test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Please Fix Name Filter!

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
This is now the second time I've seen the U.S.S. Sperm.

Come on... really? No way thats randomized. Same thing goes for U.S.S. TROLLJOO***GOT and U.S.S. ENTURPRIZE
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    How do you feel about the USS Lollipop? It's a fine ship...

    I'd rather have the ability to create our own names than constantly filtering and censoring everything.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    How do you feel about the USS Lollipop? It's a fine ship...

    I'd rather have the ability to create our own names than constantly filtering and censoring everything.

    yeah well some of us want some emmersion and not have the Uss D1ld0 up ur butt flying around (I SAW IT)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Maxloef wrote: »
    yeah well some of us want some emmersion and not have the Uss D1ld0 up ur butt flying around (I SAW IT)

    ... and thus we have conflicting values?

    At what point do name lists go too far?
    • Should it just be offensive terms?

    • Should "canon" names be off-limits?

    • Is the USS Rio Negro offensive, given it's Spanish for "Black River" and has nothing to do with ethnicity?

    • If Butt is censored, does USS Buttress get nerfed? (Buttress is a architectural term).
    These are valid considerations and reasons why filtering can be annoying. No need going to fetch the Karma Police over odd names.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Personally, I think...

    Should it just be offensive terms?
    Yes, and sexual terms, including the ones listed. As Cryptic operates in the US, they can legally be sued for such content, since kids play this game as well.

    Should "canon" names be off-limits?
    Unless the name is a main one, like Enterprise, Voyager, and Defiant, then no. Stargazer would be good as wel as anything else

    Is the USS Rio Negro offensive, given it's Spanish for "Black River" and has nothing to do with ethnicity?
    No. Only the N word that features 2 Gs in it should be filtered to that extreme.

    If Butt is censored, does USS Buttress get nerfed? (Buttress is a architectural term).
    Yes to first word, no to the second.

    We live in an age where we can filter some words without hindering others, so why not use that technology? It's just I really get tired of seeing such vulgar names
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Gath88 wrote: »
    This is now the second time I've seen the U.S.S. Sperm.

    Come on... really? No way thats randomized. Same thing goes for U.S.S. TROLLJOO***GOT and U.S.S. ENTURPRIZE


    Or you could report the offending name and not have a draconian name filter that risks filtering acceptable words.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Maxloef wrote: »
    yeah well some of us want some emmersion and not have the Uss D1ld0 up ur butt flying around (I SAW IT)

    and some "want" to fly that USS D1d0 up yer bum, just to get you all upset for days on end. ( thats the nature of any game with PvP in it, its human nature to try and get the other players riled up and off balance, its the most effective weapon in warfare, it's also fun to see people QQ )....going into a vein popping nerd-rage over some other players name.... now that's good fun.

    different play styles my friend. I hope you realize that they all arent playing to satisfy 'You'.

    relax. Take your Ritalin.


    turn off 'floating names' perhaps will keep you from yet another conniption.... It will be OK (*rubs shoulders)

    .
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    [*]If Butt is censored, does USS Buttress get nerfed? ....

    well... we 'ARE' flying ........


    :p:rolleyes:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    I commiserate and wonder what level of filtering might exist. However, in the realms of MMO it is not the place of any one person to impose their idea of what is 'right' when it comes to naming. However, they do have to conform to the ESRB rating so it can't be anything that would offend a teenager+
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    castmodean wrote: »
    .... However, they do have to conform to the ESRB rating so it can't be anything that would offend a teenager+

    'nothing' offends a teenager.

    and

    'everything' offends a teenager.


    ..... therefore the need to regulate by adults. :) (any parent will attest to this)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Gath88 wrote: »
    Should it just be offensive terms?

    Yes, and sexual terms, including the ones listed. As Cryptic operates in the US, they can legally be sued for such content, since kids play this game as well.

    No. Star Trek Online is rated T for Teen by the ESRB (ages 13 and older, may contain crude language and suggestive themes). The game's already got a warning label on it.

    The STO terms of service say: "Individuals under the age of 13 are prohibited from registering or otherwise participating in Game and Site". If a 'kid' is playing this game, it's violating the terms of use and EULA.
    Should "canon" names be off-limits?

