test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

What's your opinion of the Excelsior?

djf021djf021 Member Posts: 1,382 Arc User
edited January 2014 in Federation Discussion
Hello,
I'm currently saving Zen for an Excelsior cruiser (unless I get a ton of recommendations against it). My question is, if you have this ship, what do you think of it? I've heard a lot of good things about it.

ALSO, if I buy the C-store version, (I want it to be account wide obviously) can I get the fleet version for 1 fleet module? Just asking because the fleet starbase price seems to be 5 FMs, (different from the other fleet ships) so I wanted to make sure the pricing is not different somehow for this ship. Thanks for your help!
C4117709-1498929112732780large.jpg

Don't let them promote you. Don't let them transfer you. Don't let them do anything that takes you off the bridge of that ship, because while you're there... you can make a difference.
-Captain James T. Kirk
Post edited by djf021 on
«134

Comments

  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Not gonna lie. I hate the excelsior. She's ugly. She's ancient. And she really should just be retired. However the in-game version? As much as I hate saying this, it's a very good ship. She can tank very well, and deals acceptable damage. She has the best maneuverability (on paper) of any fed cruiser, and is arguably one of the best damage dealers (out of fed cruisers). She will serve you well. Provided you can stand her appearance.

    And it is true, if you own the VA excel, the fleet version only costs 1 FSM.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Buying the c-store version will allow you to get the fleet version for 1 module with every character.

    It's a great ship, it comes as top recommended along with the fleet assault cruiser and the odyssey for federation style cruisers. The bridge officer seating is a bit weird, but it's definitely workable.

    Really it comes down to what you want in a cruiser, do you want more offensive capabilities, or some of the best tanking in the game?

    Offensive cruisers=Excelsior and the assault cruiser fleet versions.

    Tankers=Odyssey and the fleet galaxy, these are also better at healing.

    Somewhere in between the two is the fleet heavy cruiser imo.
  • edited February 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Not gonna lie. I hate the excelsior. She's ugly. She's ancient. And she really should just be retired. However the in-game version? As much as I hate saying this, it's a very good ship. She can tank very well, and deals acceptable damage. She has the best maneuverability (on paper) of any fed cruiser, and is arguably one of the best damage dealers (out of fed cruisers). She will serve you well. Provided you can stand her appearance.

    And it is true, if you own the VA excel, the fleet version only costs 1 FSM.
    110% agree, especially the "hate" part. :D

    I think cryptic made excel too good compared to other non STO era ships, especially the Galaxy. In STO the Excel is superior in almost any way, while it should be the other way round. I don't get what Cryptics devs where thinking.

    Personally i never liked it's appearance, i hated it in 1984 and i still hate it today.
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • captainbmoneycaptainbmoney Member Posts: 1,323 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    An amazing ship. Only hated by futuretrolls and the only thing bad about it is that useless Ensign Engineer.

    Like my fanpage!
    https://www.facebook.com/CaptainBMoney913
    Join Date: August 29th 2010
  • edited February 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • erhardgrunderhardgrund Member Posts: 167 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Imho the Excelsior, especialy its Fleet version is on of the best Cruisers ingame.
    It can dish out alot of damage and it tanks well . And it is quite nimble for a cruiser.
    And the advanced Transwarp is so much fun even when it breaks down (does happen but its rare). Its the federation cruiser most suited to a cannon build. However i prefer beams and a mixture of offensive universal consoles and science powers to increase damage.

    No matter what it is well suited for Engineering Captains and Tactical Captains.
    Its a matter of taste but i like the Excelsiors look alot.
    Cruisers ftw!
  • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    The Excelsior is one of the top cruisers fedside. IMO it's the best, but that's debatable. :cool:
    Tza0PEl.png
  • mandoknight89mandoknight89 Member Posts: 1,687 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    nikephorus wrote: »
    The Excelsior is one of the top cruisers fedside. IMO it's the best, but that's debatable. :cool:
    For Fed-side tactical cruisers, it's either the Fleet Excelsior or the Fleet Assault Cruiser Refit (Imperial class), depending on whom you ask.

    The Excelsior is also far more of a love-hate ship than the AC-Refit, as far as I've seen... if you don't like the Regent or Imperial skins on the (F)ACR, you can always switch to the Sovereign, but the Excelsior draws a lot of ire for having exactly two skins, both of which are from the late 23rd century instead of the late 24th/early 25th. That and the ship (with such an old frame) being competitive with the Sovereign and generally accepted as superior to other new Fed cruisers such as the Odyssey and Galaxy.
  • momawmomaw Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I've got the Fleet version.

