test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Anniversary Buyback

ikonn#1068 ikonn Member Posts: 1,450 Arc User
What many of us have long anticipated to happen has finally arrived. The Anniversary Event has now fallen victim to the metrics...

https://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9743063

This comes as no surprise, but the "Exclusivity and Collectibility" argument goes out the window when lockboxes, special Doff packs, and R&D Packs are involved and/or are re-released, of course :)

As we all know, money trumps metrics.
-AoP- Warrior's Blood (KDF Armada) / -AoP- Qu' raD qulbo'Degh / -AoP- Project Phoenix
Join Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010
«134

Comments

  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    Well there's a shocker. Further proof that they have no idea what they're doing, and between them, can't work out a plan for the future.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    I have thousands of qmendations on several alts and I don't care. If the anniversary ship is worth it I'm more than happy to invest 5 minutes a day to get it.
  • kapla5571kapla5571 Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    only issue i have is why the spec points rewards are locked to level 60 as you start earning spec points after level 50.
  • banatinebanatine Member Posts: 250 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    umm, you DO realise that if you still have old projects slotted, they will still be claimable using the new currency right?

    So, nothing is ACTUALLY changing really, coz you're still a year behind if you don't have the last ship, and if you didn't have the projects then you still won't have them now.

    Now that DOESN'T meant they shouldn't do a 're-run' on some of those ships some day, but of all Cryptics failings, this actually isnt one of them, right now.
    Real Temporal Operative: Purchased the Special Temporal Agent pack before it was even officially announced!
  • pwecangetlostpwecangetlost Member Posts: 538 Arc User
    "We want to maintain the exclusivity and collectability of the event ships"

    But seriously. Why? Its something nobody needed or asked for. Nobody went round going, "I MUST have this ship as a status symbol to show I was playing for this arbitrary 2 week period. Its ridiculous. I've been really impressed with Cryptic and STO more recently, been loving how things have been, but this is still a ridiculous practice.
  • samt1996samt1996 Member Posts: 2,856 Arc User
    ITS Pretty Standard MMO fare... i would like a choice even if I can only earn one ship per account per year but we shall see. Other games reward space barbie items as exclusive so it is entirely different.

    Also the selection of ships is pretty nice and may seriously damage C-Store sales if people could get any free ship they wanted at any time.
  • tessaravejgantessaravejgan Member Posts: 276
    I have some 300-400 leftover from last year, guess I'll buy a few of those R&D boxes since nothing else interests me but yeah shame I can't use them for the ship.
  • thay8472thay8472 Member Posts: 6,162 Arc User
    Does anyone actually have those ship emotes? I haven't seen one since they've been out. I believe they arrived during the last summer event?
    zx2t8tuj4i10.png
    Thank you for the Typhoon!
  • hanover2hanover2 Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    "We want to maintain the exclusivity and collectability of the event ships"

    But seriously. Why?

    To appease people who derive satisfaction from depriving others of their enjoyment.

    Not exactly the sort of person who should be driving policy, if you ask me.
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    one thing that immediately drew my interest in all that manure that cryptic left was that previous event ships are to be retired. i was wondering when someone would have the sack to get that idea up and front center, i mean the events so far have gone begging for it to date and honestly it is not surprise as cryptic have previously retired specific content in the past, some of which worked.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • hanover2hanover2 Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    It's not like I'm going to keep flying the Samsar anyway, but that console, man. That's a required item on many of my builds.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    szim wrote: »
    I have thousands of qmendations on several alts and I don't care. If the anniversary ship is worth it I'm more than happy to invest 5 minutes a day to get it.
    I am HAPPY! So many QMs that I was never going to spend on ships.... Now I can get rid of them and get useful stuff.

    Seriously... I have an average of 800 per character... and 15 characters. It'd take the next decade to spend them all... but by that time I'll have several thousand more....

