test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

The Intel Ships in more classic looks

mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
edited October 2014 in The Art of Star Trek Online
So much dislike has been expressed on the boards for the new Intel ships. In the end, it's all in the eye of the beholder, but I think the shape of the Eclipse and Phantom were pretty interesting, I just was not a big fan of the Intel Materials. So when I got my Delta Rising Operation Pack and unpacked the ships, I customized them more to my liking.

So, anyone that wasn't sure or not, here may be some helpful pictures for you:

(Full Album: http://s883.photobucket.com/user/Mustrum_Ridcully/library/Startrek%20Online%20-%20Delta%20Rising)


Phantom
Phantom_07_zps4528d6f2.jpg
Phantom_03_zps579bd918.jpg

I think the Defiant heritage is clearly visible. I am using Material 6 and mostly Andromeda for colors, except I think Centaur for the Main Hull to give the underside a bit more features.
The parts are mostly Eclipse Beta, to avoid the bluish Intelligence features and get red bussard collectors.

Eclipse
Eclipse_13_zps3b5fb777.jpg
Eclipse_18_zpsbc6df624.jpg

I am a bit undecided if this is more Prometheus or Stargazer heritage, and I think I am kinda mixing between all the Tier 3 Cruiser variants in my memory. Still, it feels like a Starfleet Quad-Nacelle Cruiser.
I use also Material 6 and mostly Andromeda for pattern. I am using the Eclipse Beta nacelles for the red bussard collectors, but I actually use the standard Eclipse for the main hull because I like the Intelligence Colors here - the front looks a bit like an additional deflector/sensor array.

--
I am limited to 4 pictures anyway, but I don't have any screenshots of the Scryer yet. I am not that fond of the Scryer, to be honest, though I think it also wins a lot by non-Intelligence materials.

The customization options of all 3 ships aren't huge (but better than for the KDF and Romulan variants), but there are some neat aspects - being able to use the nacelles of any of the 3 ships (but only the "prime" variants of each, so no red bussard collectors on Phantom nacelles on the Eclipse and vice vers). The Phantom and Eclipse nacelles really work well on their sister ships IMO.
Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Options
    futurepastnowfuturepastnow Member Posts: 3,660 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    The Phantom isn't bad looking at all with the Intel features hidden, but I haven't seen any combination of parts or materials that makes the Eclipse look appealing to me.

    Thanks for the pictures.
  • Options
    azniadeetazniadeet Member Posts: 1,871 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    The Phantom isn't bad looking at all with the Intel features hidden, but I haven't seen any combination of parts or materials that makes the Eclipse look appealing to me.

    Thanks for the pictures.

    Agreed.

    The Phantom has grown on me a bit, and definitely presents as a spiritual successor to the defiant.

    The Eclipse just doesn't pass the test for me though. Nor does the Scryer.
  • Options
    jaymclaughlinjaymclaughlin Member Posts: 630 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    For the brief moment I as able to get on before the game crashed on my mac, I had a play with the ship tailor on my Phantom. I put the Scryer nacelles on it. Looks awesome.... just a shame I can't fly it!
    animated.gif
  • Options
    futurepastnowfuturepastnow Member Posts: 3,660 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    azniadeet wrote: »
    Agreed.

    The Phantom has grown on me a bit, and definitely presents as a spiritual successor to the defiant.

    The Eclipse just doesn't pass the test for me though. Nor does the Scryer.

    I actually kind of like the wacky, weird shape of the Scryer, but its boff layout makes me sad.

    Now that I have seen Eclipses in the game, holy cow is that an ugly ship. I did not realize from their initial promo shots that its nacelles were... bowlegged. It just looks very wrong.
  • Options
    janus1975janus1975 Member Posts: 739 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Yeah I love the look of the Phantom in Type 6, as it looks like a serious updating of the Defiant.

    The Eclipse works really well in its Intelligence material if you consider it a design heavily worked on by the Andorians (and the nacelles work well with that kink in them as a 'nod' to the Andorian escort's similary bent arms. I tried colouring them to be even more outlandish and it works if you approach them like that.

