test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Peregrine Fighter 's

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
I looked up the new release nots and i noticed that the feds are getting fighters now here is my problem with that now if we get fighters do we get to equip them with our current ships that we are using so we can get fighter support or can we get a fed side carrier to carry them cause to me i think it be nice to see a fed carrier cause it gives us players something new to have or to try out something different at least .
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    no the enemies use the fighters in patrols and missions.

    we dont get them.

    and they had said no plans for a fed carrier any time soon.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    no the enemies use the fighters in patrols and missions.

    we dont get them.

    and they had said no plans for a fed carrier any time soon.

    i dont think its right that you all dictate what gose in the game if im a lifer i should have a right to ask and further more have a right to be here on the forums to ask to be fighters to be used by us to have fighter support and what makes you think they will not let us use them
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Peregrine Fighters were used among others by the Maquis, and the Maquis certanily didn't have any carrier vessels for them. They are able to operate independently, just like Runabouts. All you need is some kind of base.

    Now, where can I find these new Hidekis? Are they in the new Patrols?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    i dont think its right that you all dictate what gose in the game if im a lifer i should have a right to ask and further more have a right to be here on the forums to ask to be fighters to be used by us to have fighter support and what makes you think they will not let us use them

    what are you talking about? im not dictating anything nor am i saying you cant ask

    im telling you that the fighters that they are adding are for the npc only and the devs have already said they have no plans to add any carriers for the feds at this time.

    im trying to inform you as to the facts as they currently stand.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    what are you talking about? im not dictating anything nor am i saying you cant ask

    im telling you that the fighters that they are adding are for the npc only and the devs have already said they have no plans to add any carriers for the feds at this time.

    im trying to inform you as to the facts as they currently stand.

    well i think its bs that they are bringing in fighters if we cant use them forget the npc's they dont need them i say let us use them as fighter supports in our inventory
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Actually what was said is they have added peregrine fighters to the roster. I wouldn't be too surprised to find them popping up when you click photonic fleet or fleet support.

    They haven't explicitly stated they will appear at these times, only that the models are used in game by NPCs. Well you never know.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    I take it they'll be replacing the runabouts?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    well i think its bs that they are bringing in fighters if we cant use them forget the npc's they dont need them i say let us use them as fighter supports in our inventory

    You may not need them, but I sure do. I need them to level up my Nausicaan.

    Why is it EVERY thread you post is about Carriers? The Developers have said countless times that we will not be getting them any time in the near future.

    If your post isn't about carriers, it's a post complaining about not getting your way. I have news for you, this game is not all about you. There are other players out there, and Cryptic will do what works for the majority, not what one or two people want. Being the loudest complainer will not get you what you want any faster.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    It would be nice to see working Shuttlebays added to STO for both Klings and feds. SFC1,2 and 3 had NPC Shuttle capable of defending your ship. Would be nice to see that for STO
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    You may not need them, but I sure do. I need them to level up my Nausicaan.

    Why is it EVERY thread you post is about Carriers? The Developers have said countless times that we will not be getting them any time in the near future.

    If your post isn't about carriers, it's a post complaining about not getting your way. I have news for you, this game is not all about you. There are other players out there, and Cryptic will do what works for the majority, not what one or two people want. Being the loudest complainer will not get you what you want any faster.

    first off i called cryptic about this and i told them everytime i post about what would look nice to see is fed carriers you and many like you always have my post taken down for no reason i have a right to be here and further more since i asked cryptic myself about the carriers they are very much will look into it and possibly bring in a fed carrier cause i called them personally
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    i dont think its right that you all dictate what gose in the game if im a lifer i should have a right to ask and further more have a right to be here on the forums to ask to be fighters to be used by us to have fighter support and what makes you think they will not let us use them

    Being a lifer hardly gives you the right, being someone who plays this game does. I'm pretty sure at some point people who pay monthly, 3 monthly, etc ends up paying a hell of a lot more than a lifer.

    And no one is taking your posts down, Cryptic team has said there are NO plans for a Fed Carrier, not a player, the team....someone needs to lay off the drugs.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    well i think its bs that they are bringing in fighters if we cant use them forget the npc's they dont need them i say let us use them as fighter supports in our inventory

    Not AGAIN. You now have about what... 10 threads where you say the same thing over and over !!!!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Peregrine Fighters were used among others by the Maquis, and the Maquis certanily didn't have any carrier vessels for them. They are able to operate independently, just like Runabouts. All you need is some kind of base.

