test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

DO AWAY WITH ON-DEMAND PATCHING AND SERVER THROTTLING?

salvation4salvation4 Member Posts: 1,167 Arc User
As the title suggest and also based on info from another thread where throttling was brought mentioned,

For a YES, it means that it will have everyone on the same patch level in the game thereby reducing the usage of server resources required to patch and play the game at the same time thereby giving better performance also disabling the throttling of the server resources..

For a NO, it means the current system stays in place with more server resources being used to patch while you play thereby degrading performance..
Adrian-Uss Sovereign NCC-73811 (LVL 65 FED ENG) UR/E MKXV Fleet Intel Assault Cruiser (April 2012) (Main)
Adu-Uss Firefox NCC-93425-F (LVL 65 FED AoY ENG) UR/VR MKXV Fleet Intel Assault Cruiser (July 2016)
Jean-Uss Seratoga Ravenna (LVL 60 FED Delta ENG) UC/R MKVI Bajoran Escort (April 2018)
Dubsa-RRW Mnaudh (LVL 50 FED allied ROM Delta ENG) Warbird (May 2018)
Marop-IKS Orunthi (LVL 50 KNG Delta ENG) BoP (May 2018)
Kanak'lan-TRIBBLE (LVL 65 DOM Gamma ENG) TRIBBLE (June 2018)
Post edited by salvation4 on

DO AWAY WITH ON-DEMAND PATCHING AND SERVER THROTTLING? 19 votes

Yes
94%
fihillrizadragoshawnasedo0relicthiefjansil#1393s4h1b#8126bulldogmacraggexenosmoward101#8752rsoblivionforstoguyeisengratzanswer#2172salvation4sgtfloydpepper#7911rast3rman#9798shadowleopard64#3762 18 votes
No
0%
Not sure
5%
blazewamp 1 vote

Comments

  • Options
    xenosmoxenosmo Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    Yes
    Just to let you know that ive read this post and I agree :)
  • Options
    salvation4salvation4 Member Posts: 1,167 Arc User
    Yes
    xenosmo wrote: »
    Just to let you know that ive read this post and I agree :)

    Xeno there are alot more threads and when I came back I was surprised to see them and the number of threads regarding server issues is going up.. :) This poll was just to get a sense of how many are facing issues and hopefully a dev would look at this..
    Adrian-Uss Sovereign NCC-73811 (LVL 65 FED ENG) UR/E MKXV Fleet Intel Assault Cruiser (April 2012) (Main)
    Adu-Uss Firefox NCC-93425-F (LVL 65 FED AoY ENG) UR/VR MKXV Fleet Intel Assault Cruiser (July 2016)
    Jean-Uss Seratoga Ravenna (LVL 60 FED Delta ENG) UC/R MKVI Bajoran Escort (April 2018)
    Dubsa-RRW Mnaudh (LVL 50 FED allied ROM Delta ENG) Warbird (May 2018)
    Marop-IKS Orunthi (LVL 50 KNG Delta ENG) BoP (May 2018)
    Kanak'lan-TRIBBLE (LVL 65 DOM Gamma ENG) TRIBBLE (June 2018)
  • Options
    sgtfloydpepper#7911 sgtfloydpepper Member Posts: 1,111 Arc User
    Yes
    I wouldn't say do away with it completely, just have it turned OFF by default.
    1xe027q.png
  • Options
    salvation4salvation4 Member Posts: 1,167 Arc User
    Yes
    @ambassadorkael#6946 can you put this idea across please?
    Adrian-Uss Sovereign NCC-73811 (LVL 65 FED ENG) UR/E MKXV Fleet Intel Assault Cruiser (April 2012) (Main)
    Adu-Uss Firefox NCC-93425-F (LVL 65 FED AoY ENG) UR/VR MKXV Fleet Intel Assault Cruiser (July 2016)
    Jean-Uss Seratoga Ravenna (LVL 60 FED Delta ENG) UC/R MKVI Bajoran Escort (April 2018)
    Dubsa-RRW Mnaudh (LVL 50 FED allied ROM Delta ENG) Warbird (May 2018)
    Marop-IKS Orunthi (LVL 50 KNG Delta ENG) BoP (May 2018)
    Kanak'lan-TRIBBLE (LVL 65 DOM Gamma ENG) TRIBBLE (June 2018)
Sign In or Register to comment.