    So yeah, cashing out is a HUGE score for me. :)
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • saber1973asaber1973a Member Posts: 1,225 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    banatine wrote: »
    umm, you DO realise that if you still have old projects slotted, they will still be claimable using the new currency right?

    So, nothing is ACTUALLY changing really, coz you're still a year behind if you don't have the last ship, and if you didn't have the projects then you still won't have them now.

    Now that DOESN'T meant they shouldn't do a 're-run' on some of those ships some day, but of all Cryptics failings, this actually isnt one of them, right now.

    Not exactly problem - just do new ship on other character - it will be (almost sure about it) account unlock anyway....

    Running the grind on 2 or even 5 toons every day (if the ship will be faction specific) should be light load on any player... now doing Mirror Invasion on 16 toons to get the Agony Rifle for each was literally pain in the back (i needed some massage after that event)
  • tarran61tarran61 Member Posts: 827 Arc User
    I find it all discouraging to purchase anything now days, I wish I had sloted everything but its too late. All the hard work I had put into past events wasted. Why i didn't do much with the winter event after three days. Like hanover2 said, its not about the ship to me but now I will never be able to get the consoles which take up inventory slots even if I never use them again. Red Mater, Zefram Cochrane Shotgun. My reward for not even knowing about this game when they were released. Late in the game, so sorry..... :-1:
    Positive thoughts.
    NeAC.gif
  • bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    szim wrote: »
    I have thousands of qmendations on several alts and I don't care. If the anniversary ship is worth it I'm more than happy to invest 5 minutes a day to get it.
    I am HAPPY! So many QMs that I was never going to spend on ships.... Now I can get rid of them and get useful stuff.

    Seriously... I have an average of 800 per character... and 15 characters. It'd take the next decade to spend them all... but by that time I'll have several thousand more....

    So yeah, cashing out is a HUGE score for me. :)

    same here, I collected the excess tokens from both the winter events and the anniversary events just because they were awarded and I didn't like to just discard them for nothing but in all honesty I don't think I would have ever used them to bypass the events as I enjoy playing them so the buybacks from both events has been a massive boon for me.
    sure I feel sorry for anyone who missed out on the old ships but it was pretty obvious from the start that this practice wasn't going to last for long so it came as no surprise to me when it eventually happened.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    Doesn't really bother me as i've gotten all event ships bar the Chel Grett and for 5 mins work a day they are a decent reward.

    BUT.....The Samsar has a console that's part of a 4pc set for the command cruisers so how are people to complete that set now? I can see it being available in the lobi store like with the DSD but they've not done that with every event ship even so it leaves some people a bit concerned.
    SulMatuul.png
  • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    Would certainly suck to be a new player now.
  • tenderbitstenderbits Member Posts: 117 Arc User
    "We want to maintain the exclusivity and collectability of the event ships"

    ... Nobody went round going, "I MUST have this ship as a status symbol to show I was playing for this arbitrary 2 week period. ...


    Yes I did. B)
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    "We want to maintain the exclusivity and collectability of the event ships"

    But seriously. Why? Its something nobody needed or asked for. Nobody went round going, "I MUST have this ship as a status symbol to show I was playing for this arbitrary 2 week period. Its ridiculous. I've been really impressed with Cryptic and STO more recently, been loving how things have been, but this is still a ridiculous practice.

    I still say its because Cryptic is scared CBS might get mad at them for all the non-faction ships that are in-game. These non-faction ships were always supposed to be really rare, but there's been so much of them over the years that if you go to certain instances, you might find half the ships there aren't fed/Rom/KDF.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • dareaudareau Member Posts: 2,390 Arc User
    hanover2 wrote: »
    "We want to maintain the exclusivity and collectability of the event ships"

    But seriously. Why?

    To appease people who derive satisfaction from depriving others of their enjoyment.

    Not exactly the sort of person who should be driving policy, if you ask me.

    Dang forum search is so weak that it gimps my search-fu. And of course Google's not locking into the "new" version of this, as it was all said "pre-vanilla"...

