test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Anyone have a screenshot of the TR-116B in game?

auric2000auric2000 Member Posts: 118 Arc User
I Know the stats but I wanna see what it looks like in game and other details about it.
Post edited by auric2000 on
«1

Comments

  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    https://hzero.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/tr116web.jpg

    I don't think the R&D rifles changed in appearance compared to the original. It's a white high tier phaser rifle with orange holograms instead of blue.
  • xiaoping88xiaoping88 Member Posts: 1,493 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    I hope they got rid of those holograms... stupid things. :rolleyes:
    Reality is an illusion.
    The universe is a hologram.
    latest?cb=20130715204749
    Buy gold!
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    xiaoping88 wrote: »
    I hope they got rid of those holograms... stupid things. :rolleyes:

    Don't count on it... Why do more work than you have to... Right?
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • raly95raly95 Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    That really disappoints; speaking only of my personal preference, I have always thought that the federation 'standard' phasers all start to look clunky and obnoxious after the mark 1 variants. I would love to have a Mk12 phaser rifle that looks like the mark 1 that you get in the tutorial. No big glowy holograms, no overly large plastic-y frame. Just something that resembles the phasers we see in the shows and movies. Same goes for the pistols.

    Was hoping the TR116B would have been sleeker and more detailed.
  • catoblepasbetacatoblepasbeta Member Posts: 1,532 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Ugh. So they kept the holograms? I guess I'll be giving the 'ground weapons' part of R&D a pass from now on then.

    I was hoping it would look more like the version from DS9, I purposefully avoid all the clunky hologram-covered weapons in this game. So disappointing.
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    xiaoping88 wrote: »
    I hope they got rid of those holograms... stupid things. :rolleyes:

    They haven't. 1 whinge is now allowed.
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • xiaoping88xiaoping88 Member Posts: 1,493 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    a3001 wrote: »
    They haven't. 1 whinge is now allowed.

    *whinge*

    /chars
    Reality is an illusion.
    The universe is a hologram.
    latest?cb=20130715204749
    Buy gold!
  • blitzy4blitzy4 Member Posts: 839 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    There's even a few on the exchange, although they're a bit pricey right now."
    jKixCmJ.jpg
    "..and like children playing after sunset, we were surrounded by darkness." -Ruri Hoshino



  • dessniperdessniper Member Posts: 195 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    blitzy4 wrote: »
    There's even a few on the exchange, although they're a bit pricey right now."

    As of 10 seconds ago, 48 Million EC.
  • malkarrismalkarris Member Posts: 797 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Here are some shots someone took over on reddit.


    http://imgur.com/a/emtJL

    Yep, still orange.
    Joined September 2011
    Nouveau riche LTS member
  • blitzy4blitzy4 Member Posts: 839 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    dessniper wrote: »
    As of 10 seconds ago, 48 Million EC.

    Thanks but still outside my price range.
    jKixCmJ.jpg
    "..and like children playing after sunset, we were surrounded by darkness." -Ruri Hoshino



  • futurepastnowfuturepastnow Member Posts: 3,660 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Yep. It looks exactly like the original (which I own), which doesn't look anything like the canon weapon. Disappointing, but not surprising.
  • auric2000auric2000 Member Posts: 118 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    So its still the Phaser Rifle model? .c. well thats nearly a deal breaker. How hard is it to model the actual gun considering how many new ground weapons they popped out recently. Really a lowblow considering how many people want this gun.
  • kahless2001kahless2001 Member Posts: 130 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Before you think about buying it...

    http://youtu.be/4ruCbP9TCKM?t=1m52s

    Video also shows you some visuals of the rifle and the sounds.
  • peetapipmacpeetapipmac Member Posts: 2,131 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    dessniper wrote: »
    As of 10 seconds ago, 48 Million EC.

    Considering how epicly lack luster their performance is, that is way over priced.
    The only reason they are even that high is because relativity few people are able to actually craft them yet.
    It's not my fault if you feel trolled by my Disco ball... Sorry'boutit.



    R.I.P. Leonard Nimoy
  • hartzillahartzilla Member Posts: 1,177 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Before you think about buying it...

    http://youtu.be/4ruCbP9TCKM?t=1m52s

    Video also shows you some visuals of the rifle and the sounds.

    What's worse is that not only is the MACO rifle better its considerably easier to get as well and cheaper.
  • lordagamemnonb5lordagamemnonb5 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    raly95 wrote: »
    That really disappoints; speaking only of my personal preference, I have always thought that the federation 'standard' phasers all start to look clunky and obnoxious after the mark 1 variants. I would love to have a Mk12 phaser rifle that looks like the mark 1 that you get in the tutorial. No big glowy holograms, no overly large plastic-y frame. Just something that resembles the phasers we see in the shows and movies. Same goes for the pistols.

    Was hoping the TR116B would have been sleeker and more detailed.

    Yea, I have to agree. One of the reasons I invested in fleet rifles: much sleeker (I was using the MACO rifle but grew tired of cliched sci-fi movie chunkiness).
    How the Devs see Star Trek, apparently:
    Star Trek: The Original Grind
    Star Trek: The Next Grind
    Star Trek: Deep Space Grind
    Star Trek: Voyage to the Grind
  • lordagamemnonb5lordagamemnonb5 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Before you think about buying it...

    http://youtu.be/4ruCbP9TCKM?t=1m52s

    Video also shows you some visuals of the rifle and the sounds.


