test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

New Federation Starship Designs

jamesrmartinjamesrmartin Member Posts: 14 Arc User
edited September 2014 in Federation Discussion
Hello there!


This is my first time posting on this particular subject on these boards so please if I violate any rules of the "Road" so to speak please take pity on a poor nerd thank you. Alright with my statement of naivety out of the way I'm going to jump on to the man subject. My dislike of the new Federation ship designs. To Sum up, they don't look like anything the United Federation of Planets from the Star Trek universe that Gene Roddenberry created for us. So hopefully I'll be able to give you all a cogent explanation of my reasons for the dislike of what the developers are calling Federation Starships. Firstly, they look far to Menacing, secondly they look more like the "Alien of the week" Ships we used to see on Star Trek, Star Trek: The Next Generation and to an even larger extent Star Trek: Voyager. Finally, only one of these ships follows the beloved Iconic design formula of Federation Starships. (Excluding the Defiant which in it's planning phases for Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, would have looked more like the Nova class of USS. Equinox fame.)

My first reason for dislike of the new Federation ship designs is something that most hard core trekkies have voiced, these ships are far too Menacing looking, Starfleet is a Peace keeping force, granted this means they have to complete military operations any peace keeping force has to do that. Theses ships simply look mean, too mean. When you look at those ships for the first time you instinctively go, "Hm must be a bad guy" That's not what you should think when you see a Federation Starship, frankly the Federation isn't the bad guys and a Psychological response to a ship design (Even though you are supposedly dealing with Alien Psychology with may be radically different from human) would be considered by the ship Designers of a Federation Starship. First Impressions go a long way and these ships when you see them give a very negative one. In short, they just look Evil and you don't want that kind of thing associated with the United Federation of Planets.

As for the second part of my Argument, these ships look like the old school Kit bashes we used to see on the Series. They the are not immediately Identifiable as Federation Starships. When you glance at them after the menacing feeling you get from looking at them you start to wonder. "Which Species or group of Species does this ship belong to?" They just don't look like Federation Starships plain and simple. It's as if the Designers went out of their way to make these ships not look like Starships of the Federation. They look more like an unholy union of Breen, and Tholian ships. When a Federation Starship drops out of warp you want to be able to look at it and go "Hey Feddies are here!"

Finally, These ships just don't follow the design formula we all know and love for Federation Starships (With one notable exception, the Defiant) Every Federation Starship since the beginning of the franchise has had a simple recognizable combination of features, the Round Saucer, the Cylindrical Secondary hull (The part with the Deflector) Tubular Engine Nacelles and pylons that hold the nacelles "up". Now I understand there have been some variations on these designs, the Akira and NX which had no secondary hulls to speak of, but let's face it not many people liked those designs, otherwise you'd see more of them in the game. Then there is the Constellation class, which people do like, I personally like the ship. I can go on with the list but let's face it, those ships aren't as popular as the Galaxy, Constitution, Excelsior, Sovereign and the list goes on. In summation, these ships just don't fit.

Hopefully I have been able to explain my dislike of the new ships and in a way that seems reasonable and at least semi-intelligent. If anyone sees me in the game my handle is @jamesrmartin Feel free to send me a tell and let me know what you think. I'll try to respond but I might be in the middle of a Mission or RPing with members of my fleet. Thanks for reading and above all else have fun in the game and Live long and Prosper!
Post edited by jamesrmartin on

Comments

  • Options
    thratch1thratch1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I think these are one-off designs, like the Dyson Science Destroyers. If this were a TV series, these ships would appear in one or two episodes and then inexplicably generate an underground fanbase (hello Dauntless).

    From what we've seen of the Guardian T6 cruiser, Cryptic hasn't given up on the typical Federation aesthetic.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    It is important to keep in mind that Starfleet is not what it was 30 years ago. Since Voyager and Nemesis the Federation has been bombarded with problems. The destruction of Romulus, the Klingons abandoning the treaty and declaring war on the Federation, the Borg invasion, the Undine infiltration, and now we are learning about the Iconians. This setting is quite different then what you saw on TNG, DS9, and VOY. A lot more bad stuff has happened.

    Stepping outside of canon we also have to realize there was a transition in Trek. TNG and most of DS9 comes from the ship model era. CBS used what ship models they had and kit-bashed others to keep costs down. Thus everything had a very similar look. By the time we got into Voyager CGI had become the norm. Now ships could look like whatever a programmer wanted them to look like. So Voyager could be streamline, the Defiant could be a flying wedge, the Prometheus, the Dauntless, etc. They could have non-traditional shapes and functions. The game is just an extension of that. Cryptic is only bound by polygons rather then models, and that means they can take more liberties - just as Voyager did.