    It's a beautiful ship, IMO. The silhouette reminds me of a heron.

    Performance-wise, it's one of the best turning Federation cruisers. As somebody who plays both sides of the fence this makes me face-palm endlessly because the Negh'var, the KDF's "slow cruiser", turns even better.

    Decent hull, decent shields.

    The ensign engineer is a pain in the butt due to the fact that almost all ensign engineer abilities are fighting for the same cooldown and Cryptic won't listen to our ideas for fixes. I feel like I'm fighting one slot short because of this.

    The LTC tactical gives you twice as many options as most cruisers (since your first slot is always always always Tactical Team). I went with attack pattern beta 2, and high yield 2 (which really packs a whallop with the romulan hyper-plasma torpedo).

    The improved transwarp drive is both a blessing and a curse. It's GREAT for chasing down colonization and support doff missions! ... And it forces you to spend one of your active space slots on an astrometric scientist which has no combat relevance whatsoever or to switch constantly between fights.

    The console layout is obviously all about causing damage. You've got your armor and you've got your pew pew. The ship is very light on science consoles, which is actually somewhat relevant now with the outstanding threat-scaling consoles. Dedicated tanks need not apply.

    Soooo... Has some personality quirks but probably the best Federation cruiser for flying around and feeling like you're doing something. Better options available if you like being a brick or healer
  • smokeybacon90smokeybacon90 Member Posts: 2,252 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Fantastic ship, and I think it looks great too. Transwarp is always useful. Got a lot of use out of my retrofit and fleet versions. Now I am onto the Fleet Assault Refit though, as I prefer the ensign slot being a tac instead. Yes, it is up there with the Fleet Assault and the Galor as the best cruisers available to feds.
    EnYn9p9.jpg
  • orondisorondis Member Posts: 1,447 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    djf021 wrote: »
    Hello,
    I'm currently saving Zen for an Excelsior cruiser (unless I get a ton of recommendations against it). My question is, if you have this ship, what do you think of it? I've heard a lot of good things about it.

    ALSO, if I buy the C-store version, (I want it to be account wide obviously) can I get the fleet version for 1 fleet module? Just asking because the fleet starbase price seems to be 5 FMs, (different from the other fleet ships) so I wanted to make sure the pricing is not different somehow for this ship. Thanks for your help!

    It's a great fed PvE DPS cruiser, tying with the Regent in my opinion. As a fed cruiser it's a dream to fly with it's good turnrate. While the tactical Odyssey can also be made into a very good DPS cruiser with the aid of the saucer seperation console, the consoles cooldown kinda restricts it's usefulness. Also the fleet excelsior and regent get an extra tactical console.

    Then there's the regents innate transwarp ability, which makes doffing faster. It's because of this innate ability that it normally costs 5 FM.

    Personally I prefer the regent for the extra tactical station (I like flying with two ensign tactical teams and two offensive tactical powers), but the better turnrate of the excelsior is very helpful.

    Also I personally prefer the look of the excelsior to the majority of the T5 cruisers, which look way too fancy, overdeveloped and aerodynamic. Don't get me wrong, it's not as nice looking as the Ambassador class and the Constitution class, but I really prefer it's look to the Odyssey.
    Previously Alendiak
    Daizen - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
    Selia - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
  • sovereign010sovereign010 Member Posts: 641 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Makes me wonder what the best loadout for this ship would be, as a Tac/escort captain my experience is really limited. Didn't take me long to work out that to convert dil to enough zen to buy the ship and also buy fleet weapons for it would use up all of my Dilithium :D
  • squatsaucesquatsauce Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Makes me wonder what the best loadout for this ship would be, as a Tac/escort captain my experience is really limited. Didn't take me long to work out that to convert dil to enough zen to buy the ship and also buy fleet weapons for it would use up all of my Dilithium :D

    Well, there are a few ways to go and you can always buy cheaper white or green mk xi consoles/weapons on the exchange to test out folks ideas.