    But the actual reason behind this, as I recall Salamiinferno posting during the original "flame fest" leading up to Risa last year, was much more "businesslike".

    This decision was made with an eye on the "almighty metric" - with a not-so-subtle nod to income rates...

    To wit, I gathered from his posts back in the summer lead-up that the two "critical metrics" during a "grind-a-thon" for an event reward ship are unique daily logins and number of times that the currency dispensation mission is ran.

    And he needs, for whatever reason(s), to ensure that said metrics "line up appropriately" and "are as large as possible".

    Now, we can all understand part two of the above. But part one needs a touch of explanation: He cited that during the summer where the Risian Cruiser was the prize, there was a distinctly noticeable discrepancy between the amount of people repeatedly logging in during the event and the number of times flying high was run for pearls, and the number of cruisers handed out - which could not be explained away with corresponding increases in lobi spending on pearls. This told him that not only did a "significant" amount of players have large enough stockpiles to afford to "day one" the cruiser, these players also retained a large enough stockpile to be able to "day one" future event ships without need to replenish the stockpiles (ie, a guy with 10 alts ran all 10 through the missions in one year, and therefore did not need to participate in the event for the next 8 years, having used alt 1 to get the corvette in the year he ran it 10 times, and used alt 2 to get the cruiser.)

    And he did make reference to knowing that (more his style), a "side effect" of the exclusivity card is a distinct... motivation... to help maximize the "critical metrics" in the window he needs them in - not a future window., explained away as "I can't allow for the spectre of a player logging in next year, running two alts, and getting two rewards. I need the logins & mission runs this year..."

    And whether he said it himself, or relied on the playerbase to do so, the "alternative" of shelling out large amounts of cash (or buying said large amounts of cash from others in the form of Dil to Zen or keys off exchange) and getting wads of Lobi could still "circumvent" the "granting" of the desired metrics while still allowing the acquisition of the event ship.

    And keep in mind that (hazy / interpreted) memory of postings does not indicate support - it only indicates an understanding of what's going on "behind the scenes somewhat" and a (tactic) understanding of the choice(s) made.
    Detecting big-time "anti-old-school" bias here. NX? Lobi. TOS/TMP Connie? Super-promotion-box. (aka the two hardest ways to get ships) Excelsior & all 3 TNG "big hero" ships? C-Store. Please Equalize...

    To rob a line: [quote: Mariemaia Kushrenada] Forum Posting is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever. However, opinions will change upon the reading of my post.[/quote]
  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    I have a feeling that this decision will, in the long term, do nothing but disappoint newer players as they will find out that more and more stuff that they encounter in the game will be forever unobtainable for them.

    Removing things that players want to play events or pay for doesn't make any sense. The company is losing money here, they're lowering enthusiasm of the playerbase for these events, there's less people playing them for ships they missed out in previous years and they're losing the support of newer players. I honestly cannot understand how any of those who make the decisions at the company could think this would be a good idea. Decisions like these are, eventually, in no-one's interest as everyone's losing here.

    Even if it doesn't matter to some players personally, those players - the entire playerbase - are also suffering from this decision and the reduced income (and thus reduced funds that could be used for game development). Again, I doubt this decision is in anyone's interest.
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    Honestly, I totally get the metrics explanation as far as the currencies go. However, this explanation fails to explain why they're retiring the old ships. For example, if I wanted to get next year's winter event ship and the two that I'm missing, why can't I run the event 3 times next year instead of one? Surely three times as much time spent there is three times as good for the metrics?
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    Honestly, I totally get the metrics explanation as far as the currencies go. However, this explanation fails to explain why they're retiring the old ships. For example, if I wanted to get next year's winter event ship and the two that I'm missing, why can't I run the event 3 times next year instead of one? Surely three times as much time spent there is three times as good for the metrics?