    Unless the name is a main one, like Enterprise, Voyager, and Defiant, then no. Stargazer would be good as wel as anything else

    The names 'Enterprise', 'Voyager' and 'Defiant' are off-limits...but where do we draw the line? Because clearly people don't give a damn about that restriction - witness all the people with USS Enturprize, USS Enterrprizze, etc. And hell, I think Stargazer should be off-limits too. Clearly you don't. Who's right? Why does your opinion matter more than mine?
    Is the USS Rio Negro offensive, given it's Spanish for "Black River" and has nothing to do with ethnicity?
    No. Only the N word that features 2 Gs in it should be filtered to that extreme.

    In theory, yes. But you KNOW someone out there is going to be offended. And they're going to complain anyway. And when they do complain, what do you do then?
    If Butt is censored, does USS Buttress get nerfed? (Buttress is a architectural term).
    Yes to first word, no to the second.

    We live in an age where we can filter some words without hindering others, so why not use that technology? It's just I really get tired of seeing such vulgar names

    No, we REALLY DON'T have effective filtering technology. A particular reality TV show had an issue with their official forums a couple years ago. You see, one of the judges was named TRIBBLE...

    I should say...I agree with you. The GMs need to police player and ship names more. But that's a matter of us reporting those names to the GMs for action.

    Banning words and putting a draconian filter in place is not a solution.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    'nothing' offends a teenager.

    and

    'everything' offends a teenager.


    ..... therefore the need to regulate by adults. :) (any parent will attest to this)

    Hey! I'm a teenager, and If I didn't see/hear it in STO, I'll have heard it through some other way at some point.

    Let's not forget Data saying "Oh Sh*t" in the one movie...;)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    One thing everyone seems to be forgetting is freedom of speech we can’t start banning ship names because we don’t like the word Butt . if some numnut wants to call his ship upinthebutt it is his right you and I may not like the name in STO but we don’t have the right to tell he can’t use it
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    One thing everyone seems to be forgetting is freedom of speech we can’t start banning ship names because we don’t like the word Butt . if some numnut wants to call his ship upinthebutt it is his right you and I may not like the name in STO but we don’t have the right to tell he can’t use it

    I think what it comes down to is what is appropriate. The itchy problem is then who decided what is appropriate.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    castmodean wrote: »
    I think what it comes down to is what is appropriate. The itchy problem is then who decided what is appropriate.

    Agreed. Actually, is "USS Hitler" allowed? :p
    *attempts to open can of worms*
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Mrs smith wants the name “But” pulled from the game because to her it is inappropriate for her 13 year old son to see.
    Mr Jones wants to call his ship the USS Butkiss he thinks it funny and gets a good laugh out of it. (bet the 13 year old thinks it funny too)
    So who decides what’s right, The first amendment does.
    Justice William J. Brennan once said “If there is a bedrock principle of the first amendment. It is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” So by asking cryptic to filter the names even more you are asking cryptic to ignore every Americans right to the freedom of speech.
    And in case you are wondering I have a 5 year old son my ships name is the USS Crazy Horse. And no I don’t want to see the Enterprise, Voyager, Defiant, and the Stargazer flying pass me and I don’t want to see the USS Sperm flying towards a planet (I think there’s a symbolism in there). But I will defend his right to do so.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Acylion wrote:
    No. Star Trek Online is rated T for Teen by the ESRB (ages 13 and older, may contain crude language and suggestive themes). The game's already got a warning label on it.

    The STO terms of service say: "Individuals under the age of 13 are prohibited from registering or otherwise participating in Game and Site". If a 'kid' is playing this game, it's violating the terms of use and EULA.



    The names 'Enterprise', 'Voyager' and 'Defiant' are off-limits...but where do we draw the line? Because clearly people don't give a damn about that restriction - witness all the people with USS Enturprize, USS Enterrprizze, etc. And hell, I think Stargazer should be off-limits too. Clearly you don't. Who's right? Why does your opinion matter more than mine?



    In theory, yes. But you KNOW someone out there is going to be offended. And they're going to complain anyway. And when they do complain, what do you do then?



    No, we REALLY DON'T have effective filtering technology. A particular reality TV show had an issue with their official forums a couple years ago. You see, one of the judges was named TRIBBLE...

    I should say...I agree with you. The GMs need to police player and ship names more. But that's a matter of us reporting those names to the GMs for action.

    Banning words and putting a draconian filter in place is not a solution.