    So, in the amount of time it takes to reach level 15, collect materials and craft on rifle, you could pretty much equip your entire crew with an entire MACO set each (a set that seems to have a much more useful battle rifle).
    How the Devs see Star Trek, apparently:
    Star Trek: The Original Grind
    Star Trek: The Next Grind
    Star Trek: Deep Space Grind
    Star Trek: Voyage to the Grind
  • catoblepasbetacatoblepasbeta Member Posts: 1,532 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Before you think about buying it...

    http://youtu.be/4ruCbP9TCKM?t=1m52s

    Video also shows you some visuals of the rifle and the sounds.
    So not only is it the same old hideous hologram covered clunky mess as the old gun, but it's inferior to a MACO rifle? A weapon that most players by this point already have?

    I don't see myself advancing any further in the ground weapons crafting branch. The ugly visual reuse would be enough, but this just seals the deal.
  • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    raly95 wrote: »
    That really disappoints; speaking only of my personal preference, I have always thought that the federation 'standard' phasers all start to look clunky and obnoxious after the mark 1 variants. I would love to have a Mk12 phaser rifle that looks like the mark 1 that you get in the tutorial. No big glowy holograms, no overly large plastic-y frame. Just something that resembles the phasers we see in the shows and movies. Same goes for the pistols.

    Was hoping the TR116B would have been sleeker and more detailed.

    Phaser Rifle


    Phaser Pistol
    ...its what I think of when i think of federation weapons...not a dust buster!


    I think the Sierra era they created was the (Klingon human disease) version for the Federation. They wore baggy pants (atleast they where pulled up!) big leather boots and strange shirts. Only the starting weapons resembled trek though.
  • auric2000auric2000 Member Posts: 118 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    This is depressing. Even if I didnt mind the lazy model re-use.. Its pretty sad that the MACO XII rifle dominates it in virtually every regard.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Did anyone really expect the TR-116B to look any different from the TR-116A? Now if it was the TR-142B, then obviously it should look different.
  • auric2000auric2000 Member Posts: 118 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    I will give them this.. I like the shell ejecting.. nice tough and probably one of the only pro's the weapon has currently.
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    "They should release TR-116 rifle to us. It shouldn't stay a pre-order exclusive and it should be able to be used at max level!"

    "Okay, here you go. One TR-116 rifle, adjusted for balance, and given the Mk XII treatment."

    "Not good enough!"
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • yuzralyuzral Member Posts: 160 Media Corps
    edited July 2014
    iconians wrote: »
    "They should release TR-116 rifle to us. It shouldn't stay a pre-order exclusive and it should be able to be used at max level!"

    "Okay, here you go. One TR-116 rifle, adjusted for balance, and given the Mk XII treatment."

    "Not good enough!"


    Clearly the Iconians nerfed the propellant ;)

    I may have missed something in that video I did (and if I did then I'd love to know what) but 'not good enough' pretty much sums up the 116's performance, especially against shielded targets. Something's off there and it's rendering the rifle significantly inferior to weapons of similar grade.

    (NB: the MACO rifle was used for comparison in that video as being essentially sniper v sniper).
    Blatant self-promotion: Producer of the Delta Rising Tribble Timewarp, Foundry Frolics and more: http://www.youtube.com/user/Yuzral
  • pompoulusspompouluss Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    yuzral wrote: »
    Clearly the Iconians nerfed the propellant ;)

    I may have missed something in that video I did (and if I did then I'd love to know what) but 'not good enough' pretty much sums up the 116's performance, especially against shielded targets. Something's off there and it's rendering the rifle significantly inferior to weapons of similar grade.

    (NB: the MACO rifle was used for comparison in that video as being essentially sniper v sniper).

    Yeah, most of this doesn't much confront me, but I hope the weapon's at least viable by the time I grind up to it. Else it'll just sit sadly on my mantelpiece.
  • szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    pompouluss wrote: »
    Yeah, most of this doesn't much confront me, but I hope the weapon's at least viable by the time I grind up to it. Else it'll just sit sadly on my mantelpiece.

    I feel the same way. I was really looking forward to getting it. But seeing how it performs at the moment I'm not that excited anmore. In fact the only high end crafting item that still interest me are the Particle Generator Science consoles.
  • willamsheridanwillamsheridan Member Posts: 1,189 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    i dont know what i saw yesterday in-game. It was a Tr-116 and i assume it was the old one (does someone really already have the TR-116B? Saw the Arc Beams from R&D on the Exchange How can you reach Level 15 so fast?) But it looked weak compared to my Elite Fleet Sniper Rifle. And also not very nice Design. Too many Holograms and all that
  • woodwhitywoodwhity Member Posts: 2,636 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    auric2000 wrote: »
    This is depressing. Even if I didnt mind the lazy model re-use.. Its pretty sad that the MACO XII rifle dominates it in virtually every regard.


    And its quite an accomplishment to make a weaker rifle then the Maco one, which has several handicaps since its a sniper.
  • auric2000auric2000 Member Posts: 118 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    lol. it still makes you wonder why cryptic seemed to do a 'copy/paste slap new stats on it' job
Sign In or Register to comment.