Couldn't find a forum for ideas and such so here goes.
My biggest gripe in space combat has always been the range of weapons. 10km is an extremely close range in star trek. In fact the Picard maneuver can only realy work from a distance of 1 light second, approximately 300k km distance.
Whilst this would be more realistic from a canon perspective I am not suggesting Cryptic up the range to 300km.
What I am suggesting is a slight increase but not across the board. I believe that torpedos should have extreme ranges, they can be fired, and sustain, at warp speeds. Beam arrays should be the next longest followed by banks and then cannons. Maybe something along the lines of 30km for torps, 25km beams, 20km banks and 10km cannon.
I think that this would bring up some interesting tactics in PvP and would allow, support ships to stay at the back. I can also see a distinct benefit in PvE side of things.
If this is coupled with a tweak to each of the weapons so that they have trouble targetting closer ships ie, Beams have higher chance to hit targets at 10km, this could be a very interesting change to the game.
Any case, if any one would like to chime in, discuss.
Interesting idea, would definitely make things different.
The current range limit of 10 km is only part of the situation.
DHC's experience a dropoff in DPS after 2 km from target, and beams from 4km
10 km is not just the maximum targetable range, but also the point at which you may as well be
shooting blanks.
If you get an increase in range, I'd be looking for an increase in speed, to be able to close to optimum DPS range in shorter time.
The only way to make this balanced would be to have MAJOR accuracy drop-offs on all weapons past a certain point. I.E. Torps would lose at most 60% accuracy if fired at maximum range, beams 50%, DBBs 50%, cannons 50%, or something like that. And that would have to be a fast and MAJOR drop, say with beams they work fine until 15km, then their accuracy drops by 10% for each set of 2.5 km (I.E 17.5km -10%, 20km -20%), and then a 15% drop-off for each following 2.5 km (I.E 22.5 km - 35%, 25 km -50%). That would be the only way to make it fair in addition to the major MAJOR drop-off in damage on everything that wasn't a projectile, since if you think about it, as you increase range, energy cohesion decreases, so the bolts/beams become less concentrated and as such are far less effective. And this should be an exponential decrease as well.
It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once.
The only way to make this balanced would be to have MAJOR accuracy drop-offs on all weapons past a certain point. I.E. Torps would lose at most 60% accuracy if fired at maximum range, beams 50%, DBBs 50%, cannons 50%, or something like that. And that would have to be a fast and MAJOR drop, say with beams they work fine until 15km, then their accuracy drops by 10% for each set of 2.5 km (I.E 17.5km -10%, 20km -20%), and then a 15% drop-off for each following 2.5 km (I.E 22.5 km - 35%, 25 km -50%). That would be the only way to make it fair in addition to the major MAJOR drop-off in damage on everything that wasn't a projectile, since if you think about it, as you increase range, energy cohesion decreases, so the bolts/beams become less concentrated and as such are far less effective. And this should be an exponential decrease as well.
Well I would think that the drop off in damage/hit chance should be alot less than wha you are suggesting. However, the skills that are already in place to make you harder to hit should be looked at.
I do think that projectiles should be much easier to hit with at longer range. At longer ranges the projectile has more time to make adjustments to its course, where as close in this time would be decreased dramatically.
Well I would think that the drop off in damage/hit chance should be alot less than wha you are suggesting. However, the skills that are already in place to make you harder to hit should be looked at.
I do think that projectiles should be much easier to hit with at longer range. At longer ranges the projectile has more time to make adjustments to its course, where as close in this time would be decreased dramatically.
The direct counter to this being that the farther away a projectile, the more time it's target has to dodge. Again harder to do from closer in.
And unless you have the damage and accuracy drop-off that are extreme like that, this game will soon become just cruisers using BAs and TBRs, or sci torp boats doing the same thing, only with maxed out Aux, since torps don't use weapons power. Imagine a FRSV using TBR1, 2, and 3 armed with 3 purple proj weapons officers and transphasics/quantums. You will never even come close to touching that. Ever. Completely removing the ability to use DHCs and any other weapon with range shorter than that.
It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once.
The ranges are what they are because otherwise we would be just shooting into the distance, with nothing more than a HUD indicator to show there is even anything there.
They may have talked about weapons having thousands of kilometers' range in ST, but we still see the ships fighting in visual range all the time. This is because shooting into empty space is boring.
I feel like there should be exception for some special ships.
In the Armada games, Steamrunners are long range siege ships.
So give them one fore weapon slot where if the player equip a torpedo there, it will gain higher accuracy when snipping a target, but it will have a longer cool down time for 'recalculating targeting sensor.'
i generally like the idea too, and the drop off is certainly a thing to be balanced out in the field. But the maps would also need to be huge, otherwise you wouldn't need to move away from your position once entering a map.
i also think the distances are too much, cut cannons down to 6 km, beams 10, torps 15...like that combat stays within a less than 18 km radius
the 10 km for cannons feel strange anyway, when the shots start to follow the target
at a maximum range of only 6, that wouldn't happen too much. Also escorts would allways need to be in the deadly zone of an NPC (ESTFs) and therefore need a tank/healer to back them up.
PS: further an speed increase for all torpedos would be needed...otherwise you may windup overtaking each and every torpedo you fired.
i also think the distances are too much, cut cannons down to 6 km, beams 10, torps 15...like that combat stays within a less than 18 km radius
the 10 km for cannons feel strange anyway, when the shots start to follow the target
at a maximum range of only 6, that wouldn't happen too much. Also escorts would allways need to be in the deadly zone of an NPC (ESTFs) and therefore need a tank/healer to back them up.
