I was told by a fleet admiral there is a listing of the top 10-15 fleets size wise in the game. He said STO kept track of such things. Also was told it could be found in the forum.
However I have been unable to find this listing despite using different search parameters. Despite my best efforts , I could not find any info that was more current than 2010.
Is anyone else aware of this listing? or where it is located? I would very much appreciate a link to it , if you know where it is listed. Thanks
Comments
Updated weekly.
VS is completely done with all special stuff
HoTJ is 48 hours away from completing the final spire upgrade O_o with everything else done (i think we have to do the tailor unlock, but thats really minor compared to the rest)
Both fleets are at member cap with nearly monthly prunings of inactive members, and we have several overflow fleets for alts and fleet credit grinding.
Edit to add: I guess House is >_> lemme alone its 1am. kthx, But vice squad isnt. lolz
Fleet Admiral Rylana - Fed Tac - U.S.S Wild Card - Tactical Miracle Worker Cruiser
Lifetime Subscriber since 2012 == 17,200 Accolades = RIP PvP and Vice Squad
Chief of Starfleet Intelligence Service == Praise Cheesus
Vice Admiral Volmack ISS Thundermole
Brigadier General Jokag IKS Gorkan
Centurion Kares RRW Tomalak
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sentinels of Freedom (fed) tier 5 Industrial Fabricator
Sentinels of War (KDF) tier 5 Shipyards
Unless there is something else I need to do.
I noticed the same thing.
Quite simply, the ones updating that list have no way of confirming that it is in fact the true list.
The reason for this, is that cryptic does not release the actual numbers to the players.
Well, the page claims to update every week. Maybe it's in the que? And besides, said fleets that you know of might not want aforementioned information to be made public.
http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253
Why are you not rejoicing?
so while that is an old list of t5 fleets, it is far from complete.
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
It's an issue that user created/supported pages run into, rather than those that are procedurally generated using fleet statistics... I'm not sure if Cryptic would want to officially support such a feature.
pwebranflakes: this system is currently in place and working the way it should.
moradum: I got banned for saying "I started my day with cutting off 3 MM off of the bottom of my cabinet"
Is it? Ausmonauts Fedside have completed everything. T5 Starbase and T3 Embassy, spire and mine.
Look... "Updated Weekly" in STOwiki terms means "untill I get bored with it".
STOWiki hasn't been reliable in at least a year...
True. Most of the "upcoming content" is based on complete rumours. LOTS of people just ditch pages, this is a prime example.
It was a good idea while it lasted. Lol
No... it wasn't...
The problem is, that way too many people here believe rumors, and consider anything said in a podcast to be true and upcoming.
It's been proven again and again, that using a gaming forums is a... bad way to get information on what is upcoming and what is not...
And Just like that, when people can make up numbers (wich we know is the case, since cryptic dosen't release numbers), to create a fictional list of "top fleets".
I would even go as far as to claim that the list linked above has never been accurate... not even the day it was released.
Inaccurate information on teh intarwebz...who'd'a thunk it?
Oh, right- anyone with a grip on reality.
I'd have it set up so there is a index of all fleets with an updated screenshot of their fleet rank/lvl/holdings or a link to the fleet's Gateway page.
This creates a big picture problem since Cryptic links the official wiki through the official site here. Which means there's the illusion of it being a byproduct of Cryptic's own work.
So the caretaking of the wiki should either switch to Cryptic and they hire some people to get it up to date and official, or the wiki should be dumped from the STO site.
I know neither will happen. But yeah, more problems like this are bound to crop up because of that.