    possibly because they want to see players play for this years ships this year not last year or next year, just guessing.

    just as players could save the currency's and get the ships from multiple years without playing the events players could not play the events and then get all the ships a few years later.

    the only way to ensure players play the events every year is to retire both the currency's and the past ships being offered.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    Honestly, I totally get the metrics explanation as far as the currencies go. However, this explanation fails to explain why they're retiring the old ships. For example, if I wanted to get next year's winter event ship and the two that I'm missing, why can't I run the event 3 times next year instead of one? Surely three times as much time spent there is three times as good for the metrics?

    possibly because they want to see players play for this years ships this year not last year or next year, just guessing.

    But if they retire the currency at the end of each event, removing them from your inventory, then you can't actually grind for then next year's ship. And why would they care if you're grinding for a previous ship? Twice (or more) the participation means twice as good metrics.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • sheldonlcoopersheldonlcooper Member Posts: 4,042 Arc User
    awww yeah - got 4000 Q-mendations in the bank. Those will be some happy bridge officers sporting mach 14 sets. Happy Q-mas!
    Captain Jean-Luc Picard: "We think we've come so far. Torture of heretics, burning of witches, it's all ancient history. Then - before you can blink an eye - suddenly it threatens to start all over again."

    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

  • hanover2hanover2 Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    If someone has a large stockpile of event currency XYZ, it means they either bought it with lobi or made a substantial contribution to last year's login metrics. I say that ought to count for something, and that value should not be arbitrarily taken away.

    Not my decision. Not a democracy.

  • bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    Honestly, I totally get the metrics explanation as far as the currencies go. However, this explanation fails to explain why they're retiring the old ships. For example, if I wanted to get next year's winter event ship and the two that I'm missing, why can't I run the event 3 times next year instead of one? Surely three times as much time spent there is three times as good for the metrics?

    possibly because they want to see players play for this years ships this year not last year or next year, just guessing.

    But if they retire the currency at the end of each event, removing them from your inventory, then you can't actually grind for then next year's ship. And why would they care if you're grinding for a previous ship? Twice (or more) the participation means twice as good metrics.

    so they have retired the currency but still out of say every 300 players only 100 players play this event the other 200 players still end up getting the ship from the event next year, this doesn't look good on the metrics, far better for their metrics to retire past ships and ensure that every one of these players play the event this year to get the ship.
    they are not concerned with next years metrics, anything could happen between now and then, the game could go bust and shut down or the world could end so they are not concerned with next year, it is only this year they care about and they want to show the maximum possible players played the event.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • This content has been removed.
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    all i see here in this design is that its meant to inflate artificial numbers for a little over 2 weeks to make it look as if it were "Popular" so it can be sent off to the suits in china to be seen as if the event on the game is a "success". it would be the excuse these people are looking for to say "hang on this grinding idea is such a success and the players love it, lets do it again!". i suspect this is what it is designed for. it is only meant for one way traffic.

    as for those looking to bypass this absurd mechanic if it is what it appears, cryptic have to decide whats more important to them, short term monetary gains from playersgains through players who are taking the long route? if their metrics sayonly a few are taking the short route and the rest are going the long route, may as well just cut out the lobi altogether on the event ships and force everyone down one path to inflate the numbers even more.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    Honestly, I totally get the metrics explanation as far as the currencies go. However, this explanation fails to explain why they're retiring the old ships. For example, if I wanted to get next year's winter event ship and the two that I'm missing, why can't I run the event 3 times next year instead of one? Surely three times as much time spent there is three times as good for the metrics?

    possibly because they want to see players play for this years ships this year not last year or next year, just guessing.

    just as players could save the currency's and get the ships from multiple years without playing the events players could not play the events and then get all the ships a few years later.

    the only way to ensure players play the events every year is to retire both the currency's and the past ships being offered.
    Also, in theory, you could use 5 characters to simultaneously collect what you needed to unlock 5 ships.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.