test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Desired Fleet T6 Requests

flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
Tier #6 Fleet Exploration Cruiser (Galaxy Class):

Weapons: 4/4
+10 Weapon Power
+10 Shield Power

Bridge Officer Seating:
Commander Engineering
Lieutenant Commander Science
Lieutenant Commander Tactical
Lieutenant Universal/Intel
Ensign Engineering

Console Setup:
Engineering Consoles x5
Science Consoles x3
Tactical Consoles x3
  • To include Galaxy, Venture and Monarch Skins (in addition to a new one).
  • Please fix the position of Windows before release.
  • There's also a chance this is too similar to the Guardian (which may be intentional), though if so, some tweaking will be needed.
  • Masonry Package down to Cryptic.
  • A Dreadnought Cruiser to be addressed (with all of the above notes taken into consideration).
Tier #6 Fleet Advanced Research Vessel (Nebula Class):

Weapons: 3/3
+10 Axillary Power
+10 Shield Power

Bridge Officer Seating:
Commander Science
Lieutenant Commander Engineering
Lieutenant Tactical
Lieutenant Universal/Intel
Lieutenant Science

Console Setup:
Engineering Consoles x4
Science Consoles x4
Tactical Consoles x3
  • To include Nebula, Venture and Monarch Skins (in addition to a new one).
  • Please fix the position of Windows before release.
  • The Masonry Package with this can be the same as the new Pathfinder; Science Vessel.
  • Instead of a Secondary Deflector, I would like something similar that ties into the rear Pod. Maybe something cosmetic depending on which item is slotted?
Tier #6 Fleet Battlecruiser (Vor'cha/Torkhat Class):

Weapons: 5/3
+10 Weapon Power
+10 Engine Power

Bridge Officer Seating:

Commander Engineering
Lieutenant Commander Tactical
Lieutenant Engineering
Lieutenant Tactical/Intel
Lieutenant Science

Console Setup:
Engineering Consoles x5
Science Consoles x2
Tactical Consoles x4
  • To include Vor'cha, Tor'khat and Vor'Kang Skins (in addition to a new one).
  • Please fix the hull patterns and windows before release.
  • Masonry Package down to Cryptic.
Probably a long shot, but if you don't ask, you don't get - though it's possible I wont get anyway, but at least I'll have asked.
attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
Post edited by flash525 on

Comments

  • sennahcheribsennahcherib Member Posts: 2,823 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    no, don't touch at the Nebula, it's perfect right now :)
  • js26568js26568 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    You forgot to add how much you'd be willing to pay.

    The bottom line is what drives change, you should know that by now!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Free Tibet!
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    no, don't touch at the Nebula, it's perfect right now :)
    It's good, but it's not perfect. By (what will be) T6 Fleet Standard it'll be lesser. Furthermore, the Nebula Class could really make good use of the Venture Skin. :)
    js26568 wrote: »
    You forgot to add how much you'd be willing to pay.
    I'd begrudgingly pay the 3k zen requirement (for x6 fleet modules) for this.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • rearllrearll Member Posts: 87 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I'd love a T6 MVAM, a fleet version would be most welcomed too!
  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I'll be honest, what's with all of this willing for a Ltcmdr tac on 99% of the cruisers? All of the ideas I've seen for T6 cruisers revamps had ltcmdr tac in it.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I'll be honest, what's with all of this willing for a Ltcmdr tac on 99% of the cruisers? All of the ideas I've seen for T6 cruisers revamps had ltcmdr tac in it.
    Helps to keep the DPS players happy. :)
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    @ OP: Why Intel on everything? I'd much rather have a new specialization, Intel is becoming pretty oversaturated IMO.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    orangeitis wrote: »
    @ OP: Why Intel on everything? I'd much rather have a new specialization, Intel is becoming pretty oversaturated IMO.
    I have yet to use an Intel Ability (I don't own any Intel Boffs, nor do I intend too). I'm just catering for everyone.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • immudzenimmudzen Member Posts: 145 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I want a fleet T6 Borg Tactical Cube with a 10/10 weapon config and 10 each of sci/eng and tac consoles with 9 commander boff slots.

    We are going to end up there anyways so why not just get it over with?

    On a more serious note I want a Fleet T6 Avenger and Fleet T6 Vesta
  • edited December 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    immudzen wrote: »
    On a more serious note I want a Fleet T6 Avenger and Fleet T6 Vesta
    I too wouldn't mind seeing a T6 Vesta, though I didn't want to list another Science Ship due to the number we already have in-game. Needless to say, I would imagine if Cryptic have intentions to redo any of the existing Science Ships for T6, the Nebula and Vesta are going to be the two they look toward first.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
Sign In or Register to comment.