    It also says that online play may affect the experience - just as any MMO is quick to point out.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Mrs smith wants the name “But” pulled from the game because to her it is inappropriate for her 13 year old son to see.
    Mr Jones wants to call his ship the USS Butkiss he thinks it funny and gets a good laugh out of it. (bet the 13 year old thinks it funny too)
    So who decides what’s right, The first amendment does.
    Justice William J. Brennan once said “If there is a bedrock principle of the first amendment. It is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” So by asking cryptic to filter the names even more you are asking cryptic to ignore every Americans right to the freedom of speech.
    And in case you are wondering I have a 5 year old son my ships name is the USS Crazy Horse. And no I don’t want to see the Enterprise, Voyager, Defiant, and the Stargazer flying pass me and I don’t want to see the USS Sperm flying towards a planet (I think there’s a symbolism in there). But I will defend his right to do so.

    And that is exactly the point, well played. But of course remember that its not just Americans so you do have to conform to the decency writ of the territories the game is available in too. Again thats where things get itchy.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    If you kill the word Sperm you can't be the legit U.S.S. Sperm Whale. :(
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    If you kill the word Sperm you can't be the legit U.S.S. Sperm Whale. :(

    I could see an IKS Sperm Whale for that new Klingon Carrier, but true the point stands that filters, sadly are not very smart.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    castmodean wrote: »
    And that is exactly the point, well played. But of course remember that its not just Americans so you do have to conform to the decency writ of the territories the game is available in too. Again thats where things get itchy.

    There are 2 points to that
    1 the game is based in the USA so it has to follow US laws that’s the way it was set up for the internet as far as I understand it.
    And 2 most other Country are not as anal as the USA at least from what I have seen.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    There are 2 points to that
    1 the game is based in the USA so it has to follow US laws that’s the way it was set up for the internet as far as I understand it.
    And 2 most other Country are not as anal as the USA at least from what I have seen.

    I am offended! you used anal in a response to me! Kidding aside, I would have to check to be sure, but most likely you are completely correct on point 1 and pretty much spot on with point 2 :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    While I hate to see many of the ship names I have to agree that it is peoples rights to use them. No where are we promised the right not to be offended and in fact should expect it in a online game and real life. I don't think any thing should be censored except for degrading names of races or sexes but again I will live if they don't. Maybe the best compromise to role players and others would be only to allow the names of real life warships ( from any country) to be used for the feds but never mind that wouldn't work since there is no way to do that with the Klingons:p
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    I'm actually more offended by Klingon exploration mission system names. Just thinking about pronouncing that 15-20 letter names makes my tongue hurt. :D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Political correctness is killing modern civilization. If the word offends you, ignore it.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    when you see people with ship names like But kisser or Sperm you know that that person isn't really into the game he or she is just goofing off and that’s not a person I want in my party and I just ignore them. I try not to use star trek canon names but I found that it is almost imposable not it seems every good name you can think of was already used in star trek some were so I now try to use less common names like Crazy Horse, the Rising Star or the Berkshire I know STO does give you a random name for your ship but it seems more personal to name it myself.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    I agree that some filter should be put in place but I was very dispappointed when I discovered I couldn't name my ship the U.S.S. Titan because of the first three letters in the word.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Deol wrote:
    I agree that some filter should be put in place but I was very dispappointed when I discovered I couldn't name my ship the U.S.S. Titan because of the first three letters in the word.

    Actually that might be more a factor that, in Titan's case at least, it is a reserved ship name thanks to Riker *shakes his fist*
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    In general trying to blacklist all possible profane words and phrases is a losing battle. Our filter list is actually surprisingly large, I didn't even know what many of the phrases meant >_< Thats kids these days for ya. Anyway, if you see a name that you feel is inappropriate, just file a Behavior ticket under the GM Help menu and one of the GMs will review it (and can force a name change if needed).
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    coderanger wrote:
    In general trying to blacklist all possible profane words and phrases is a losing battle. Our filter list is actually surprisingly large, I didn't even know what many of the phrases meant >_< Thats kids these days for ya. Anyway, if you see a name that you feel is inappropriate, just file a Behavior ticket under the GM Help menu and one of the GMs will review it (and can force a name change if needed).

    Danke for the reply there Coderanger.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    castmodean wrote: »
    Actually that might be more a factor that, in Titan's case at least, it is a reserved ship name thanks to Riker *shakes his fist*

    I do love your Avatar \m/, *snickers* The Doctor is on the bridge.
Sign In or Register to comment.