I also think this would be an opportunity to look at how the weapon beams/energy/projectiles travel. Torpedoes track targets, so do phasers (i think, seeing as they don't really have a travel time they're that fast). But one of my main graphical gripes with the game is when you launch a cannon volley, the target is moved using photonic shockwave or whatever, and the cannon shots follow. They should travel in a straight line, and if your target moves, well then they dodge them. Meaning that from far away, cannons should be completely useless.
I can see this adding a massive dynamic to the game, and therefore could see why the devs wouldn't look at it, it would be a drastic undertaking.
I can't recall the exact reason(it was 3+ years ago), but I do know Cryptic has a very specific reason for why 10k was the limit. I'm not sure if it was something to do with tech, or because of play testing feedback.
What would be a good idea is if the developers created a console that increased your maximum range. The console would be increased by 10% per rarity level.
Quite simply, beams, which are almost instantaneous, should be much more accurate over distance than cannons which have to actually travel through space.
Torpedoes have tracking devices so they should always be more accurate that cannons.
the 10 km for cannons feel strange anyway, when the shots start to follow the target
Personally I'd rather see cannons fire "realistically"; instead of hit or miss essentially being decided in advance, the accuracy would determine how well the cannon can lead (aim ahead of) its target. So while cannons may still have a good max range they wouldn't be as effective at extreme range since they'd miss more often if the enemy changes direction. Maybe with a small damage buff to compensate if it proves too big a change. Abilities like scatter shot would function as normal.
Ranges could be a great way to differentiate some ships; for example, there is a ton of discussion about the Dreadnought Cruiser, but if ranges were involved then a boost to weapon range could make a big difference to its offensive capabilities.
There are weapons in the game with ranges longer than 10km- the starbase's weapons will reach out to 15km, as will some of the operational assets you can drop (fleet phaser turrets and such).
Comments
The current range limit of 10 km is only part of the situation.
DHC's experience a dropoff in DPS after 2 km from target, and beams from 4km
10 km is not just the maximum targetable range, but also the point at which you may as well be
shooting blanks.
If you get an increase in range, I'd be looking for an increase in speed, to be able to close to optimum DPS range in shorter time.
Make torpedo launched at the suggested 30km more easier to dodge/miss than those fired at 10.
Beam banks does more damage close up.
Well I would think that the drop off in damage/hit chance should be alot less than wha you are suggesting. However, the skills that are already in place to make you harder to hit should be looked at.
I do think that projectiles should be much easier to hit with at longer range. At longer ranges the projectile has more time to make adjustments to its course, where as close in this time would be decreased dramatically.
The direct counter to this being that the farther away a projectile, the more time it's target has to dodge. Again harder to do from closer in.
And unless you have the damage and accuracy drop-off that are extreme like that, this game will soon become just cruisers using BAs and TBRs, or sci torp boats doing the same thing, only with maxed out Aux, since torps don't use weapons power. Imagine a FRSV using TBR1, 2, and 3 armed with 3 purple proj weapons officers and transphasics/quantums. You will never even come close to touching that. Ever. Completely removing the ability to use DHCs and any other weapon with range shorter than that.
They may have talked about weapons having thousands of kilometers' range in ST, but we still see the ships fighting in visual range all the time. This is because shooting into empty space is boring.
In the Armada games, Steamrunners are long range siege ships.
So give them one fore weapon slot where if the player equip a torpedo there, it will gain higher accuracy when snipping a target, but it will have a longer cool down time for 'recalculating targeting sensor.'
i also think the distances are too much, cut cannons down to 6 km, beams 10, torps 15...like that combat stays within a less than 18 km radius
the 10 km for cannons feel strange anyway, when the shots start to follow the target
at a maximum range of only 6, that wouldn't happen too much. Also escorts would allways need to be in the deadly zone of an NPC (ESTFs) and therefore need a tank/healer to back them up.
PS: further an speed increase for all torpedos would be needed...otherwise you may windup overtaking each and every torpedo you fired.
I like the idea of range reduction for cannons.
I also think this would be an opportunity to look at how the weapon beams/energy/projectiles travel. Torpedoes track targets, so do phasers (i think, seeing as they don't really have a travel time they're that fast). But one of my main graphical gripes with the game is when you launch a cannon volley, the target is moved using photonic shockwave or whatever, and the cannon shots follow. They should travel in a straight line, and if your target moves, well then they dodge them. Meaning that from far away, cannons should be completely useless.
I can see this adding a massive dynamic to the game, and therefore could see why the devs wouldn't look at it, it would be a drastic undertaking.
Just my 2 pence
Torpedoes have tracking devices so they should always be more accurate that cannons.
For cannons I'd personally limit the range based on the arc, so dual and dual heavy cannons would have more range than single cannons and turrets.
Personally I'd rather see cannons fire "realistically"; instead of hit or miss essentially being decided in advance, the accuracy would determine how well the cannon can lead (aim ahead of) its target. So while cannons may still have a good max range they wouldn't be as effective at extreme range since they'd miss more often if the enemy changes direction. Maybe with a small damage buff to compensate if it proves too big a change. Abilities like scatter shot would function as normal.
Ranges could be a great way to differentiate some ships; for example, there is a ton of discussion about the Dreadnought Cruiser, but if ranges were involved then a boost to weapon range could make a big difference to its offensive capabilities.
Game Balance - Ship Size and Wingmates
USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
Star Trek Gamers
A dot that must die!!! Die Dot, DIE!!!
Damnit! Now I've gone and made Dot in accounting nervous again........
R.I.P