    The science version is 'meh', as it reminds me way too much of the Star Wars Trade Federation "Donut Class" carrier.

    The Guardian is lovely, and to me looks very much like a "what might have been" Ambassador.

    The only ship I really don't like at all is the KDF Qin, it's just far too flat and square. It's a 1970's American Car turned into a space ship for Tron.
  • Options
    toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Hmm, the Phantom actually looks like a federation ship, unbelievable. (That's good, but as I never liked the defiant, I can't really say I like it either.)
    The Eclipse, though, gets worse by the minute. It's just wrong on so many levels...
    The Scryer is simply odd, but I'll wait, perhaps with some trying, it may become bearable to look at it.
    janus1975 wrote: »
    Yeah I love the look of the Phantom in Type 6, as it looks like a serious updating of the Defiant.

    The Eclipse works really well in its Intelligence material if you consider it a design heavily worked on by the Andorians (and the nacelles work well with that kink in them as a 'nod' to the Andorian escort's similary bent arms. I tried colouring them to be even more outlandish and it works if you approach them like that.

    The science version is 'meh', as it reminds me way too much of the Star Wars Trade Federation "Donut Class" carrier.

    The Guardian is lovely, and to me looks very much like a "what might have been" Ambassador.

    The only ship I really don't like at all is the KDF Qin, it's just far too flat and square. It's a 1970's American Car turned into a space ship for Tron.

    You mean the Qib intel battlecruiser? Qin is a Tier 5 raptor.

    What I've noticed is the two Tier 6 KDF ships look like they should be longer/with smaller 'wingspan'. From some angles, they look a bit like after a crash.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • Options
    futurepastnowfuturepastnow Member Posts: 3,660 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    janus1975 wrote: »

    The Guardian is lovely, and to me looks very much like a "what might have been" Ambassador.

    Here's mine:

    EVc7641.jpg

    The Guardian captures the general Fed cruiser aesthetic pretty well. Size-wise (and design-wise) it is in between the Galaxy and Odyssey, which limits the Ambassador comparison.
  • Options
    janus1975janus1975 Member Posts: 739 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    The Guardian captures the general Fed cruiser aesthetic pretty well. Size-wise (and design-wise) it is in between the Galaxy and Odyssey, which limits the Ambassador comparison.

    A very early design for the Ambassador Class which I was reminded of, is shown in more detail here: http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Ambassador_class_model

    The 'painting' in the article shows a ship concept that's half-way between an Excelsior and a Galaxy. I was particularly struck by the Guardian's neck and deflector arrangement. I didn't go searching for the image before my comment so looking back there are marked differences, but it was certainly what I was most reminded of by the Guardian's design.

    I agree the Guardian is far more advanced-looking than this early Ambassador concept. Basically a more Guardian-style sleekness could have (not saying 'would have', I don't know) made it to production if they had the time, but tight schedules and budget constraints on the show meant the canon Ambassador Class had to be far less curvy.
  • Options
    maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    The ships do look a lot better in conventional colors. Are there any different nacelle choices for the Eclipse? or more to be more exact, what does it look like? So far it seems the Phantom is the most attractive of the lot.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • Options
    mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    maxvitor wrote: »
    The ships do look a lot better in conventional colors. Are there any different nacelle choices for the Eclipse? or more to be more exact, what does it look like? So far it seems the Phantom is the most attractive of the lot.

    All 3 Intelligence ships can interchange their nacelles. I think the Phantom ones look good, but some may find them too short.

    Each also has access to one variant of its own nacelles, with the classic red bussard collector. (But you don't have access to the red bussard collectors when you pick a nacelle from a different ship.)


    I mostly play my Tac Alt right now, and I can safely say the Phantom is definitely sexy. I don't get tired of looking at it blowing up stuff. That might actually make it feel even more like a Defiant sucessor to me. ;)
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • Options
    crappyturbocrappyturbo Member Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    The Eclipse with the Phantom nacelles looks sort of like the TFCT Roger Young from Starship Troopers, came across that on another thread so I cannot claim to have discovered it.

