test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Ships of the Galactic Union

sirsitsalotsirsitsalot Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
In Enterprise, Daniels, our favorite time traveler from the 31st century spoke of an alliance that would span the galaxy, with a monument built to the Federation. The way Daniels spoke, the Federation seems to no longer exist as a sovereign power and is merely a member of a much larger Union.

In STO, we see the narrative moving in that direction, in the form of the Alliance.

In another post, I hasd suggested that if the alliance is formalized into this union during the scope of the game's lifespan, that ships no longer maintain the distinctive Federation, Klingon or Romulan designs and essentially adopt their own unique aesthetic, possibly sharing design traits of two or more member-factions to symbolize the unity of diversity.

Actually, I suggested that this should happen with the Alliance, but an alliance is not necessarily a merging of diverse societies into one organization of governance, but rather a collection of sovereign societies working together for mutual advantage. The ALLIANCE members would maintain their individual characteristics, such as uniforms and ship designs. But if they were to take that next big step and sign the Galactic Union charter, in which all member societies officially become part of a single "galactic village," that would inevitably change.

So... What might a Galactic Union ship look like? Early on, I think the aesthetics will still remain close to the respective civilization's familiar designs. But the hull material and base color scheme would be shared. for all ships. If you saw the independent film "Of Gods and Men" then you will remember that all ships that belonged to Gary Mitchell's "Galactic Order" retained their physical Klingon, Romulan or Federation design, but the color schemes for them were primarily white and secondary red indicating commonality between them as members of a single organization. The only exception was Mitchell's command ship, which was massive, and was a clever amalgamation of Romulan, Klingon and Federation design elements.

So a Galactic Union flagship would make sense to have physical characteristics of at least both Klingon and Federation design.

Of course, this discussion is strictly hypothetical. I'm just interested in people's thoughts on what form things could take going forward into this age of unity between factions.

Let's talk about it.
"There can be no meeting of the minds between two parties
if both parties are not willing to meet in the middle."
-Ambassador Samuel J. Stone
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on

Comments

  • leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,343 Arc User
    Well, we already know what ships will look like from the 26th Century Fed ship design to the 31st Century Alliance ships. So it's really a moot point.
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • spiritbornspiritborn Member Posts: 4,263 Arc User
    westmetals wrote: »
    I think it's way way too early.

    An alliance is just that - an alliance. Usually temporary. And historically, allied countries still maintained distinct militaries, etc., and even distinct equipment (except in cases like WWII when one ally is actively supplying the others, and even that was on a case by case basis... the British for example used (some) American tanks and fighters, but had their own bombers, landing craft, and some of their own man-portable weapons; also British aircraft carriers had armored decks while American carriers did not).

    While yes we've seen Klingons as full members of this "Galactic Union" in the deep future sequence (in the Temporal Cold War arc), that was specifically taking place centuries in the future, and in a much shorter-term future sequence (the timeframe of Procyon V and the Enterprise-J), the Federation and Klingons are still distinctly separate.

    There is virtually no chance that the main plotline of the game will advance that far in the timeline.

    I have to agree at least within the STO timeline we should see only some mutual projects like the Khitomer-class but should still maintain their own their technologies and cultures.
  • crm14916crm14916 Member Posts: 1,516 Arc User
    Having played the game for over 8 years, and seen a total of two years go by in-game (2409 to 2411) equates to be about 4 years for every one. At this rate, STO will have to be around for players for the next 2,400 years before the game catches up with the 31st century...

    That is, unless they bring up another time-travel arc, and take a player character from the future this time... lol...

    CM
    "Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure science." - Edwin Hubble
  • leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,343 Arc User
    crm14916 wrote: »
    Having played the game for over 8 years, and seen a total of two years go by in-game (2409 to 2411) equates to be about 4 years for every one. At this rate, STO will have to be around for players for the next 2,400 years before the game catches up with the 31st century...

    That is, unless they bring up another time-travel arc, and take a player character from the future this time... lol...

    CM

    Have to admit I'm also perplexed with how much 'story' takes part with-in a 3 year window. Discounting the TOS/DSC Toons, the Romulan Toons start 6 months in the time-line before the 2409 FED/KDF factions begin. I think they need to do a jump forward, and at least let there have been some peace! Lol.
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,362 Arc User
    What would an Alliance ship look like?

    I present to you AFS Sheer Freaking Hubris, commanded by Capt. Grunt:

    screenshot-2020-02-27-23-03-54.jpg

    (Inspired by the following meme:)

    USS-Sheer-TRIBBLE-Hubris.jpg
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,569 Arc User
    Here is the Galactic Union"s Anthem: :)

    https://youtu.be/KdOCWUgwiWs
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • vegeta50024vegeta50024 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    crm14916 wrote: »
    Having played the game for over 8 years, and seen a total of two years go by in-game (2409 to 2411) equates to be about 4 years for every one. At this rate, STO will have to be around for players for the next 2,400 years before the game catches up with the 31st century...

    That is, unless they bring up another time-travel arc, and take a player character from the future this time... lol...

    CM

    Frankly, I don't know why they insist on not moving the timeline ahead each actual year.

    I think because if they did that, it would seem like not enough happens between the years. The way they handle things is much better in my opinion.

    TSC_Signature_Gen_4_-_Vegeta_Small.png
This discussion has been closed.