test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

How to bring back Lore

mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
edited September 2014 in Ten Forward
The last thing we've heard of Lore that he was deactivated by Data.

How would you bring back Lore? Or do you rather not want to see him back at all?


---

Here is what I might do:

Note there is some expanded universe material (e.g. not strictly canon) suggesting that Lore was stored securely by Data, but was destroyed in the crash of the Enterprise D saucer section.
I think it would have made sense if Data would send Lore to Commander Maddox for research, with a strict note to neither reactivate him nor perform any modifications, merely studying the design.


40 years later, some stuff could have happened. IIRC; there is an Isaac Asimov story about two androids that are put in storage and supposedly deactivated, but occasional energy spikes allow them to have a conversation over a very long time span.

This could serve as a basis for one story:
Lore doesn't have any androids or persons to talk to, but his brain is not as inactive as anyone expected - he slowly manages to use some of the modifications he made to himself over time (we've seen him do such modifications before), and contact the local computer. This takes several decades, but he can manipulate the computer to provide him some aid.

He slowly manages to improve his mental capacities but realizes he cannot actually go anywhere.
His body is disassembled and he cannot break the security measures Data and Maddox had put in place - at least not in his current state, . So he changes his plan, and manages to transfer his neuronal pattern to a holographic doctor that serves in the research facility he's stored in. He can't quite avoid triggering an alarm, and so he gets himself a mobile emitter and runs off. He may no longer be an android, but he's still out there, and he's pissed at the world.

The holographic doctor disguise back story would allow us to use this even in game without requiring a likeness of Spiner (because a hologram could look like anyone - it's also not limited to Picardo).


---

How would you bring back Lore? Or do you rather not want to see him back at all?
Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • jeffel82jeffel82 Member Posts: 2,075 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I probably wouldn't bother.

    I have nothing against the character, but I feel like he's run his course already.

    I think it would be extra pointless without Spiner, because Lore almost requires having Data to play off of.

    No point in having an Evil Twin without the original around.
    You're right. The work here is very important.
    tacofangs wrote: »
    ...talking to players is like being a mall Santa. Everyone immediately wants to tell you all of the things they want, and you are absolutely powerless to deliver 99% of them.
  • steamwrightsteamwright Member Posts: 2,820
    edited September 2014
    I'd rather not see Lore back at all. There was a moment in his unfolding story when he expressed "distress" at the shortcomings of his design. That might have led to a more 3D character, a sympathetic villain. But in the end, they dropped him back into the role of "mustache-twirling villain". A bit too 1D for my tastes.

    That said, I always assumed he'd have been sent to the robotics institute for further study of the Soog-type design. Frankly, given the danger he posed, I'd be surprised if Picard didn't make it clear that no two parts of him were to be kept in the same complex at the same time.

    But if you want him revived, I could easily see it as a reactivation by a misguided, possibly arrogant type of researcher who feels he knows better what is best. Like Arik Soong was regarding eugenics.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Or... Lore managed to use Borg tech to copy his mind into another body. He did a bunch of really messed up experiments on some of the Borg he was studying... But we never really learned his goal did we?
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    jeffel82 wrote: »
    I probably wouldn't bother.

    I have nothing against the character, but I feel like he's run his course already.

    I think it would be extra pointless without Spiner, because Lore almost requires having Data to play off of.

    No point in having an Evil Twin without the original around.

    I agree, that would be a bit of a problem - on the other hand - such could also serve as a way to give the character an entirely new dimension.

    I would expect he'd be angry and go after is brother immediately after reactivation, but... that's actually not what he does after he's rescued floating in deep space after the Crystalline Entity event. He only encountered Data by accident, when his father called the homing beacon for Data and also triggered Lore's. What was Lore up to?