    Personally, I think that beams are substandard enough that running a 2 torp/6 turret layout using cannon tac abilities will get you better DPS and more procs than running a 2 torp/6 beam layout. It will also mean you can pretty much just concentrate on positioning as you'll deal roughly the same DPS no matter what direction you're facing. The Excelsior's better turn rate means you'll have an easier time bringing your torpedoes to bear or rotating wounded shields out of the way.
  • sirokksirokk Member Posts: 990 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    yreodred wrote: »
    110% agree, especially the "hate" part. :D

    I think cryptic made excel too good compared to other non STO era ships, especially the Galaxy. In STO the Excel is superior in almost any way, while it should be the other way round. I don't get what Cryptics devs where thinking.

    Personally i never liked it's appearance, i hated it in 1984 and i still hate it today.

    No it's not a beauty queen... it's your daddy with a machine gun! :eek: IT'S SERIOUS and gonna get the job done! :D

    I love it, it's tanks well as any other and I have never felt the need to add an RCS console to it... which means you get 1 more slot for some other more useful console.

    A nice plus is to be able to Transwarp to all the major systems including Tau Dawa. Unlike the T3 version, the Transwarp never fails.

    Besides the looks, you'll never regret getting the ship.

    The Galaxy's need another Tac console to start making sense.
    Star Trek Battles Channel - Play Star Trek like they did in the series!Avatar: pinterest-com/pin/14003448816884219Are you sure it isn't time for a "colorful metaphor"? --Spock in 'The Voyage Home'
    SCE ADVISORY NOTICE: Improper Impulse Engine maintenance can result in REAR THRUSTER LEAKAGE. ALWAYS have your work inspected by another qualified officer.
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I love the ship when I bought the lesser one. So my self is currently saving up for the Refit version. After long thoughts about it. I'm getting the Excelsior as well. Since it will offer a more Eng. based layout. Which I don't have on my Fed. Later I might pick up the Refit Galaxy to play around with. But that will be a much later purchase.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • asimosaasimosa Member Posts: 58 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    The Fleet Excelsior is pretty much the best PVE cruiser fedside, outside of lockbox ships. It's tough as bricks, it's nimble, and aside from the worthless enisgn engy slot it basically has a perfect BOFF layout. Get the right build and setup going (and this won't be cheap, mind you...) and you can compete with escorts in damage while being tough as a cruiser. The Regent is really its only competition, and it just doesn't quite match up (extra tac console, but at the cost of science console which are a lot more useful these days; worse turn; and an ensign tac isn't much better than an ensign engie). Even the non-fleet version is pretty damn good, and competes pretty well with fleet ships.

    Also it's the best looking Trek ship bar none, if you're old enough to appreciate the best 70's styling has to o
    YGYDvFm.png
    EGO operor non vere tutela
  • cptrichardson12cptrichardson12 Member Posts: 143 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    For Fed-side tactical cruisers, it's either the Fleet Excelsior or the Fleet Assault Cruiser Refit (Imperial class), depending on whom you ask.

    The Excelsior is also far more of a love-hate ship than the AC-Refit, as far as I've seen... if you don't like the Regent or Imperial skins on the (F)ACR, you can always switch to the Sovereign, but the Excelsior draws a lot of ire for having exactly two skins, both of which are from the late 23rd century instead of the late 24th/early 25th. That and the ship (with such an old frame) being competitive with the Sovereign and generally accepted as superior to other new Fed cruisers such as the Odyssey and Galaxy.

    And the Fleet Ambassador coming.
  • captainamericaxcaptainamericax Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    The Fleet Excelsior is amazing. I bought it a few weeks back and I do NOT regret it. I may have also spent enough EC for 5 ships with all of the testing to get a good set up on it, but it was well worth it.

    I'm running 3 Cannons and a Torp in the front with 3 Turrets and the Kinetic Cutting Beam on the Aft.

    It runs great in PVE, mainly STFs. I am able to get a good dps out without being a sitting duck with the turn rate being a great plus factor. Also it can take a good beating.

    I strongly suggest that OP buys the C-Store variant and a Fleet Module for the Fleet Excelsior. Its probably one of the best ships by far and I am pretty positive that it wont be out classed anytime soon. And if it does, it will still probably compete with it toe to toe.

    Now the look is debatable. I personally like it ,but a more updated skin for the ship would be great and would fix the grief that many people have about it.
    "The Easiest Day, was Yesterday"
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    asimosa wrote: »
    The Fleet Excelsior is pretty much the best PVE cruiser fedside, outside of lockbox ships. It's tough as bricks, it's nimble, and aside from the worthless enisgn engy slot it basically has a perfect BOFF layout. Get the right build and setup going (and this won't be cheap, mind you...) and you can compete with escorts in damage while being tough as a cruiser. The Regent is really its only competition, and it just doesn't quite match up (extra tac console, but at the cost of science console which are a lot more useful these days; worse turn; and an ensign tac isn't much better than an ensign engie). Even the non-fleet version is pretty damn good, and competes pretty well with fleet ships.

