test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Government in Star Trek

captclazoruscaptclazorus Member Posts: 377 Arc User
edited October 2013 in Ten Forward
http://voices.yahoo.com/is-star-trek-communist-3331996.html?cat=9

I now that many of my fellow Americans are deeply prejudice against communism. I want to point out, even though this is a rather old document, that the writer is only partially true. Star Trek may have some communistic aspects, but those are only similarities. The Federation isn't even a Republic really. The only reason there is no free enterprise system any more is because there is no more money. Every one is equal. You don't need to work to survive.

About the lazy thing- human philosophy changed dramatically. All governments were destroyed in WWIII and so people were left guide less. Zefram Cochrane established a new philosophy, though unintentionally, to form a peaceful society of equality and learning and exploration. The Federation is beyond the comprehension of a modern day person. I think we all would be better off without money. Where there is money, there is greed.

I only wish I lived in such a society.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Star Trek: Rubicon" Season 1, Season 2 A new era, a new time, a new crew, a new ship, a new mission...
"I rather believe that time is a companion who goes with us on the journey and reminds us to cherish every moment because it will never come again."- Jean-Luc Picard
Post edited by captclazorus on

Comments

  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Trek was very inconsistent about there being no money - it was Gene's dream, but it never came through in the series. Clearly there was money in Kirk's time - the Federation was dealing with Dilithium miners. The first thing Beverly Crusher does in TNG is buy some cloth from a merchant, so it would seem there's money in the TNG time period as well. Sisko's father owned a restaurant. I don't believe he was giving away the food for free, nor do I believe his vendors were giving him all the ingredients for him to cook for free either. And we have all the Starfleet people buying drinks and Holo time a Quark's.

    I would say that Trek's ideology is that most basic human services are covered: education, healthcare, etc. It's clear they still use money and that some live larger then others.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • philipclaybergphilipclayberg Member Posts: 1,680
    edited October 2013
    The only reason there is no free enterprise system any more is because there is no more money.

    What about gold-plated latinum in DS9? I don't think one can truly separate a human or semi-human or non-human from currency. Eventually someone will find a way to reintroduce it and find a way to control it for their own reasons (I was going to say "for their own good", but that sounded like a contradiction). Avarice will never die. It will simply find dark corners to hibernate in until it feels that there are those whose thoughts/feelings/actions can be influenced by the seductive power of greed (greed for money, greed for power, etc.).
  • lookmanohandslookmanohands Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Seems to me that the whole point of the No-Money-Rule (introduced by Roddenberry with TNG) was simply to tell writers to not write stories involving humans having money problems. Like Starfleet Officers going bankrupt, having debts, getting bribed or talking about troubles to afford tuition fees for their kids.... all that stuff.

    The rule keeps all those troubles out of the show and this way keeps it focussed on adventure, exploration and drama from conflicts that are feeling more epic than paying bills.

    And when we do get stories about money problems its usually involving Ferengis, so its presented as a light hearted comedy.
  • twg042370twg042370 Member Posts: 2,312 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Replicator rations are their form of currency. This is why they were trading them constantly on Voyager while running a holodeck 24/7.
    <3
  • grendelthewise#0990 grendelthewise Member Posts: 640 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Don't really care if there is communists in Star Trek. Its just a game.
    Fleet Admiral of the U.S.S. ATTILA KHAN-CDA (NX-921911).
  • marc8219marc8219 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    No money is unrealistic, thats why latinum was in DS9.
    Just because you can get food, housing, education, and medical care for free, there still has to be a medium of exchange for other stuff. If I want something you have like a rare gemstone, or hundreds of years old antique or something I need something to exchange for it if you aren't going to give it for free. If Earth and the Federation didn't have any currency to let me do that people needing currency would have to trade items to the Ferengi for Latinum, giving them control over the Federation economy. It wouldn't make sense.

    Also every country on Earth uniting is very unlikely, even if their governments were destroyed in WW3, successor states would spring up along similar boundries and have their own space programs, and I don't think a lot of them would be interested in peace with all the aliens we encounter. Given the history of the US and how it is still conducting itself and the way it dominates starfleet in the show I think it would look more like the mirror empire then Federation.
    Tala -KDF Tac- House of Beautiful Orions
  • voyagerfan9751voyagerfan9751 Member Posts: 1,120 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    Trek was very inconsistent about there being no money - it was Gene's dream, but it never came through in the series. Clearly there was money in Kirk's time - the Federation was dealing with Dilithium miners. The first thing Beverly Crusher does in TNG is buy some cloth from a merchant, so it would seem there's money in the TNG time period as well. Sisko's father owned a restaurant. I don't believe he was giving away the food for free, nor do I believe his vendors were giving him all the ingredients for him to cook for free either. And we have all the Starfleet people buying drinks and Holo time a Quark's.

    I would say that Trek's ideology is that most basic human services are covered: education, healthcare, etc. It's clear they still use money and that some live larger then others.

    You really see this in DS9. On the one hand you had everyone hanging out in Quark's, who I think we can all agree was not giving food or drinks away for free. On the other, There is at least one episode involving Jake, where it mentions them not having money.

    twg042370 wrote: »
    Replicator rations are their form of currency. This is why they were trading them constantly on Voyager while running a holodeck 24/7.

