test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Help identifying a ship? O_o;

capemike4capemike4 Member Posts: 394 Arc User
edited February 2014 in Federation Discussion
I would've asked this a LOT sooner, but I nearly forgot about this, until now....

Just after New Years', I ran across a bizarre-looking Fed ship that I've never seen before or since, including in the Shipyard's 'store' or even the Zen store!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v615/CapeMike/screenshot_2014-01-05-01-00-48.jpg

It's the extremely 'tall' Quad-nacelles ship located just above my own in the center of the pic, with an almost whale-like body...I've not seen anything on it anywhere else, including the STO Wiki...anyone have any clue on it's identity?

O_o;
When in doubt...Gravity Well TO THE FACE!! :D
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • xigbargxigbarg Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Its the Typhoon Class ship that some people want flyable in the game. Its been in the game for a good while, nobody has been able to fly one though.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • jabberwalkie09jabberwalkie09 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I think that is the Jupiter class..... Typhoon looks a little more conventional IIRC
  • patientnr0patientnr0 Member Posts: 234 Arc User
    edited February 2014
  • themadrigogsthemadrigogs Member Posts: 207 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I think that's Jupiter Class. Non-playable, obviously. You can see one near the transwarp gate in Gamma Orionis.
  • xigbargxigbarg Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I have failed the people.

    *commits hegh'bat*
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ltdata96ltdata96 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I hear Jupiter? xD
  • patientnr0patientnr0 Member Posts: 234 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    it looks like a flying bathtub :D
  • capemike4capemike4 Member Posts: 394 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Yep, that's it! Wouldn't mind having one'a those monsters....
    When in doubt...Gravity Well TO THE FACE!! :D
  • steamwrightsteamwright Member Posts: 2,820
    edited February 2014
    patientnr0 wrote: »
    it looks like a flying bathtub :D

    How is it that the Jupiter uniforms are very cool, yet the ship looks like, as you say, a flying bathtub?
  • gjohnny1990gjohnny1990 Member Posts: 116 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Ha I think it's one butt ugly ship but it'd nice to be a flyable option.
  • ddesjardinsddesjardins Member Posts: 3,056 Media Corps
    edited February 2014
    The Jupiter was a stop-gap development designed specifically to deal with the Borg. Mind you this was at a time in the game when 10K dps was considered a high damage rate.

    Fast forward 4 years; dps is reaching 50+K for some Scimi builds. Cruiser builds can solo sides in KASE, and the NWS is entirely winnable.

    Note: this happened in Champions Online. Power creep made it less enjoyable.

    I feel confident in saying that within 12 months we will see something in Scimidar-type design for the Federation and Empire - either in a BOFF layout improvement to existing ships or an entirely new class built for war. The Avenger is NOT even close to the destructive capabilities of the Scimidar. It's all about the boff stations...

    Personally I would not want to see a Jupiter-type craft. Go full on TAC Carrier, or perhaps a Tactical Drone Command Ship with four drone hangers. Go big or go home ;)
  • edited February 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • insanerandomnesinsanerandomnes Member Posts: 228 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    skollulfr wrote: »
    kdf already has the bortas.
    if the scimitar gets a 7 turn rate there is no reason for any other ship to turn slower than it does.

    NEITHER of those statements are excuses. The Bortas ISN'T a klingon ship. Klingon ships tend to be fast and powerful, striking hard and quick. This ship, while not being terrible, isn't klingon. It is neither fast nor hard hitting.

    The scimitars design is fragile at best, it's big and monstrous, but it's not bulky, it's slim. Fed cruiser, like the galaxy-X I'm assuming ar much bulkier and in general more massive, and thus slower.

    Also the warbirds tend to be the fastest ships for their size. The mogai is actually the size of a soverign class, but it's performanc ewouldn't tell you that, now would it?
    I AM THE HARBINGER OF HOPE!
    I AM THE SWORD OF THE RIGHTOUS!


    dark_dreadnaught_by_insane_randomness-d5z6ydl.jpg
  • maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Ha I think it's one butt ugly ship but it'd nice to be a flyable option.
    It will be a sad sad day when they make that THING flyable.
    Sure make it flyable.....during 'The Doomsday Device" mission and you have to fly that THING down the throat of the planet eater on a suicide mission with a last minute transporter escape, but sadly (crocodile tears), the ship doesn't survive.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • trycksh0ttrycksh0t Member Posts: 148 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    NEITHER of those statements are excuses. The Bortas ISN'T a klingon ship. Klingon ships tend to be fast and powerful, striking hard and quick. This ship, while not being terrible, isn't klingon. It is neither fast nor hard hitting.

    The scimitars design is fragile at best, it's big and monstrous, but it's not bulky, it's slim. Fed cruiser, like the galaxy-X I'm assuming ar much bulkier and in general more massive, and thus slower.

    Also the warbirds tend to be the fastest ships for their size. The mogai is actually the size of a soverign class, but it's performanc ewouldn't tell you that, now would it?

    The Bortas isn't Klingon because it isn't fast and maneuverable? Klingon battle doctrine started leaning towards having larger, slower, more heavily armed ships a long while ago, when they introduced the Negh'Var-class battlecruiser (which is larger than a Sovereign).

    As for Warbirds, the simple answer is that Romulans have better impulse engines than the Federation and KDF. I have no documentation, canon or otherwise, to back that up, but it is the only thing that makes sense.
  • ebeneezergoodeebeneezergoode Member Posts: 227 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Yeah, it's not just size that's in the equation. If you look at a Bentley Continental, it weighs nearly 3 tons. But because the engine, suspension and brakes are so well put together it still goes quickly and does it tidily. Conversely, a Robin Reliant, light though it is, only need look at a corner wrong to end up on it's roof.

    The Jupiter is a strange ship though, and frankly, I was very surprised it wasn't jazzed up a bit to become the Starfleet carrier vessel as opposed to the Atrox. People wanted a Starfleet carrier, they wanted a Jupiter. They had an existing asset rather than going to the effort of making a new one. :confused:
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.