Ok maybe not, but it's fun to do nevertheless. And taking a look in the mirror to reflect upon oneself can be quite important to do from time to time.
Cause even when you make a joke about the Kelvin timeline not being real Trek, someone will start complaining about what they perceive as 'purists', 'cancer to the franchise' and what more.
All the while ignoring that they are as narrow minded and extreme in their opinions in that they do not accept any criticism or other points of view as these so-called Kelvin-haters. The first person who couldn't take a joke has already been found here.
Ok maybe not, but it's fun to do nevertheless. And taking a look in the mirror to reflect upon oneself can be quite important to do from time to time.
Cause even when you make a joke about the Kelvin timeline not being real Trek, someone will start complaining about what they perceive as 'purists', 'cancer to the franchise' and what more.
All the while ignoring that they are as narrow minded and extreme in their opinions in that they do not accept any criticism or other points of view as these so-called Kelvin-haters. The first person who couldn't take a joke has already been found here.
1.) Someone calling you out on your intolerance doesn't make them intolerant. 2.) Repeating old jokes isn't funny. You going to break out some vintage "yo mama" jokes next? How about, do all the ladies call you daddy because your jokes are old and tired?
"I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am."
1). True, in theory. In reality, the manner in which the Kelvin fans attack everyone who doesn't entirely embrace the Kelvin timeline is what makes the difference here though.
2.) It was used as a device to get responses and prove a point. Sigh.
1). True, in theory. In reality, the manner in which the Kelvin fans attack everyone who doesn't entirely embrace the Kelvin timeline is what makes the difference here though.
2.) It was used as a device to get responses and prove a point. Sigh.
1.) What? People you attack should tolerate it, and if not, they can't take a joke? But people shouldn't attack you, because that's intolerant, and they should have more respect than to make jokes about you and your opinion, especially when you present your opinion as a fact? I guess I'm just not smart enough to understand your point, because after all, you're not just simply being a hypocrite, right?
2.) Acting out for attention? Yeah, I have a three-year-old nephew who does that.
"I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am."
'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
Judge Dan Haywood
'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
Hmm, well it does mention Zach at the same time as Joe Gatt, so it could be a hint he is coming in for some further Kelvin Timeline missions, which would be fun.
Thought it would be fun to watch JJTrek. Turned out stabbing myself with my mouse while watching it was more fun and less painful.
Time to contact the SPCA... Just what did your mouse do to you, to warrant such punishment?
1). True, in theory. In reality, the manner in which the Kelvin fans attack everyone who doesn't entirely embrace the Kelvin timeline is what makes the difference here though.
2.) It was used as a device to get responses and prove a point. Sigh.
1.) What? People you attack should tolerate it, and if not, they can't take a joke? But people shouldn't attack you, because that's intolerant, and they should have more respect than to make jokes about you and your opinion, especially when you present your opinion as a fact? I guess I'm just not smart enough to understand your point, because after all, you're not just simply being a hypocrite, right?
2.) Acting out for attention? Yeah, I have a three-year-old nephew who does that.
The fact that you couldn't reply without resorting to name-calling proves my point enough. And see, for further examples, the threads where people were called the things I've quoted here.
As for attention: you do realise that it's a Forum, right? I have yet to find the first Forum-user who isn't posting his opinion because he wants it to be read. It'd be kinda weird if not outright illogical if I or anyone else were posting here if I of them were not looking for attention.
I'm afraid it won't be possible without the extremists (on both sides) cooling off a bit and starting to accept different opinions without resorting to name-calling.
Though most of the other replies here are promising.
Correction, "the manner in which some fans of both Trek timelines attack everyone who doesn't entirely embrace their preferred timeline" would be far more accurate.
Comments
He might still be in the revamped tutorial, but I haven't rolled a new 25c Fed in a while so I can't remember for certain.
Zachary Quinto isn't even a real Trek actor. Why is he mentioned there?
Didn't he play a Vulcan in a movie or something?
(lol)
Yeah I believe it was a Star Wars movie. I could be wrong though
Yeah, Yeah! The one where Darth Vader kills Kirk, right?
The spoiler tag is there for a reason, you jerk.
That's true. TRIBBLE do have to compulsively remind everyone around them what TRIBBLE they are.
Namecalling.
Also, I'm not quite sure how to use spoiler tags.
Quit picking on me!
Meanie!
(Lol)
I don't understand your comment. Try using less *'s
Ok maybe not, but it's fun to do nevertheless. And taking a look in the mirror to reflect upon oneself can be quite important to do from time to time.
Cause even when you make a joke about the Kelvin timeline not being real Trek, someone will start complaining about what they perceive as 'purists', 'cancer to the franchise' and what more.
All the while ignoring that they are as narrow minded and extreme in their opinions in that they do not accept any criticism or other points of view as these so-called Kelvin-haters. The first person who couldn't take a joke has already been found here.
Offensive Foul: Faulty Comparison Fallacy. 1 minute agonizer penalty.
1.) Someone calling you out on your intolerance doesn't make them intolerant. 2.) Repeating old jokes isn't funny. You going to break out some vintage "yo mama" jokes next? How about, do all the ladies call you daddy because your jokes are old and tired?
2.) It was used as a device to get responses and prove a point. Sigh.
1.) What? People you attack should tolerate it, and if not, they can't take a joke? But people shouldn't attack you, because that's intolerant, and they should have more respect than to make jokes about you and your opinion, especially when you present your opinion as a fact? I guess I'm just not smart enough to understand your point, because after all, you're not just simply being a hypocrite, right?
2.) Acting out for attention? Yeah, I have a three-year-old nephew who does that.
My character Tsin'xing
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
Was he Jar Jar?
The fact that you couldn't reply without resorting to name-calling proves my point enough. And see, for further examples, the threads where people were called the things I've quoted here.
As for attention: you do realise that it's a Forum, right? I have yet to find the first Forum-user who isn't posting his opinion because he wants it to be read. It'd be kinda weird if not outright illogical if I or anyone else were posting here if I of them were not looking for attention.
This.
I'm afraid it won't be possible without the extremists (on both sides) cooling off a bit and starting to accept different opinions without resorting to name-calling.
Though most of the other replies here are promising.
True.
Well I don't think it'll be necessary to vote for this. His actor is the only one that's left unfortunately
So I guess we'd just have to vote for more Spock in Star Trek Online.