test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

In response to all of the T5 Connie threads

starfleetfcstarfleetfc Member Posts: 0 Arc User
Hello, I'm SFC3. You may not know me, but if you do, I'm that guy who won a lot of awards at Friday's social event.

Now anyways, I've been lurking on the forums and seeing a lot of T5 Connie threads. I just want to make sure you know I don't want a sticking T5 Connie. We can't have a T5 Connie. That's the TOS Constitution, and T1 as well.

We can possibly get a T5 Connie REFIT. Now, before you start hating, let me tell you something. The Constitution Refit is the best ship design of the entirety of the Star Trek universe. Now, a idea of how it would work would be easy.

There would be a T5 Connie Refit in the Fleet store, as a retrofit. The retrofit wouldn't be as good as the one you could get in C-Store, or worse, it could be a lockbox. (I hope not)

The T5 Cruiser Retrofit would have the Refit skin, the Exeter skin, and the Excalibur and Vesper classes. It would have better stats to bring it on par with the Excelsior and Galaxy classes. It wouldn't be too powerful, but powerful enough for endgame VA's.

Now, the C-Store (or lockbox, but I sincerely hope not) version would be called Constitution Class Cruiser and it would include phasers like in The Wrath of Khan, something I like to call "pulse phasers":
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060622224445/startrek/images/8/8e/WoK_Enterprise.jpg

Also, it would come with a console, "Energize Defense Grids" like in The Wrath of Khan shortly before the Enterprise got the TRIBBLE beat out of her (sadly). It would add +10 percent shield bonus, and protect all crew while in combat for 5 seconds.

It would be the normal 2000 CP (or should I say ZEN? :P) and be designed for VA 50.
The stats of the ship would be a little better than the Retrofit, but not too much.

Well, that brings this Connie Refit Thread to a close. I just want a Constitution class refit retrofit or something. Anything. I'm desperate.
Post edited by starfleetfc on
«1345

Comments

  • thay8472thay8472 Member Posts: 6,163 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    i will counter your proposal with the traditional "no tier 5 connie" .... can we all demand something else instead... like...

    Tar Monster Stf please.
    zx2t8tuj4i10.png
    Thank you for the Typhoon!
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I want a battlestar. Let's call this a Starbattle class, for IP reasons.

    If you think it's ridiculous beause it wouldn't fit in this universe, timeline, or whatever, then you'll see my point.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • nalonalo Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    thay8472 wrote: »
    i will counter your proposal with the traditional "no tier 5 connie" .... can we all demand something else instead... like...

    Tar Monster Stf please.

    Hmm now that sounds like "a sticky situation":D
  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    You are late to the party. Cryptic has been claiming that CBS won't allow them to make a T5 Constitution (if you call it a refit, replica or whatever doesn't matter) for ages now, in spite of older or contemporary ships (D'kyr, Excelsior, B'rel and now D7 and K't'inga) making it.
    That's why a lot of people are now asking for a refit of the T2 cruiser without the Constitution skin. Unfortunately Cryptic doesn't respond to that or answers that CBS doesn't allow Constitutions at T5. What that has to do with the Excalibur and Vesper is anyone's guess.
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • mikewendellmikewendell Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    We had a social event?
  • th3gr4ndnagu5th3gr4ndnagu5 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I just want to make sure you know I don't want a sticking T5 Connie.

    What you or I want doesnt matter at all. CBS said no T5 connie, so thats the end of that story. However the Excalibur and Exeter *arent* connies, and if every other T2 ship is getting a T5 fleet version there is no reason they should not either. Thats really all there is to it. And that has *nothing* to do with the T5 connie issue.

    The.Grand.Nagus
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: NPW Forums
  • starfleetfcstarfleetfc Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    What you or I want doesnt matter at all. CBS said no T5 connie, so thats the end of that story. However the Excalibur and Exeter *arent* connies, and if every other T2 ship is getting a T5 fleet version there is no reason they should not either. Thats really all there is to it. And that has *nothing* to do with the T5 connie issue.
    I would be happy with a T5 Exeter. It's one of my favorite STO vessels and if they could make just that, I would buy it in an instance.
  • crypticvyper#7920 crypticvyper Member Posts: 47 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    If you are going to say that CBS said "No" to a T5 Connie.. make sure you state it in the correct Context.

