test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Tier 6 Dyson ships

So i am really looking forward to and Cant wait for a Tier 6 dyson ship, im really enjoying flying around in my KDF Tactical dyson Destroyer :)
What id also like is the ability to Craft more Proton weapons! :) Am having to settle with protonic Polaron weapons which are ok, But id prefer more proton weapons, to go with the experimental proton weapon and the proton Dual Heavy Cannons...... :)

Comments

  • nickcastletonnickcastleton Member Posts: 1,212 Arc User
    correct me if im wrong but wasn't there a statement that the ships wernt popular.
    Hell the only one i have is the event ship and that's only cause rommies have no good t5 or 6 sci ships.
    0bzJyzP.gif





    "It appears we have lost our sex appeal, captain."- Tuvok
  • lawstanzlawstanz Member Posts: 70 Arc User
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but my take was that the Dysons weren't popular because the Vestas were essentially the same plus they had a hanger for extra dps. If the T6 version could offer an actual alternative, then it might be worth considering.
  • kyrrokkyrrok Member Posts: 1,352 Arc User
    I never caught word on any of it. Are you sure it's true?
  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,165 Arc User
    kyrrok wrote: »
    I never caught word on any of it. Are you sure it's true?

    No, he isn't sure. Did you see where he said "correct me if I'm wrong" and "my take"?

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,950 Arc User
    I personally think the Dyson ships are ugly as sin, Id never buy them even if they were insanely OP
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    The Dyson Science Destroyers were not particularly popular from what I recall.

    Yes, they are T5 Science ships for the KDF and RR something that is sorely missing from those faction's ship lineup. But in an interview with Priority One Podcast Al "Captain Gecko" Rivera made it abundantly clear that science ship were not popular with the KDF and RR. I believe he mentioned something like selling a dozen or so of them being purchased per week at best for the KDF and RR factions.

    On the Fed side, it was kinda "meh". Much better science ships already existed so what was the point? Plus I think all the ships were buggy when released so that must have hurt sales as well. Most people would not buy "broken" ships hoping that they will be fixed soon by the developer.

    While both of the KDF and RR looked nice, I don't recall a lot of people liking the looks of the Federation variant.
  • berginsbergins Member Posts: 3,453 Arc User
    I think you meant abhorrition.
    "Logic is a little tweeting bird chirping in a meadow. Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell BAD." - Spock
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    Now why would you expect a t6 version of ships that are stated to be using some of the most advanced, bleeding edge, technology available to the alliance? I mean come on they were outdated months after their own release with the advent of a whole new tier of vessels and never sold well so how advanced could they be really? /sarcasm
  • trillbuffettrillbuffet Member Posts: 861 Arc User
    lawstanz wrote: »
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but my take was that the Dysons weren't popular because the Vestas were essentially the same plus they had a hanger for extra dps. If the T6 version could offer an actual alternative, then it might be worth considering.

    They are re-selling the flagships even the KDF one. You can be sure that they are going to re-sell every ship as a T6 before this cow tips over.
  • samt1996samt1996 Member Posts: 2,856 Arc User
    Yes I wouldn't mind T6 Dyson ships they would likely correct all the issues.
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    samt1996 wrote: »
    Yes I wouldn't mind T6 Dyson ships they would likely correct all the issues.

    I wouldnt mind one either if 1)There were more proton weapons to load it with OR 2)They made that proton cannon removable
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    Are the Dyson ships even flown anymore?

    I cannot recall seeing any recently, since I started playing again.

    Of course... Never say never. Perhaps with some tweaking and new hulls, Cryptic may take the risk of putting out a T6 version. Will probably be on the bottom of their "to do" list, though...
  • blitzy4blitzy4 Member Posts: 839 Arc User
    I know this may not go over too well, but I was hoping the Dyson's and Vesta's would be rolled into the same ship essentially. Give a science ship the forth slot and the special toggle, but allow the forth slot to be player selected.
    jKixCmJ.jpg
    "..and like children playing after sunset, we were surrounded by darkness." -Ruri Hoshino



  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    I would welcome them.


    The two information I remember the devs saying:
    1) 3-Packs are popular and work well for them. They never stated any explicit exceptions.
    2) Science Vessels are not as popular as other types of ships. (I think this is not just a KDF or RR issue, the specific issue for the KDF and RR is that they are generally not as popular as FED, I think.)

    Those two aren't mutally exclusive - a Science 3-pack might be better for revenue than just a single Science Vessel, but not as good as a Cruiser or Escort 3-pack.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited February 2016
    Man, there was a lot of drama about the DSDs. Opening threads on them is like picking open a large scab.

    Bugs, set items scattered to the 4 winds, being the first 9-ship mega pack which blew a lot of people's minds at the time, and a near-universal hatred of the near-white texture. People all over the place were asking for faction style textures but Cryptic was not having any of that. Cryptic changed their minds and implemented it live on around Delta Rising. WAY too late.

    There's also another huge fail on the DSDs... The Proton DHCs.
    1. There are only 2 Proton damage weapons in the game. These and the Experimental Proton Weapon from Dyson Rep. Cryptic failed to expand upon Proton damage, so these weapons were a dead end. FAIL.

