test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Disco Connie in June?

135678

Comments

  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 10,296 Community Moderator
    I said stop.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • lexusk19lexusk19 Member Posts: 1,407 Arc User
    Peeps, mod said stop. So you stop. But in relation to Disco Connie, im thinking end of month.
    1e3sni150tar.jpg
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,569 Arc User
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • starliner20starliner20 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    The most likely fact is that the ship will be a redesign of the current Constitution class in R&D. Its abit silly to add a "third" constitution class when there are two existing in two different gambling areas (R&D - TOS/TMP and Lockbox - Kelvin), The C-Store could be a good idea but for a ship like that, no way.

  • timberwolf#2067 timberwolf Member Posts: 49 Media Corps
    From what i'm seeing, it'll be a Promo R&D ship, linked with the Disco D7
  • norcaler2norcaler2 Member Posts: 114 Arc User
    From what i'm seeing, it'll be a Promo R&D ship, linked with the Disco D7

    I do find myself wondering if instead of being another Infinity Promotion Ship, it'll be a separate promotion to start with that has just these two ships.

  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,857 Arc User
    edited June 2019
    (flame/troll post removed) - darkbladejk
    Post edited by darkbladejk on
    Spock.jpg

  • tymerstotymersto Member Posts: 433 Arc User
    From what i'm seeing, it'll be a Promo R&D ship, linked with the Disco D7

    Well we'll have full details on Monday, June 17. I just saw a notice in my youtube subscription crawl (of which I have Cryptic's Official STO channel subbed), that Cryptic, along with ZEFilms, will have something about the Discoprise and ST: D D7 around 11AM CDT.

    STO CBT Player - 400 day+ Vet, Currently Silver
    Cryptic, would you actulaly like me to spend actual Money? It's Simple:
    • Full, Story-driven, select from start 1-50 Klingon Side
    • Scrap current Lock Box & Lobi system for something more reasonable
    • Expand Dil and Rep/Fleet Marks to regular story content
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,950 Arc User
    tymersto wrote: »
    From what i'm seeing, it'll be a Promo R&D ship, linked with the Disco D7

    Well we'll have full details on Monday, June 17. I just saw a notice in my youtube subscription crawl (of which I have Cryptic's Official STO channel subbed), that Cryptic, along with ZEFilms, will have something about the Discoprise and ST: D D7 around 11AM CDT.

    Yeah i just saw the thumbnail on my phone, immediately went to the news section of the forums and saw nothing, then went back to YouTube and saw that it was just an announcement of an announcement
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • salazarrazesalazarraze Member Posts: 3,794 Arc User
    It's impossible that they'll be lock box ships since the current lock box will only be 6 weeks old by the time this month ends. That leaves us with C-Store (LOLNOPE), Promo and a very VERY outside shot of it being a lobi ship. But if it were a lobi ship, it would only be released after a massive lobi sale ends.
    When you see "TRIBBLE" in my posts, it's because I manually typed "TRIBBLE" and censored myself.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    reddit wrote:
    Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTIP19x0z44 (Video isn't live until monday, text comes the description)

    The Discovery era versions of the Enterprise and D7 are coming June 20th, and filmmaker extraordinaire ZEFilms was kind enough to make us this amazing video showing off the new ships and what they can do. Not only are these screen accurate versions of the ships, based on the 3D models used on Discovery and lovingly created by ship artist Donny Versiga, but they are the first ships to use Fighter Squadron pets, meaning the Discovery can have around 95 pets out at any given time.

    95 pets? How would that math work out?
    If these are hangar bay pets in some form, wouldn't the number be even? Usually you get 2 waves per hangar bay, and 1 or 2 hangar bays? How do you get to an odd number?
    Does the ship have some innate ability, console or trait that adds more? Are they also counting other sources, like the Scorpion Consumable Pet and Photonic Fleet and Fleet Support?

    It could be a typo, but a poster on reddit reminded us of something from the last 10 Forward Stream (05.06.19) mentioning that ambassadorkael worked with an unnamed fan content creator about content with this ship, and the creator mailed back: "Are you sure? Is that a typo?"
    It would kinda fit if that unnamed content creator is ZEFilms.


    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • madhatch1971madhatch1971 Member Posts: 196 Arc User
    Hummm, I wonder... If the DSC Connie and D7 are going to be in-game aircraft carriers, and operate as such, with such a high number of combat pets - that's a whole new class of ship in-game. Perhaps it will be C-Store, with both having 25th Century skins as alts?

    If they are C-Store, I have a feeling they will either cost more because of the new "fighter carrier" dynamic, or be exempt from the T6-ship voucher.

    Begs the question: will they come with bridges? Will the Connie unlock the alt uniform seen in DSC season 2?