    One of the top answered options in the poll about what enemy you'd like to face in a weekly was a Federation splinter faction, which would be one to describe the Maquis. So perhaps this is a sign if what the next weekly will offer as an enemy.

    Queue ominous "Dun dun duuuuuun!" music....
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    One of the top answered options in the poll about what enemy you'd like to face in a weekly was a Federation splinter faction, which would be one to describe the Maquis. So perhaps this is a sign if what the next weekly will offer as an enemy.

    Queue ominous "Dun dun duuuuuun!" music....

    What about a True Way vs Maquis war ;)

    If anyone has a screenshot of the Peregrine fighter/Hideki Class/Dominion escort please share :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    At it again I see.
    TR71777 wrote: »
    first off i called cryptic about this and i told them everytime i post about what would look nice to see is fed carriers you and many like you always have my post taken down for no reason

    Not taken down for now reason, there has been a reason each time... and it will continue to happen untill you get into your head, WHY they are taken down, cause there are obvious reasons for that.
    TR71777 wrote: »
    i have a right to be here

    No one said otherwise
    TR71777 wrote: »
    and further more since i asked cryptic myself about the carriers they are very much will look into it and possibly bring in a fed carrier cause i called them personally

    Yes... they tell a single person that they will do it, and EVERYONE else that they won't... Lets see how many belive that.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Quiskota wrote:
    What about a True Way vs Maquis war ;)

    Well... the real Maquis are kinda... well.... a little too dead to be tossing their swords into any conflicts. A faction named in honour of them picking a fight with the True Way for some reason? Possibly, but the Feds are already blowing the True Way up frequently enough to make any Maquis sympathizers very, very happy. I mean, let's face it, if that were the case about a quarter of this game would qualify as Maquis TRIBBLE. I'd tend to think if they wanted to strike a blow there Starfleet would hand them a phaser and stick a few pips on their chest for the sentiment alone.

    A more likely implementation would be tossing them in as an enemy of the typical Cardassian government, with the Maquis-minded swearing vengeance against them for their previous alliance with the Dominion, and the resulting deaths of the old Maquis (and ultimately how the Cardassians helped gain the Dominion a foothold in the Alpha Quadrant, resulting in a Breen assault directly on Earth). In this scenario this "Neo-Maquis" could even declare war on the Federation proper, viewing attempting peace with Cardassia as a sign of collaboration.

    This actually would give the Federation a reason to fight them in a weekly, beyond being blatantly attacked, after all they're working for peace with Cardassia (but not the True Way). Though, that wouldn't narrow down why the klingons would be involved on their end of the weeklies. Perhaps the klingons are also trying to negotiate peace with Cardassia so they can focus on greater enemies, or perhaps this Neo-Maquis would have declared war on the klingons as well, seeing their current state, them spreading and conquering, as a sign that they are the "New Cardassians" on the block in these systems.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    i dont think its right that you all dictate what gose in the game if im a lifer i should have a right to ask and further more have a right to be here on the forums to ask to be fighters to be used by us to have fighter support and what makes you think they will not let us use them

    TR71777, I have.. Refrained.. From commenting in your threads to date.

    Frankly, it's for multiple reasons. Mostly because others express the very points I would make.

    But this is too far.

    You have accused a thoroughly honorable forum-goer of tyranny, in a manner both disrespectful and arrogant.

    You suggest that your wants should overshadow those of other posters merely because you are a lifetime sub.

    I too, am a lifetime sub. And my vote, is that carriers remain a KDF exclusive ship type. Furthermore, I request that any Federation fighter, or fighter-like pet, should only be available as NPCs.

    There, now there's a "deadlock" between your wants and mine. You can be quiet now, stop harping on Federation Carriers, and let the other forum goers alone, and let the Devs do their jobs in peace.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    first off i called cryptic about this and i told them everytime i post about what would look nice to see is fed carriers you and many like you always have my post taken down for no reason i have a right to be here and further more since i asked cryptic myself about the carriers they are very much will look into it and possibly bring in a fed carrier cause i called them personally

    Oh can you give me cryptics phone number i lost it and want to call them and say hi.

    OP = proof there is more then one use for glue :eek:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    anazonda wrote: »
    Not taken down for (no) reason, there has been a reason each time... and it will continue to happen until you get into your head, WHY they are taken down, cause there are obvious reasons for that.

