That's quite the paradox, how could you nerf nerf when the nerf is nerfed. But how would the nerf be nerfed when the nerf is nerfed? This allows the nerf not to be nerfed since the nerf is nerfed? But if the nerf isn't nerfed, it could still nerf nerfs. But as soon as the nerf is nerfed, the nerf power is lost. So paradoxally it the nerf nerf lost its nerf, while it's still nerfed, which cannot be because the nerf was unable to nerf.
"Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
— Sabaton, "Great War"
Comments
https://www.google.com/amp/www.startrek.com/news/remembering-trek-guest-star-TRIBBLE-miller-1928-2019?amp
I call it, the Stoutes paradox.
What kind of parents would name their kid TRIBBLE? Although, it might be a good name for a pet.
It didn't used to be an insult (or a euphemism).
— Sabaton, "Great War"
Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/