test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Federation Discussion

TOS Ship suggestions

tehepicpwnzertehepicpwnzer Member Posts: 23 Arc User
in Federation Discussion
Hi dev team! I would like to bring an interesting resource to your attention. There is a site called Ex Astris Scientia (http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/my_ships.htm) It is a wonderful site with a lot of interesting ships that aren't in the show that look like they should be. Such as the Asia class, a smaller version of the Constitution, or the Kremlin a interesting looking ship. Or the Lincoln a more modern take on the Daedalus class (More curves than Daedalus). They could show up as lock box ships, or if you feel they fit a role you have yet to really fill, maybe they can make the cut for your new expansion.
Star Wars next?

26th Fleet

Comments

  • tom61stotom61sto Member Posts: 3,676 Arc User
    Non-canon for the most part, they only have rights to the canonical on-screen stuff, at least without separate negotiation that is a huge pain they last went through for the Vesta class.
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,016 Arc User
    TOS Miranda
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • starshipserenitystarshipserenity Member Posts: 54 Arc User
      Yorktown-Class

      latest?cb=20110806162543
      ==
      defiance_by_killabc-d8br45s.jpg
      ==
      build_3_shot_2.jpg
      Through breaking waves and vicious storms /
      Against lightning's fury and thunder's scorn /
      Only through fire is order forged /
      WIth vibrant glory /
      A sword
      =/\=

      I.S.S. Excalibur NCC-1664
    • dataweaver42dataweaver42 Member Posts: 17 Arc User
      tom61sto wrote: »
      Non-canon for the most part, they only have rights to the canonical on-screen stuff, at least without separate negotiation that is a huge pain they last went through for the Vesta class.
      Frankly, the ones I'd like to see them negotiate for would be the Destroyer and Dreadnought from the (non-canon) Star Fleet Manual: basically, a constitution-class saucer section with either one or three nacelles rather than two.

    • giovanniblasinigiovanniblasini Member Posts: 26 Arc User
      null

      The day I can run the USS Diana, NCC-589, as the Hermes class she was meant to be will be a happy day.
    • captkelly31#5645 captkelly31
      captkelly31#5645
             Member Posts: 392 Arc User
      What is really needed is TOS style generic ships for canon/foundry background decor.
    • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,016 Arc User
      latest?cb=20060612020143

      TOS version of the Miranda would be very nice
      NMXb2ph.png
        "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
        -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
      • waldotrekwaldotrek Member Posts: 319 Arc User
        I would LOOVVEEE a TOS carrier with TOS Shuttles! By love I mean I have my credit card at the ready.
        Former Moderator 10-28-16
      • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
        I would LUV to get the USS Franklin and ALL the TOS Kelvin-verse ships to fly.
        B)
        STO Member since February 2009.
        I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
        Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
        upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
      Sign In or Register to comment.