    Also it's the best looking Trek ship bar none, if you're old enough to appreciate the best 70's styling has to o

    Imperial Class Fleet Assault Cruiser. Equal tank, higher damage, better looking. Only catch: Tier 5 Shipyard required.

    That is all.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • byzanathosbyzanathos Member Posts: 100 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Imperial Class Fleet Assault Cruiser. Equal tank, higher damage, better looking. Only catch: Tier 5 Shipyard required.

    That is all.

    *Only catch: Tier 5 Shipyard required, lower turn rate.


    I think turn rate is a big factor, only 1 point difference but I think that would be noticeable.

    I'm struggling to figure out what ship to pickup... Excelsior looks really good on paper apart from the already discussed noob eng Boff. I like SCI ships but I'm an ENG, I really want a maneuverable ship.

    Any other options other than the Excelsior? Starting to think I should just cough up and get the vesta pack....
  • sander233sander233 Member Posts: 3,992 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    My opinion of the Excelsior-class:

    "The Excelsior? Why in God's name would you want that bucket o' bolts?" - Cpt. Motgomery Scott
    16d89073-5444-45ad-9053-45434ac9498f.png~original

    ...Oh, baby, you know, I've really got to leave you / Oh, I can hear it callin 'me / I said don't you hear it callin' me the way it used to do?...
    - Anne Bredon
  • age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I would say it is great ship if you like ship from that era.It can take you all the way up to VA if you want it to.

    It is worth the Zen if you really like.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
    USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
    Star Trek Gamers
  • dixa1dixa1 Member Posts: 92 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    the fleet one is good and allows you to run aux2batt builds with dem and appropriate officers. it wont have the dps of even the regent class refit although it has one more tac console due to the boff layout.

    in addition, the regent refit has teh 180 degree torp, allowing you to 6 beam+cutting beam+torp broadside all at the same time....forever. this again puts it to the regent not just for this console, but being able to run aux2batt x2 with two tac slots so you can have two bfaw, apb and some torp love all in the same package
  • sjokruhlicasjokruhlica Member Posts: 434 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    In my never-humble opinion, the Excelsior and Excel retrofits are the only real option if you insist on having a tac officer in a cruiser, other than the Galor or D'Kora. A 4 single cannon/4 turret double-aux2bat setup works really well, provided you add an RCS console. I even ran this configuration with my engineer character for a while, until I got a Galor.
  • erhardgrunderhardgrund Member Posts: 167 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Imperial Class Fleet Assault Cruiser. Equal tank, higher damage, better looking. Only catch: Tier 5 Shipyard required.

    That is all.

    true , but to use the damage potential fully you basicly sacrifice science abilities wich can be very powerfull in their own right. Or things like graviton well or tractor beam wich limits your opponents mobility wich brings down their defence value.

    I think the Fleet Assault cruiser will do more damage per shot , but the Excelsior will bring most enemies down faster, espicially in PvP and STFs.

    And overall, counting in the built in transwarp locations its also nice for doffing, doin episodes and so on. With the transwarp computer console and a purple doff that shortens transwarp cooldown time , you can transwarp every 4 minutes.
    Combines with a MACO or Borg engine this thing so beats the Vesta in that racing event.

    However - mount the wideangle torp form the regent on the excelsior - its worth it.

    All in all, the Excelsior is very good at doing dps but has way more allround value.
    But the Fleet Assault will do a wee bit more damage.
    Cruisers ftw!
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    true , but to use the damage potential fully you basicly sacrifice science abilities wich can be very powerfull in their own right. Or things like graviton well or tractor beam wich limits your opponents mobility wich brings down their defence value.

    I think the Fleet Assault cruiser will do more damage per shot , but the Excelsior will bring most enemies down faster, espicially in PvP and STFs.

    And overall, counting in the built in transwarp locations its also nice for doffing, doin episodes and so on. With the transwarp computer console and a purple doff that shortens transwarp cooldown time , you can transwarp every 4 minutes.
    Combines with a MACO or Borg engine this thing so beats the Vesta in that racing event.