    Maybe he actually doesn't want to engage his brother, and rather did his own thing?
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • hawku001xhawku001x Member Posts: 10,769 Arc User
    edited September 2014
  • otisnobleotisnoble Member Posts: 1,290 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I know in the STO timeline Data was brought back and he Captained the Enterprise but where is he now? I want Data back not Lore
    Fleet Admiral Stephen
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    The holographic doctor disguise back sttory would allow us to use this even in game without requiring a likeness of Spiner (because a hologram could look like anyone - it's also not limited to Picardo).
    I have no issue with the story, as it is very plausible. The issue here is that Data is not Data without Spiner and Lore is not Lore without Spiner either. I do not want to see all of my favorites looking like someone else any more then I would want to see the Defiant looking like a Borg Sphere simply because Cryptic could not afford to pay for the rights to show the actual Defiant. A Lore that looks like John Q. Public does not give me a Trek vibe. If he cannot be Lore as we are aware of him I would rather not have Lore at all. But that is just me.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    I have no issue with the story, as it is very plausible. The issue here is that Data is not Data without Spiner and Lore is not Lore without Spiner either. I do not want to see all of my favorites looking like someone else any more then I would want to see the Defiant looking like a Borg Sphere simply because Cryptic could not afford to pay for the rights to show the actual Defiant. A Lore that looks like John Q. Public does not give me a Trek vibe. If he cannot be Lore as we are aware of him I would rather not have Lore at all. But that is just me.
    Well, I still dream that one day, there will be a new Trek show, and they'll put in Data at least as a guest role, and I would not mind if it was another actor playing it (since I don't think we can rejuvenate Spiner.)

    I have experienced several Doctor and Sherlock Holmes now, I think a good role can be played well by different actors.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    The last thing we've heard of Lore that he was deactivated by Data.

    How would you bring back Lore? Or do you rather not want to see him back at all?


    ---

    Here is what I might do:

    Note there is some expanded universe material (e.g. not strictly canon) suggesting that Lore was stored securely by Data, but was destroyed in the crash of the Enterprise D saucer section.
    I think it would have made sense if Data would send Lore to Commander Maddox for research, with a strict note to neither reactivate him nor perform any modifications, merely studying the design.


    40 years later, some stuff could have happened. IIRC; there is an Isaac Asimov story about two androids that are put in storage and supposedly deactivated, but occasional energy spikes allow them to have a conversation over a very long time span.

    This could serve as a basis for one story:
    Lore doesn't have any androids or persons to talk to, but his brain is not as inactive as anyone expected - he slowly manages to use some of the modifications he made to himself over time (we've seen him do such modifications before), and contact the local computer. This takes several decades, but he can manipulate the computer to provide him some aid.

    He slowly manages to improve his mental capacities but realizes he cannot actually go anywhere.
    His body is disassembled and he cannot break the security measures Data and Maddox had put in place - at least not in his current state, . So he changes his plan, and manages to transfer his neuronal pattern to a holographic doctor that serves in the research facility he's stored in. He can't quite avoid triggering an alarm, and so he gets himself a mobile emitter and runs off. He may no longer be an android, but he's still out there, and he's pissed at the world.

    The holographic doctor disguise back story would allow us to use this even in game without requiring a likeness of Spiner (because a hologram could look like anyone - it's also not limited to Picardo).


    ---

    How would you bring back Lore? Or do you rather not want to see him back at all?

    as far as i am aware lore was deactivated and dismantled because lore was such a danger to everything around him, the chances are the technology is either collecting dust in some bunker somewhere held by starfleet intelligence or it was destroyed. either case, lore is no longer and there is no point trying to bring that element onto the game.

    just for argument sake the storyline you have constructed is opposite the intended purpose of starfleet and the federation which is the right to choose what a person wants to do with their own lives, not be controlled. maddox only wanted to understand the technology, hes not the type to control others and data himself is far more open minded.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Looking at it from a pure utilitarian pragmatist cost/benefit analysis, I'd leave him wherever the hell Starfleet stuck his body after Hugh and the Enterprise took him down. He's a clinical psychopath with genius-level intelligence and the body of Luke Cage. He's a critical danger to anyone he encounters, and I see no benefit at all to risking the danger. There's nothing he has that the more, well, sane Data doesn't.
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I don't want to see Lore brought back. I want to see new villains with their own unique quirks and backstories that challenge the way people view morals and ethics.

    I want to see villains cast in shades of various grays, not James Bond villains. This is Star Trek, a clean slate where numerous aliens and their cultures often clash with our own human lines of thinking.

    Lore was a James Bond villain. Unique one-off that most certainly made Data's character a lot more interesting.

    But he isn't someone we need to keep trotting out. That's the kind of repetitive, umimaginative, unoriginal bs that killed Star Trek after Enterprise and Nemesis.
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    The way the borg is now as in what they cannot assimilate they destroy could be spun as having Lore behind it all.

