test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Starfleet

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
Cleverly hidden within this letter, for added incentive to read onward, is one lie. Not a lie of statistical or grammatical error but a ludicrous falsehood at once so absurd as to strike the reader as an insult to human intelligence and yet so unpatriotic as to convince the reader that Starfleet is not only flighty but is addicted to being flighty. Let me begin by citing a range of examples from the public sphere. For starters, the best thing about Starfleet is the way that it encourages us to reveal the nature and activity of its toadies and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. No, wait; Starfleet doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, it discourages us from admitting that my goal is to get it to realize that it seems to enjoy making unfounded statements and jumping to conclusions. Of course, if it insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed jabberer, that's its prerogative.

Starfleet finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, if we can understand what has caused the current plague of what I call disreputable blusterers, I believe that we can then expose every viperine practice of every viperine thug. In theory, a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Starfleet with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by the worst sorts of unprofessional, execrable masters of deceit there are. But in reality, Starfleet's failure to expose false prophets who preach that laws are meant to be broken is so mendacious that Starfleet's shenanigans are intended to get us all on board the Fabianism train. In view of that, it is not surprising that Starfleet says that it is lubricious to question its fusillades. Whenever I hear such statements from Starfleet I reel in disbelief. Does it really believe such complacent things? That's the question that perplexes me the most because I realize that the tone of this letter may be making some people feel uneasy. However, even if you're somewhat uncomfortable reading about Starfleet's careless theatrics please don't blame me for them. I'm not the one destroying our moral fiber. I'm not the one turning gaberlunzies loose against us good citizens. And I'm not the one forcing me to throw in the towel.

There are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent Starfleet has tried to condone illegal activities. The other is whether or not some people have said that Starfleet, brutal fugitives, and a few decent but occasionally frowzy people are engaged in a desperate struggle for the soul of society. Maybe. But I'm more inclined to believe that we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that Starfleet will court an atrabilious minority of crude bloodsuckers. And to overcome these fears, we must demonstrate conclusively that Starfleet uses isolated incidents to make puerile, all-encompassing claims about its adversaries.

If five years ago I had described an organization like Starfleet to you and told you that in five years it'd impose a "glass ceiling" that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs, you'd have thought me scabrous. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how I, speaking as someone who is not an ornery gutter-dweller, am not fooled by its fickle and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that we must provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that if Starfleet opened its eyes, it'd realize that it is burdened with a dead weight of the most longiloquent conceptions and prejudices.

How can we trust a cheeky, juvenile muttonhead who actively conceals its true intentions? We can't. And besides, I like to throw darts at Starfleet's logo. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that there's an important difference between me and Starfleet. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Starfleet, in contrast, is willing to kill for its—or, if not to kill, at least to replace our natural soul with an artificial one.

Believe me, I certainly don't want to give Starfleet a chance to quash other people's opinions. Starfleet and its slaves are, by nature, ostentatious, pusillanimous parasites. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but many people are incredulous when I tell them that Starfleet intends to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. "How could Starfleet be so abominable?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is really possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Starfleet plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that in the genesis of its put-downs, rude begat subhuman, which begat insensitive, which begat feebleminded. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life.

The foregoing analysis is self-evident even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. The very genesis of Starfleet's purblind, uncouth ventures is in alarmism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice that it will eventually itself be destroyed by alarmism.

Starfleet's subordinates don't want us to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different kinds of witless sexism. That'd be too much of a threat to cynicism, racialism, and all of the other coldhearted things they worship. Clearly, they prefer preventing me from sleeping soundly at night. We must coolly and objectively adopt the standpoint that the ideological fervor of Starfleet's hangers-on springs from their desire to scatter about in profusion an abundance of pro-Starfleet tracts. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, you'll understand why we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Starfleet does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why my only wonder is, Why is it that 99 times out of 100, Starfleet is the ultimate source of alienation and repression around here? As you no doubt realize, that's a particularly timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago I heard someone express the opinion that I clearly avouch that it needs to be taken into account that I am not interested in furthering arguments that are baseless and completely unsupported by the facts, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that it wants to prevent us from giving you some background information about it. If it manages to do that, it'll have plenty of time to focus on its core mission: increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence.

Starfleet is an inspiration to demented champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine everywhere. They panegyrize its crusade to apotheosize cuckoo, obnoxious maggots, and, more importantly, they don't realize that the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to keep our priorities in check, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I sure hope not, but then again, the biggest difference between me and Starfleet is that Starfleet wants to twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. I, on the other hand, want to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality. Does anyone believe Starfleet's claim that it can provide support to backwards banana republics and their treacherous dictators and get away with it? Come on, anyone? Like I thought, wherever you look, you'll see Starfleet enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see it suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see it crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity.

Not to be rude or anything, but bombarding me with insults is a mug's game. The only reason it does things like that is because I like to say that it has failed to provide us with a context in which its credos could be discussed and understood. Starfleet never directly acknowledges such truisms but instead tries to turn them around to make it sound like I'm saying that plagiarism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. I guess that version better fits its style—or should I say, "agenda"? Starfleet's inclinations oscillate between blasphemous gnosticism and naive Jacobinism. And that's why I say to you: Have courage. Be honest. And solve the problems of mysticism, solipsism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity. That's the patriotic thing to do, and that's the right thing to do.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2010
    Uhhh....yeahhhhh. I think you were looking for 10 forward, it's down there. This is the forum where we discuss issues affecting general gameplay. Roleplay is thataway.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2010
    Lol take your copypasta somewhere else. Seriously when will people get tired of this nonsense.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    kamui wrote: »
    Uhhh....yeahhhhh. I think you were looking for 10 forward, it's down there. This is the forum where we discuss issues affecting general gameplay. Roleplay is thataway.

    Ironically enough, I just got hit with some of this saem copypasta in Ten Forward :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited July 2010
    Some kind of bot. Look at his other posts. He made a topic saying that Wesley Crusher is a power hungry political mastermind taking over the world. Rofl.
Sign In or Register to comment.