No fix to Security/Medical drop rates or Fleet DOFFs in the wrong department?
I did find something that could be considered over powered with tacts using the new draw fire shield distribution officers since thats a ground power you can slot atleast 3 of them in space and then 5 additional for ground so you can have 8 doffs running for ground with the security protocol kit.
I would think something like this would have been fixed immediately.
The fix to the Enterprise panels also includes moving the potted plant so that it does not block the Ent-F.
Cheers,
Brandon =/\=
How much do I have to pay maintenance in hours now to move that plant :P
Proud Fleet Commander in Garfon's Renegades!
Proud Leader of the Massive Chaos Group
Proud Listener of Subspace-Radio.net The Voice of Star Trek Online.
[SIGPIC]http://massivechaos.enjin.com/[/SIGPIC]
Okay, they're fixing the plant, but what about the spelling mistake on the HMS "Enterprise" ?
In the Enterprise TV show intro, the ship was named the HMS Enterprize. With a Z.
Dreadnought class. Two times the size, three times the speed. Advanced weaponry. Modified for a minimal crew. Unlike most Federation vessels, it's built solely for combat.
In English the word Enterprise is spelt with a letter S not Z. This is a British ship, HMS stands for Her/His Majesty's Ship. The spelling of the original ship would have been with an S
Actually, there was multiple HMS Enterprize's and HMS Enterprise's. Around the period of 1775 there was a HMS Enterprise that was captured by the Americans but the ships were typically called "Enterprize" up until WWII. For example there is an Echo-class survey ship in service with the Royal Navy at this current time calle HMS Enterprise. And yes the ship shown at the start of ENT is HMS Enterprize so therefore the ship on the wall should read Enterprize.
EDIT: The ship captured in 1775 by the Americans was HMS Enterprize not Enterprise
And there was no ship launced under the name Enterprise or Enterprize in 1775
We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender. Winston Churchill
The fact that they did not fix the security and armory doffs falling under "tactical" now 2 weeks in is inexcusable!
Seriously?
Anyway, your 'inexcusable' bug is by definition a low-priority bug, because it doesn't really affect much. And 2 weeks is nothing compared to some still-here bugs.
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Anyway, your 'inexcusable' bug is by definition a low-priority bug, because it doesn't really affect much. And 2 weeks is nothing compared to some still-here bugs.
Well the majority trying to build Fleet Bases wouldn't define misclassified as low-priority. And yes, some bugs have been here so long its ridiculous...
Ex: Klingon Marauding T4 reward (We were told on Jan 16, 2012 "Top people are on this")
Well the majority trying to build Fleet Bases wouldn't define misclassified as low-priority. And yes, some bugs have been here so long its ridiculous...
Ex: Klingon Marauding T4 reward (We were told on Jan 16, 2012 "Top people are on this")
Yeah? That's nothing. We reported in February of 2011 that the TNG and DS9 combadges were now clipping into both male and female chests. It wasn't until 6 months later that said report was acknowledged, and we were told that it was "being looked into". A year after that, the badges remain unchanged, with no response to further inquiries on the subject.
And how about cloaking? Every time you get a dialogue box, you're uncloaked. Their response is "that's intentional... we want you to decloak when there's a required interaction." I'm sorry, but a conversation, any conversation, is not a reason to decloak the ship. Actively scanning, firing weapons, sure. But not a conversation.
Comments
Cheers,
Brandon =/\=
I did find something that could be considered over powered with tacts using the new draw fire shield distribution officers since thats a ground power you can slot atleast 3 of them in space and then 5 additional for ground so you can have 8 doffs running for ground with the security protocol kit.
I would think something like this would have been fixed immediately.
I'm so happy I could kiss you... And whoever else is responsible for the fix...
Directive 010
I /bugged that the second we completed it and saw the plant blocking it for screen shots!
The system Does work!
Thanks talking cereal box guy!
Tib
Good. How about fixing the space 'fire all torps' (but not mines) button?
Really annoying bug.
How much do I have to pay maintenance in hours now to move that plant :P
Proud Leader of the Massive Chaos Group
Proud Listener of Subspace-Radio.net The Voice of Star Trek Online.
[SIGPIC]http://massivechaos.enjin.com/[/SIGPIC]
www.caspian-division.com
In the Enterprise TV show intro, the ship was named the HMS Enterprize. With a Z.
Dreadnought class. Two times the size, three times the speed. Advanced weaponry. Modified for a minimal crew. Unlike most Federation vessels, it's built solely for combat.
are we talking about the same game + company? there is no such thing
I just wish to see bi-weakly Tribble patch notes again. There hasn't been a large patch for weeks. I wunder what the devs are all working on actually.
Original Join Date: January 30th, 2010
Indeed. Interestingly though there was a ship named "Enterprize", also a British Navy vessel that was a captured Spanish Barca-Longa.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Enterprize_(1743)
However in this context I think they meant to use Enterprise but miss-keyed
And YES I hope they fix the text too! What price testing eh?
EDIT: The ship captured in 1775 by the Americans was HMS Enterprize not Enterprise
And there was no ship launced under the name Enterprise or Enterprize in 1775
Winston Churchill
1st Lt, M.A.C.O. Foxtrot Squadron
Anyway, your 'inexcusable' bug is by definition a low-priority bug, because it doesn't really affect much. And 2 weeks is nothing compared to some still-here bugs.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Well the majority trying to build Fleet Bases wouldn't define misclassified as low-priority. And yes, some bugs have been here so long its ridiculous...
Ex: Klingon Marauding T4 reward (We were told on Jan 16, 2012 "Top people are on this")
Yeah? That's nothing. We reported in February of 2011 that the TNG and DS9 combadges were now clipping into both male and female chests. It wasn't until 6 months later that said report was acknowledged, and we were told that it was "being looked into". A year after that, the badges remain unchanged, with no response to further inquiries on the subject.
And how about cloaking? Every time you get a dialogue box, you're uncloaked. Their response is "that's intentional... we want you to decloak when there's a required interaction." I'm sorry, but a conversation, any conversation, is not a reason to decloak the ship. Actively scanning, firing weapons, sure. But not a conversation.
Original Join Date: January 30th, 2010