    As once mentioned in this thread we dont know what lores goal was when he was experimenting on the borg who is to say he didnt place his mind or concesinous into a machine or body and become an overmind of a new borg faction.

    Not one lead by the borg queen but one lead by lore himself for his own agendas
  • steamwrightsteamwright Member Posts: 2,820
    edited September 2014
    I have experienced several Doctor and Sherlock Holmes now, I think a good role can be played well by different actors.

    I agree, however, I respectfully suggest that the Doctor and Holmes are not great examples.

    In the case of Holmes (and for that matter, Hamlet, Romeo, Gulliver, and a host of others) the character was created without a "face", save for any descriptions given in book or play. It gives an "everyman" quality to a character, allowing every man who fits the basic description to play the character. (frankly, I like seeing the limits to this tweeked once in a while. I'd love to see a play of Hamlet sometime where all the "Danes" are played by actors of African or Asian ancestry, just to showcase their talent)

    In video productions though, if a character is not originated by book first, and instead originated by a specific actor, the audience percieves the character and actor as nearly inseparable. This was initially a concern with 2009's Star Trek, and you'll notice that many of the new actors were given makeup and hair stylings to make them resemble the original actors. Bascially easing the viewing audience into accepting an "everyman" viewpoint of the characters. For just such a reason, I suspect should Data ever be recast, they'll have to make the actor appear to be very similar to Spiner.

    Incidentally, even if the character is created in book form first, sometimes the actor still becomes fully associated with the character. The question of recasting Tony Stark/Iron Man in the Marvel Cinematic Universe is a huge one because Robert Downey has so made the role his own.

    Now The Doctor is a special case. One man was visually, uniquely associated with the role, but when he no longer could continue, they had to do something special: not just recast the role, but recast the character with a new personality and styling. Once Troughton wonderfully convinced the audience that this was a good thing, the exchange of actors could continue, but only if the personality and styling of the Doctor changed as well. To date, I can only thing of one other work where the role was recast in similar fashion, and that was to replace the late Heath Ledger in the Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus.
  • grylakgrylak Member Posts: 1,594 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    In my mind, Shinzon aquired the body of Lore, did some surgery on his brain to degrade his mental abilities and make him loyal, and that was who we saw in Nemesis, instead of some random extra Data look alike just suddenly appear that the Romulans just happened to find.


    Also, why in the hell did no one mention Lore when they discovered B4? And given all the trouble Lore made, why in the hell did they reassemble B4 fully? He was already active as just a head, they could have talked ot him and studied him without putting him back together fully.
    *******************************************

    A Romulan Strike Team, Missing Farmers and an ancient base on a Klingon Border world. But what connects them? Find out in my First Foundary mission: 'The Jeroan Farmer Escapade'
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    What if Section-31 has Lore...


    :eek:
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    grylak wrote: »
    Also, why in the hell did no one mention Lore when they discovered B4? And given all the trouble Lore made, why in the hell did they reassemble B4 fully? He was already active as just a head, they could have talked ot him and studied him without putting him back together fully.

    Hardly the worst problem with that movie. We can probably put that, along with so many similarly stupid Picard decisions, down to "Picard's a naive idealistic idiot."
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • grylakgrylak Member Posts: 1,594 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    starswordc wrote: »
    Hardly the worst problem with that movie. We can probably put that, along with so many similarly stupid Picard decisions, down to "Picard's a naive idealistic idiot."

    I know. There are elements to the film I like (the score, Romulans being Romulany) and parts that are terrible. But even when I watched it in the cinema the first time, and everyone on the ship was carrying on like they'd never found another data before, I was screaming in my head "WHAT ABOUT LORE?!"


    In fact, when they first found B4's head, I thought it WAS Lore making a comeback.
    *******************************************

    A Romulan Strike Team, Missing Farmers and an ancient base on a Klingon Border world. But what connects them? Find out in my First Foundary mission: 'The Jeroan Farmer Escapade'
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    grylak wrote: »
    In my mind, Shinzon aquired the body of Lore, did some surgery on his brain to degrade his mental abilities and make him loyal, and that was who we saw in Nemesis, instead of some random extra Data look alike just suddenly appear that the Romulans just happened to find.