    CBS stated that there would be no T5 TOS "Connie" as they hold exclusive rights to that ship design.

    Now the TMP "Connie" is a Viacom/Paramount ship design that is share licensed with CBS from their split in 2005.. as such, CBS can not give exclusive refusal on that ship hull (or the Miranda hull)... the refusal would have to come from Viacom/Paramount.

    Cryptic/PWE on the other hand has stated that there would be no upgraded TOS or TMP "Connie" or Miranda hulls while citing CBS's refusal on the TOS "Connie" hull.

    Just to clear things up.
    _______________________________________________

    STO Forum Account Creation Date: June 9, 2008 (Perpetual Entertainment at the time)

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Pestalence_XC
    Proud member of Xenocorp

    "Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead." - Kyle Reese, 'Terminator'
  • th3gr4ndnagu5th3gr4ndnagu5 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    If you are going to say that CBS said "No" to a T5 Connie.. make sure you state it in the correct Context.

    CBS stated that there would be no T5 TOS "Connie" as they hold exclusive rights to that ship design.

    I have never seen *any* distinction made between the TOS and TMP in any Dev post or interview saying that CBS will not allow a T5 connie. If you have a link to a specific statement that makes that distinction, please share. However, as I have followed the dev posts and interviews pretty closely, IMO what you just said is a complete urban legend that someone made up.

    The.Grand.Nagus
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: NPW Forums
  • crypticvyper#7920 crypticvyper Member Posts: 47 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I have never seen *any* distinction made between the TOS and TMP in any Dev post or interview saying that CBS will now allow a T5 connie. If you have a link to a specific statement that makes that distinction, please share. However, as I have followed the dev posts and interviews pretty closely, IMO what you just said is a complete urban legend that someone made up.

    The distinction is that CBS produced, aired, and have exclusive rights to the TOS material, TNG material, Voyager material, DS9 material, and Enterprise material.

    Viacom/Paramount on the other hand Produced, filmed, released to theaters and hold all rights to any Trek Movie material.

    The Viacom/Paramount Trek Movie License is a joint license between them and CBS with Viacom holding the deciding portion due to production of the movies while CBS was a partner company. In 2005, Paramount/Viacom and CBS split ways.. CBS retained all rights to the TV episodes and materials, but also recieved a Shared license with Paramount for the Trek Movie Material with Paramount holding the proprietary portion of those rights.

    This is why CBS was able to use TMP hull designs in the TV series, however it does not give CBS the ability to refuse TMP material from being "Escalated" to higher tiers, as example, the Excelsior Class is being escalated, it is a Viacom/Paramount hull design, not CBS.

    The Devs are not making a distinction between TOS and TMP "Connies" because they just state "Connie" as an all inclusive statement for 2 different hull designs from 2 different companies and can get by stating that CBS refuses that the "Connie" be raised into a higher tier without having to make the actual distinction between hull designs, it is a Dev decision, just as it is the Dev's decision not to escalate the Viacom/Paramount "Miranda" hull design.
    _______________________________________________

    STO Forum Account Creation Date: June 9, 2008 (Perpetual Entertainment at the time)

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Pestalence_XC
    Proud member of Xenocorp

    "Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead." - Kyle Reese, 'Terminator'
  • kekvinkekvin Member Posts: 633 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    It would have been easier for cryptic/PWE to say we are not putting ENT/TOS/TMP Ships at Tier 5. That they are just going to use TNG and 2409 skins as T5. Allowing for ships like the Exeter to be used at endgame
  • th3gr4ndnagu5th3gr4ndnagu5 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    The distinction is that CBS produced, aired, and have exclusive rights to the TOS material, TNG material, Voyager material, DS9 material, and Enterprise material.

    Believe me, I understand the IP division between CBS and Paramount. I've explained this to other people before. However what you are missing is that when STO started development(in 2004), CBS owned both the TV series *and* the movies. That being the case, STO's legal deal is with CBS only, and has nothing to do with Paramount. And because of that, it is CBS only who gets to approve or deny ship tiers in this game. That includes both TOS and TMP connies as well as every other ship.

