test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Star Trek Online General Discussion

Prometheus MVAE

htibbshtibbs Member Posts: 2 Arc User
in Star Trek Online General Discussion
Not sure if anyone has pointed it out but the MVAE console now allows each vector to retain its ship costume instead of reverting to default and separation can now be performed while moving.

Comments

  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    I think they did that a while back, but could of broken, and fixed again. I hardly get out of my Nebula or Manticore on my 2 Feds these days.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • drakethewhitedrakethewhite Member Posts: 1,240 Arc User
    Nice.

    If those pets weren't completely worthless things that die as quick as a simple shuttle, I might actually care.
  • kyrrokkyrrok Member Posts: 1,352 Arc User
    I wouldn't even detatch them at all. It would be just one mid-sized attack ship for me just like the Alita.
  • azniadeetazniadeet Member Posts: 1,871 Arc User
    The rumor is that the MVAE mode is getting quite a boost when the T6 prometheus comes out.
  • orion0029orion0029 Member Posts: 1,122 Bug Hunter
    edited September 2015
    Ok, after reading this I had to try it out with my multi vector console...

    I'm digging that the seperation/reintegration animations are fast & smooth now.

    But I notice that the model of my ship is rather borked, the Beta section is missing its 'saucer' (the triangular section which resides under the main saucer is gone), and the Gamma section has some texture issues, perhaps this change wasn't meant to hit Holodeck just yet?

    Edit: Also, the 'rotational center' for the Alpha section is off center (it's too far back, as if the Alpha section were still attached to the other two sections), but it was that way before... Just a friendly reminder. *hint* *hint*

    Edit 2: Just for reference I'm using the standard Prometheus tailor options, and the missing geometry is easily noticable from the ship tailor.
  • dracounguisdracounguis Member Posts: 5,358 Arc User
    I hope they fix the graphical issues. I know one ship has 'invisible' panels after the ship separates. It's been that way since they came out!
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    The Prometheus is one of my favourite ships.

    Cannot wait for the T6 version!
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • generalbannon07generalbannon07 Member Posts: 41 Arc User
    sunfrancks wrote: »
    The Prometheus is one of my favourite ships.

    Cannot wait for the T6 version!

    Same here. I'm flying the Hephaestus class for 4 jears now.
    I hope a T6 MVAE is more than just a rumor.

    t643t0.jpg

    Original join date: Jul 2008
  • azniadeetazniadeet Member Posts: 1,871 Arc User
    Aye. I've been flying one version of the Advanced Escort or another for five years. This is the only T6 ship that i'm truly, truly excited about.
  • chivs116chivs116 Member Posts: 109 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    since the update on the 3rd, the bottom section of the Prometheus looks wrong it now has a slope towards the shuttle bay, I’m sure it used to be a bulky then have a small 45` angle line to the shuttle bay.

    also the middle section is now missing the forward section once seperated

    Starship Reg is missing from ship

    follow link to see what is wrong so FAR!!!!!!!
    http://stoeds.enjin.com/profile/4200597/pics?album_id=609468&refresh=1441455831
    Post edited by chivs116 on
    4058756.jpg
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    chivs116 wrote: »
    since the update on the 3rd, the bottom section of the Prometheus looks wrong it now has a slope towards the shuttle bay, I’m sure it used to be a bulky then have a small 45` angle line to the shuttle bay.

    also the middle section is now missing the forward section once seperated

    Starship Reg is missing from ship

    follow link to see what is wrong so FAR!!!!!!!
    http://stoeds.enjin.com/profile/4200597/pics?album_id=609468&refresh=1441455831

    Yup, she is all kinds of broken since the update. :(

    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    Looks like someone was doing model updates on code branches being incorporated into the game and that said model updates are incomplete. I would suggest it won't be long before we see a finished product for sale.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • hawku001xhawku001x Member Posts: 10,770 Arc User
    There are holes in my ship.
    Phoenix_Compendium_1.jpg
    USS Phoenix-X Literary Index | Comics | Most recent story: "The Opposite of That"
  • chivs116chivs116 Member Posts: 109 Arc User
    still not fixed....we aint happy!!
    4058756.jpg
  • lizweilizwei Member Posts: 936 Arc User
    The Galaxy X model has been broken for over 3 years, pull up a chair and get used to it!
  • chivs116chivs116 Member Posts: 109 Arc User
    unlike the Galaxy X it doesnt have 2 missive holes when all together and a mission forward section of delta when apart...there is more wrong atm.
    all the galaxy x has wrong with it is a misslined lance phaser
    4058756.jpg
  • lizweilizwei Member Posts: 936 Arc User
    chivs116 wrote: »
    unlike the Galaxy X it doesnt have 2 missive holes when all together and a mission forward section of delta when apart...there is more wrong atm.
    all the galaxy x has wrong with it is a misslined lance phaser

    The primary notable feature of the Galaxy X, which is it's phase lance is crooked and too small. The registry number clips through it, and various features on the top of the saucer are also misaligned.

    Besides, you're missing the point. All they have to do with the Galaxy X is nudge the lance and the top saucer features a little and fix the scale. That's about a half hour of work in a modelling program.
    And they haven't done that. In 3 years. So good luck with the multiple flaws on the Prommie!
  • hawku001xhawku001x Member Posts: 10,770 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    I thought that they might be speed holes.

    2f12_beschleunigungsloecher.jpg
    Phoenix_Compendium_1.jpg
    USS Phoenix-X Literary Index | Comics | Most recent story: "The Opposite of That"
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    hawku001x wrote: »
    I thought that they might be speed holes.

    2f12_beschleunigungsloecher.jpg

    Either that or to let more fresh air in.
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





Sign In or Register to comment.