    Personally tho the Scryer with the Eclipse nacelles does not look half bad either
  • Options
    davidwforddavidwford Member Posts: 1,836 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I do like the change in look that the original poster has for the Phantom. I agree that it makes it look more like the Defiant and her sister ships. In that regard, I might try flying her with my Saurian Tactical captain as she is optimized for Escort play, but I suspect I will return to my T5-U Tempest or perhaps back to the legacy Maelstrom.

    I am good with the Guardian as it has the more traditional Starfleet features we expect for a Federation ship. It is just too bad that the good old Galaxy-R didn't have her BOFF layout.

    I am comfortable with the Scryer's curves as they are similar to the Luna. This was the only ship I really considered trying out as far as the intel ships go, but I didn't have a captain that was geared towards heavy Science.

    The Eclipse is just all messed up. Whoever designed that should be fired.
  • Options
    toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I must return to this thread with some rectifications as I have found in game some of the intel ships (actually all I've tried yet) look substantially different than in most screenshots.

    - I don't yet know about the Scryer and Phantom first hand (though I maintain the Phantom doesn't look much worse than a defiant in traditional material - that's good enough for me considering flying it).

    - I've basically said the Eclipse is a mess. After some playing in the ship tailor, I came up with this:

    screenshot_2014_10_22_04_09_34.jpg
    screenshot_2014_10_22_04_09_44.jpg

    The nacelles are no longer wonky and held at strange angles, the lines are relatively clean. Now I can say: If the nacelles had a (little) more traditional look - not so wide yet slim at the Bussard collectors and more progressively extending rear - the Eclipse could actually look good. The way it is now barely passable, if you don't look much at the nacelles (still far better than I expected from pics and glimpses in game so far).

    - However I have rather praised the Qib before. Sadly even here I was wrong. It looks far worse in 'person'. While the usual materials look good on it, the basic shapes (and no customization to speak of) make it terrible.

    screenshot_2014_10_22_04_01_11.jpg
    screenshot_2014_10_22_04_01_40.jpg

    The hull itself and wings could work, but the paper thin neck, forward section and nacelles make it look non realistic even. The deflector is barely there as well, it must be the size of one Klingon warrior at most. And the neck could be longer (I guess it would break then, due to how thin it is).

    - And last, I was sadly disappointed with the Faeht warbird. I thought: "it's got wings, a beak -> looks like a warbird, will be fine". However I found it looks fat in all 3 wing positions. That might be because it's got a very short neck and small 'head' in comparison with the large hull and wings.


    Overall it's funny how the Romulan intel warbird is the most 'massive' while the Klingon intel battlecruiser is by far the skinniest. I would have expected the opposite and that's why I may not like them at all.


    EDIT: After some playing in order to get the Eclipse starship trait, it also becomes plainly obvious it is (the Eclipse) far too big for a battlecruiser. Heck it's in the same league size wise as the Odyssey, the Guardian or the Galaxy. Quite larger than all assault cruisers or the previous Starfleet battlecruiser, the Avenger. Again, quite an illogical choice for what should be a 'stealthy' intel ship.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • Options
    markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,231 Arc User
    edited October 2014
  • Options
    mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • Options
    shadowfirefly00shadowfirefly00 Member Posts: 1,026 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Honestly, I don't mind the 'stealth' material, but appreciate that folks have the choice of not using it. That said, I'd love to see it (and the Dyson materials) become available for other ships. Case in point: the Patrol Escort/Mirror Adv. Escort...
  • Options
    toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I've finally gotten around to the Phantom and damn, I wish it looked as well as it seems to in the OPs screenshots. In game, I just couldn't find a balanced look. A pity, as it's a beast of a ship. An OP Defiant with built-in cloak and a Lance console with no stat drawbacks whatsoever.

    So far, I've been surprised by 4 out of 5 intel ships (the only rather positive one was the Eclipse), wonder what the Scryer will look like.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
Sign In or Register to comment.