    The.Grand.Nagus
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: NPW Forums
  • captrayvenwingcaptrayvenwing Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I could so live with an exeter.... oh how i have even just about given up
    The Account formally known as Rayvenwing
    Actual Join Date : Feb 2010

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    A serious question this time... Why do you all think you need a T5 one? PVE is so easy in this game that you can play with whatever ship you like, it's just a matter of patience. Just don't take that ship to elite STFs. I've done infected space normal in a Miranda several times, and I even get this ship out of the hangar for some random available story mission. It works well. You can also team up with some people willing to play pvp with that only. So, why?
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • th3gr4ndnagu5th3gr4ndnagu5 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    diogene0 wrote: »
    A serious question this time... Why do you all think you need a T5 one? PVE is so easy in this game that you can play with whatever ship you like, it's just a matter of patience. Just don't take that ship to elite STFs. I've done infected space normal in a Miranda several times, and I even get this ship out of the hangar for some random available story mission. It works well. You can also team up with some people willing to play pvp with that only. So, why?

    The same question could be asked of all the other T2 ships that they are adding T5 versions of to the fleet store. The fact is, none of them are *needed*, but people simply *want* them.

    The.Grand.Nagus
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: NPW Forums
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    The same question could be asked of all the other T2 ships that they are adding T5 versions of to the fleet store. The fact is, none of them are *needed*, but people simply *want* them.

    The game needs some diversity, that's a fact. Different ships mean different builds and different opponents, but you're only asking for a skin. This ship already exists, and you can use it in 95% of the missions. I really don't see the point of all this, that's illogical. :D

    BTW you should better ask for a holo emitter with severe restrictions on it (specific missions, maybe some new dailies), it could work better than asking for the same thing again and again.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • captrayvenwingcaptrayvenwing Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Your opinion not mine. I want my ship. not a holoemitter that makes ship "x" look like ship "y" cause then i know im really flying ship "y" and i dont want to fly ship "y".
    The Account formally known as Rayvenwing
    Actual Join Date : Feb 2010

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • th3gr4ndnagu5th3gr4ndnagu5 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    diogene0 wrote: »
    The game needs some diversity, that's a fact. Different ships mean different builds and different opponents, but you're only asking for a skin. This ship already exists, and you can use it in 95% of the missions. I really don't see the point of all this, that's illogical. :D

    Incorrect. The T5 versions of the T2 ships that will be in the fleet store will have actual T5 stats, not simply look like the T2 versions.

    The.Grand.Nagus
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: NPW Forums
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Incorrect. The T5 versions of the T2 ships that will be in the fleet store will have actual T5 stats, not simply look like the T2 versions.

    Sure, that's not what i meant. I just said you could already play 95% of the game with the T2 constitution, you just need to be willing to do it. This is why I'm really wondering about your goals...
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • captrayvenwingcaptrayvenwing Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    because i want to fly the other 5% with it
    The Account formally known as Rayvenwing
    Actual Join Date : Feb 2010

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • captainbmoneycaptainbmoney Member Posts: 1,323 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Your opinion not mine. I want my ship. not a holoemitter that makes ship "x" look like ship "y" cause then i know im really flying ship "y" and i dont want to fly ship "y".

    agreed. im tired of hearing that.

    Like my fanpage!
    https://www.facebook.com/CaptainBMoney913
    Join Date: August 29th 2010
  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    diogene0 wrote: »
    Sure, that's not what i meant. I just said you could already play 95% of the game with the T2 constitution, you just need to be willing to do it. This is why I'm really wondering about your goals...

    Stupid question: Did you ever actually fight a Borg cube or any other boss vessel at max level with a T2 Constitution?
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • captrayvenwingcaptrayvenwing Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Stupid question: Did you ever actually fight a Borg cube or any other boss vessel at max level with a T2 Constitution?

    Im willing to put money down that he has not.
    The Account formally known as Rayvenwing
    Actual Join Date : Feb 2010

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • psiameesepsiameese Member Posts: 1,650 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    because i want to fly the other 5% with it

    Thank you. Agreed.
    (/\) Exploring Star Trek Online Since July 2008 (/\)
  • mainamaina Member Posts: 430 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Hello, I'm SFC3. You may not know me, but if you do, I'm that guy who won a lot of awards at Friday's social event.

