test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Suggestion: Admiral title

michlomichlo Member Posts: 95 Arc User
edited October 2013 in Federation Discussion
Greetings,

please consider changing the way we are addressed. I'm tired of seeing those I interact with calling me "Rear Admiral Upper Half". It is rather silly. Wouldn't "Admiral" be more appropriate?

Cheers.
Post edited by michlo on

Comments

  • kintishokintisho Member Posts: 1,040 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Whenever the level cap is increased to (Full) Admiral we will have that change... Followed by Fleet Admiral respectively (per many prior dev posts, this is the language they have used). I am hoping for an escort slot for one of my garaged ships.. maybe 2 at FA.. the away team of ships (no not talking about teams) has also been used on multiple occasions by the devs but no detail as to schedule or execution of any kind ever eluded to.
  • captainpirkocaptainpirko Member Posts: 270 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    shouldnt they stop calling you "rear admiral upper half" and start calling you "vice admiral" at endgame? i thought they did.

    and to the above poster, oooh, i so hope they add starship away teams soon. that'd add a really high level of epicness to drop out of warp in some missions with a fleet of cruisers next to me. =D
    [SIGPIC]Timelords Fleet [/SIGPIC]
  • michlomichlo Member Posts: 95 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    shouldnt they stop calling you "rear admiral upper half" and start calling you "vice admiral" at endgame? i thought they did.

    and to the above poster, oooh, i so hope they add starship away teams soon. that'd add a really high level of epicness to drop out of warp in some missions with a fleet of cruisers next to me. =D


    Thank you.
  • predconpredcon Member Posts: 478 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    To be honest, I'd enjoy the option of just being addressed as 'captain', since I'm only commanding one ship and not a fleet.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Yeah the whole Rear Admiral Lower Half and Rear Admiral Upper Half distinction makes no sense when Rear Admiral is just fine. Or better yet, let our chosen rank determine what people call us. Could use some of the Titles, but others are ridiculous like Moist.

    The Ask Cryptics have pretty much confirmed that the next level cap will have us create our own personal fleet where we can fight with our unused ships. Having lockbox ships and C-Store ships being unused seems like a waste when we can send them out on missions like the duty officer assignments and have them fight with us.
  • captainhunter1captainhunter1 Member Posts: 1,627 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    They ought to scrap the whole rank 'address' system as it stands and have NPCs just use our chosen titles.

    Cryptic could remove the more rediculous ones, such as 'moist', but even if they didn't, no one can see it in any dialog boxes except you.

    And I really hope they never promote us to 5 pip Fleet Admirals - I mean seriously - what's next, promoting us to 'President of the Federation' when they raise the level cap after that?

    They should have just stopped at the canon 'hero' rank of Captain for everyone. And then had ongoing levels in that, like Captain 60, Captain 70, etc, etc. The 'Admiral' title should have been reserved for Fleet (guild) Leaders.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    They ought to scrap the whole rank 'address' system as it stands and have NPCs just use our chosen titles.

    Cryptic could remove the more rediculous ones, such as 'moist', but even if they didn't, no one can see it in any dialog boxes except you.

    And I really hope they never promote us to 5 pip Fleet Admirals - I mean seriously - what's next, promoting us to 'President of the Federation' when they raise the level cap after that?

    They should have just stopped at the canon 'hero' rank of Captain for everyone. And then had ongoing levels in that, like Captain 60, Captain 70, etc, etc. The 'Admiral' title should have been reserved for Fleet (guild) Leaders.

    And the devs have confirmed in the Ask Cryptics that when the level cap increase has occurred, we will be full Admirals were we can control our own fleet. Some of us like commanding a fleet of our own. We are an Admiral so we should like to be able to do Admiral content. This is from November's Ask Cryptic.

    "Q: (cbp4964) Will we ever be able to send out bridge officers off on separate missions, or have them accompany us to battle in ships we assign them from our own selection?

    Dstahl: We have some pretty awesome plans for when we increase ranks to Admiral level 60 which make good use of your bridge officers, ships, and crew. We ultimately want full Admirals to command their fleets. You?ll have to wait until at least Season 9 to get more details though."

