test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Is the new Romulan faction a waste of time for PvP?

darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
edited April 2013 in PvP Gameplay
Cryptic has already disappointed many of us by going on record as saying that they are more biased towards escorts and they will cater more towards them then any of the other classes.

These new Romulan ships are NOT like escorts as all. Slow turning, lumbering beasts.

In PvP that pretty much means never being anything special. Run of the mill. Ordinary at best.

If this is the case, what's the point?
Post edited by darramouss1 on

Comments

  • fraghul2000fraghul2000 Member Posts: 1,590 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Cryptic has already disappointed many of us by going on record as saying that they are more biased towards escorts and they will cater more towards them then any of the other classes.

    These new Romulan ships are NOT like escorts as all. Slow turning, lumbering beasts.

    In PvP that pretty much means never being anything special. Run of the mill. Ordinary at best.

    If this is the case, what's the point?

    You don't have any stats whatsoever on planned Romulan ships, you don't know which ones will have Fleet or Refit variants, you don't know what c-store ships there are going to be...yet you're already complaining abput how bad they'll be in PvP?
  • marshalericdavidmarshalericdavid Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The D'deridex Class warbird I do expect to be a slow turning lumbering beast but the Mogai won't be. The Mogai is the Romulan ship I look forward to the most.
  • doffingcomradedoffingcomrade Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Seems like a premature concern. We can burn that bridge when we come to it.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    You don't have any stats whatsoever on planned Romulan ships, you don't know which ones will have Fleet or Refit variants, you don't know what c-store ships there are going to be...yet you're already complaining abput how bad they'll be in PvP?

    You're right, I don't have stats. I have this, though.

    "Romulan ships tend to be large and heavy, making them somewhat slower and less maneuverable than comparable Federation and Klingon Defense Force ships. The iconic D?deridex, for example, is larger and more resilient than the Galaxy ? but considerably slower as a result."

    This is from Dev Blog 3.

    Slow ships with cannons aren't as useful as fast ships with cannons. I don't think many people will argue with this, after all if you can't get the cannons aimed at the enemy they're useless. This is but one of the things that makes the JHAS so deadly.

    Logic follows that if your ship can't turn fast enough for cannons you're going to have to fit on beams or torpedoes. (I seriously doubt there will ever be a ship that only packs mines and nothing else.)

    I seriously doubt that they will invalidate the Feds and the klinks by making the Romulans noticeably stronger or have wildly stronger powers. If they do that then who will play (and pay for items from) the original two factions? That being said, apart from a few new fancy powers they're just going to be green ships that will blend in to the PvP background. Any serious PvP Romulan will just fly a JHAS.

    Cryptics blind lust for the profits generated by escorts will hurt the Romulans.
  • abyssinainabyssinain Member Posts: 98 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The new expansion is coming with massive balance passes along with the new content, its very possible beams may became a viable alternative to DHC's.
  • darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    abyssinain wrote: »
    The new expansion is coming with massive balance passes along with the new content, its very possible beams may became a viable alternative to DHC's.

    I sincerely hope this is the case. I want Star Trek Online, not escorts online.
  • mattimeo97mattimeo97 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    ITT: OP fails to notice that plenty of people seem to make cruisers and other slow things viable in PvP, and that most serious premades have more sci ships than escorts.
  • hroothvitnirhroothvitnir Member Posts: 322
    edited April 2013
    Most sci ships turn relatively fast and deliver their deadly deeds in a burst, SensorScan subnuke ect. 5/7 turnrate is far different from 13

    The only way a rom cruiser will be viable is if it has one crazy powerful alpha strike from cloak. Something most cruiser type ships arn't setup for. Anyway I call the "Durpy'Dex" right now as the future naming for it. And will also admit I am going to buy a scimitar no matter how terrible a ship it may be if they give us the option.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    What it overlooks is the following:

    Retrofit versions of the various ships.
    Fleet versions of the various ships.
    C-Store versions of other ships.

    It's going to be a P2T faction.