    However - mount the wideangle torp form the regent on the excelsior - its worth it.

    All in all, the Excelsior is very good at doing dps but has way more allround value.
    But the Fleet Assault will do a wee bit more damage.

    Right but wrong.

    F-excel and F-AC are exactly the same in everything except for two BOff stations, 1 degree of turn, crew (not a valid point), and power allocation.

    The FAC will do more damage overall, since it has more tactical abilities (yes, 1 ensign tac can make a HUGE difference), and has 5 more power allocated to weapons (yes, that makes a difference). It is not limited in science, at least compared to the excel, they are exactly the same. They have almost identical BOff layouts except for ONE ENSIGN SLOT. That isn't enough to make the excel superior, nor is that 1 degree of base turn. At most it will translate into 3 degrees total difference TOPS. And both are gimped in science, but the Imperial simply puts that Uni Lt to sci, and all of a sudden is equal to the excel. AMAZING...

    So... no, your excel will not kill things faster in PvP or in STFs or in anything.

    Also you know that wide-angle from the Regent? Put it on the Imperial too, not just the excel. Equally amazing results.

    Basically the only part you got right was the usefulness for DOffs, which doesn't matter since you can do all that in 15 minutes anyways (if you're patient that transwarp won't amount to TRIBBLE).

    As for damage and usefulness in combat? Imperial beats out Excelsior.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • erhardgrunderhardgrund Member Posts: 167 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    The turn rate difference is less important to me than for others as im happy with 7 all day long.
    But considering the worse innertia of the Fleet Assault Cruiser and the lack of an Energybonus to Engines results in a lower defence rating and its not only less maneuverable in turnrate but in getting it to move/turn. And even with beams that can be quite deciding because you neet to get the target into the overlapping arcs of your cruiser. Dont underestimate the role speed does in that game.

    That 1 Tac Ensign sure is usefull, i dont deny that. but i dont see much use for it other than another tactical team 1 wich i use on the Excelsior as well. Torpedo and Beam boffs are not realy powerfull on an Ensign.But at least an additinal torpedo skill wont suck dry the Energy for your beams. But i admit that Ensign Engineer on the Excelsior is equaly uninspired.
    That Ensign Engineer can provide me with EPtW wich not only boost my damage for 5 Seconds but also keep my Weapons Energy up. However hardly a decisive difference.

    What i meant with the limitation in science abilities was the Universal slot. If not used for science but for tactical powers the ship limits itself in defence and indirect damage capabilities in favor of level I tac powers wich are kinda limited. But the rate of fire for Special attacks would double - im still undiceded wether it would be worth to put a Tac-Lt in. Will test it once i get my hands on the ship.

    Wich brings me to Energy allocation. The lack of 5 bonus points of power to weapons is of little concern to me because i use the Borgmodule, Transwarp Computer and the Zeropoint Energy Conduit on my ships wich brings my Energy levels up across the board and with my Weapons set to attack it adds up to 125 as well so it does mean little. I do however have a tad more juice for my engines than The Assault Cruiser. Still no decisive difference.

    Going beyond stats , the Excelsior s available at a Tier 3 Shipyard and it is the only Fleet ship with a special ability (wich does not use a console slot). It does provide some more noncombat fun.

    Sure it depends alot on wether or not you like he look and feel of a ship. I dont think badly of the Fleet Assault cruiser, no - i will definitly buy one once my fleet reaches Tier 5. I like the Sovereign skin the most. I also have the sovereign bridge set ant the regent and the captains yacht, so it will be like completing a set. Im looking forward to it.
    But i highly doubt it can give me that feeling of being "home" like the Excelsior does.
    And i tried alot of ships. I had alot of fun with the Steamrunner and the Armitage and the Odyssey Ships and just about two hours ago i tried out the new Fleet Ambassador , all fun to fly and fight but it never quite felt right. You know what i mean.
    Cruisers ftw!
  • moronwmachinegunmoronwmachinegun Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Yep, pretty happy with my non-fleet excelsior...

    Gets max DPS in PUG STFs quite often, and is now hitting 6.8k. Yep, pretty damned happy.

    Died once during this run.

    My Build
  • paragon92518paragon92518 Member Posts: 268
    edited February 2013
    It's Over-Powered for its' age (Excelsior)....and being the best cruiser in-game, seems a little insane (to me).
Sign In or Register to comment.