My pc has a duel core 1.5 gig proseser and 4 gig of ram along with a 3300 hd video card and over 1500 gig of hard drive space will this game work on my pc ???
i'm running the game on laptop with core 2 duo 2,4 9600m gt 1024mb dedicated and 1024 shared latest drivers from nvidia.
And with 3 gb ram.
With shadows on low because laptops always had problems with that it runs almost perfect with anisotropic 16x.
No antialising though
resolution 1280x1024
Im very satisfied with game graphics and it;s performance.
If not sure why dont u try the trial and see 4 yourself.
My pc has a duel core 1.5 gig proseser and 4 gig of ram along with a 3300 hd video card and over 1500 gig of hard drive space will this game work on my pc ???
I doubt it.
Your processor is below minimum specs.
Your graphics card is below minimum specs.
Do you really have 1.5 TB worth of harddrive space?
Your processor is below minimum specs.
Your graphics card is below minimum specs.
Do you really have 1.5 TB worth of harddrive space?
Hey, when I have to, I play on a Athlon XP 2400+ with a Radeon 9550 256MB card...it might not look pretty, but it definately runs so I can run some missions; he might not be able to turn on High detail setting or the like, but at least he could turn off Half Resolution, unlike me with the specs I just mentioned!
Hey, when I have to, I play on a Athlon XP 2400+ with a Radeon 9550 256MB card...it might not look pretty, but it definitely runs so I can run some missions; he might not be able to turn on High detail setting or the like, but at least he could turn off Half Resolution, unlike me with the specs I just mentioned!
I really do not mean to pick on you on this but I'm really genuinely curious. How exactly can you stand to play a game that looks THAT bad as STO does with those settings? We're talking near eye-gouging bad level graphics just to get a marginal performance increase with textures so blocky you would swear you are playing Lego Star Trek Online instead and even DOS games looked better level of bad.
How exactly can you stand it and what drives you to pay money to even do so? Inquiring minds would like to know.
Comments
And with 3 gb ram.
With shadows on low because laptops always had problems with that it runs almost perfect with anisotropic 16x.
No antialising though
resolution 1280x1024
Im very satisfied with game graphics and it;s performance.
If not sure why dont u try the trial and see 4 yourself.
Your processor is below minimum specs.
Your graphics card is below minimum specs.
Do you really have 1.5 TB worth of harddrive space?
Hey, when I have to, I play on a Athlon XP 2400+ with a Radeon 9550 256MB card...it might not look pretty, but it definately runs so I can run some missions; he might not be able to turn on High detail setting or the like, but at least he could turn off Half Resolution, unlike me with the specs I just mentioned!
I really do not mean to pick on you on this but I'm really genuinely curious. How exactly can you stand to play a game that looks THAT bad as STO does with those settings? We're talking near eye-gouging bad level graphics just to get a marginal performance increase with textures so blocky you would swear you are playing Lego Star Trek Online instead and even DOS games looked better level of bad.
How exactly can you stand it and what drives you to pay money to even do so? Inquiring minds would like to know.