    No one likes every ship. 3 decades later and I still do not like the Galaxy. People still complain about the Luna, and CBS approved that a decade ago. You are never going to make all Trek fans happy.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • Options
    sqwishedsqwished Member Posts: 1,475 Bug Hunter
    edited September 2014
    I agree with the post above, I don't think it does a great deal of harm to let cryptic let their imagination run riot for a while. The original design features present in many federation ship designs
    are still present as well as Romulan and Klingon. But again they won't please everybody.
    Oh, it's not broken? We can soon fix that!

  • Options
    qweeble#7491 qweeble Member Posts: 164 Cryptic Developer
    edited September 2014
    thratch1 wrote: »
    I think these are one-off designs, like the Dyson Science Destroyers. If this were a TV series, these ships would appear in one or two episodes and then inexplicably generate an underground fanbase (hello Dauntless).

    From what we've seen of the Guardian T6 cruiser, Cryptic hasn't given up on the typical Federation aesthetic.




    Bingo.....
    I make space ships!
    Twitter! STO_JamJamz
  • Options
    angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,001 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    (...)

    Stepping outside of canon we also have to realize there was a transition in Trek. TNG and most of DS9 comes from the ship model era. CBS used what ship models they had and kit-bashed others to keep costs down. Thus everything had a very similar look. By the time we got into Voyager CGI had become the norm. Now ships could look like whatever a programmer wanted them to look like. So Voyager could be streamline, the Defiant could be a flying wedge, the Prometheus, the Dauntless, etc. They could have non-traditional shapes and functions. The game is just an extension of that. Cryptic is only bound by polygons rather then models, and that means they can take more liberties - just as Voyager did.
    (...)

    Ironically, the CGI era recycled even more ship models than actual physical models were reused. This was also to cut costs - half of Enterprises alien ships are recycled Voyager assets, and Voyager assets are even bought from other franchises, I think partly from Babylon 5. If you ever wondered about 8472 for example - there was no genius planning behind them, rumors are they just reused models the CGI production company had in stock (ships, not the aliens, although the resemblance is... striking ;) ). That's why they look like they were taken directly from wing commander 4 rather than being something you'd suspect in Star Trek :D
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • Options
    kelshandokelshando Member Posts: 887 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Remember in time the Feds will using ships looking like

    http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/memory-gamma/images/d/de/USS_Relativity.jpg

    So at some point the "classic" starship maybe going to the way side anyhow.
  • Options
    tobar26thtobar26th Member Posts: 799 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thratch1 wrote: »
    I think these are one-off designs, like the Dyson Science Destroyers. If this were a TV series, these ships would appear in one or two episodes and then inexplicably generate an underground fanbase (hello Dauntless).

    From what we've seen of the Guardian T6 cruiser, Cryptic hasn't given up on the typical Federation aesthetic.
    Speaking of the Dauntless....


    *scurries off to his hole*
  • Options
    ddesjardinsddesjardins Member Posts: 3,056 Media Corps
    edited September 2014
    Bingo.....

    TY SIR.

    One ship does not a design trend make. The low-observable forward and side facing of the intelligence ships is in line with thier design purpose.

    My only argument is that instead of talking about 'ships' - marketing would been better off selling them as 'a new generation of intelligence gathering craft, purpose built for the new threats from the Delta Quadrant' But then again, marketing is not your (Cryptics) strong suit.

    High notes - i love the new fed designs. The escort is a nice modern take on the defiant, a ship which was radical in it's design. The cruiser's 4 nacelles are sweet. The image of the sci vessel doesn't seem to do it justice - seriously we need more images of these ships in action.

    KDF ships - niiiice.

    Romulan ships - a D'D variant? faster? better armed? Heck yeah ;)
  • Options
    jeffel82jeffel82 Member Posts: 2,075 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    By the time we got into Voyager CGI had become the norm. Now ships could look like whatever a programmer wanted them to look like. So Voyager could be streamline, the Defiant could be a flying wedge, the Prometheus, the Dauntless, etc. They could have non-traditional shapes and functions.