    Many, many questions. All I hope will be answered at some point 🤗
    People ask how long have I been playing STO - well the answer is simple: I have been here since the beginning. I just haven't always had a lot to say.
  • reafisreafis Member Posts: 147 Arc User
    Either would be nice to have but I have long come to terms with what is required to get them.

    Am saving up for the big discovery pack though, could only hope they be added to that (I wish lol)
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,569 Arc User
    They would be exempt from the T6 Voucher, now. But after another C-Store release they would drop off the blacklist.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,008 Community Moderator
    edited June 2019
    The way I'm thinking these squadrons will act is each squadron will behave as one unit. So each squadron would be equivelent to, lets say one Peregrine fighter. Individually, each member of the squadron is probably rather pathetic. But massed together, the power grows. And in order to actually behave like a squadron they are probably not gonna be just mashed together and fly like a single current hanger pet. They're probably gonna be able to swarm.

    Which brings to mind a line from Babylon 5 when they went after the second Vorlon Ambassador.
    "One beesting is an annoyance, but a hundred can kill."
    Hummm, I wonder... If the DSC Connie and D7 are going to be in-game aircraft carriers, and operate as such, with such a high number of combat pets - that's a whole new class of ship in-game. Perhaps it will be C-Store, with both having 25th Century skins as alts?

    It would make sense in terms of getting feedback from players on the performance of the squadrons. C-Store means wider access, which means more people, which means more reports on performance, which means more data to work off of.

    Most prototypes have been widely accessable, either by event or by C-Store. Back when they did the Cruiser Commands, only the Avenger/Mogh had them before they were given to all cruisers. Secondary Deflectors... the Dysons prototyped them if I remember correctly. I believe Raider Flanking was prototyped on the Plesh'Brek Heavy Raider.
    Generally when we have some new feature or mechanic... it was always prototyped on a ship that was made widely available in one form or another, allowing for more feedback from the playerbase.
    Post edited by rattler2 on
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    edited June 2019
    rattler2 wrote: »
    It would make sense in terms of getting feedback from players on the performance of the squadrons. C-Store means wider access, which means more people, which means more reports on performance, which means more data to work off of.

    Most prototypes have been widely accessable, either by event or by C-Store. Back when they did the Cruiser Commands, only the Avenger/Mogh had them before they were given to all cruisers. Secondary Deflectors... the Dysons prototyped them if I remember correctly. I believe Raider Flanking was prototyped on the Plesh'Brek Heavy Raider.
    Generally when we have some new feature or mechanic... it was always prototyped on a ship that was made widely available in one form or another, allowing for more feedback from the playerbase.
    You just game me... *gulp*... hope, that this might be the case...

    We shall see on Monday, if I shall curse you name till the end of days... or not... >:)

    EDIT: but then on second thought.. the https://sto.gamepedia.com/Phased-Waveform_Beacon may have been our Beta test for the new tech...
    (OMG... the emotional roller coaster ride... **UGH** )
  • alonaralonar Member Posts: 280 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    The way I'm thinking these squadrons will act is each squadron will behave as one unit. So each squadron would be equivelent to, lets say one Peregrine fighter. Individually, each member of the squadron is probably rather pathetic. But massed together, the power grows. And in order to actually behave like a squadron they are probably not gonna be just mashed together and fly like a single current hanger pet. They're probably gonna be able to swarm.

    Which brings to mind a line from Babylon 5 when they went after the second Vorlon Ambassador.
    "One beesting is an annoyance, but a hundred can kill."
    Hummm, I wonder... If the DSC Connie and D7 are going to be in-game aircraft carriers, and operate as such, with such a high number of combat pets - that's a whole new class of ship in-game. Perhaps it will be C-Store, with both having 25th Century skins as alts?

    It would make sense in terms of getting feedback from players on the performance of the squadrons. C-Store means wider access, which means more people, which means more reports on performance, which means more data to work off of.

    Most prototypes have been widely accessable, either by event or by C-Store. Back when they did the Cruiser Commands, only the Avenger/Mogh had them before they were given to all cruisers. Secondary Deflectors... the Dysons prototyped them if I remember correctly. I believe Raider Flanking was prototyped on the Plesh'Brek Heavy Raider.
    Generally when we have some new feature or mechanic... it was always prototyped on a ship that was made widely available in one form or another, allowing for more feedback from the playerbase.

    This is right, except for one new ship mechanic, the vanguard ship's escorts.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 10,296 Community Moderator
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    ....

    you tease...
  • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,008 Community Moderator
    alonar wrote: »
    This is right, except for one new ship mechanic, the vanguard ship's escorts.

