test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
T6 Dyson Science Destroyer
speedforce73
Member Posts: 17 Arc User
Are there any plans to upgrade the dyson ships to T6? I really like the looks of the ships and would like to see them upgraded to T6 especially the tactical dyson science destroyer.
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
personally I would prefer pilot over intel, though anything besides temporal is good enough for me.
if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
That being said, intel or pilot would be much more appropriate for the story context behind the Dyson ships; there is nothing temporal about Dyson storyline.
Meh...there are way to many Science ships that have Temporal including all of the Romulan Science options. Pilot would be fun and would be the most unique since there are plenty of Sci ships with Intel too.
Agreed with both of these.
And if for some reason we don't want to fly that ship? For example, I fly the Vo'quv cause I like it and I like the BoP pets. BoP pets can only be used on a Vo'quv. But when they release a T6 version, I'd like to be able to pick which specialty gets applied to it (even if I can't pick to which seat) because what I'd like to use it for is apt to be different from what someone else would.
Otherwise, if the specialty they apply is one that I consider useless for my play style, then it's a complete waste on the ship.
There are no Romulan sci ships that have a commander Temp op station other than the mirror ship. The only Romulan ship in the C-store that has a commander temp op is a tac ship (I don't count Mudd's rip-off boutique).
This is an interesting idea. Here is my spin on it:
Since the Dyson ships have two modes, tac mode and sci mode, there is the possibility to have two specializations. Make the commander tac station have pilot specialization, and make the commander sci station have MW specialization. That way while the ship is in tac mode, it is a pilot ship (with pilot maneuvers enabled) and while in sci mode, it is a MW ship with the MW mechanic enabled (I'm not sure how to handle the universal console slot). Since only one commander station is active at a time, I think this would work.
+1
I too love Romulan Dyson ships, trully the sexiest in game and i hope like many others to get a T6 version !!!!!
That is a matter of opinion.
Personally i never liked the dyson ships (although the Romulan one was decent ) probably because of a certain unnamed mission.
I do feel that since the dyson ships are relative late to the party other designs which have been waiting for an update should get priority. Ships like the Nova and Oberth.
Haven't had a chance to tinker with it again, or the Mirror Crossfield which I see as many steps above the old Dysons, but they have got to do something about how bad and niche protonic weapon & exotic damage is (bonuses against Voth), which is disappointing considering the Dyson pack, correct me if I'm wrong, was among the last if not the last T5 released before T6 and how badly they aged.
That said, I'd still really like to see T6 Dysons, provided you can just remove the protonic junk weapon in Tac mode altogether, and end up with really cool looking flexible ships that can be fully science or fully tactical depending on their mode.
> (Quote)
>
> as far as using certain ships in missions...i dislike it as a whole, no matter the ship, cuz the layouts never work, all the powers are generally not in locations one would use, etc.
Yup, that’s my grip with being forced to use other ships in missions, too.
I've done something similar for a sci/tac hybrid build focusing on protonic exotic damage (there isn't much out there). I fly it in sci mode and utilize the 4pc console set with the Dyson rep deflector set. It is a good sci ship, but not nearly as powerful as the more modern ships.
Still the best looking ship in the game!
I just don't know what exactly it is about the Fed Dyson I don't like. I just... don't like it.
Anyways... after the release of the Mirror Crossfield as a transforming Sci Destroyer... I can see T6 Dysons coming. The original T5s flopped because they were pretty buggy. But I think they fixed that, and with the T6 Mirror Crossfield, opened the door to T6 Dysons.
I think it would be interesting for the dyson-rep torpedo to do proton damage instead of kinetic and the set bonuses to switch to boosting proton damage, crit chance, and crit severity instead of photon torpedo. The rift formed from the dyson torp I think should stay the way it is because it is basically a mini grav well (which is kinetic damage).
The dyson rep store tac consoles should be changed to boost ALL proton damage, not just proton weapon damage. Or add a sci console option that boosts proton exotic damage.
Oh!, i totally agree with you.. never liked the federation one, but with that vanity shield, it kinda looks good...
On appearance, I like both the warbirds and raptors with either shield visuals, while I used to really dislike the fed designs but they sort of grew on me a bit including their big deflectors. If a T6 dyson megapack was made, would definitely buy it all. So far only own the 1 warbird, and the 3 warbirds on alt account.