Good Afternoon Star Trek: Online Developers,
Question, why is the starship name Gorkon prohibited ? I have for several months attempted to name my Excelsior Class Starship USS Gorkon (NCC-40512), and the name Gorkon will not be accepted. A message appears: "The field contains restricted words". Is this an error ? Would you all correct this ? I would like to name my starship the Gorkon.
I understand why the starship name Enterprise is being restricted, to some degree. I have also noticed that the starship name Defiant is also restricted.
Thank You !
0
Comments
http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Gorkon
https://sto.gamepedia.com/Gorkon_Science_Battlecruiser_(T6)
Could be the reason why. It's already the class name of a Klingon Science ship.
Could also be that it's the name of a ship in the TNG book series. I.K.S. Gorkon: A Good Day To Die.
It's verboten, evident by you not being able to choose it. A bunch of guesses why, but none of that matters. That's it.
Yeah, I'm just guessing. I'd go with the ship name from the book series or science ship one as best guesses on it.
Flipping through a translator, Gorkon translates as Gorkon in every language for it.
The only translation I can find is with it broken down into certain components. Go r kon which translates from japanese as you r crowded.
So best guess is because of the ship name in both the TNG book series and/or the ship class name, like Enterprise or Defiant, it's locked out due to lore usage.
My character Tsin'xing
I don't know if Gorkon isn't allowed because it's a canon character name because Kahless was allowed when I last tried (I've had both an IKS & a USS Kahless before).
I myself have spent a considerable amount of money making an accurate Chang, but i was slightly dissapointed when I had to modify the name a little, in order for it to be acceptable.
My 'Chang' alt also has familiar Boffs, But instead of Gorkon, It's Gorkan, and Azetbur, has become Aze'bur.
I also Have a Khan flying a Reliant, again with a slight twist of the names.
It's not movie-based, I tried Martok and was not allowed. curiously, Kahless worked just fine.
USS Fearless NCC 14598. Used to ferry Kosinski and his assistant to the Enterprise to sort out ineffiencies in the Enterprise's warp core.
I have the ships name and the registry as well as the excelsior class ship.
Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
I think that's unlikely (as far as being a reason why we can't use a select few names from the IP). The issue with restricted names probably comes from Cryptic and/or CBS wanting to preserve several key names that have prominence in canon (if only to encourage players to think more creatively about their choice in ships and crews.) Take for example Voyager, Excelsior, and Enterprise (but not Saratoga, Intrepid, and Columbia.)
Gorkon apparently was included in that list. Okay, we can't use it, so move on.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
"Let them eat static!"
U.S.S. Galactica
U.S.S. Long Shot
U.S.S. Hull Zero Three
U.S.S. Heart of Gold
U.S.S. Elmo
U.S.S. X-Wing
U.S.S. Farscape
U.S.S. Pillar of Autumn
U.S.S. Yoda
U.S.S. Frodo
U.S.S. Harlan Ellison
U.S.S. Sailor Moon
U.S.S. Yamato (also a Space Battleship)
U.S.S. Duncan Idaho
It's worth at this point citing the Terms of Use:
Cryptic is not responsible for ensuring that players don't use the names of other IP's (inside and out of the Star Trek Franchise) for ships, boffs, and for that matter character handles (see. me) in the main game. We certify that ourselves by agreeing to the TOU. If there's a problem, then we are wholly responsible for content abuse, not them.
So, the devs' restrictions are for the obvious expletives (although that returns a different error message than restricted names) and obvious names from intra-IP content that Cryptic didn't want players to use for their own reasons. What could they be? Well, maybe it's as simple as "they want us to be more creative." If approached honestly, that helps support the STO narrative and provides more space for personal investment (what we make is more our own).
(BTW, lock in Discovery now if you want to make a 25c equivalent, you never know when Cryptic might update the restricted list )
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!