test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

federation carrier cloaks for fred? holodecks for ship interior?

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
when could we get a federation carrier? i mean we could use one! and all you klingons stop whineing too! i mean i can barley blow up a klingon ship in pvp so just shut up! stop trying to hog all the good stuff ! so feds get more missions and have more classes of ships (i think i dont no much of klingon classes)

but you guys get cloaks!!!!! (btw not thinknig this will happen but could the feds get a scout ship with a cloak) (defeaint) i mean i saw a klingon carrier named battlestar. it friken was a battlestar ! had like 5000 fighters and 100 birds of prey spwewing out of that sucker! every time i get close to killing one and other one pops out of nowhere (cloaked klingon ship) and blows me up. i have a pretty good covariant sheilding with power maxed with sheild batteries and a BO that has power to sheilds and they dont do nothing to prevant me from blowing up! if anybody should be whineing it should be me! i mean i can barley kill a klingon in pvp! i see some like migets runing around with huge weapons comeing out of nowhere and killing me all the time. all i am saying is give a little look to the federation side for a bit.

o one more thing since i am here... i have a small idea of adding holodecks to ether the crew deck or engineering deck. just think of the posibilites for it because i think it could be a pretty cool thing to add to ship interior.


(plz excuse my spelling i got a new kewboard.... XD :( ) so plz think of these ideas.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Ricane wrote:
    ...so just shut up! stop trying to hog all the good stuff !

    Yes, this is the ideal way to prompt intelligent, mature discussion. This is the tone to adopt.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    " federation carrier cloaks for fred?"

    I will try and give a fine fur cloak to Fred for Christmas this year, how's that?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Stormshade said just yesterday in the other carrier thread its probably not happening, so maybe you should, ahem, "shut up" and "stop whining"
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    gx4th wrote: »
    " federation carrier cloaks for fred?"

    I will try and give a fine fur cloak to Fred for Christmas this year, how's that?

    lol not what i ment but its a start. :D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Stormshade said just yesterday in the other carrier thread its probably not happening, so maybe you should, ahem, "shut up" and "stop whining"

    whos whineing i just saying my ideas:cool:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    dixonium wrote: »
    Yes, this is the ideal way to prompt intelligent, mature discussion. This is the tone to adopt.

    so i feel a little mad about it geeze...:mad:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Dayum, i wish my Vo'Quv had 5000 fighters and 100 BoPs...

    "sogh'hom! Initiate manuevre 'GPU Meltdown' on my mark......EXECUTE!!!"
    (btw not thinknig this will happen but could the feds get a scout ship with a cloak) (defeaint)

    Something like this?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    dixonium wrote: »
    Yes, this is the ideal way to prompt intelligent, mature discussion. This is the tone to adopt.

    I believe that particular dialect he was using is called "STOforumese". It seems most people here speak it. Many fluently.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    we dont need a fed Carrier.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Are you, in any way, related to that other guy begging for Federation carriers? Stormy has stated...on several accounts...it ain't gonna happen, at least any time soon. Look at all the cool stuff you have and what little we have.

    So, yeah. In your own words, "shut up" and "stop whining".
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Sure you need a carrier, then you can also complain about how it takes a parsec to turn. We want to turn this into world of warcraft, where both faction lost their unique-ness and purplez are throw at people.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Lewt wrote:
    Sure you need a carrier, then you can also complain about how it takes a parsec to turn. We want to turn this into world of warcraft, where both faction lost their unique-ness and purplez are throw at people.

    You mean how the Alliance got shamans and the Horde got paladins, even though the lore really didn't support the addition? Yeah, kinda like that. And, yes, I made a Dranei shaman, but I rarely played her.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    I believe that particular dialect he was using is called "STOforumese". It seems most people here speak it. Many fluently.

    :mad:ya hopefullythey can get rid of that for us:mad:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    i was just saying and i read taht klingons where whineing about us not getting it geeze! seems liek klingons get stuff more easy than feds it seemed when i played for a day
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    I believe that particular dialect he was using is called "STOforumese". It seems most people here speak it. Many fluently.

    Although this is true it is at least a bit better then a 300 word run on sentence.

    Honestly Im really tired of this argument that I always hear some federation player complaining about at ESD nearly every time I go there.

    The reason why the Klingon's may seem overpowered, or unfair to you is because they coordinate better on average then most random federation PvP groups ive been in.

    That really is it too, cloaks aren't hard to counter with the right setups/groups of ships and cannons on cruisers aren't really a huge deal. Its all about coordination and tactics, I have randomly joined so many Klingon squads with people that I have never met before that can properly coordinate an attack on a set group of targets quickly and efficiently.

    In contrast to this in nearly every random federation group that I join there is either 1 or 2 people who keep their chat turned off and refuse to team, flying off into the distance, get poped, and ultimately bring the team down because of it.

    Bringing a carrier into the Feds side wont make it more fair, it will just lead to cmplaining that the fed carrier isant as strong as the klingon carrier because of "this one time it was TTTHHHHIIIIIIISSSSSS many fighters!" or "that guy was totally cheating! There is NO WAY he could beat my build!" Giving federating players a carrier would not make the game more fair or balanced, it would just lead to another whine fest.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    well i guess that ends this thread on to my net holodevices! you can mock me there. :D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    wow i just saw defaint class that can cloak..... cryptic moves fast lol jk
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Ricane wrote:
    :mad:ya hopefullythey can get rid of that for us:mad:

    They're commenting on your original post....
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Stormshade said just yesterday in the other carrier thread its probably not happening, so maybe you should, ahem, "shut up" and "stop whining"

    This makes me sad.

