That's the problem, now isn't it? They went with a complex "solution" when a simple one will do, and they've mucked it up.
The thing is they need a solution that works independent of the TFO in question and those are never that simple especially on program with as much legacy code as STO. Essentially you're intentionally looking for the solution to the wrong issue just so you can mock the developers.
That's the problem, now isn't it? They went with a complex "solution" when a simple one will do, and they've mucked it up.
The thing is they need a solution that works independent of the TFO in question and those are never that simple especially on program with as much legacy code as STO. Essentially you're intentionally looking for the solution to the wrong issue just so you can mock the developers.
How so? I stated pretty much why I belive our argument doesn't hold water aka they have to figure out a universal instead of a TFO specific solution and due a known problem of legacy code STO has such a solution is much harder to figure out then you think. Just throwing about defination of logical fallacies doesn't make you automatically correct you know.
Comments
The thing is they need a solution that works independent of the TFO in question and those are never that simple especially on program with as much legacy code as STO. Essentially you're intentionally looking for the solution to the wrong issue just so you can mock the developers.
How so? I stated pretty much why I belive our argument doesn't hold water aka they have to figure out a universal instead of a TFO specific solution and due a known problem of legacy code STO has such a solution is much harder to figure out then you think. Just throwing about defination of logical fallacies doesn't make you automatically correct you know.