    In fairness, Voyager was designed and built as a physical model, and CGI was used only sparingly for the first couple of seasons.
    You're right. The work here is very important.
    tacofangs wrote: »
    ...talking to players is like being a mall Santa. Everyone immediately wants to tell you all of the things they want, and you are absolutely powerless to deliver 99% of them.
  • Options
    d3fk0nd3fk0n Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I'm not sure why everyone is so upset over the material the hull is made of you will probably be able to use most of the existing ship materials making the new cruiser just look like a retrofitted slightly more future Prometheus, and the escort look like a retrofitted slightly more future Defiant. I don't see how so many people are up in arms about this new material when there is that weird dark material already, I think it is type 4 but I would have to check. Also I get that these ships are different from lockbox ships because they are meant to be Ships of The Line as it were, but still people love to fly the lockbox ships and use their Jem'hadar Boffs and all manner of non-cannon, and to be honest completely unreasonable items. For instance what military would allow their soldiers to carry weapons of any type they wish from any source, while at the time wearing whatever they want to as their uniform. So, do I think the new ships are a little bit far off cannon yes, but even if there were 100 more cannon ships to use, new technologies would be developed and I think any real military would build a newer better ship/weapons platform even if it looks different from what they are used to. The change in ship designs seems rational and realistic to me, and also seems logical. If the ships are of poor non-aesthetic design I won't fly them but if they are the new and superior technologies that the Alpha-Quadrant deserves I will.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Section 31
    [Joseph Steel] [Jennifer Steel] [Dredd Steel] [Kenzi Steel] [Shira Steel] [Eris Steel] [Artemis Steel] [Stardragon] [Delta] [Alexandria Rose] [Number Six] [K'emb'ah Steel] [Karnak Steel] [Kacy Steel] [Venom Steel] [Areli Steel]
  • Options
    d3fk0nd3fk0n Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    TY SIR.

    One ship does not a design trend make. The low-observable forward and side facing of the intelligence ships is in line with thier design purpose.

    My only argument is that instead of talking about 'ships' - marketing would been better off selling them as 'a new generation of intelligence gathering craft, purpose built for the new threats from the Delta Quadrant' But then again, marketing is not your (Cryptics) strong suit.

    High notes - i love the new fed designs. The escort is a nice modern take on the defiant, a ship which was radical in it's design. The cruiser's 4 nacelles are sweet. The image of the sci vessel doesn't seem to do it justice - seriously we need more images of these ships in action.

    KDF ships - niiiice.

    Romulan ships - a D'D variant? faster? better armed? Heck yeah ;)

    I completely agree these ships look tough and battle ready, I can't wait to fly them.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Section 31
    [Joseph Steel] [Jennifer Steel] [Dredd Steel] [Kenzi Steel] [Shira Steel] [Eris Steel] [Artemis Steel] [Stardragon] [Delta] [Alexandria Rose] [Number Six] [K'emb'ah Steel] [Karnak Steel] [Kacy Steel] [Venom Steel] [Areli Steel]
  • Options
    khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,007 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    edalgo wrote: »
    I'm thinking the backstory to these new ships coming out is that they are Section 31 derived ships and are now going into mass production due to Iconian threats or something.

    Same with the Romulans and KDF intelligence.

    This will also explain why there will be an Intelligence Boff as its mandatory being normally operated by Section 31 Intelligence officers for the ships special weapons.

    So think of those designs as radical bc they're not Starfleet at all.

    I am thinking the same but instead of Section 31...Starfleet Intelligence.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • Options
    mikeflmikefl Member Posts: 861 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I think you have to remember the context in which these ships are being built. The UFP is at war on many fronts which demands new and unconventional means to combat its enemies. This same philosophy is what led to the design of the Defiant which is a departure from what one would expect to see in a Fed design. It was not a peaceful exploration vessel, but a warship created for desperate times during the battles with the borg and then the dominion. The same is happening here.
    Gold Sub since March 2010
    Lifetime Sub since June 2010
  • Options
    zipagatzipagat Member Posts: 1,204 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    edalgo wrote: »
    I'm thinking the backstory to these new ships coming out is that they are Section 31 derived ships and are now going into mass production due to Iconian threats or something.

    Same with the Romulans and KDF intelligence.

    This will also explain why there will be an Intelligence Boff as its mandatory being normally operated by Section 31 Intelligence officers for the ships special weapons.

    So think of those designs as radical bc they're not Starfleet at all.

    The Klingon and Romulan ships are following their respective design lineage though, both are unmistakeably part of their faction, the Federation ships look more like they belong in a different IP than Trek.

    Its kind of weird really, Cryptic seem to be able to get the aesthetics of the KDF and RR spot on when they design a new ship for them but they seem to be getting worse with each Federation design.
  • Options
    smeeinn1tsmeeinn1t Member Posts: 618 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Just going to put this link here http://www.reddit.com/r/sto/comments/2fh905/sto_concept_artist_here_amaish/.

