test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Klingon Bridge View has Federation Bridge Crew working on a Klingon Ship

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
edited January 2010 in PC Gameplay Bug Reports
I have posted this many times and have bugged it in game, still Cryptic ignores it. On my Klingon Ship when you look at the Bridge View there is Federation Crew in their Federation uniforms woking on the bridge and not a Klingon crew, wow seriously, they are at war, nice TRIBBLE up. How about gettign some Klingon bridge crew working on a Federation ship in Klingon uniforms, could you guys up in your fancy office fix this big mistake. Might want to fire the guy that was in charge of it, was he drunk that day ?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    I have posted this many times and have bugged it in game, still Cryptic ignores it. On my Klingon Ship when you look at the Bridge View there is Federation Crew in their Federation uniforms woking on the bridge and not a Klingon crew, wow seriously, they are at war, nice TRIBBLE up. How about gettign some Klingon bridge crew working on a Federation ship in Klingon uniforms, could you guys up in your fancy office fix this big mistake. Might want to fire the guy that was in charge of it, was he drunk that day ?

    The bridge was introduced just before open beta launched. Your issue is probably in the queue to be worked on but frankly since the bridge is currently nothing more than eye candy it's probably pretty low on the priority queue.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    cryptic are just lazy starting to think they don't care bout the bus that are in the game
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    pepper23 wrote: »
    cryptic are just lazy starting to think they don't care bout the bus that are in the game

    Yes, because the wrong avatars are on the non-functional bridge, they're lazy and don't care about the "bus" in the game. :rolleyes:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    Rojon wrote: »
    The bridge was introduced just before open beta launched. Your issue is probably in the queue to be worked on but frankly since the bridge is currently nothing more than eye candy it's probably pretty low on the priority queue.

    are you serious. regardless of whether it's just "eye candy" for a game to launch with such a glaring and shameful bug is pathetic.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    I somehow doubt this requires a massive code rewrite.

    As long as you bugged it in game I'm sure they'll change that 0 to a 1.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    They are probably working on it, but its probably of a lower priority, theres a sea of bugs to be smashed and unless they get to costco and buy some RAID we're going to be knee deep in bugs in the first few months.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    Intrepidox wrote: »
    are you serious. regardless of whether it's just "eye candy" for a game to launch with such a glaring and shameful bug is pathetic.

    Agreed, it is pathetic, its pretty bad we the public waiting to play this game, when it was advertised many years ago that they started to make this game, that there is so many problems being found in Beta, personaly, sounds like they need to hire some better programmers that make less mistakes, since its now the 23rd adn early starts at the 29th, wow, no way they will be able to fix all the bugs in time, great way to **** off some new people that bought the game, or even spent 300 for the life time package for so many mistakes by rooky programmers. How about this, instead of having meetings about when the launche should be or when the early launch should be, or what the box art should be, or stupid in game pets like a god dam shuttle craft that is useless that is only available in the states at Deltaco, not in Canada where I am is bullsh.t. Spend more time on fixing your mistakes in game programming before the rushed launch. Personnaly thinking goign back to WoW that I left to play this game cause im a Star Trek fan, or was.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    You bring up alot of good point blueamdgamer, but don't let this game sell the whole franchise for you there will be some errors but thats with every MMO, you don't think WoW was glitched up back when it was first released? Everything will have its problems but I do agree, they need to work harder on the bugs and server downtimes.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that none of you that are calling the devs lazy and/or incompetent are in software development...
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    NarfMann wrote: »
    I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that none of you that are calling the devs lazy and/or incompetent are in software development...

    Not calling them lazy at all, they have made it an excellent game so far but when people are going to be paying 15$ a month to play we expect them to have everything up to par.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    My point is that bugs are almost never as simple as they seem. In my experience, it's actually the stuff that seems more complicated and bizarre that's easiest to find and fix. Just because they haven't fixed this cosmetic bug doesn't meant they aren't trying to. Cut them some slack, they have a really hard job (which they've done pretty well, if you ask me) and there are a lot of bugs to get through. Something like this is sure to be pretty low on the list of priorities. It will get fixed, and doomsaying and insults aren't helping. Actually, if I were in charge of what bugs get fixed first, threads that call me lazy or stupid or incompetent would make me lower the priority of those bugs purely out of spite.

    And that's why nobody puts me in charge of things.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    NarfMann wrote: »
    My point is that bugs are almost never as simple as they seem. In my experience, it's actually the stuff that seems more complicated and bizarre that's easiest to find and fix. Just because they haven't fixed this cosmetic bug doesn't meant they aren't trying to. Cut them some slack, they have a really hard job (which they've done pretty well, if you ask me) and there are a lot of bugs to get through. Something like this is sure to be pretty low on the list of priorities. It will get fixed, and doomsaying and insults aren't helping. Actually, if I were in charge of what bugs get fixed first, threads that call me lazy or stupid or incompetent would make me lower the priority of those bugs purely out of spite.

    And that's why nobody puts me in charge of things.

    Your missing the point, its not about the bug I was complaining about, its the fact that they are more interested in making new TRIBBLE like a shuttle craft pet? Instead of spending the time to fix the problem they already have.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited January 2010
    Your missing the point, its not about the bug I was complaining about, its the fact that they are more interested in making new TRIBBLE like a shuttle craft pet? Instead of spending the time to fix the problem they already have.

    During beta tests, developers don't usually add more stuff, they are busy trying to fix the problems that are already there and not make more of them. Fixing bugs can be really hard to do, especially when you're not sure how the fix will affect everything else.

    As for the shuttle craft pet, that was probably created a while back with all the other preorder items and not during the BETA test.

    Usually, it's the marketing department's decision about when to unveil certain new things, not the developers.

    If you want a better understanding of what "beta" means in software development, read here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_version#Beta
Sign In or Register to comment.