    As far as promotions beyond that, there is no possible way to become President of the Federation while still part of Starfleet. Of course, plans could change due to it being unfeasible, but it is simply something I hope I am right and you are wrong and we will see who is right in the years to come. Dan Stahl has mentioned his desire to allow us to become Full Admirals and we are simply playing Cryptic's version of what Star Trek is not your version or my version of what Star Trek is. If Cryptic wants thousands of full Admirals and a Liberated Borg faction, then we will have to deal with it if it is feasible and the majority don't care about it or want it.
  • johnny111971johnny111971 Member Posts: 1,300 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    starkaos wrote: »
    And the devs have confirmed in the Ask Cryptics that when the level cap increase has occurred, we will be full Admirals were we can control our own fleet. Some of us like commanding a fleet of our own. We are an Admiral so we should like to be able to do Admiral content. This is from November's Ask Cryptic.

    "Q: (cbp4964) Will we ever be able to send out bridge officers off on separate missions, or have them accompany us to battle in ships we assign them from our own selection?

    Dstahl: We have some pretty awesome plans for when we increase ranks to Admiral level 60 which make good use of your bridge officers, ships, and crew. We ultimately want full Admirals to command their fleets. You?ll have to wait until at least Season 9 to get more details though."

    As far as promotions beyond that, there is no possible way to become President of the Federation while still part of Starfleet. Of course, plans could change due to it being unfeasible, but it is simply something I hope I am right and you are wrong and we will see who is right in the years to come. Dan Stahl has mentioned his desire to allow us to become Full Admirals and we are simply playing Cryptic's version of what Star Trek is not your version or my version of what Star Trek is. If Cryptic wants thousands of full Admirals and a Liberated Borg faction, then we will have to deal with it if it is feasible and the majority don't care about it or want it.

    Note what it DOES NOT SAY... and that is that these ships will join us in battle. Is it a possibility, sure... but lets not jump to conclusions...

    Star Trek Online, Now with out the Trek....
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Note what it DOES NOT SAY... and that is that these ships will join us in battle. Is it a possibility, sure... but lets not jump to conclusions...

    How is it jumping to conclusions? Commanding a fleet means that will fight. There are two types of content that is in that statement. We send our unused ships off on missions similar to the duty officer assignments and we summon our unused ships to help us in combat against some foe. Sure it is possible that only certain maps allow us to summon our fleet like defending Earth from invasion where each teammate can summon their fleet resulting in 25 ships or the fleet summon only lasts a couple of minutes with a 10 minute cooldown.

    It is possible that the first step of this system could include the basics of getting our unused ships Fleet ready like deciding which bridge officers to use and which Captain to use for each ship and the duty officer type system while the second step of having the fleet join us in battle and give us an appropriate command system similar to what our away team has. So it is not necessary to have the complete system available when it is initially released.
  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,857 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I think it should be cadet 1-9
    Ens 10-19
    Lt junior grade 20-29
    Lcdr 30-39
    Cdr 40-49
    Capt 50
    Fleet capt 60
    Commodore 70
    Rear admiral 80
    Vice adm 90
    Adm 100
    Spock.jpg

  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I think it should be cadet 1-9
    Ens 10-19
    Lt junior grade 20-29
    Lcdr 30-39
    Cdr 40-49
    Capt 50
    Fleet capt 60
    Commodore 70
    Rear admiral 80
    Vice adm 90
    Adm 100

    That would require completely changing the game. Cadet means that we would have to spend a couple of hours at Starfleet Academy. Ensign would mean that we are not in control of the ship, but some npc is. Commodore is a rank that was used a lot in TOS, but only one episode in TNG and even then it was in the past tense by 2364 so it is no longer used.
  • dracounguisdracounguis Member Posts: 5,358 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Better being upper half of an Admiral than the lower half.

    But honestly, like others have stated; rank should be divorced from level. IMO, we should all be max rank of Captain right now. Rank of Admiral should come in a future Season if/when some sort of fleet action is put out. Or Commodore.
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    For what it's worth, rank is already divorced from level, practically speaking. In a Starfleet with tens of thousands of "Vice Admirals", the only officers that can actually tell anyone what to do are Admiral Quinn and (to an extent), Admiral T'nae.