    A nice piece on the T6 ship design from the horses mouth.
    V9BQ6SM.gif
    "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." — Lazarus Long --->Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • Options
    angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,001 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    smeeinn1t wrote: »
    Just going to put this link here http://www.reddit.com/r/sto/comments/2fh905/sto_concept_artist_here_amaish/.

    A nice piece on the T6 ship design from the horses mouth.

    It's good to know that everything I thought was behind the design process actually WAS behind it as well :D

    Stealth bombers, appealing to new audience thus imitating what other "cool" franchises have, STO is an action game. Now, mind you this is understandable and frankly, it doesn't hurt STO much in my opinion since it never was a very true-to-canon piece of work to begin with. I like that the design team comes forward and talks about the issue and while I don't necessarily agree with what has been said I understand it and I even can live with the ship designs since they aren't new ships of the line but basically meant to be three one-of-a-kind ships operated by Starfleet Intelligence. Almost every player having one of those is nothing that happens in-lore - it doesn't help the "degrading" visuals (regarding true-to-canon designs you see when interacting with others) of the game, but in the story there are only very few intel ships.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • Options
    neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Did the Caitians make the ships, because they look like they came from the Atrox carrier
    GwaoHAD.png
  • Options
    smokeybacon90smokeybacon90 Member Posts: 2,252 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Personally, I like the designs, however I can see why some people are annoyed over their departure from the usual Starfleet theme.

    These are the latest and most advanced ships in the Federation arsenal. And not just the release of a new C-store pack, but a whole new tier of ship, representing a big technological leap that will potentially change how Starfleet operates.

    And, to spearhead this change, we are getting these 3 frankly alien designs, along with just a single traditionally Trek ship. To introduce T6 you could have designed successors to the Odyssey, Armitage and Vesta for example. Ships that really show the advance of technology but still stay true to the things that make Starfleet vessels so recognisable, and crucially, so popular amongst players and fans.

    The Intel ships could have been released as the next phase of T6 ships, with emphasis put on their departure from usual design principles being a temporary measure, given their unique role and background.

    I digress, I think that when designing these Fed ships, you could have been more careful to stay close to what we already have, especially given that in the eyes of many players, these ships have come along to make all their existing Odysseys, Sovereigns, Defiants, Vestas etc. utterly obsolete.
    EnYn9p9.jpg
  • Options
    starsider32485starsider32485 Member Posts: 57 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I was skeptical of the new designs (aside from the Guardian) myself...until it hit me WHY they look the way they do. As some people have already pointed out, these are intelligence ships, but more pointedly, these are STEALTH ships. All three intel ships have built in cloaking capabilities for starters but beyond that we have the black hull material, the streamlined, almost flattened shapes...shapes and materials that would probably give them a low profile sensor signature even while decloaked.

    Lets face it guys, whatever you thought about Voyager or Janeway, the undeniable fact is that she left a lot of enemies behind in the Delta Quadrant, enemies that would, thus, be hostile to the Federation and Starfleet in general. Starfleet knows this, and hence why I get the feeling that a lot of the early missions in Delta Rising will be on the covert side, and so we get a trio of new ships designed specifically to be stealthy and, hopefully, allow captains to avoid unnecessary confrontations while executing their missions.
  • Options
    xigbargxigbarg Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Its funny to think of the Eclipse as the next gen Multi-Vector. I can see it splitting via sliding out of place instead of just unlatching.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    mandarsmashmandarsmash Member Posts: 78 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    valoreah wrote: »
    If the ship is invisible, what difference does the hull color, hull shape or material it's made out of make? Romulan and Klingon ships had none of this F'ed up looking materials/shapes before and their stealth/cloak seemed to work just fine.

    There's many ways one could justify a difference in the material/hull colour/hull shape. Generally speaking, even a ship under cloak gives off trace particles and radiation that can be tracked. This may be one of the Federation's ways to minimize that effect. Also, it would also be beneficial for a ship, whose main purpose is recon and intelligence gathering, to also have a design that minimizes detected when not cloaked, as well. There are going to be a lot of times when an intelligence ship like these are going to be uncloaked, for various reasons.

    And as has been said before, it's not like Cryptic has abandoned creating more Trek-like Federation ships, looking at the Guardian.

    The intelligence ships are specific purpose ships. Just like escorts are purpose built apart from cruisers and science ships (until DS9, there were only cruisers and science ships), this is a new category that borrows and builds on other classes, but designed towards a specific purpose.
Sign In or Register to comment.