NO actually i was saying that guns should be better than a knife in ranged combat, currently most melee'er can easily outrun bullets to get in close range the risk of dying crossing a open field is bare minimum
Ok, no swords for star fleet. The romulans and klingons are about the only people that use them in the various series and books. It's just lame as all get out. The rifle butt is pretty natural. TRIBBLE in various st series, people rifle butt more than they fire, take the jem'haddar.
I dislike the fact people use meele weapons and rifles buts and thanks to stun/explout from meele its often more deadly than useing the rifle for what it was designed for.
I dislike the fact people use meele weapons and rifles buts and thanks to stun/explout from meele its often more deadly than useing the rifle for what it was designed for.
As i am full medic and can tank like a good'un i often run head first into feds with my Bat'leth to cause disruption in a stalemate firefight often with great success
Comments
personally i think in a firearms game melee weapons should be a lot more powerfull but at a severe cost.
Short examples could be to make melee weapons allways crit but as long as a person use a melee weapon their are allways exposed.
A knife or a sword is lethal when used on the defenceless or unaware but in ranged combat the guns will allways win.
As i am full medic and can tank like a good'un i often run head first into feds with my Bat'leth to cause disruption in a stalemate firefight often with great success