    Pay-to-Turn. :)
  • praxi5praxi5 Member Posts: 1,562 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Where has Cryptic stated that they favor Escorts over all others?
  • simeion1simeion1 Member Posts: 898 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I think that it is going to stop some of the complaining about Feds not having cloaking devises and the BoP alpha on spawn. It might balance things out but it might also give people another reason to complain. I suspect the later, but until it is implemented we will not know. One thing there is for sure it is going to open more options for people to do, which is a good thing.
    320x240.jpg
  • marc8219marc8219 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The blog clearly states the T1 warbird will handle like a raider (bird of prey), the t2 will be like a escort, and the t3 will be like a destroyer, all of these will have t5 versions available.

    Also they stated the D'deridex will appeal to people who like battlecruisers, well battlecruisers vary a lot in their base turn rate, from slow turners like Bortasqu, to the Fleet Ktinga which handles almost like a destroyer. So we really have no idea how good this thing will turn until they release the stats.

    I am confident Cryptic wants to sell ships, so they won't make these suck.
    Tala -KDF Tac- House of Beautiful Orions
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    sounds like the big warbirds everyone cares about are going to turn like fed cruisers, and thus suck, draining away about 90% of my ability to care about the faction at all
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    sounds like the big warbirds everyone cares about are going to turn like fed cruisers, and thus suck, draining away about 90% of my ability to care about the faction at all
    they'll probably battlecloak though, so maybe balanced
  • hroothvitnirhroothvitnir Member Posts: 322
    edited April 2013
    battlecloak and a mighty singly LTC Tac. Sneaky snoozers. Well it'll still be better than the GalX with that setup.
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Turn...? Turn!?! I don't care about TURNING!

    I'm making all my Romulan toons go to the KDF side, so they will have instant (and free) access to Subspace Jump. So the moment they have the level, and if I choose to put them in a slower turning ship, I can use Subspace Jump for the same reason as my Bortas:

    To make it so that turn doesn't mean ****.

    Besides, when I have to turn, I've always found that Evasives in reverse is perfectly fine most of the time. If needed I will chain a Deuterium Surplus, and maybe an engine battery.

    Plus these buggers are going to be cloaking. So I can set myself up for an attack however I like ahead of time.

    Sure in PvP I'd be totally running it differently, but in PvE, I don't see a massive need to turn as it stands now.



    My plans of flying a D'deridex haven't changed.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited April 2013
  • gradstudent1gradstudent1 Member Posts: 633 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    We need to wait and see what kinds of powers willl be associated with the new singularity warp cores as well. we simply don't have enough information at this point to make a call on this issue.
  • darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    praxi5 wrote: »
    Where has Cryptic stated that they favor Escorts over all others?

    In a PodcastUGC interview with Captain Gecko they asked about the sci/esc/cru dynamics. Gecko stated that they focus more on escorts as more people spend money on them. Because of that they give escorts more love. VERY disappointing.

    sounds like the big warbirds everyone cares about are going to turn like fed cruisers, and thus suck, draining away about 90% of my ability to care about the faction at all

    My fears exactly.
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    In a PodcastUGC interview with Captain Gecko they asked about the sci/esc/cru dynamics. Gecko stated that they focus more on escorts as more people spend money on them. Because of that they give escorts more love. VERY disappointing.




    My fears exactly.

    More love=more ship releases, they were not implying they try to make escorts op.
  • darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    cidstorm wrote: »
    More love=more ship releases, they were not implying they try to make escorts op.

    I'm not going to listen to the podcast again as it was insanely long but it was recognised that escorts are the better ships and there won't be efforts to change that.
  • trintrektrontrintrektron Member Posts: 73 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    You're right, I don't have stats. I have this, though.

    "Romulan ships tend to be large and heavy, making them somewhat slower and less maneuverable than comparable Federation and Klingon Defense Force ships. The iconic D?deridex, for example, is larger and more resilient than the Galaxy ? but considerably slower as a result."

