bring the Enterprise XCV-330 to STO
Glasses man Section 31
First I'll say...I hate temporal mechanics. Well, knowing the fate of the Terran empire gives her motivation to save it...or at least try. That is, unless Sec31 man was just gaslighting her...which they do. Maybe they want her to find a way to bridge both universes...they may need more amoral Terrans to deal with whatever threats they face now.
For an event that has passed for a long time, undoing it will lead to greater and dangerous dire consequences, the universe in the Empresses time, has already settled and moved on. To borrow a near quote, from the Film AI, -All things have their place, once they have lived their moment in that time...there is no means to reverse it.-
If it was possible, then there has to be a greater or more sacrifice on her part to make that happen, and knowing her she will sacrifice, the only question who will it be?
Who's to say that the burn timeline is even a normal timeline or some kind of paradox aberration that is starting to come apart at the seams (hence the burn itself)? The solution could very well be to go back and put the timeline back on course before it hits the wipeout point.
Of course, I don't expect them to be that clever and the burn is probably just an excuse with some silly sci-fantasy justification to switch DSC over to using the spore drive full time like Andromeda with their slipstream jump drive.
I leave it as this....it is Alternate verse, everything since 2009 has been so. Despite the sprinkling of Prime Trek pieces in their storyline.
Getting rid of Dil, and lessen the appearance of the Terrain Empire does not make my head giddy, but I question the direction, if they know themselves on what direction they are going in the first place. So far, they have not exceeded any expectations of mine.
Hmmm...the Burn is around 100 to 120+ years back of the Future time stamp, Terrain Crossing is around 500 years back or technically the last crossing or incursion was around 380 years back.
Definitely not connected....
As much as I don't care for any of these new ships in ST:D, the idea of banning time travel remains utterly nonsensical. Things don't go away because you wave a piece of paper at it. It would necessarily require enforcement (which itself requires time travel), and especially post-burn, who has the resources to do that?
Either things are going to change later in the season, or its just the same bad writing with no thought put into it. However it gets settled, we are likely to see these ships in game.
The "last crossing" was the point just before the alternates got too far apart to make crossing possible, the burn itself could have been from the distortion/shock of it ripping completely away or collapsing into nothingness as it kept moving further away afterwards travelling along the causal link that kept them in lockstep as seen in TOS.
Of course, unless Kurtzman hired some new creative talent this line of speculation is probably too deep to realistically expect of DSC writers considering their track record so far.
Time connects all points...despite some arbitrary ban on time travel. If the writers want to go down that route, I hope not(I dislike time travel stories), Georgiou may attempt to salvage the Terran Empire, and keep the universes from drifting apart...because...why not?
Hmm, maybe she'll find a way to pester Q into helping her...maybe Q will tell her to sod off, and turn her into a toad; I'd like to see that.