A friend of mine is one of the furry deviants who infest Second Life, and she took time out from - well, we won't go into what she gets up to over there - to pass on a blog article about some of the legal implications of SL's "Linden dollars" virtual money system.
http://webspelunker.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/are-lindens-really-worth-anything-in.html
It contains a link to a PDF from the US Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, in which it sets out guidelines on the legal frameworks around virtual currencies. SL, apparently, is a Money Transfer Business under these guidelines, since SL dollars can be traded from person to person and converted back into real-world money.
STO, obviously, has its virtual currencies, but from the looks of it, it
isn't a Money Transfer Business because Zen and stuff, once
we've bought them, can't be sold on for real money....
... under the terms of service, that is.
However, reading through that PDF file, it occurs to me that various gold-selling spammers whom I won't name here (because we all see their blasted adverts, so they don't need any more publicity from me)
are in the business of acquiring in-game currency and selling it to third parties in exchange for real money.
Which, as far as I can see, makes
them Money Transfer Businesses within the meaning of those regulations.
I don't often claim to speak for anyone but myself... but, this time, I really do believe others will join me when I say
HA HA HA HA HA Enjoy your metric shedloads of Treasury Department paperwork you spamming ****s!
Comments
Most games you buy stuff, its an expense, your money is gone for entertainment. The minute you bring in a real economy, you purchase assets, inventory, you can be taxed by having items that increase in value if governments want to get sticky. Chances are they won't ever look into a casual person, but the people that enter games to do business are going to be targets, because they will attempt to not declare their income.
Completed Starbase, Embassy, Mine, Spire and No Win Scenario
Nothing to do anymore.
http://dtfleet.com/
Visit our Youtube channel
I think the interesting takeaway the original poster was interested in was that gold sellers / EC sellers could be considered engaged in money transfer business, which could cause legal repercussions. If they don't report their transactions correctly and don't pay their taxes, they could run into legal problems, and the extra work of making sure that you're doing "legal" business could eat up their profits.
The universe has a wonderful sense of humor. The trick is learning how to take a joke.
The other interesting thing about the FinCEN document, though, was how (comparatively) clued-up it was about virtual currency transaction models. I was reading it and thinking to myself "that's SL's Linden bucks... that's EVE's PLEX... ah, now they're talking about things like Bitcoin...." The bureaucrats are clearly getting the hang of this here system of tubes.
Any specific reason for that?