    I would love to see a Fed carrier. Every other group is using fighters after all so the feds can't afford to be left behind.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    yes it would be awsome!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    ok how the heck you close a thread???:D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Ricane wrote:
    when could we get a federation carrier? i mean we could use one! and all you klingons stop whineing too! i mean i can barley blow up a klingon ship in pvp so just shut up! stop trying to hog all the good stuff ! so feds get more missions and have more classes of ships (i think i dont no much of klingon classes)

    but you guys get cloaks!!!!! (btw not thinknig this will happen but could the feds get a scout ship with a cloak) (defeaint) i mean i saw a klingon carrier named battlestar. it friken was a battlestar ! had like 5000 fighters and 100 birds of prey spwewing out of that sucker! every time i get close to killing one and other one pops out of nowhere (cloaked klingon ship) and blows me up. i have a pretty good covariant sheilding with power maxed with sheild batteries and a BO that has power to sheilds and they dont do nothing to prevant me from blowing up! if anybody should be whineing it should be me! i mean i can barley kill a klingon in pvp! i see some like migets runing around with huge weapons comeing out of nowhere and killing me all the time. all i am saying is give a little look to the federation side for a bit.

    o one more thing since i am here... i have a small idea of adding holodecks to ether the crew deck or engineering deck. just think of the posibilites for it because i think it could be a pretty cool thing to add to ship interior.


    (plz excuse my spelling i got a new kewboard.... XD :( ) so plz think of these ideas.

    I agree with this post 100% cause the klingon carriers are overpowered the feds needs carriers of their own I SAY LET US FEDS HAVE OUR OWN CARRIERS AND ALL YOU KLINGONS NEED TO SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    ...the klingon carriers are overpowered the feds needs carriers of their own...

    I really don't see the logic in this argument. So because The klingons have an apparently OP ship the feds must have that same ship?...

    Would it not make more sense to make the carrier not OP rather than just add the same problem to the other side. or buff the rest of the ships in game to bring them up to the apparently OP standard of the carrier? Seriously mate out of all your arguments for carriers on the fed side this is the weakest of them.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    I agree with this post 100% cause the klingon carriers are overpowered the feds needs carriers of their own I SAY LET US FEDS HAVE OUR OWN CARRIERS AND ALL YOU KLINGONS NEED TO SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad:

    And you need to figure out how to unlock your Caps Lock key.

    On topic: I vote no to purposed addition to game.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    ...... intiating standard carrier thread responses............

    ..........1) LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL funny feds:)
    ..........2) Why in Gods name do you still push this, even after the Dev's have said "No, at this time" ?
    ..........3) What "OP", we finally gets some love and you selfish *******s still can't let it go? talk about self-centered Star Trek fans....
    ..........4) "Its the pets that make the carrier seem "OP". Before the pet changes nobody was concerned about the carrier as it was just a big cruisers and brought little to the pvp matches. Now that the carrier is playible and has a contribution- everybody cries OP. L2p
    ..........5) Really? DId we need another thread on this? What this one cover thats not been covered in the 40 others?
    ..........6) "slams head against keyboard"
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Roach wrote: »
    ...... intiating standard carrier thread responses............

    ..........1) LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL funny feds:)
    ..........2) Why in Gods name do you still push this, even after the Dev's have said "No, at this time" ?
    ..........3) What "OP", we finally gets some love and you selfish *******s still can't let it go? talk about self-centered Star Trek fans....
    ..........4) "Its the pets that make the carrier seem "OP". Before the pet changes nobody was concerned about the carrier as it was just a big cruisers and brought little to the pvp matches. Now that the carrier is playible and has a contribution- everybody cries OP. L2p
    ..........5) Really? DId we need another thread on this? What this one cover thats not been covered in the 40 others?
    ..........6) "slams head against keyboard"

    You forgot:

    ..........7) ROFL... Here we go
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Roach wrote: »
    ...... intiating standard carrier thread responses............

    ..........1) LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL funny feds:)
    ..........2) Why in Gods name do you still push this, even after the Dev's have said "No, at this time" ?
    ..........3) What "OP", we finally gets some love and you selfish *******s still can't let it go? talk about self-centered Star Trek fans....
    ..........4) "Its the pets that make the carrier seem "OP". Before the pet changes nobody was concerned about the carrier as it was just a big cruisers and brought little to the pvp matches. Now that the carrier is playible and has a contribution- everybody cries OP. L2p
    ..........5) Really? DId we need another thread on this? What this one cover thats not been covered in the 40 others?
    ..........6) "slams head against keyboard"

    I think all of those have already appeared here. lol
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    Something about this thread....
    ...expression
    ...derision
    ...explanation
    ...clarification
    ...teasing
    ...understanding
    ...sarcasm
    ...Facetious

    Nice.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    I actually blame Cryptic for this forum crying and demanding phenomenon, which is very excessive on STO forum vs. other MMORPG forums.

    It started to happen when there was sharp drop in STO interest. Soon after so long as you were Federation player after you put enough blood and guts into your crying post you had good chance of getting it implemented into the game.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited November 2010
    TR71777 wrote: »
    I agree with this post 100% cause the klingon carriers are overpowered the feds needs carriers of their own I SAY LET US FEDS HAVE OUR OWN CARRIERS AND ALL YOU KLINGONS NEED TO SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad:

    Of course YOU want carriers. You just spam threads every day wanting one. Quit your supreme "You need to gain the upper hand" garbage.

    Anyways, I am against this. It would make both sides identical. I was against the Federation getting cloaks. They got those. I would prefer it if the Klingons still provided some challange. A single skilled Federation Escort pilot can blow craters through a carrier solo. It is not your ship TR, it is you.

    Also, before you start flaming me for being a Klingon, I have rolled a Klink once, and deleted it after 5 minutes. I like the Federation more, and would prefer it if it stayed in it's current state.
This discussion has been closed.