    Indeed, the right move would be for Cryptic to alter all the mission text and remove the code tag that automatically references a player's rank (leading to you being addressed as "Rear Admiral Upper Half" etc), and simply replace it with "Captain", because the correct form of address for the commanding officer of a ship is "Captain", regardless of the officer's actual rank. That's what I'm doing for the Foundry series I'm working on, so that's that.

    That aside, to reconcile this I've invented a needlessly complicated rationalization in my mind, where everyone's rank is "provisional" (i.e. battlefield promotions), and as such doesn't translate to real authority in Starfleet. Given the level of autonomy your average STO player has, we're all more like privateers rather than members of the rank-and-file.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    edalgo wrote: »
    No1 wants to be Admiral. We all want to be Captains and command Starships.

    And this is completely incorrect which is why generalizations are usually wrong. Since I want to be an Admiral and control a fleet of ships, then your statement is invalid. "No one should be an Admiral" is an opinion that some agree with. More would agree with it if it is a choice of commanding a ship or being stuck behind a desk where mission rewards are getting a more comfortable chair and a bigger desk.

    As the game is currently, there is no difference between any rank. Admiral content where you can send ships out on missions similar to duty officer assignments and help fight with you in combat would actually give some needed depth to the game. The worst thing IMO about this game besides no missions on the ship and very few non-combat missions is that people spend $25 and above for a ship and it just collects dust at the shipyard because something cooler came along. Being able to have these unused ships fight with you or able to send them on missions would make them not seem like a waste.

    Rank should be determined through our titles, but only some titles should be used. There are just some titles that should not be used as rank.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    A Captain can control a group of ships just as well as an Admiral - just ask Sisko.

    The Admiral title should only apply to true/real Fleet Leaders, people who actually work hard to administrate/run Fleets - not for for commanding a bunch of 'pet' ships.

    It sure would be nice to make Captain the highest rank title in the game for most people, with the Admiral title still available (even by 'cheating' for it - just make your own Fleet by simply getting 5 people to help you make a Fleet - and then drop them! Viola! Admiral title unlocked!).

    Having Admiral titles be somewhat rare would actually make them mean something in this game.

    It is too late for that since the Admiral ranks are already in the game and people expect Admiral content for being an Admiral. People don't like forced demotions for their characters. The ranks are already screwed up since Lieutenants are commanding decent sized ships which should be only for people at a higher rank.

    What the devs should do is add the Admiral title for getting to level 60, but have a person's rank associated to certain titles. Could add the Fleet Captain title as a reward for getting to level 60 as well. So once a person is level 30, they can select the Captain rank and stay there or they could choose something like Master Chef, Diplomat, Master Explorer, or any other title that sounds like a possible rank.
  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,857 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Again, level should have nothing to do with rank (other than unlocking titles as you level up - to insure no level 1 characters spouting the title "President of the Federation").

    As for being 'too late' and 'demotions' - no one is asking for that. It would be an easy thing for the Dev team to have all future/new characters created have their titles cap at Captain. Existing characters would keep what ever titles they currently have. (They should have done this back at the Free to Play launch as a 'reward' to previous subscribers, but that opportunity is long since gone). Attrition over time would then bring the out-of-control, overpopulation of Admirals down.

    As for lower level (rank) characters commanding ships, that is already logically factored into the game in the way of the General War that is going on galaxy-wide creating a shortage of manpower to fill command positions. It doesn't explain why every uncles brothers son, their neighbors, their cats, and all their friends are ADMIRALS in this game.

    The 'default' end game rank title should be the revered and iconic Star Trek 'hero' title - Captain.

    actually there are historical examples of junior officers commanding vessels Ens and LtJG (O-2) often commanded patrol boats in the USN in Vietnam. LT's commanded PT boats and sometimes submarines in ww2. DE's were commanded by Lts and LCDRs, as were fleet subs. LCDRs and junior commanders skippered destroyers. you did not see a captain command a ship till you got to Cruisers and carriers. (still that way)
    Spock.jpg

Sign In or Register to comment.