So, anyone think we'll ever see the Ship Listing on the website complete with outlines of all the ships on there? Personally, I'm really enjoying reading about the 'in-universe' stats and the small blurbs they've put up about the ships. I know we don't really need them for the likes of canon ships like the Galaxy, Intrepid, etc, but getting write-ups for all the original ships and maybe some brief comments on how the older ships have been upgraded to keep up with the advances in technology would be nice.
But honestly I would create/want something more along the lines of "Suricata's STO Ship Tier Chart" mixed with additional content along the lines of the old "Star Trek: Star Fleet Technical Manuals".
*sigh*
I'm starting to giving up hope on cool docs like this from Cryptic.
Yes, that's what I'm talking about. Thus far only a handful of ships are listed including some they had up and stated out before beta. It's the stuff under 'Specifications' I like, the small bits of 'in-universe' technical data I'd like to see more of.
Yes, that's what I'm talking about. Thus far only a handful of ships are listed including some they had up and stated out before beta. It's the stuff under 'Specifications' I like, the small bits of 'in-universe' technical data I'd like to see more of.
Haven't heard a peep about better docs, and there has been more than one thread on it. I can only assume they don't have the resources (people resources, not technical resources), to do this. It appears (and I could be totally wrong), like they are as short-handed in this area as they are in Support.
Comments
But honestly I would create/want something more along the lines of "Suricata's STO Ship Tier Chart" mixed with additional content along the lines of the old "Star Trek: Star Fleet Technical Manuals".
*sigh*
I'm starting to giving up hope on cool docs like this from Cryptic.
Haven't heard a peep about better docs, and there has been more than one thread on it. I can only assume they don't have the resources (people resources, not technical resources), to do this. It appears (and I could be totally wrong), like they are as short-handed in this area as they are in Support.