    Who? What? Cares?

    It's simple the "Connie" is iconic, more so than a D-7. You don't mess with things like this, unless a sense of "National Pride" allows you to slap on a Wave Motion Drive, and you can fly off to Iscandar. :rolleyes:
    thay8472 wrote: »
    i will counter your proposal with the traditional "no tier 5 connie" .... can we all demand something else instead... like...

    Tar Monster Stf please.

    YES PLEASE!!!! To add to that, on this map only anytime you activate the power "Security Escort", they all look like Tasha Yar.
    Believe me, I understand the IP division between CBS and Paramount. I've explained this to other people before. However what you are missing is that when STO started development(in 2004), CBS owned both the TV series *and* the movies. That being the case, STO's legal deal is with CBS only, and has nothing to do with Paramount. And because of that, it is CBS only who gets to approve or deny ship tiers in this game. That includes both TOS and TMP connies as well as every other ship.

    What is being missed is, all IP legal mumbo jumbo aside, the same company owns both license holders, it's not impossible......

    *****************

    Nothing holds to the word "Iconic" like the Connie, it should not be messed with, it should be left alone and treated with respect. There was a reason true trekkies got tears in their eyes when she burned up in ST3 and again when the "B" was shown at the end of ST4.

    May she rest in peace.
    gHF1ABR.jpg
  • flywizflywiz Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    If there was a T5 Connie, for the fleets, I would buy that, and I would buy the T2 retrofit of it, that costume looks awesome! :D
  • piwright42piwright42 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I have learned in this game to pick my battles. While I have not given up on the KDF I have given up on a T4+1 or better Connie.

    I just accept it like a retired jersey on a sports team. Does not make me happy but I do.

    Now if they were to add a T4+1 or better Connie to the fleet store I would be over joyed, as I would finally be able to use that snazzy TOS interior package I wasted money on, but I do not expect it. I do not even have the heart to ask for it any more.
    If you are a pickle in a pickle jar you know every pickle's different, sort of, but really they're all just pickles...
    They taste the same.
  • captrayvenwingcaptrayvenwing Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    maina wrote: »
    Who? What? Cares?.

    LOL I started to say the same dang thing also. Its like some Hollywood star who says "I im an academy award winner and my opinion is <insert some garbage>". So your famous for doing something and that makes your opinion better than mine or anyone elses?


    maina wrote: »

    Nothing holds to the word "Iconic" like the Connie, it should not be messed with, it should be left alone and treated with respect. There was a reason true trekkies got tears in their eyes when she burned up in ST3 and again when the "B" was shown at the end of ST4.

    May she rest in peace.

    I did Cry. I broke down in the Theater....
    piwright42 wrote: »
    I have learned in this game to pick my battles. While I have not given up on the KDF I have given up on a T4+1 or better Connie.

    I just accept it like a retired jersey on a sports team. Does not make me happy but I do.

    Now if they were to add a T4+1 or better Connie to the fleet store I would be over joyed, as I would finally be able to use that snazzy TOS interior package I wasted money on, but I do not expect it. I do not even have the heart to ask for it any more.

    You and me are like right there >.>====<.<

    I have given up ever being able to use my TOS unis and bridge and ship at any level other than 1 to 16 or so..

    I would settle for a Exeter.... Just so i got something that remotely looks like my connie
    The Account formally known as Rayvenwing
    Actual Join Date : Feb 2010

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • retunred4goodretunred4good Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    maina wrote: »
    Nothing holds to the word "Iconic" like the Connie, it should not be messed with, it should be left alone and treated with respect. There was a reason true trekkies got tears in their eyes when she burned up in ST3 and again when the "B" was shown at the end of ST4.

    May she rest in peace.

    It was the last movie that taught us that nothing is sacred anymore. :(
    -It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.-- Mark Twain.
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Im willing to put money down that he has not.

    I said I did, I've played Infected space normal in a Miranda (which is even worse) several times. Of course I wasn't alone. But no one ever complained about it.

    I also played some of the romulan front mission at VA level with the Miranda. Not a big deal, it's just a bit long and tedious, but I have to admit I had a lot of fun doing that.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
This discussion has been closed.