    Also, why in the hell did no one mention Lore when they discovered B4? And given all the trouble Lore made, why in the hell did they reassemble B4 fully? He was already active as just a head, they could have talked ot him and studied him without putting him back together fully.
    I'm pretty sure there was a line in the movie about how Geordi and Data scanned the parts to make sure it wasn't Lore.... They may not have mentioned Lore by name but they talked about how B4 was more primitive than previous examples.

    Also, Lore was found on the same planet that Data was found on. B4 was found on a random speck of dirt.... that was home to a pre-warp culture. I would have been surprised too...
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • grylakgrylak Member Posts: 1,594 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    They said he was more primitive than data. There was no reference or even hint at lore. The whole thing played as if they never knew lore existed. I get the average movie goer wouldn't know about lore, and they wouldn't want to confuse them, but when pulling a story like that in continuity where they have encountered the exact same thing, they can't just dismiss it like it never happened. They got Wesley back for crying out loud, so its not like they couldn't have tried.
    *******************************************

    A Romulan Strike Team, Missing Farmers and an ancient base on a Klingon Border world. But what connects them? Find out in my First Foundary mission: 'The Jeroan Farmer Escapade'
  • edited September 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • hyefatherhyefather Member Posts: 1,286 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Why not, might be fun. The android they found that at the beginning of Nemesis could be used to transfer all of Data's Data (lol). Then you could have the classice Good twin Vs Bad twin rivalary. Get Brent Spinner to do the VOers.

    Kind of in a way. Data is immortal. So this has got to happen eventually. I figured when data sacraficed himself jordi would made it top priority to transfer all of Data's info into the android they found anyways. According to STO's timeline that "Should" have happened 35 years ago. So were has Data been all this time. Since hes been a no show. I figures hes somewhere in the Delta Quadrant. Living with the Borg queen, raiseing a bunch of Borg rug rats.

    OMG, he could be introduced as the "Borg King" (I said it first). We might see him iin Delta Rising. That could be a connection to the Liberation of the Borg being a single mind. Data !!! Champion of the Borg.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I agree, however, I respectfully suggest that the Doctor and Holmes are not great examples.

    In the case of Holmes (and for that matter, Hamlet, Romeo, Gulliver, and a host of others) the character was created without a "face", save for any descriptions given in book or play. It gives an "everyman" quality to a character, allowing every man who fits the basic description to play the character. (frankly, I like seeing the limits to this tweeked once in a while. I'd love to see a play of Hamlet sometime where all the "Danes" are played by actors of African or Asian ancestry, just to showcase their talent)

    *snip*
    And I think, quite frankly, that the distinction is not that relevant.

    If someone had never read or seen something of Sherlock Holmes before, and he was presented with the Downy Jr. version first, he would probably react to a different Sherlock interpretation just as you would to a different Data actor.

    So I think it's only about how you related to the role, and not the role itself, that makes recasting the character difficult to you or me. But the role itself is not actually that strongly linked to a particular actor.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    grylak wrote: »
    They said he was more primitive than data. There was no reference or even hint at lore. The whole thing played as if they never knew lore existed. I get the average movie goer wouldn't know about lore, and they wouldn't want to confuse them, but when pulling a story like that in continuity where they have encountered the exact same thing, they can't just dismiss it like it never happened. They got Wesley back for crying out loud, so its not like they couldn't have tried.
    That's actually what I was getting at. Lore was NOT more primitive than Data. He was virtually identical, except in personality.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    And I think, quite frankly, that the distinction is not that relevant.

    If someone had never read or seen something of Sherlock Holmes before, and he was presented with the Downy Jr. version first, he would probably react to a different Sherlock interpretation just as you would to a different Data actor.

    So I think it's only about how you related to the role, and not the role itself, that makes recasting the character difficult to you or me. But the role itself is not actually that strongly linked to a particular actor.
    To be honest, as someone who HAS read the books, Robert Downey Jr. did a very good job of portraying Holmes. Most adaptations show him as a rather boring but brilliant chap, which is decidedly NOT what he was in the books. Brilliant? yes. Boring? AHAHAHAAHAAH!!!!!!! no.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I don't see Lore being destroyed, he was dismantled ( Memory Alpha ) sure, but Starfleet would most likely of studied his parts as he would be to valuable to lose with only Data around, and they can't keep asking him to turn up for tests, he does have duty's to preform and is as a sentient being they can't just open him up when they felt like it.