    This is from Dev Blog 3.

    Slow ships with cannons aren't as useful as fast ships with cannons. I don't think many people will argue with this, after all if you can't get the cannons aimed at the enemy they're useless. This is but one of the things that makes the JHAS so deadly.

    Logic follows that if your ship can't turn fast enough for cannons you're going to have to fit on beams or torpedoes. (I seriously doubt there will ever be a ship that only packs mines and nothing else.)

    I seriously doubt that they will invalidate the Feds and the klinks by making the Romulans noticeably stronger or have wildly stronger powers. If they do that then who will play (and pay for items from) the original two factions? That being said, apart from a few new fancy powers they're just going to be green ships that will blend in to the PvP background. Any serious PvP Romulan will just fly a JHAS.

    Cryptics blind lust for the profits generated by escorts will hurt the Romulans.



    So..... Oddys, Bortas, Most carriers are no good in PVP ?
    I thought I took the Blue Pill.......:(
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I'm not going to listen to the podcast again as it was insanely long but it was recognised that escorts are the better ships and there won't be efforts to change that.

    Well if you're not willing that really says it all doesn't it?
  • darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    So..... Oddys, Bortas, Most carriers are no good in PVP ?

    A team of escorts that focus fire will beat a team of oddys on most days. Yes, there will be battles that the cruisers win but in the end the war will go to the escorts.

    cidstorm wrote: »
    Well if you're not willing that really says it all doesn't it?

    Did you listen to it? Did you take the time to? I did. I listened to it once and owing the very long length of it I'm not going to listen to it again to find the exact time when he says it.
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Did you listen to it? Did you take the time to? I did. I listened to it once and owing the very long length of it I'm not going to listen to it again to find the exact time when he says it.

    He says that escorts are the best sellers and that they will focus on making more escorts than anything else. It's that simple, cryptic PR is bad but not "we want to make the game more imbalanced" bad.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    We need to wait and see what kinds of powers willl be associated with the new singularity warp cores as well. we simply don't have enough information at this point to make a call on this issue.

    The Singularity Cores in the Dil Store hint at several of the powers - there's what, 5 or 6 of them? Shielding, Jump, Overcharge, Warp Shadow, etc, etc, etc...
  • orondisorondis Member Posts: 1,447 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    From what's been said on TTS, the stats haven't been finalised yet for the Romulan warbirds.

    Lets wait until actual stats appear before whining. Story fluff is interesting, but doesn't directly translate into gameplay.

    I'll admit though, if they give the D'deridex a turnrate of 6 instead of 9 like a Negh'var, I'm going to avoid it. That'll be despite it being on of my favourite ships in Trek.
    Previously Alendiak
    Daizen - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
    Selia - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
  • naeviusnaevius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    One other hint from the blog:

    With an emphasis on the tactical use of potent abilities stemming from advanced Romulan technology, Romulan Warbirds are built to fight like the Romulans themselves ? with a high risk, high reward style.

    So, just maybe, they have some high criticals or special overload attacks. Or extra high level tac slots.
    _________________________________________________
    [Kluless][Kold][Steel Heels][Snagtooth]
    [Louis Cipher][Outta Gum][Thysa Kymbo][Spanner][Frakk]
    [D'Mented][D'Licious]
    Joined October 2009. READ BEFORE POSTING
  • portgazdportgazd Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    cidstorm wrote: »
    He says that escorts are the best sellers and that they will focus on making more escorts than anything else.

    The way I see it, It's BECAUSE escorts are more overpowered than science ships/cruisers/etc that they are the better sellers. If this game was at pre-F2P levels, science ships would be the better sellers with at least some more cruisers being sold.

    And it shouldn't be the case that "escorts are stronger than most ships and that is how it should be". If they actually leveled the playing field a little bit more and somehow made cruisers more viable in PVP/PVE, they could have more sales across the board.
    Vice-Chancellor of Federation Fleet Directive 010

    DISENCHANTED
Sign In or Register to comment.