    Voyager can't really be used as a benchmark. Replicator Rationing was specific to the fact that they had limited resources, If you used up the power on Voyager, you were basically stranded, So any use of resources was made scarce (and no don't ask me about the Holodeck, I can't explain it any better then you).
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    There's more holes in the "Federation doesn't use money" thing that it makes Swiss cheese blush. Obviously there was some kind of currency, the problem, though, I think was that the writers didn't seem to know what "money" was.

    It's highly likely that they were thinking of "money" as being little green pieces of paper, obviously, but this is not the only means of exchange. There's numerous other monetary systems like barter where actual currency is not actually exchanged, but instead goods. Then there are voucher systems and stuff like Bitcoin....

    I could go on, really.
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    Trek was very inconsistent about there being no money - it was Gene's dream, but it never came through in the series. Clearly there was money in Kirk's time - the Federation was dealing with Dilithium miners. The first thing Beverly Crusher does in TNG is buy some cloth from a merchant, so it would seem there's money in the TNG time period as well. Sisko's father owned a restaurant. I don't believe he was giving away the food for free, nor do I believe his vendors were giving him all the ingredients for him to cook for free either. And we have all the Starfleet people buying drinks and Holo time a Quark's.
    I'm pretty sure that when they say there's no money, they mean internally, as in within Federation-to-Federation business(at least official/non-black market stuff). Of course other cultures might have money, because the Federation doesn't dictate how other governments run things.

    The dilithium miners probably don't have the benefits of the Fed's post-scarcity society. The merchant Crusher was buying from wasn't a Fed either. No idea about Sisko's father, but who's to say that Fed restaurants need a currency system to run? And lol Quark... he definitely wasn't a Fed.

    It's safe to say that Feds DO deal with currencies... but only when they come across another culture that does. But rest assured that the Fed's claim that money doesn't exist to them isn't as inconsistent as you think.
  • yaisuke15yaisuke15 Member Posts: 421 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Government? What government?! There is no government! Governments are just a myth!

    *meanwhile a group of mysterious black cloaked figures bury several things in the ground, one of which is the Constitution of the United States*

    Please look elsewhere for this mythical subject!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    "Look at me I'm a target!"
    "Fire the Lance on my mark... MARK!
    "How many times have we gone into the breach again R'shee?"
    My proposal for a Galaxy bundle
  • lookmanohandslookmanohands Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    marc8219 wrote: »
    No money is unrealistic, thats why latinum was in DS9.
    Just because you can get food, housing, education, and medical care for free, there still has to be a medium of exchange for other stuff. If I want something you have like a rare gemstone, or hundreds of years old antique or something I need something to exchange for it if you aren't going to give it for free.

    Or, the rare gemstones and the antiques are public property?

    But you are right. What about that one house at the lake with the beautyfull view. Housing maybe 'for free', but how do you settle who gets exactly what house? A lottery? The best houses are given away by a democratically elected commission of citizens, who award the best houses to citizens who have excelled, like governments these days give away medalls, awards and prizes?

    There are countless of possible systems that could govern those different conflicts over who gets what stuff. And wether those systems work or not merely depends on wether or not the people want these systems to work, accept them, prefer the strength of the systems and tollerate their weaknesses.
  • nickcastletonnickcastleton Member Posts: 1,212 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    1. Utopian
    This has to be the most flawed argument ever in the article
    Most Utopian of all, however, is the view of human nature. As Captain Picard states in the above-cited clip, humans in the Star Trek universe simply work to better themselves. We are led to believe, therefore, that the hundreds of members of the Star Trek Enterprise voluntarily follow Picard's commands simply because they believe doing so will better themselves, and that they stand to gain nothing else from their service. This willingness to disregard human nature is why Star Trek is Communist, fundamentally.
    Starfleet is more or less the military arm of the Federation, yes they state that Starfleet isn't military many times in star trek but they are the main defense for the Federation so they are in part military, and it is stated many times that their are risks wearing the uniform this isn't just from fighting its from the dangers of space travel so the whole argument that they join only to better humanity is a load of bull they join to explore and protect the Federation.

    2. Totalitarian
    While Earths Government isnt really explored in Star trek the federation is the UN in space which means members govern their own planet set rules ect but as members they do have guidelines and follow rules set out by the federation very much like we do now with the UN. As for United Earth we need to remember that almost all of the major governments were destroyed in world war 3 that and 6 million deaths its more than likely that all of earths nations had no choice but to join together in order to help each nation rebuild yet again we dont know how it works.

    3. Opposed to Capitalism
    It is never stated that the Federation is opposed to Capitalism The frenengi were supposed to be enemies of the Federation but not because they hated the fact they love money, the frenengi themselves dont follow what is considered fair business practice as a result they are considered untrustworthy when it comes to buying things from them.

    granted there are some things that support the idea that Star trek is Communist the quote springs to mind.
    Open your eyes, Captain. Why is the Federation so obsessed with the Maquis? We've never harmed you. And yet we're constantly arrested and charged with terrorism. Starships chase us through the Badlands and our supporters are harassed and ridiculed. Why? Because we've left the Federation, and that's the one thing you can't accept. Nobody leaves paradise. Everyone should want to be in the Federation. Hell, you even want the Cardassians to join. You're only sending them replicators because one day they can take their "rightful place" on the Federation Council. You know, in some ways you're even worse than the Borg. At least they tell you about their plans for assimilation. You're more insidious. You assimilate people and they don't even know it."
    but this article does a very poor job of proving that.
    0bzJyzP.gif





    "It appears we have lost our sex appeal, captain."- Tuvok
Sign In or Register to comment.