    2. The Proton DHCs were only usable in "Destroyer Mode" of the DSD. So to use it, you had to switch outside of being a Science Vessel. FAIL.

    It would have been interesting if the DSDs had an arsenal of hard hitting Proton weaponry available to it and that it could have been used in all modes. It would have synergized well with the Proton-damage oriented DSD-only consoles. But of course that didn't happen.

    FAIL

    There's a lot of FAIL written all over the DSDs. Statistically, they get the job done. They're also one of the very few Non-Premium ship selections for KDF & Rom players for Science Vessels. For the Feds, there were far superior Science Vessels already when the DSDs came out, and today, they have access to even better Science Vessels. But there's a lot of bad history with these average ships.

    If they were to get the T6 treatment, Cryptic has to drastically change these things.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    tousseau wrote: »
    Are the Dyson ships even flown anymore?

    I cannot recall seeing any recently, since I started playing again.

    Of course... Never say never. Perhaps with some tweaking and new hulls, Cryptic may take the risk of putting out a T6 version. Will probably be on the bottom of their "to do" list, though...

    I've seen 3 roms and 2 klingons using it in the last 10d or so... not counting the 2 alts I have in theirs atm
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    I've seen 3 roms and 2 klingons using it in the last 10d or so... not counting the 2 alts I have in theirs atm

    I have a KDF and RR that flies the anniversary versions of the DSDs.

    Why? Because what other choice do I have if I want to fly a faction specific science vessel for both of those factions? Both of them will be moving on to the Krenim science vessel.

    I will probably place my KDF sci captain in a Klavek Class Pilot Raptor (the "sciency" version) later this year. It's not a real science vessel since there is no sensor analysis and no Cmdr Boff science station. At least the universal console Subspace Sinkhole Generator has a "sciency" ability.
  • smokeybacon90smokeybacon90 Member Posts: 2,252 Arc User
    Please give T6 [Insert personal favourite T5 ship here]!
    EnYn9p9.jpg
  • schloopdooschloopdoo Member Posts: 373 Arc User
    edited February 2016
    Given how popular the Paradox Dreadnought seems to be, I wonder whether the Dyson wasn't a big seller because it was a science ship, or because it wasted a fore weapon slot on an unremovable weapon of an energy type nobody wanted to use. I know why I never bought them, and I'll bet it's not the reason the developers think.
  • sinn74sinn74 Member Posts: 1,149 Arc User
    lawstanz wrote: »
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but my take was that the Dysons weren't popular because the Vestas were essentially the same plus they had a hanger for extra dps. If the T6 version could offer an actual alternative, then it might be worth considering.

    If they offered a T6 cross- faction version type of thing with the Vesta, no one would ever need touch the gimmick destroyers again.
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    Man, there was a lot of drama about the DSDs. Opening threads on them is like picking open a large scab.

    Bugs, set items scattered to the 4 winds, being the first 9-ship mega pack which blew a lot of people's minds at the time, and a near-universal hatred of the near-white texture. People all over the place were asking for faction style textures but Cryptic was not having any of that. Cryptic changed their minds and implemented it live on around Delta Rising. WAY too late.

    There's also another huge fail on the DSDs... The Proton DHCs.
    1. There are only 2 Proton damage weapons in the game. These and the Experimental Proton Weapon from Dyson Rep. Cryptic failed to expand upon Proton damage, so these weapons were a dead end. FAIL.

    2. The Proton DHCs were only usable in "Destroyer Mode" of the DSD. So to use it, you had to switch outside of being a Science Vessel. FAIL.

    It would have been interesting if the DSDs had an arsenal of hard hitting Proton weaponry available to it and that it could have been used in all modes. It would have synergized well with the Proton-damage oriented DSD-only consoles. But of course that didn't happen.

    FAIL

    There's a lot of FAIL written all over the DSDs. Statistically, they get the job done. They're also one of the very few Non-Premium ship selections for KDF & Rom players for Science Vessels. For the Feds, there were far superior Science Vessels already when the DSDs came out, and today, they have access to even better Science Vessels. But there's a lot of bad history with these average ships.

    If they were to get the T6 treatment, Cryptic has to drastically change these things.


    ^ 100% agreed.

    Proton can work, but the most of it you're getting from the space set synergy (clickety abilities). I have a full Proton build, with 4x Epic Protonic Tact consoles. So, essentially you're boosting half Polaron, and half Proton for the clickety stuff (and maybe 2 weps, only one of which you can permanently use. FAIL. Oh yeah, and you can forget about the CrtH on those Tact consoles. FAIL.

    They pretty much abandoned Proton weps before even giving them a chance. FAIL.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • nikeixnikeix Member Posts: 3,972 Arc User
    So rather than T6-ifying them, what needs to be done to them to make them solid offerings in their own right?

    Personally I like the look (at least the Romulan ones - totally deliver on the idea that they were built after examining the Obelisk carrier for a while).
Sign In or Register to comment.