    They can how ever keep Lore deactivated and study individual parts powered up, but did they store his mind away in some data base of wipe it? I think stored due to being the base program.

    Would explain the STO Androids thou, somewhat offspring from Lore and Data.

    But what about Data's mother? He never told her that she was a Android. Wonder if she was just simply buried without a autopsy due to Data's wish that her secret died with her?

    even as evil as lore was, starfleet wouldnt want to wipe the mind that is lore, to destroy the very essence of what a being is like that would be opposite the intended moral of the federation's compass.

    the juliana tainer android had an inbuilt self destruct on the positronic matrix, basically emulating a natural lifecycle of a human. there wouldnt be anything left when she "died".
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • havokreignhavokreign Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I enjoyed Cumberbatch's portrayal of Holmes as well, although that's largely a directior/writing complement.

    Lore, though, what a terribly underused villain. When you think of all the heroics, all the capabilities Data has, what a fantastic character he turned out to be, and then there's Lore. He gets used only thrice in seven seasons. IMO Brothers, only a guest appearance, was way better than Descent 1/2, which is supposed to be his coup de grace.

    Were they just incapable of writing a script that would do Lore justice? All the while inventing even crappier movie adversaries like Soran, the Son'a or Shinzon.
  • admrenlarreckadmrenlarreck Member Posts: 2,041 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    as far as i am aware lore was deactivated and dismantled because lore was such a danger to everything around him, the chances are the technology is either collecting dust in some bunker somewhere held by starfleet intelligence or it was destroyed. either case, lore is no longer and there is no point trying to bring that element onto the game.

    just for argument sake the storyline you have constructed is opposite the intended purpose of starfleet and the federation which is the right to choose what a person wants to do with their own lives, not be controlled. maddox only wanted to understand the technology, hes not the type to control others and data himself is far more open minded.
    daveyny wrote: »
    What if Section-31 has Lore...


    :eek:

    I was thinking the entire time about Section 31 while reading this. Those guys are crazy enough to see that this is to their advantage. Who's to say they didn't add some unknown tech to Lore that makes them think they have control over him, and he ends up playing them.
    fayhers_starfleet.jpg


    Fleet leader Nova Elite

    Fleet Leader House of Nova elite
    @ren_larreck
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I was thinking the entire time about Section 31 while reading this. Those guys are crazy enough to see that this is to their advantage. Who's to say they didn't add some unknown tech to Lore that makes them think they have control over him, and he ends up playing them.

    section 31 strikes me as the type of group that was interested in defending the federation from its enemies, collecting information on the droid is fine along with its background, schema and such, but i doubt section 31 itself has the resources to create an android let alone not getting noticed in the attempt of constructing such a droid. they may have learned advances reverse engineering some components to help federation science and engineers to create better things that will help in defending the federation, but outright construction of these droids? i doubt section 31 is willing to draw attention to itself by trying.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    havokreign wrote: »
    I enjoyed Cumberbatch's portrayal of Holmes as well, although that's largely a directior/writing complement.

    Lore, though, what a terribly underused villain. When you think of all the heroics, all the capabilities Data has, what a fantastic character he turned out to be, and then there's Lore. He gets used only thrice in seven seasons. IMO Brothers, only a guest appearance, was way better than Descent 1/2, which is supposed to be his coup de grace.

    Were they just incapable of writing a script that would do Lore justice? All the while inventing even crappier movie adversaries like Soran, the Son'a or Shinzon.
    Hoenstly , I think the writers were fearful of villain creep. IE needing to have the villain do something more outlandish each time they appear to make them threatening again.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • elglass#2975 elglass Member Posts: 159 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Already brought him back as a member of my bridge crew on one of my many alts. It's not like Androids are rare or anything these days.

    I suppose if you were to do a story, having him be fixed, since it was well established that he was flawed, by whoever it is that released the mass market versions and actually have Lore as a protagonist in a story would be cool. Perhaps as the gateway to the new Exploration system they really should be developing for areas other than the Delta Quadrant. Lore, now that he's fixed wishes to find his wayward brother who has been lost as amends for his past mistakes.
Sign In or Register to comment.