    The Vanguard ships are C-Store though. The only stipulation for them is they first have to be used by Jem'Hadar characters.
    tousseau wrote: »
    You just game me... *gulp*... hope, that this might be the case...

    We shall see on Monday, if I shall curse you name till the end of days... or not... >:)

    EDIT: but then on second thought.. the https://sto.gamepedia.com/Phased-Waveform_Beacon may have been our Beta test for the new tech...
    (OMG... the emotional roller coaster ride... **UGH** )

    I'm hopeful too. And I doubt the Beacon was the beta test because we can't control them like we can hanger pets. It just summons ships to fight for us like the older Delta and Pirate beacons and makes use of the Hur'q AI.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    edited June 2019
    ok... so 3 bursts of 6... 5 man team = 95 ships?
    Is that where the "95" comes from?
  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,165 Arc User

    Very excited for this! That said, I certainly hope this isn't true (despite what I see with my own eyes in that video).

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • crypticarmsmancrypticarmsman Member Posts: 4,111 Arc User
    the torp dont seem to be firing from where the ship actually is
    also
    tick tock tock tick

    Those are all small shuttleraft/pods being launched. There was no torpedo fired in the Discoprise animated GIF that was tweeted.
    Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    TOS_Connie_Sig_final9550Pop.jpg
    PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
  • salazarrazesalazarraze Member Posts: 3,794 Arc User
    tousseau wrote: »
    You just game me... *gulp*... hope, that this might be the case...
    Ehhh, I wouldn't get too excited. Even if by some crazy stupid decision by Cryptic, they DID release it in the c-store, they would release an at best "meh" quality ship from the boff/console layout standpoint. Personally, I'd rather have a good quality boff/console layout in the form of a grand prize ship(lock box/lobi/promo) instead of a craptastic quality c-store ship.
    When you see "TRIBBLE" in my posts, it's because I manually typed "TRIBBLE" and censored myself.
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    tousseau wrote: »
    You just game me... *gulp*... hope, that this might be the case...
    Ehhh, I wouldn't get too excited. Even if by some crazy stupid decision by Cryptic, they DID release it in the c-store, they would release an at best "meh" quality ship from the boff/console layout standpoint. Personally, I'd rather have a good quality boff/console layout in the form of a grand prize ship(lock box/lobi/promo) instead of a craptastic quality c-store ship.

    If only there was a way to to get C store ships to have those states...almost like a Fleet ship
    GwaoHAD.png
  • salazarrazesalazarraze Member Posts: 3,794 Arc User
    edited June 2019
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    tousseau wrote: »
    You just game me... *gulp*... hope, that this might be the case...
    Ehhh, I wouldn't get too excited. Even if by some crazy stupid decision by Cryptic, they DID release it in the c-store, they would release an at best "meh" quality ship from the boff/console layout standpoint. Personally, I'd rather have a good quality boff/console layout in the form of a grand prize ship(lock box/lobi/promo) instead of a craptastic quality c-store ship.

    If only there was a way to to get C store ships to have those states...almost like a Fleet ship
    Nah you somehow misunderstand that. I'm didn't even mention fleet level vs non-fleet level. I'm referring to craptastic ships with horrible boff/console layouts like the T6 Excelsior and Intrepid. The Excelsior is so underwhelming and WAAAAAYYYY too engineering heavy. It's almost as bad as the Samsar which sucks since the Excelsior is one of my favorite ships visually. I'd rather have a "grand prize" ship with a better boff layout over a cheaper/easier to acquire c-store ship that sucks.
    When you see "TRIBBLE" in my posts, it's because I manually typed "TRIBBLE" and censored myself.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,008 Community Moderator
    There are C-Store ships that actually work too. Not all C-Store ships are as bad off as the T6 Excelsior.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    tousseau wrote: »
    You just game me... *gulp*... hope, that this might be the case...
    Ehhh, I wouldn't get too excited. Even if by some crazy stupid decision by Cryptic, they DID release it in the c-store, they would release an at best "meh" quality ship from the boff/console layout standpoint. Personally, I'd rather have a good quality boff/console layout in the form of a grand prize ship(lock box/lobi/promo) instead of a craptastic quality c-store ship.

    If only there was a way to to get C store ships to have those states...almost like a Fleet ship

    Two of the top 3 ships in the game right now are C-Store ships.. the Gagarin/Qugh and the Jem'Hadar Warship.

    The only 'better' ship is the Vaadwaur Juggernaut.

    If you think you can't get quality ships from the C-Store, you're very much mistaken. Lobi/Lockbox ships usually have a little something special, but none of them are significantly ahead of C-Store offerings.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 10,296 Community Moderator
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
This discussion has been closed.