    Anazonda is completely correct, and here's why:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Katic wrote: »
    TR71777, I have.. Refrained.. From commenting in your threads to date.

    Frankly, it's for multiple reasons. Mostly because others express the very points I would make.

    But this is too far.

    You have accused a thoroughly honorable forum-goer of tyranny, in a manner both disrespectful and arrogant.

    You suggest that your wants should overshadow those of other posters merely because you are a lifetime sub.

    I too, am a lifetime sub. And my vote, is that carriers remain a KDF exclusive ship type. Furthermore, I request that any Federation fighter, or fighter-like pet, should only be available as NPCs.

    There, now there's a "deadlock" between your wants and mine. You can be quiet now, stop harping on Federation Carriers, and let the other forum goers alone, and let the Devs do their jobs in peace.

    first and formost im not going to stop till the feds get a carrier and till my voice is heard im tired of everyone els get their voices heard but my so stop telling me that i can't have my voice heard or aboust some whinnie players say it canon or not canon im tired of it either i see the fedes get their carrier or im just going to keep on going till im heard
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Katic wrote: »
    Anazonda is completely correct, and here's why:

    first off im not cross posting its people like you dictate what the game should be and further more its people like you alway complain about my post and having them removed for no reason
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    first off im not cross posting its people like you dictate what the game should be and further more its people like you alway complain about my post and having them removed for no reason

    do you have spell check?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    *sigh* Haven't you all figured out that this poster has no desire for any kind of discussion on the matter? You can't argue with him. This is just going to go around in circles for several pages until it gets out of hand.

    I'm sure I'll now be called a 'dictator' for saying this, but It's not worth the impact stress to your finger tips from typing. Really :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Katic wrote: »
    TR71777, I have.. Refrained.. From commenting in your threads to date.
    Maybe it would help if we all refrain from commenting in these threads? Not that I don't want you to stop posting, your Avatar...
    ...

    ...

    ...

    Well, where was I?

    Maybe this will work:
    Anyone that posts below my post will get exactly the opposite of which he wants to have most in Startrek Online, regardless of what he posts. :p
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    thefrayl wrote: »
    *sigh* Haven't you all figured out that this poster has no desire for any kind of discussion on the matter? You can't argue with him. This is just going to go around in circles for several pages until it gets out of hand.

    I'm sure I'll now be called a 'dictator' for saying this, but It's not worth the impact stress to your finger tips from typing. Really :)

    lol your right.....but it is kinda fun listening to a completely unreasonable rant.

    especially when its not me ranting :p
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    first and formost im not going to stop till the feds get a carrier and till my voice is heard im tired of everyone els get their voices heard but my so stop telling me that i can't have my voice heard or aboust some whinnie players say it canon or not canon im tired of it either i see the fedes get their carrier or im just going to keep on going till im heard

    i can't understand this...is it just me?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    People always seem to forget the akira was originally designed to be a carrier

    The following is a quote from Alex Jaeger of Industrial Light & Magic, the designer of the Akira

    "This was my gunship/battlecruiser/aircraft carrier. It has 15 torpedo launchers and two shuttlebays &nash; one in front, with three doors, and one in the back. I really got into it with this one, with the whole idea that the front bay would be the launching bay, and then to return they'd come into the back, because they'd be protected by the rest of the ship."

    Source:http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Akira_class
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    thefrayl wrote: »
    *sigh* Haven't you all figured out that this poster has no desire for any kind of discussion on the matter? You can't argue with him. This is just going to go around in circles for several pages until it gets out of hand.

    I'm sure I'll now be called a 'dictator' for saying this, but It's not worth the impact stress to your finger tips from typing. Really :)

    Yeah I agree, but it's fun to watch what's going to happen before that guy gets infraction or not. In addition servers are down and I'm getting popcorn ready and refreshing this topic. Only PvP around this forum at this time.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    thefrayl wrote: »
    *sigh* Haven't you all figured out that this poster has no desire for any kind of discussion on the matter? You can't argue with him. This is just going to go around in circles for several pages until it gets out of hand.

    I'm sure I'll now be called a 'dictator' for saying this, but It's not worth the impact stress to your finger tips from typing. Really :)


    or punctuation:P
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Mr.Chris wrote:
    Yeah I agree, but it's fun to watch what's going to happen before that guy gets infraction or not. In addition servers are down and I'm getting popcorn ready and refreshing this topic. Only PvP around this forum at this time.

    hehe i'm in!!
This discussion has been closed.